Abstract
Since its introduction in 1986, the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) has been assumed to be unidimensional. Factor analysis of two independent SUS data sets reveals that the SUS actually has two factors – Usable (8 items) and Learnable (2 items – specifically, Items 4 and 10). These new scales have reasonable reliability (coefficient alpha of .91 and .70, respectively). They correlate highly with the overall SUS (r = .985 and .784, respectively) and correlate significantly with one another (r = .664), but at a low enough level to use as separate scales. A sensitivity analysis using data from 19 tests had a significant Test by Scale interaction, providing additional evidence of the differential utility of the new scales. Practitioners can continue to use the current SUS as is, but, at no extra cost, can also take advantage of these new scales to extract additional information from their SUS data. The data support the use of “awkward” rather than “cumbersome” in Item 8.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Brooke, J.: SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Lewis, J.R.: Usability Testing. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 1275–1316. John Wiley, New York (2006)
Sauro, J., Lewis, J.R.: Correlations among Prototypical Usability Metrics: Evidence for the Construct of Usability. In: The Proceedings of CHI 2009 (to appear, 2009)
Landauer, T.K.: Behavioral Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 203–227. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)
Lucey, N.M.: More than Meets the I: User-Satisfaction of Computer Systems. Unpublished thesis for Diploma in Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (1991)
Kirakowski, J.: The Use of Questionnaire Methods for Usability Assessment (1994), http://sumi.ucc.ie/sumipapp.html
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 574–594 (2008)
Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability. Unpublished presentation given at the UPA Annual Conference (2004), http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004TullisStetson.pdf
Lewis, J.R.: IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7, 57–78 (1995)
Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14, 463–488 (2002)
Cliff, N.: Analyzing Multivariate Data. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego (1987)
Coovert, M.D., McNelis, K.: Determining the Number of Common Factors in Factor Analysis: A Review and Program. Educational and Psychological Measurement 48, 687–693 (1988)
Finstad, K.: The System Usability Scale and Non-Native English Speakers. Journal of Usability Studies 1, 185–188 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J. (2009). The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human Centered Design. HCD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5619. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02805-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02806-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)