Abstract
When contracting through software agents, disputes will inevitably arise. Thus there is an urgent need to find alternatives to litigation for resolving conflicts. Methods of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) need to be considered to resolve such disputes. Having agents understanding what the dispute is about, managing all interaction between the parties and even formulating proposed solutions is an important innovation. Hence it is of the utmost relevance that the agents may be able to recognise and evaluate the facts, the position of the parties and understand all the relevant data. In many circumstances, risk management and avoidance will be a crucial point to be considered. In this sense we analyze the usefulness of a parallel concept to BATNA – Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement, that of a WATNA – Worst Alternative to Negotiated Agreement, allowing the software agents to consider the space between BATNA and WATNA as a useful element to be taken into account when making or accepting a proposal. These software agents embodied with intelligent techniques are integrated in an architecture designed to provide support to the ODR in a system we have developed for the resolution of labour disputes - UMCourt. In this context software agents are used to compute and provide the parties with the best and worst alternative to a negotiated agreement.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 39–59 (1994)
Abrahams, B., Zeleznikow, J.: A multi-agent architecture for online dispute resolution services. Expanding the horizons of ODR. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop 2008), Firenze, Italy, pp. 51–61 (2008)
Bellucci, E., Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Integrating artificial intelligence, argumentation and game theory to develop an online dispute resolution environment. In: ICTAI 2004 - 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 749–754 (2004)
Brazier, F., Kubbe, O., Oskamp, A., Wijngaards, N.: Are Law abiding agents realistic? In: Proceedings of the workshop on the Law of Electronic Agents (LEA 2002), CIRSFID, pp. 151–155. University of Bologna (2002)
Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J., Neves, J.: The Legal Precedent in Online Dispute Resolution, in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. In: Governatori, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Jurix 2009 - the 22nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 47–52. IOS press, Amsterdam (2009) ISBN 978-1-60750-082-7
De Vries, B.R., Leenes, R., Zeleznikow, J.: Fundamentals of providing negotiation support online: the need for developping BATNAs. In: Proceedings of the Second International ODR Workshop, Tilburg, pp. 59–67. Wolf Legal Publishers (2005)
Fernandes, A.M.: Direito de Trabalho, Almedina (2005) (in Portuguese)
Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting To Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1981) ISBN 0-395-31757-6
Goldberg, S.B., Sander, F.E., Rogers, N., Cole, S.R.: Dispute Resolution: negotiation, mediation and other processes. Aspen Publishers, New York (2003)
Goodman, J.W.: The pros and cons of online dispute resolution: an assessment of cyber-mediation websites. Duke Law and Technology Review (2003)
Katsh, E., Rifkin, J.: Online dispute resolution – resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Wiley Company, San Francisco (2001)
Klaming, L., Van Veenen, J., Leenes, R.: I want the opposite of what you want: summary of a study on the reduction of fixed-pie perceptions in online negotiations. In: Expanding the horizons of ODR, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop 2008), Firenze, Italy, pp. 84–94 (2008)
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Minton, J.: Zone of Potential Agreement. In: Negotiation, 3rd edn. Irwin-McGraw Hill, Burr Ridge (1999)
Muecke, N., Stranieri, A., Miller, C.: The integration of online dispute resolution and decision support systems. In: Expanding the horizons of ODR, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop 2008), Firenze, Italy, pp. 62–72 (2008)
Notini, J.: Effective Alternatives Analysis In Mediation: “BATNA/WATNA” Analysis Demystified (2005), http://www.mediate.com/articles/notini1.cfm (Accessed July 24, 2009)
Peruginelli, G., Chiti, G.: Artificial Intelligence in alternative dispute resolution. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the law of electronic agents – LEA (2002)
Picard, W.: Support for Power in adaptation of social Protocols for Professional Virtual Communities. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C. (eds.) Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 363–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) ISBN: 978-0-387-73797-3
Pimenta, J.C.: A Lógica da Sentença, Livraria Petrony (2003) (in Portuguese)
Raiffa, H.: The art and science of negotiation: how to resolve conflicts and get the best out of bargaining. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Steenbergen, W.: Rationalizing Dispute Resolution: From best alternative to the most likely one. In: Proceedings 3rd ODR workshop, Brussels (2005)
Ury, W., Brett, J.M., Goldberg, S.B.: Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1988)
Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny. D.: The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 3 (2000)
Zeleznikow, J., Abrahams, B.: Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 177–184. ACM, Barcelona (2009)
Zweigert, K., Kötz, H.: An Introduction to Comparative Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)
Waterman, D.A., Peterson, M.: Rule-based models of legal expertise. In: The Proceedings of the First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University, Stanford (1980)
Cáceres, E.: EXPERTIUS: A Mexican Judicial Decision-Support System in the Field of Family law. In: Francesconi, E.B.E., Sartor, G., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 78–87. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)
Kersten, G., Noronha, S.: Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making. Group Decision and Negotiation 8, 251–279 (1999)
Thiessen, E.M.: ICANS: An Interactive Computer-Assisted Multi-party Negotiation Support System. PhD Dissertation, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1993)
Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E.: Family_Winner: integrating game theory and heuristics to provide negotiation support. In: Proceedings of Sixteenth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based System, pp. 21–30 (2003)
Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Enhanced Dispute Resolution through the use of Information Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Black, H.C.: Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing Company, St. Paul (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andrade, F., Novais, P., Carneiro, D., Zeleznikow, J., Neves, J. (2010). Using BATNAs and WATNAs in Online Dispute Resolution. In: Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14887-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14888-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)