Abstract
This chapter gives information on nanoparticle classification and their origin. The two main classes of nanoparticles are from natural and anthropogenic sources. Natural nanoparticles existed on earth since millennia from wind erosion and dust storms, volcanic activity and from biogenic sources. Recently large amounts of anthropogenic nanoparticles are being intentionally and unintentionally released into the environment. Nanoparticles are being used today as pesticides and fertilizers, for water and soil remediation. Due to their special properties compared to bulk counterparts, nanoparticles are used in today in many products. Accidental release of nanoparticles occurs from an increasing number of products that contain nanoparticles as well as a by-product of incomplete combustion as a result of automobiles and industry. Many studies show that nanoparticles are toxic to humans and animals; however, there is a lack of regulations regarding the use of nanoparticles, many being researched and patented for use in agriculture, food industry, and various consumer products.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Nanoparticle
- Natural nanoparticles
- Anthropogenic nanoparticles
- Engineered nanoparticles
- Biogenic nanoparticles
- Fertilizers
- Pesticides
- Nanoparticle toxicity
1 Introduction
Nanomaterials are defined as materials with external dimensions in the nanoscale or with internal structure or surface structure in the nanoscale. This would qualify most of the materials as nanomaterials, as their internal structure is modulated at the nanoscale.
A nanoparticle can be defined as a particle with at least one external dimension in the nanoscale. The term nanoscale can be defined as a size range from about 1 nm to less than 1 μm (Buzea et al. 2007). Particles larger than nanoparticles are called microparticles , while the ones smaller than nanoparticles are atoms and molecules. One must emphasize that the properties of a material in nanoform can be quite different that those of its bulk (heat of fusion, melting temperature, band energy gap, electronic structure and catalytic activity, magnetic properties, fluorescence, tensile strength, etc.) (Auffan et al. 2009; Buzea et al. 2007). The size at which nanoparticles physical properties begin to deviate from its bulk counterpart is about 100 nm (Bakshi et al. 2015), however it is not always a rule (Buzea et al. 2007). Hence, some authors are trying to limit the size of nanoparticles to sizes for which the properties of particles differ from those of their bulk counterparts.
2 Nanoparticle Classification
From the point of view of their dimensionality , nanomaterials encompass broadly three types: with one, two, and three dimensions in the nanoscale. Those with one dimension in the nanoscale are very thin films or coatings attached on a substrate. Those with two dimensions in the nanoscale can be porous films with nanoscale pores, long aspect ratio fibers, wires, or tubes. The third type nanomaterials are membranes with nanopores and nanoparticles. This chapter focuses only on nanoparticle and long aspect ratio particles.
From the point of view of their provenance, inorganic nanoparticles qualify as natural and anthropogenic, as seen in Fig. 3.1. Natural nanoparticles can have geologic sources, incomplete combustion, biochemical cycling, and abiotic chemical precipitation. Geological sources of natural nanoparticles encompass wind erosion, dust storms, glaciations, earthquakes, and volcanic activity. Natural nanoparticles are generated via incomplete combustion in forest fires and earthquakes. An example of abiotic chemical precipitation is sea spray. Biochemical cycling of nanoparticles can be mediated by bacteria, plants, or fungi. Anthropogenic sources of nanoparticles can be unintentional and intentional. The unintentional can be due to incomplete combustion from heating and cooking, automobiles, industry, wear, corrosion (such as tires or construction materials), and garbage disposal of products containing nanoparticles. The intentional nanoparticles are released as pesticides, fertilizers, water or soil remediation.
Sometimes is hard to predict the origin of environmental nanoparticle , however several markers elements can be used to determine the most probable source of inorganic nanoparticles, as shown in Table 3.1 (Calvo et al. 2013). For example, anthropogenic nanoparticles from the steel industry will have Cr, Ni and Mo markers, while the ones from the petrochemical industry those of Ni and V. Incomplete combustion from vehicle tailpipe have platinum group elements tracers, as well as Ce, Mo, and Zn.
Origins, composition, and morphology of various types of natural and anthropogenic nanoparticles are discussed in this chapter.
3 Natural Nanoparticles
The term “nanoparticle ” is relatively a new one. One should keep in mind that when searching the earlier literature for publications on natural nanoparticle keywords other than nanoparticles should be used, as this term is a relatively new one. For instance to increase the search yield, particle, particulate matter, dust or the specific composition of mineral particles should be used.
When are think of nanoparticle we associate them mainly with nanotechnology and manufactured nanoparticles. However, naturally formed nanoparticles are ubiquitous in nature and can be found in 10,000 years old glacial ice cores or in the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary layer (Murr et al. 2004; Verma et al. 2002; Handy et al. 2008a).
For example, studies of samples from the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K-T) boundary layer from Italy shows nanoparticles made of magnetically ordered iron materials, hematite, and a paramagnetic silicate, with a size of about 16–27 nm (Verma et al. 2002). It is believed that these nanoparticles formed due to the impact between Earth and a meteorite, and remained as aerosols for a long time before settling.
Natural nanoparticles can be organic and inorganic. The focus of this chapter is on inorganic nanoparticles. Natural nanoparticles sources can be classified as geologic, incomplete combustion, abiotic precipitation, and biochemical cycling. These sources of natural nanoparticles can involve bottom-up processes, which begin with molecular or ionic species, or top-down processes which begin with a larger precursor. Examples of bottom-up approaches are metallic nanoparticles formation via biomineralization or halide and hydrous sulfate nanoparticles from evaporation of sea spray (Sharma et al. 2015; Hochella et al. 2008). Examples of top-down approaches are nanoparticles generated by wind erosion in deserts, nanoparticles from incomplete combustion of matter.
Nowadays, the mineral dust generated by blowing wind from arid and agricultural lands constitutes probably the largest source of natural nanoparticles (Hochella et al. 2008). Other considerable source of natural nanoparticles are those generated by volcanoes and forest fires as ash, and biological debris (Bernhardt et al. 2010).
