Summary
This chapter introduces the main topics of a telerobotic system. It describes the architecture of such a system from a general point of view and emphasizes the interaction between a human operator and a robot that performs the task in the remote environment. Furthermore it focuses on multi-modal human system interfaces and explains the main features of haptic, auditory, and visual interfaces. Finally important issues for the measurement and evaluation of the attribute telepresence are described.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
T.B. Sheridan. Telerobotics. Automatica, 25(4):487–507, 1989.
M. Buss and G. Schmidt. Control Problems in Multimodal Telepresence. In Advances in Control: Highlights of the 5th European Control Conference ECC’99, pages 65–101, 1999.
T. Burkert, J. Leupold, and G. Passig. A photorealistic predictive display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(1):22–43, 2004.
N. Chong, S. Kawabata, K. Ohba, T. Kotoku, K. Komoriya, K. Takase, and K. Tanie. Multioperator teleoperation of multirobot systems with time-delay: part 1-aids for collision-free control. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(3):277–291, 2002.
N.A. Tanner and G. Niemeyer. Improving perception in time delayed telerobotics. International Journal of Robotics Research, 24(8):631–644, 2005.
M. Massimino and T. Sheridan. Sensory Substitution for Force Feedback in Teleoperation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2(4):344–352, 1993.
M. Buss. Study on Intelligent Cooperative Manipulation. PhD thesis, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 1994.
M. Buss and H. Hashimoto. Motion Scheme for Dextrous Manipulation in the Intelligent Cooperative Manipulation System—ICMS. In V. Graefe, editor, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’94). Post-Conference Book, pages 279–294, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1995.
N. Delson and H. West. Robot programming by human demonstration: Subtask compliance controller identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, pages 33–41, Yokohama, Japan, 1993.
H. Friedrich, J. Holle, and R. Dillmann. Interactive Generation of Flexible Robot Programs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 538–543, Leuven, Belgium, 1998.
Y. Kunii and H. Hashimoto. Tele-teaching by human demonstration in virtual environment for robotic network system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pages 405–410, 1997.
J. Yang, Y. Xu, and C. Chen. Hidden markov model approach to skill learning and its application to telerobotics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 396–402, Atlanta, Georgia, 1993.
H. Baier, M. Buss, F. Freyberger, and G. Schmidt G. Interactive Stereo Vision Telepresence for Correct Communication of Spatial Geometry. In Advanced Robotics, 17(3):219–233, 2003.
R.E. Cole and D.L. Parker. Stereo TV improves manipulator performance. In Proceedings of the SPIE, 1083:18–27, Bellingham, WA, 1990.
M. Ferre, R. Aracil, and M. Navas. Stereoscopic Video Images for Telerobotic Applications. Journal of Robotic Systems, 22(3):131–146, 2005.
J. Hsu, Z. Pizlo, D.M. Chelberg, C.F. Babbs, and E.J. Delp. Issues in the design of studies to test the effectiveness of stereo imaging. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics, Part A 26(6):810–819, 1996.
L.B. Stelmach, W.J. Tam, and D.V. Meegan. Perceptual Basis of Stereoscopic Video. In Proceedings of the SPIE, 3639:260–265, 1999.
W.S. Kim, S. Won, E. Stephen, T. Mitchell, H. Blake, and S. Lawrence. Quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics, 17(1):418–425, 1987.
E.B. Goldstein. Sensation and Perception. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2002.
E.B. Goldstein. Cognitive Psychology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2004.
G. Burdea. Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1996.
S.D. Laycock and A.M. Day. Recent developments and applications of haptic devices. Computer Graphics Forum, 22(2):117–132, 2003.
J. Martins and J. Savall. Mechanisms for haptic torque feedback. In Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 611–614, 2005.
C. Yongblut, R.E. Johnston, S.H. Nash, R.A. Wienclaw, and C.A. Will. Review of virtual environment interface technology. IDA Paper P-3186, Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA), 1996.
M. Benali-Khoudja, et al. Tactile interfaces: a state-of-the-art survey. In Proceedings of 35th International Symposium on Robotics (ISR 2004), Paris, pages 1–9, 2004.
A. Kron and G. Schmidt. Multi-fingered tactile feedback from virtual and remote environments. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS), pages 16–23, 2003.
K.A. Kaczmarek and P. Bach-y-Rita. Tactile displays. Virtual environments and advanced interface design, Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, 1993.
K. Shimoga. A Survey of Perceptual Feedback Issues in Dextrous Telemanipulation: Part II. Finger Touch Feedback. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, New York, pages 271–279, 1993.
S. Ino, T. Izumi, M. Takahashi, and T. Ifukube. Psychophysical study on tactile sense produced by grasping forhand with sensory feedback. Systems and Computers in Japan, 24(13):89–97, 1993.
B.G. Witmer and M.J. Singer. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Presence 7(3):225–240, 1998.
T.B. Sheridan. Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1):120–126, 1992.
D. Schloerb. A Quantitative Measure of Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1):64–80, 1995.
W.A. IJsselsteijn, H. de Ridder, J. Freemanand, and S.E. Avons. Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. In Proceedings of the SPIE, 3959:520–529, 2000.
M. Usoh, E. Catena, S. Arman, and M. Slater. Using Presence Questionaires in Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5):497–503, 2000.
B. Hannaford. A Design Framework for Teleoperators with Kinesthetic Feedback. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 5(4):426–434, 1989.
Y. Yokokohji and T. Yoshikawa. Bilateral Control of Master-Slave Manipulators for Ideal Kinesthetic Coupling-Formulation and Experiment. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 10(5):605–620, 1994.
D.A. Lawrence. Stability and Transparency in Bilateral Teleoperation. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 9:624–637, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aracil, R. et al. (2007). The Human Role in Telerobotics. In: Ferre, M., Buss, M., Aracil, R., Melchiorri, C., Balaguer, C. (eds) Advances in Telerobotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71364-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71364-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71363-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71364-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)