Abstract
Non-cooperative game theory purports that economic agents behave with little regard towards the negative externalities they impose on each other. Such behaviors generally lead to inefficient outcomes where the social welfare is bounded away from its optimal value. However, in practice, self-interested individuals explore the possibility of circumventing such negative externalities by forming coalitions. What sort of coalitions should we expect to arise? How do they affect the social welfare?
We study these questions in the setting of Cournot markets, one of the most prevalent models of firm competition. Our model of coalition formation has two dynamic aspects. First, agents choose strategically how to update the current coalition partition. Furthermore, coalitions compete repeatedly between themselves trying to minimize their long-term regret. We prove tight bounds on the social welfare, which are significantly higher than that of the Nash equilibria of the original game. Furthermore, this improvement in performance is robust across different supply-demand curves and depends only on the size of the market.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Airiau, S.: Lecture Notes in Coalitional Games. In: 11th European Agent Systems Summer School, EASSS 2009 (2009), http://staff.science.uva.nl/~stephane/Teaching/EASSS09/notes-coopGT-easss09.pdf
Andelman, N., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong price of anarchy. In: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 189–198 (2007)
Cesa-Bianchi, N., Lugosi, G.: Prediction, Learning and Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Chalkiadakis, G.: A Bayesian Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning and Coalition Formation under Uncertainty. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada (2007)
Chalkiadakis, G., Elkind, E., Polukarov, M., Jennings, N.R.: The price of democracy in coalition formation. In: International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 401–408 (2009)
Cournot, A.A.: Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Hatchette, Paris (1838); English translation: Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. Macmillan, New York (1897)
Cramton, P., Palfrey, T.: Cartel enforcement with uncertainty about costs. International Economic Review 31(1), 17–47 (1990)
Dieckmann, T., Schwalbe, U.: Dynamic Coalition Formation and the Core (1998); Economics Department Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth
Even-Dar, E., Mansour, Y., Nadav, U.: On the convergence of regret minimization dynamics in concave games. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC (2009)
Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Spirakis, P.: Atomic congestion games among coalitions. ACM Trans. Algorithms 4(4), 1–27 (2008)
Guo, X., Yang, H.: The price of anarchy of cournot oligopoly. In: Deng, X., Ye, Y. (eds.) WINE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3828, pp. 246–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Harberger, A.: Monopoly and resource allocation. Amer. Econ. Review 44, 77–87 (1954)
Hart, S., Kurz, M.: Endogenous formation of coalitions. Econometrica 51, 1047–1064 (1983)
Hayrapetyan, A., Tardos, É., Wexler, T.: The effect of collusion in congestion games. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 89–98 (2006)
Kluberg, J., Perakis, G.: Generalized quantity competition for multiple products and loss of efficiency. In: 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, pp. 930–936 (2008)
Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. Computer Science Review 3(2), 65–69 (2009)
Mas-Colell, A., Green, J., Whinston, M.D.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
Nadav, U., Piliouras, G.: No regret learning in oligopolies: Cournot vs bertrand. In: 3rd International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory, SAGT (2010)
Ray, D.: A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Coalition Formation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2007)
Ray, D., Vohra, R.: Equilibrium binding agreements. Journal of Economic Theory 73, 30–78 (1997)
Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)
Suetens, S., Potters, J.: Bertrand colludes more than Cournot. Experimental Economics 10, 71–77 (2007)
Young, H.: Strategic Learning and Its Limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Immorlica, N., Markakis, E., Piliouras, G. (2010). Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies. In: Saberi, A. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6484. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17571-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17572-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)