The composition of naturally generated nanoparticles is varied, ranging from: metals, metal oxides, and their compounds, alloys, carbon allotropes and silicates (Sharma et al. 2015; Guo and Barnard 2013; Hough et al. 2011). Noble metal nanoparticles are found in various environments. Figure 3.2 shows schematics, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of several types of natural nanoparticles: (a), (b) imogolite, a naturally occurring aluminosilicate nanotube in volcanic soils (Wilson et al. 2008; Yamamoto et al. 2005), (c) natural hydrous iron oxide aggregates on a mixture of organic fibrils found between 6.5 and 7.5 m in the water column (Taillefert et al. 2000), (d) weathered quartz fracture with Au nanoparticles (Hough et al. 2011), (e) bacteriomorphic gold (Brugger et al. 2013). Sometimes mineral nanoparticles can form in aqueous environments via nano-biomineralization, as aggregates with natural organic matter. Mineral weathering can generate nanoparticles of Fe and Mn oxides or ferrihydrite (Bakshi et al. 2015). Weathering reactions result in the formation of nanoparticle aggregates and coatings. Hence, nanoparticles in the environment have a dynamical chemical composition, size, and shape.
3.1 Nanoparticles from Wind Erosion and Dust Storms
Natural processes , such as weathering, can result in the formation of nanoparticles in soil, atmosphere, and aquatic environments. Weathering is a process of physical abrasion or chemical dissolution of rock material that results in the formation of nanoparticles and microparticles at the solid–air or solid–liquid interface. Weathering existed on Earth since 4 billion years from the time Earth was cold enough to have an atmosphere (Handy et al. 2008a). Today, the mineral dust generated by blowing wind from arid and agricultural lands constitutes probably the largest source of natural nanoparticles (Hochella et al. 2008).
Wind erosion is a top-down process of generating nanoparticles from larger precursors. Nanoparticle generation occurs via aeolian erosion in the desert, and on lands that is not covered by vegetation. Dust deposition occurs annually and increases with extended drought and land disturbance in source regions (Painter et al. 2007). Nanoparticles generated from dust storms are the largest amount of natural nanoparticles in the atmosphere.
Dust storms originate in drylands, the main sources being the Sahara and Kalahari (Africa), Arabian desert (Middle East), Gobi desert (Asia), Patagonian desert (South America), Western US deserts (North America) and Great Victoria desert (Australia). Desert dust has an effect on human health and ecosystems specially those situate downwind (Goudie 2014). Dust storms occur many times throughout the year in many regions. Dust particles from dust storms are able to transport pollutants and allergens over immense distances across continents.
Naturally occurring nanoparticles from dust storms have not only a local or regional environmental effect, but also global consequences, as seen in Fig. 3.3. Dust from dessert storms in Africa are transported across the oceans and seas and are able to affect ecosystems worldwide, as illustrated in Fig. 3.3a, c (Prospero and Mayol-Bracero 2013; Prospero et al. 2014). An example of dust deposition on mountain snow cover is shown in Fig. 3.3b. African mineral dust is transported to the Caribbean basin, showing a strong seasonal cycle, as seen in Fig. 3.3c (Prospero et al. 2014). The measurement of particulate matter at two different locations, at Cayenne (French Guiana) and Guadeloupe, show that the high levels of particles are almost entirely due to African dust.
Figure 3.4 shows examples of scanning electron microscope images and composition of particles from Asian dust storm samples (Kim et al. 2012). Carbon and crustal elements magnesium, aluminum, silicon and calcium are major components in most particles.
3.2 Nanoparticles from Volcanic Activity
A class of natural nanoparticle are those generated by volcanic activity. During a volcano eruption gases and large amounts of ash, composed of nanoparticles and microparticles, are ejected in high in the atmosphere, up to a height of 18,000 m (Buzea et al. 2007). During a single volcanic eruption hundreds of tons of ash can be ejected. Due to the air circulation in the upper troposphere and stratosphere, ash can distribute worldwide, blocking and scattering sun radiation. Figure 3.5 shows examples of scanning electron microscope images of volcanic ash and the 2011 Eruption of Shinmoedake volcano in Japan.
Figure 3.6 shows transmission electron microscope images of nanoparticles trapped in ice core drilled from Greenland and estimated to be about 10,000 years old. Some of these core samples include particles related to volcanic eruptions and dust-fall (Murr et al. 2004). Interesting to note that the arctic airborne particulate matter as well as carbon dioxide and methane concentrations are highly correlated. The ice cores of glacier ice are able to shed some light on their concentrations and antiquity (Murr et al. 2004). Various techniques can allow the identification of the time of the ice cores, ranging from 100 years to several millions years old ice identified in Antarctica. The study of particulate matter trapped in ice cores drilled from Greenland from a depth of 506 m, estimated to be about 10,000 years old, showed the composition of nanoparticles to be of carbon, including carbon nanotubes, silica, alumina, and iron-based compound, among others (Murr et al. 2004). Some clusters had a much more complex chemistry, including C, O, Na, S, Cl, K, Ca, Cu, and Zn. The carbon nanotubes are indicative of incomplete combustion processes, such as burning natural gas, while alumina is indicative of weathered alumino silicates (Murr et al. 2004).
3.3 Nanoparticle Weathering
Research on aerosol sources and their chemical composition shows that aerosol particles may be removed from the atmosphere by dry and/or wet deposition (Calvo et al. 2013). They can enter soil, interact with the substances from soil, release ions and be available for uptake by plants (Coutris et al. 2012). The size of aerosol particle varies from a few nanometers to several tens of microns (Calvo et al. 2013). Size is an important parameter that dictates its environmental behavior.
In many cases, nanoparticles occur via a combination of processes. An example would be weathering, which is a combination of mechanical processes, such as erosion, combined with dissolution and precipitation (an example is shown in Fig. 3.7), or volcanic activity that involves fast cooling of fumes and explosions. Usually nanoparticles form at phase boundaries, such as wind erosion at a solid–gas interface, evaporation of sea spray, at a liquid–gas interface, and weathering of rocks at a solid–liquid interface (Sharma et al. 2015).
