Abstract
A fair blind signature is a blind signature with revocable anonymity and unlinkability, i.e. an authority can link an issuing session to the resulting signature and trace a signature to the user who requested it. In this paper we first revisit the security model for fair blind signatures given by Hufschmitt and Traoré in 2007. We then give the first practical fair blind signature scheme with a security proof in the standard model. Our scheme satisfies a stronger variant of the Hufschmitt-Traoré model.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe, M., Fujisaki, E.: How to date blind signatures. In: Kim, K.-c., Matsumoto, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1163, pp. 244–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Abe, M., Ohkubo, M.: Provably secure fair blind signatures with tight revocation. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 583–602. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Short signatures without random oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 56–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Boneh, D., Boyen, X., Shacham, H.: Short group signatures. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 41–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Blazy, O., Fuchsbauer, G., Izabachène, M., Jambert, A., Sibert, H., Vergnaud, D.: Batch Groth-Sahai. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2010/040 (2010), http://eprint.iacr.org/
Bellare, M., Shi, H., Zhang, C.: Foundations of group signatures: The case of dynamic groups. In: Menezes, A. (ed.) CT-RSA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3376, pp. 136–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Canard, S., Gaud, M., Traoré, J.: Defeating malicious servers in a blind signatures based voting system. In: Di Crescenzo, G., Rubin, A. (eds.) FC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4107, pp. 148–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Chaum, D., Rivest, R.L., Sherman, A.T. (eds.) CRYPTO 1982, pp. 199–203. Plenum Press, New York (1983)
Damgård, I.: Towards practical public key systems secure against chosen ciphertext attacks. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 445–456. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Fuchsbauer, G., Pointcheval, D., Vergnaud, D.: Transferable constant-size fair e-cash. In: Garay, J.A., Miyaji, A., Otsuka, A. (eds.) CANS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5888, pp. 226–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Fuchsbauer, G.: Automorphic signatures in bilinear groups. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/320 (2009), http://eprint.iacr.org/
Fuchsbauer, G., Vergnaud, D.: Fair blind signatures without random oracles. Cryptology ePrint Archive (2010), Report 2010/101, http://eprint.iacr.org/
Groth, J., Lu, S.: A non-interactive shuffle with pairing based verifiability. In: Kurosawa, K. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4833, pp. 51–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Groth, J.: Simulation-sound NIZK proofs for a practical language and constant size group signatures. In: Lai, X., Chen, K. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4284, pp. 444–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Groth, J.: Fully anonymous group signatures without random oracles. In: Kurosawa, K. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4833, pp. 164–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Groth, J.: Homomorphic trapdoor commitments to group elements. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/007 (2009), http://eprint.iacr.org/
Groth, J., Sahai, A.: Efficient non-interactive proof systems for bilinear groups. In: Smart, N.P. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 4965, pp. 415–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Gaud, M., Traoré, J.: On the anonymity of fair offline e-cash systems. In: Wright, R.N. (ed.) FC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2742, pp. 34–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Hufschmitt, E., Traoré, J.: Fair blind signatures revisited. In: Takagi, T., Okamoto, T., Okamoto, E., Okamoto, T. (eds.) Pairing 2007. LNCS, vol. 4575, pp. 268–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Kiltz, E.: Chosen-ciphertext security from tag-based encryption. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 581–600. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Naor, M.: On cryptographic assumptions and challenges (invited talk). In: Boneh, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2729, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Okamoto, T.: Efficient blind and partially blind signatures without random oracles. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 80–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Ohkubo, M., Miura, F., Abe, M., Fujioka, A., Okamoto, T.: An improvement on a practical secret voting scheme. In: Zheng, Y., Mambo, M. (eds.) ISW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1729, pp. 225–234. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Rückert, M., Schröder, D.: Fair partially blind signatures. In: Bernstein, D.J., Lange, T. (eds.) AFRICACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6055, pp. 36–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Stadler, M., Piveteau, J.-M., Camenisch, J.: Fair blind signatures. In: Guillou, L.C., Quisquater, J.-J. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 1995. LNCS, vol. 921, pp. 209–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fuchsbauer, G., Vergnaud, D. (2010). Fair Blind Signatures without Random Oracles. In: Bernstein, D.J., Lange, T. (eds) Progress in Cryptology – AFRICACRYPT 2010. AFRICACRYPT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6055. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12678-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12678-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12677-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12678-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)