Abstract
Spatial abilities are correlated with success in science. However, research on this topic has not focused on possible differences in the spatial demands of different scientific fields. Furthermore, there is a partial dissociation between spatial abilities involved in dealing with the space of environments (large-scale spatial abilities) and those involved in dealing with the space of objects (small-scale spatial abilities). We used on-line self-report measures to collect preliminary data on the spatial abilities of scientists in different fields, as well as humanists and individuals in professional fields. Geoscientists had the highest self-report ratings of both environmental and small-scale spatial abilities, whereas geographers had relatively high self ratings of environmental spatial abilities and engineers had relatively high self ratings of small-scale spatial abilities. Other scientific disciplines did not differ from the mean in self reported spatial abilities. Self ratings of verbal ability were uncorrelated with self ratings of spatial abilities and, as expected, were highest for humanities specialists.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M., Hegarty, M.: Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31, 549–579 (2007)
Sorby, S.A.: A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 7, 153–172 (2001)
Coleman, S.L., Gotch, A.J.: Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education 75, 206–209 (1998)
Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., Kali, Y.: Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education 45, 129–132 (1997)
Casey, M.B., Nuttall, R.L., Pezaris, E.: Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology 33, 669–680 (1997)
Peters, M., Chisholm, P., Laeng, B.: Spatial ability, student gender and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Edcuation 84, 69–73 (1995)
Schueneman, A.L., Pickelman, J., Hesslein, R., Freeark, R.J.: Neuropsychological predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 96, 288–295 (1984)
Keehner, M.M., Tendick, F., Meng, M.V., Anwar, H.P., Hegarty, M., Stoller, M.L., Duh, Q.: Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. The American Journal of Surgery 188, 71–75 (2004)
Shea, D.L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P.: Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 93, 604–614 (2001)
Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R., Richardson, A.E., Ishikawa, T., Lovelace, K.: Spatial Abilities at Different Scales: Individual Differences in Aptitude-Test Performance and Spatial-Layout Learning. Intelligence 34, 151–176 (2006)
Hegarty, M., Waller, D.: Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 121–169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Montello, D.R.: Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I. (eds.) COSIT 1993. LNCS, vol. 716, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Hegarty, M., Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., Lovelace, K., Subbiah, I.: Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30, 425–447 (2002)
Kozlowski, L.T., Bryant, K.J.: Sense-of-direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 590–598 (1977)
Sholl, M.J., Kenny, R.J., Dellaporta, K.: Allocentric-heading recall and its relation to self-reported sense-of-direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 32, 516–533 (2006)
Chatterjee, A.: The Neural Organization of Spatial Thought and Language. Seminars in Speech and Language 29, 226–238 (2008)
Crookes, R.D., Shipley, T.F., Hegarty, M.: Development of a self-report measure of spatial reasoning abilities. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association Meeting, Brooklyn, NY (March 2010)
Stieff, M.: Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction 17, 219–234 (2007)
Schwartz, D.L., Black, J.B.: Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fall-back. Cognitive Science 20, 457–497 (1996)
Kastens, K.: Synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences: Developing representational competence. Presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America, October 18-21 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hegarty, M., Crookes, R.D., Dara-Abrams, D., Shipley, T.F. (2010). Do All Science Disciplines Rely on Spatial Abilities? Preliminary Evidence from Self-report Questionnaires . In: Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J.A., Newcombe, N.S. (eds) Spatial Cognition VII. Spatial Cognition 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6222. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14748-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14749-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)