The formation of new nanoparticles from dissolved species is called authigenesis or neoformation (Handy et al. 2008a). This process occurs when the concentration of dissolved species is high enough and exceed the saturation in solution of a phase, and results in the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles. An example of nanoparticles formed by authigenesis are clay and iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles.
3.4 Biogenic Nanoparticles: From Bacteria
Organisms, especially microorganisms , generate a large amount of inorganic nanoparticles in the environment, such as iron, silicon and calcium based minerals (Sharma et al. 2015). These biogenic nanoparticles are ubiquitous. The morphology of these particles varies from wires, see for example Fig. 3.8 (Leung et al. 2013), to spherical or cuboidal shapes, as seen in Fig. 3.9 (Fairbrother et al. 2013; Reith et al. 2014; Lengke et al. 2006; Alphandéry 2014).
Microorganisms that produce nanoparticles are bacteria, fungi, and yeast (Prasad et al. 2016). Table 3.2 gives some examples of microorganisms able to synthesize nanoparticles and the composition of nanoparticles. The composition of nanoparticles produced by microorganism is varied, ranging from precious metals to magnetic materials, such as Au, Ag, Ba, Hg, Se, Cd, Te, CdS, Cu, U, Tc, Cr, Co, Mn, Pd, Pt, Zr, Fe3O4, Fe3S4, Zn, TiO2, among other (Nath and Banerjee 2013; Quester et al. 2013).
Some types of bacteria, as a response to environmental stresses (such as toxicity of metal ions), have developed a defense mechanism that allows them to survive and grow in environments with high metal ion concentrations (Quester et al. 2013; Prasad et al. 2016). As a result, many bacterial species are currently used to produce metallic nanoparticles as an alternate route to simple chemical synthesis. This method of nanoparticle biosynthesis can use intact cells and cell extracts. In Table 3.2 are presented types of bacteria used to produce a large variety of metallic nanoparticles . The synthesis of nanoparticles by bacteria can be an intracellular or extracellular process, depending on the type of bacteria and material.
Biologically induced mineralization (BIM) is one of the processes involved in nanoparticle formation by organisms (Sharma et al. 2015). During this process nanoparticles are formed as a result of metabolic processes, the nanoparticles having no particular function in the functioning of the organisms, being only in a substrate attached to bacteria, or interacting with bacterial cell wall.
Biologically controlled mineralization (BCM) is another process when, in contrast to the previously discussed one, the growth of the nanoparticles is controlled by the organisms, being usually formed inside the cells (Sharma et al. 2015). Nanoparticles formed during this process are usually crystalline with a narrow particle-size distribution and serve different functions within the organisms, such as iron storage, tissue hardening, electron transfer mediators to promote oxidation and reduction under anaerobic conditions. For example, magnetotactic bacteria generates magnetite nanoparticles that are used for navigation, or in Shewanella oneidensis hematite nanoparticles facilitate respiration (Sharma et al. 2015).
Some bacteria developed a strategy for efficient electron transfer and energy distribution by generating electrically conductive appendages having the shape of nanowires (Gorby et al. 2006). This is the case for the mesophilic bacterium Shewanella oneidensis, cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803, and the thermophilic bacterium Pelotomaculum (Gorby et al. 2006; Leung et al. 2013).
Magnetosomes are nanoparticles synthesized intracellularly by magnetotactic bacteria , as seen in Fig. 3.9e, f (Alphandéry 2014). Magnetotactic bacteria use the magnetosomes as tiny compasses to navigate using the geomagnetic field. These bacteria are ubiquitous in sediments of fresh water, marine and hypersaline habitats, being found on all continents (Lefevre and Bazylinski 2013). The structure of a magnetosome is composed of a magnetic nanoparticle surrounded by lipid bilayer membrane. The magnetic nanoparticles are morphologically uniform, with a size between 35 and 120 nm, with a narrow size distribution, for the most studied species of magnetotactic bacteria. The composition of the core nanoparticle is high purity and crystallinity magnetite (Fe3O4) or greigite (Fe3S4) (Lefevre and Bazylinski 2013). The magnetosome has usually a single domain magnetic nanoparticle, as opposed to chemically synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles which are usually multidomain. As shown in Fig. 3.9e, the magnetosomes are ordered in chains inside the magnetotactic bacteria. The magnetic nanoparticles are coated by lipids and proteins, which gives it a total negative charge and good water dispersability.
Via their interactions with some metals, microorganisms are involved in metal cycling, determining their mobility in surface environments (Brugger et al. 2013). For example Au has a high mobility in many near-surface environments due to their interaction with metal-resistant bacteria.
3.5 Biogenic Nanoparticles: From Plants
Plants have different behavior towards excess metals present in the growth media. Metal-tolerant ones limit the uptake of nanoparticles into the photosynthetic tissue by restricting the transport of metals across the root endodermis and storing them on the root cortex (Manceau et al. 2008). Hyper-accumulating plants uptake and translocate excess amounts of metals in harvestable parts (Manceau et al. 2008).
Hydraulic lift of nanoparticles by deep-rooted vegetation is a mechanism of transport of nanoparticles from deeper sediments to the earth surface (Lintern et al. 2013). It has been shown that Eucalyptus trees are able to translocate Au from mineral deposits at more than 30 m depth (Lintern et al. 2013). Gold nanoparticles were found in the foliage of the studied Eucalyptus tree.
Rice (Oryza sativa) uptakes silica from the soil as silicic acid and accumulates around cellulose micro-compartments (Mohammadinejad et al. 2016). As the second largest farmed crop in the world, rice has the potential to become a significant source of silica nanoparticles (Mohammadinejad et al. 2016). Rice husks are considered an important agricultural residue, 1 t of husks for every 5 t of rice. Some authors suggest the use of rice husks as a source of silica nanoparticles (Mohammadinejad et al. 2016). Silica nanoparticles derived from burning the husks is about 20 % of the dry weight of their weight.
Common wetlands plants can transform cationic copper into nanoparticles in and near their roots with the help of fungi when grown in contaminated soils (Manceau et al. 2008). Table 3.3 shows examples of plants that are able to synthesize nanoparticles together with the composition of nanoparticles (Nath and Banerjee 2013; Quester et al. 2013).
4 Anthropogenic Nanoparticles
4.1 Examples of Engineered Nanoparticles
Engineered nanoparticles can have different compositions: carbon based, metals and their oxides, polymers, etc. Carbon based nanomaterials encompass carbon different allotropes: carbon black, an amorphous form of carbon, graphite, nanodiamonds, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and fullerenes, such as C60, C70 (Bhatt and Tripathi 2011; Nowack and Bucheli 2007). Examples of carbon allotropes that can be found in nanoform are shown in Fig. 3.10 (Balasubramanian and Burghard 2005). The size of these nanomaterials can range from smaller than 1 nm, 0.7 nm for fullerenes, while carbon nanotubes can have diameter of about 1 nm and varying lengths. Carbon nanotubes can be single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) , or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (Balasubramanian and Burghard 2005). SWCNTs are formed of rolled up single-layered graphene sheets while MWCNTs can have several concentric layers with varying diameter, as shown in Fig. 3.10e, g, respectively.
Various types of nanoparticles are currently synthesized for various applications. They range from metals, metal oxides (such as TiO2 and ZnO), non-metals, such as carbon and silica. Figure 3.11 shows transmission electron microscope images of various anthropogenic nanoparticles: rattle-type Au/CdS nanostructures (Xia and Tang 2012), MWCNTs (Larue et al. 2012), silica nanoparticles (Nair et al. 2011), cobalt oxide nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles (Ghodake et al. 2011), ceria nanoparticles (Zhang et al. 2011), and rare earth oxides nanoparticles La2O3, Gd2O3, Yb2O3 (Ma et al. 2010).
Magnetic nanoparticles are being used extensively in various fields, ranging from medicine to water remediation. Examples of magnetic nanoparticles are Fe, Co, Ni, Fe3O4, CoFe2O4, HoMnO3, MnFe2O4, FePt (Kolhatkar et al. 2013; Chekli et al. 2016). Interesting to note that nanoparticles made of materials that are not magnetic in bulk form may acquire magnetic properties when in nanoform (Buzea et al. 2007). This is the case for nanoparticles with size of few nanometers made of Au, Pd (Hori et al. 1999), Pt (Sakamoto et al. 2011).
Quantum dots are a class of nanoparticles made of semiconductor nanocrystals with special optical properties, usually covered in a shell (silica). The role of the shell is to protect the core from oxidation and to mitigate the quantum dots toxicity. The core can be made of cadmium selenide CdSe, cadmium telluride CdTe, indium phosphide InP, or zinc selenide ZnSe (Farre et al. 2011).
Nowadays engineered nanoparticles are fabricated in industrial amounts. Each class of materials, such as SWCNTs exceed 1000 t per year (Klaine et al. 2008). Nanotechnology is one of the most rapidly growing fields of application. Given this, the entry of nanoparticles in the environment is unavoidable and its implication on the ecosystem health is becoming an increasing concern.
4.2 Pesticides and Fertilizers
A major way to introduce engineered nanoparticles in agricultural fields is the intentional use of nanoparticles as agrichemicals for crop protection and soil remediation (Deng et al. 2014). Agrichemicals encompass nanosystems that act as delivery devices for specific target tissues, pesticides additives that enhance solubility of active ingredients (Deng et al. 2014). Nanotechnology in the pesticide field comprise either very small particles of pesticides, nanocages, or small nanoparticles with pesticidal properties when in nanoform (Khot et al. 2012). Pesticides containing silver nanoparticles are used for their properties of supressing harmful organisms.
Nanoparticles with compositions of TiO2, ZnO, Ag, Zn, Au are being developed for pesticide remediation due to their photocatalytic activity (Aragay et al. 2012; Gogos et al. 2012; Kah and Hofmann 2014). Other nanomaterials, such as Fe3O4, are being used for pollutant removal due to their magnetic properties (Aragay et al. 2012). Some research papers study the effects of carbon nanotubes and fullerenes on some pesticide uptake by agricultural plants (De La Torre-Roche et al. 2013).
The idea that nanomaterials can be applied in agriculture started to evolve about a decade or so ago, after the year 2000 (Gogos et al. 2012). There is an increasing number of research papers and patents involving nanomaterials for plant protection or fertilizers, as shown in Table 3.4 (Gogos et al. 2012; Aragay et al. 2012; Kah and Hofmann 2014; Servin et al. 2015). The composition of these nanomaterials is carbon-based (carbon nanotubes, liposomes, organic polymers), titanium dioxide, silver, silica, and alumina (Gogos et al. 2012). They serve as additives (for controlled release) and as active constituents.
Gogos et al. analyzed publications and patents of nanomaterials used for plant protection and fertilization (Gogos et al. 2012). They found that nanomaterials can be in the form of solid nanoparticles or nonsolid structures (lipid or polymer). As seen in (Fig. 3.12a), plant protection products were the topic of 74 % of all papers, with the rest on fertilizers and UV protection. 35 % of the plant protection products were used as fungicides, 33 % as insecticides, and 27 % had multiple function (Fig. 3.12b). Nanomaterials were the active component in 41 % of the plant protection products, and additives in 57 %, acting as controlled release carriers (Fig. 3.12c, d).
Another suggested application of nanoparticles in agriculture that is still in the developmental stages is for genetically modified crops with nanoparticles acting as vectors for DNA (Kah et al. 2013). The increase interest for the utilization of nanoparticles in agriculture should be addressed by regulatory bodies in order to control their use as nanopesticides or fertilizers (Kookana et al. 2014). A large number of patents involving nanoparticles have been already filed in agriculture and food industry and many research papers explore the use of nanoparticles for improved seed germination and crop yield. For example, carbon nanotubes are researched for improving the germination of some seeds (Alexandru et al. 2012). However, note should be made that multiple studies have proved that carbon nanotubes are quite toxic to humans and animals. Thus, the true benefit of carbon nanotubes in agriculture seems quite controversial and perhaps dangerous.
In the future, it is reasonable to speculate that the unregulated use of engineered nanoparticles in agriculture and food industry may pose a threat to food safety and health of unawares consumers. The accumulation of nanoparticles in soils and groundwater may potentially lead to accumulation of nanoparticles in plants. The long term effects of nanoparticle accumulation in plants is still largely unknown, but as research suggest, they may undergo morphological, physiological, genetic, and epigenetic changes that may alter plant growth and nutritional status. The introduction of engineered nanoparticles in the food chain from plants grown in contaminated soils may have serious repercussion upon the health of animals and humans.
4.3 Water and Soil Remediation
Nanoparticles are prospected for pollution remediation, water treatment and purification due to their high surface area, high adsorption capacity and unique structure and electronic properties (Gupta and Saleh 2013). They are able to remove organic and inorganic contaminants. Several types of materials are used for their adsorption of pollutants: metal-containing particles, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, and zeolites (Gupta and Saleh 2013).
The magnetism of some nanoparticles makes them unique agents for water treatment (Xu et al. 2012). Adsorption processes together with magnetic separation makes some magnetic nanoparticles extensively used in water treatment and environmental cleanup. Most commonly used in soil remediation is nano-zero-valent iron due to its high reactivity (high surface area) and its ability to detoxify a wide range of contaminants, such as chlorinated organic solvents, organochlorine pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (Deng et al. 2014).
The composition of nanoparticles used as heavy metals pollutant adsorbents include Fe2O3, Fe3O4, SiO2, and Al2O3 (Bakshi et al. 2015). Nanoparticles of Fe and Al oxides or oxyhydroxides can be useful in the removal of As from water (Bakshi et al. 2015).
Recently, carbon nanomaterials , like carbon nanotubes and fullerene, are being broadly used for advanced treatment of wastewaters and are being researched as promising adsorbents for water treatment (Gupta and Saleh 2013). There is ongoing research regarding CNTs adsorbent properties against organic compounds such as pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), antibiotics, herbicides. They are also able to adsorb metal ions (Cu, Ni, Co, V, Ag, Cd and rare earth elements).
4.4 Incomplete Combustion
Accidental release of anthropogenic nanoparticles near urban areas is a result of traffic (such as exhaust emission due to incomplete combustion, road surface abrasion, brake and tire wear), industrial activities (incomplete combustion emissions from power plants, oil refineries, dust from mining), building (dust from excavations and demolitions) and from housing (incomplete combustion particles from heating and cooking) (Buzea et al. 2007). The anthropogenic particles in rural areas are mainly from biomass burning and various farming activities.
Nanoparticles generated via incomplete combustion of vehicle fuel are a large source of pollutants. In addition to the inherent release of nanoparticles due to incomplete burning of the fuel, nanocerium nanoparticles are being used as fuel additives to improve fuel efficiency and to reduce emissions of fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and hydrocarbon species (Erdakos et al. 2014). The concentrations of cerium oxide is estimated to be between 0.32 and 1.12 μg/g at a distance of 26 m from the edge of highway, and 0.28–0.98 μg/g for a distance of 96 m from the highway (Park et al. 2008).
Nanoparticles synthesized by incomplete combustion are also used in different products (Heiligtag and Niederberger 2013). For example, carbon black, produced by the incomplete combustion of natural gas, is produced worldwide in huge amounts (10 million metric tons) and it is used as rubber reinforcement in car tires (Heiligtag and Niederberger 2013).
4.5 Particles in the Environment and their Long Range Transport
In environmental sciences particles are labeled as a function of their size. For example, particulate matter with components having diameters less than 0.1 μm (100 nm) is labeled PM0.1 (often called ultra-fine particles) and results mainly from combustion processes. PM10 is particulate matter having a diameter smaller than 10 μm while PM2.5 has size smaller than 2.5 μm. PM10 and PM2.5 are mainly aggregates of ultra-fine particles and larger particles mostly mechanically generated (Buzea et al. 2007).
The particulate air matter may change its properties and chemical composition during its transport and aging. Its lifetime in the atmosphere can range from hours to weeks (Sielicki et al. 2011). The particulate matter in the atmosphere varies in amount and composition depending on its geographical location (Sielicki et al. 2011). The anthropogenic contribution to particulate matter is considerable, especially in highly populated areas of the globe. For example, in Netherlands between 70 and 95 % of particulate matter, with agriculture, transportation, and industry being the major sources of pollution (Hendriks et al. 2013).
Anthropogenic nanoparticles generation has an important effect not only locally, but also globally. They can be transported over large distances. For example, measurements of the dustfall in the high snowfields of the Caucasus is correlated to the European and Soviet industrialization, with little variation from 1790 to 1930, followed by an enormous 19-fold increase from 1930 to 1963 and a leveling off during World War II (Murr et al. 2004).
Due to their adverse effect on human health, particulate matter aerosols are monitored around the world. In order to protect human health, maximum thresholds standards are set by governments around the world for the fraction of particles with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (Calvo et al. 2013). For example, in Europe a maximum threshold value of 20 μg/m3 must be attained by 2020.
4.6 Nano-Waste
Many human activities generate nano-waste , such as research and development or various industries (Yadav et al. 2014). Nano-waste can also enter the environment from the disposal of consumer products that contain nanomaterials discarded via municipal or industrial waste treatment plants. Nanoparticles from waste water are not efficiently removed in water treatment plants, therefore they can enter the environment (Yadav et al. 2014; Aziz et al. 2015; Brar et al. 2010). The sludge from the waste water treatment plants is an important exposure source of engineered nanomaterials (Cornelis et al. 2014).
A study that model the flows of nanoparticles in the recycling system in Switzerland showed that occupational exposure, release of nanoparticles in landfills and incineration plants are the most important factors to be considered in the risk assessment (Caballero-Guzman et al. 2015).
Atmospheric nanoparticles can enter the water reservoir and the soil. Drinking water treatment does not remove entirely nanoparticles from the water. A study reported that only 2–20 %, 3–8 %, and 48–99 % of Ag, TiO2, and ZnO nanoparticles are removed by a conventional drinking water treatment (Chalew et al. 2013). Therefore, a large amount of nanoparticles are still detectable in finished water.
4.7 Nanoparticles in the Construction Industry
Nanoparticles are also used in the construction industry (Pacheco-Blandino et al. 2012). Nanoparticles can be incorporated as nanocomposites in concrete. Silica, alumina, and zinc oxide nanoparticles nanocomposites in concrete confer it increased strength, water penetration and accelerated hydration. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles is used in concrete for their self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and pollution remediation properties. The incorporation of carbon nanotubes in concrete, polymers, or glass may result in a nanocomposite with improved properties, such as self-sensing, electromagnetic field shielding, and increased strength. Iron oxide nanoparticles incorporated in construction materials can offer self-sensing capabilities as well. Coating with different nanoparticles can greatly improve the properties of the covered material (Pacheco-Blandino et al. 2012). For example, photocatalytic TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles are used for pollution remediation, for their antifog, anticorrosion, and antimicrobial properties. Cu and Zn nanoparticles in coatings are anticorrosive, while Ag, Cu nanoparticles are antimicrobial. Silica nanoparticle coatings are scratch resistant, fireproof, and antireflective, while W2O3 can be used in coatings to adjust light transmittance (Pacheco-Blandino et al. 2012).
4.8 Nanoparticles in the Food Industry
Nanotechnology is becoming widely used in the food industry (Dasgupta et al. 2015). The use of nanotechnology in foods and dietary supplements encompasses food additives, food contact materials, and encapsulation (Prasad et al. 2014).
Nanoparticles of Ag, ZnO, TiO2 are used as antimicrobial coating for refrigerators, storage containers, equipment for food processing (Rossi et al. 2014; Chellaram et al. 2014).
Smart packaging incorporates sensors that inform on the existence of specific chemicals and mitigate their effects, and can give information on the product shelf life. The smart packaging industry is about 80 % composed of oxygen, pathogen scavengers, moisture absorbers and barrier packing product (Chellaram et al. 2014).
Active food packaging serves as a passive barrier and also as active components via a desirable direct interaction with the food (antimicrobial or antioxidative agent) (Dasgupta et al. 2015). Food packaging with nano-coatings improve barrier properties. Food packaging uses mostly nanoparticles of clay or silver. Fewer products use silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide (Bouwmeester et al. 2014). Some nanoparticles are added to the matrix to confer antimicrobial activity or preservation via oxygen absorption. Nanoclays are used in polymers to improve barrier protection and preserve food by maintaining it in a low oxygen environment in order to inhibiting microbial growth (Chellaram et al. 2014).
Antibacterial nanoparticles are incorporated in food packaging which may extend food shelf life (Chellaram et al. 2014). For example the incorporation of silver or titania nanoparticles into food packaging serves as antimicrobial. The sunlight initiates photocatalysis of titania nanoparticle which promotes peroxidation of cell membrane phospholipids of bacteria (Dasgupta et al. 2015). Titania nanoparticles incorporated into food packaging can also act as O2 scavengers, reducing food browning and rancid flavors. Silver is one of the most used nanomaterial in food industry and packaging. Silver can be used in refrigerators and food storage boxes due to its antibacterial properties. Nanoparticles can migrate from food packaging coatings into food, such as the case of Ag nanoparticles into food samples that were stored in contact with nano-silver coated surfaces (Metak et al. 2015).
Nanocomposites containing polymer incorporated nanoparticles are used to improve the strength of materials, durability, and biodegradation.
Some nanoparticles used as food additives have been available in products on the market for a long period of time, such as silicon dioxide SiO2—E551, titanium dioxide TiO2—E171, and Ag—E174, and are permitted as food additive without a definition of the particle size (Rossi et al. 2014; Bouwmeester et al. 2014; Lim et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2013). Silver nanoparticles can be used as food colorant (Wang et al. 2013). The anatase crystalline phase of titanium dioxide is mostly used as whitening agent and for texture (Wang et al. 2013). Silica is utilized in the production process of beer and wine, as a clearing, anticaking, and anti-clumping agent (Wang et al. 2013; Dekkers et al. 2011; Lim et al. 2015).
Other metals in nano-form marketed as food or health supplements are selenium, calcium, iron, copper, gold, platinum, silver, molybdenum, palladium, titanium, and zinc (Bouwmeester et al. 2014).
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) commissioned an inventory of currently used and reasonably foreseen applications of NM in agriculture and food/feed production, published in 2015 (Aschberger et al. 2015). The majority of applications of nanotechnology are used in food (about 90 %), mostly as food additives and food contact materials. About 9 % are used in agriculture and 3 % in feed. The report found 55 types of inorganic and organic nanomaterials, of which the most used are nano-encapsulates, silver and titanium dioxide. This information is depicted in Fig. 3.13 (Aschberger et al. 2015).
Table 3.5 shows examples of nanomaterials and nanoparticles used in food, food additives and food packaging (Blasco and Pico 2011; Pico and Blasco 2012). Studies had shown that nanoparticles are in general toxic to humans and they are associated with a multitude of diseases (Buzea et al. 2007), therefore food contamination with nanoparticles or the environmental pollution via inadvertent release of nanoparticles from food packaging is highly undesirable.
4.9 Cosmetics
Nanoparticles have been used in cosmetics since ancient times, as powders or hair-dyes. Currently several types of nanoparticles are incorporated in cosmetics due to their special properties (Borowska and Brzoska 2015). For example, Ag and Au nanoparticles are used in face and body care products, while Cu-Silica nanoparticles are used in deodorants due to their antibacterial properties. Alumina nanoparticles are incorporated in mineral foundations and concealers due to their properties of diffusing light. Many sunscreens contain titanium dioxide and zinc oxide due to their properties of UV filtering.
4.10 Engineered Nanoparticles Applications and Environmental Accumulation
While there is an increasing number of products containing nanoparticles on the market, the assessment of risk posed by nanomaterials and related legislations that should limit the use of toxic nanoparticles in products are in lagging behind. Many consumer products contain nanoparticles that will most likely enter the environment after improper recycling and disposal of consumer products. The buildup of engineered nanoparticles in the environment may affect soil-based food crop quality and yield. The effect of nanoparticle on edible plants is very important because of their uptake by plants. Once nanoparticles entered the food chain, they may potentially affect the health of humans and animals in ways that we cannot predict empirically.
Table 3.6 shows some of the most used engineered nanoparticles, their applications and possible environmental accumulation in soil, water, waste, and air (Bhatt and Tripathi 2011; Boxall et al. 2007; Brar et al. 2010; Gladkova and Terekhova 2013; Gottschalk et al. 2015; Hincapie et al. 2015; Khin et al. 2012; Tang and Lo 2013; Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska et al. 2009). The interaction, transport, and ecotoxicology of nanoparticles are dynamically altered by abiotic factors (pH, salinity, water hardness, temperature) (Handy et al. 2008b).
5 Nanoparticle Relative Toxicity Index on Humans and Animals
There are already various studies on the effects of nanoparticles on plants, with most of them reporting detrimental effects, and a minority showing some beneficial effects. While some plants exhibit benefits from a type of nanoparticle, other plants are negatively impacted by the same nanoparticles. Moreover, many nanoparticles are found to be extremely toxic to humans and animals and even though they might show some minor benefits for the growth of some plants, they may lead to detrimental effects if these plants containing nanoparticles were to be ingested by humans or animals. For example, Ag nanoparticles that are starting to be used increasingly in agriculture have a toxicity index higher than those of asbestos in animal cells, as shown in Table 3.7 (Soto et al. 2005). Also, carbon nanotubes, which have similar morphologies and sizes with asbestos, as shown in Fig. 3.14 (Murr and Soto 2004), have similar toxicities in animal cells (Soto et al. 2005). For a comprehensive review of nanoparticles toxicity on humans see reference Buzea et al. (2007).
References
Alexandru SB, Mariya VK, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV (2012) Method of using carbon nanotubes to affect seed germination and plant growth. US Patent Application Ep20100830332
Alphandéry E (2014) Applications of magnetosomes synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria in medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2:5
Aragay G, Pino F, Merkoci A (2012) Nanomaterials for sensing and destroying pesticides. Chem Rev 112:5317–5338
Aschberger K, Gottardo S, Amenta V, Arena M, Moniz FB, Bouwmeester H, Brandhoff P, Mech A, Pesudo LQ, Rauscher H, Schoonjans R, Vettori MV, Peters R, Iop (2015) Nanomaterials in food – current and future applications and regulatory aspects. 4th International conference on safe production and use of nanomaterials. Iop, Bristol
Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY, Lowry GV, Jolivet JP, Wiesner MR (2009) Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4:634–641
Aziz N, Faraz M, Pandey R, Sakir M, Fatma T, Varma A, Barman I, Prasad R (2015) Facile algae-derived route to biogenic silver nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and photocatalytic properties. Langmuir 31:11605–11612
Bakshi S, He ZLL, Harris WG (2015) Natural nanoparticles: implications for environment and human health. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:861–904
Balasubramanian K, Burghard M (2005) Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes. Small 1:180–192
Barati A (2010) Nano-composite superabsorbent containing fertilizer nutrients used in agriculture. US 20100139347 A1. US Patent Application US 12/701,613
Bernhardt ES, Colman BP, Hochella MF, Cardinale BJ, Nisbet RM, Richardson CJ, Yin LY (2010) An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment. J Environ Qual 39:1954–1965
Bhatt I, Tripathi BN (2011) Interaction of engineered nanoparticles with various components of the environment and possible strategies for their risk assessment. Chemosphere 82:308–317
Blasco C, Pico Y (2011) Determining nanomaterials in food. Trac-Trends Anal Chem 30:84–99
Borowska S, Brzoska MM (2015) Metals in cosmetics: implications for human health. J Appl Toxicol 35:551–572
Bouwmeester H, Brandhoff P, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Peters RJB (2014) State of the safety assessment and current use of nanomaterials in food and food production. Trends Food Sci Technol 40:200–210
Boxall AB, Tiede K, Chaudhry Q (2007) Engineered nanomaterials in soils and water: how do they behave and could they pose a risk to human health? Nanomedicine 2:919–927
Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY (2010) Engineered nanoparticles in wastewater and wastewater sludge – evidence and impacts. Waste Manag 30:504–520
Brugger J, Etschmann B, Grosse C, Plumridge C, Kaminski J, Paterson D, Shar SS, Ta C, Howard DL, De Jonge MD, Ball AS, Reith F (2013) Can biological toxicity drive the contrasting behavior of platinum and gold in surface environments? Chem Geol 343:99–110
Buzea C, Pacheco I, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2:Mr17–Mr71
Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manag 29:2587–2595
Caballero-Guzman A, Sun T, Nowack B (2015) Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland. Waste Manag 36:33–43
Calvo AI, Alves C, Castro A, Pont V, Vicente AM, Fraile R (2013) Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: past, current and emerging issues. Atmos Res 120–121:1–28
Chalew TEA, Ajmani GS, Huang HO, Schwab KJ (2013) Evaluating nanoparticle breakthrough during drinking water treatment. Environ Health Perspect 121:1161–1166
Chekli L, Bayatsarmadi B, Sekine R, Sarkar B, Shen AM, Scheckel KG, Skinner W, Naidu R, Shon HK, Lombi E, Donner E (2016) Analytical characterisation of nanoscale zero-valent iron: a methodological review. Anal Chim Acta 903:13–35
Chellaram C, Murugaboopathi G, John AA, Sivakumar R, Ganesan S, Krithika S, Priya G (2014) Significance of nanotechnology in food industry. APCBEE Proc 8:109–113
Cornelis G, Hund-Rinke K, Kuhlbusch T, Van Den Brink N, Nickel C (2014) Fate and bioavailability of engineered nanoparticles in soils: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2720–2764
Coutris C, Joner EJ, Oughton DH (2012) Aging and soil organic matter content affect the fate of silver nanoparticles in soil. Sci Total Environ 420:327–333
Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2015) Nanotechnology in agro-food: from field to plate. Food Res Int 69:381–400
De La Torre-Roche R, Hawthorne J, Deng YQ, Xing BS, Cai WJ, Newman LA, Wang Q, Ma XM, Hamdi H, White JC (2013) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and C-60 fullerenes differentially impact the accumulation of weathered pesticides in four agricultural plants. Environ Sci Technol 47:12539–12547
Dekkers S, Krystek P, Peters RJB, Lankveld DPK, Bokkers BGH, Van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Bouwmeester H, Oomen AG (2011) Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products. Nanotoxicology 5:393–405
Deng YQ, White JC, Xing BS (2014) Interactions between engineered nanomaterials and agricultural crops: implications for food safety. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 15:552–572
Erdakos GB, Bhave PV, Pouliot GA, Simon H, Mathur R (2014) Predicting the effects of nanoscale cerium additives in diesel fuel on regional-scale air quality. Environ Sci Technol 48:12775–12782
Fairbrother L, Etschmann B, Brugger J, Shapter J, Southam G, Reith F (2013) Biomineralization of gold in biofilms of Cupriavidus metallidurans. Environ Sci Technol 47:2628–2635
Farre M, Sanchis J, Barcelo D (2011) Analysis and assessment of the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment. Trac-Trends Anal Chem 30:517–527
Farrukh MA, Naseem F (2014) Nano-Leucite for slow release nitrogen fertilizer and green environment. US 20140190226 A1. US Patent Application US 13/738,727
Ghodake G, Seo YD, Lee DS (2011) Hazardous phytotoxic nature of cobalt and zinc oxide nanoparticles assessed using Allium cepa. J Hazard Mater 186:952–955
Gladkova MM, Terekhova VA (2013) Engineered nanomaterials in soil: sources of entry and migration pathways. Moscow Univ Soil Sci Bull 68:129–134
Gogos A, Knauer K, Bucheli TD (2012) Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: current state, foreseen applications, and research priorities. J Agric Food Chem 60:9781–9792
Gorby YA, Yanina S, Mclean JS, Rosso KM, Moyles D, Dohnalkova A, Beveridge TJ, Chang IS, Kim BH, Kim KS, Culley DE, Reed SB, Romine MF, Saffarini DA, Hill EA, Shi L, Elias DA, Kennedy DW, Pinchuk G, Watanabe K, Ishii S, Logan B, Nealson KH, Fredrickson JK (2006) Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain Mr-1 and other microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:11358–11363
Gottschalk F, Lassen C, Kjoelholt J, Christensen F, Nowack B (2015) Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:5581–5602
Goudie AS (2014) Desert dust and human health disorders. Environ Int 63:101–113
Guo HB, Barnard AS (2013) Naturally occurring iron oxide nanoparticles: morphology, surface chemistry and environmental stability. J Mater Chem A 1:27–42
Gupta VK, Saleh TA (2013) Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene- an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:2828–2843
Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami-Jones E (2008a) The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17:315–325
Handy RD, Von Der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellov M, Owen R, Crane M (2008b) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:287–314
Heiligtag FJ, Niederberger M (2013) The fascinating world of nanoparticle research. Mater Today 16:262–271
Hendriks C, Kranenburg R, Kuenen J, Van Gijlswijk R, Kruit RW, Segers A, Van Der Gon HD, Schaap M (2013) The origin of ambient particulate matter concentrations in the Netherlands. Atmos Environ 69:289–303
Hincapie I, Kunniger T, Hischier R, Cervellati D, Nowack B, Som C (2015) Nanoparticles in facade coatings: a survey of industrial experts on functional and environmental benefits and challenges. J Nanopart Res 17:287
Hochella MF, Lower SK, Maurice PA, Penn RL, Sahai N, Sparks DL, Twining BS (2008) Nanominerals, mineral nanoparticles, and earth systems. Science 319:1631–1635
Hori H, Teranishi T, Nakae Y, Seino Y, Miyake M, Yamada S (1999) Anomalous magnetic polarization effect of Pd and Au nano-particles. Phys Lett A 263:406–410
Hough RM, Noble RRP, Reich M (2011) Natural gold nanoparticles. Ore Geol Rev 42:55–61
Jaynes BS, Sgande ME, Fenton RJ, Stadler UL, Mamak M, Choi S (2012) Antimicrobial silver silica composite. US 20120294919 A1. US 13/470,881
Jian L, Zhiming Z (2011) Environment-friendly carbon-nano synergistic complex fertilizers. US 20110174032 A1. US Patent Application US 12/672,951
Kah M, Hofmann T (2014) Nanopesticide research: current trends and future priorities. Environ Int 63:224–235
Kah M, Beulke S, Tiede K, Hofmann T (2013) Nanopesticides: state of knowledge, environmental fate, and exposure modeling. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 43:1823–1867
Khin MM, Nair AS, Babu VJ, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2012) A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energ Environ Sci 5:8075–8109
Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW (2012) Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Prot 35:64–70
Kim W, Doh S-J, Yu Y (2012) Asian dust storm as conveyance media of anthropogenic pollutants. Atmos Environ 49:41–50
Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, Mclaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–1851
Kolhatkar AG, Jamison AC, Litvinov D, Willson RC, Lee TR (2013) Tuning the magnetic properties of nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 14:15977–16009
Kookana RS, Boxall ABA, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, Cornelis G, Fernandes TF, Gan J, Kah M, Lynch I, Ranville J, Sinclair C, Spurgeon D, Tiede K, Van Den Brink PJ (2014) Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. J Agric Food Chem 62:4227–4240
Larue C, Pinault M, Czarny B, Georgin D, Jaillard D, Bendiab N, Mayne-L'hermite M, Taran F, Dive V, Carriere M (2012) Quantitative evaluation of multi-walled carbon nanotube uptake in wheat and rapeseed. J Hazard Mater 227:155–163
Lefevre CT, Bazylinski DA (2013) Ecology, diversity, and evolution of magnetotactic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:497–526
Lengke MF, Fleet ME, Southam G (2006) Synthesis of platinum nanoparticles by reaction of filamentous cyanobacteria with Platinum(Iv)−Chloride complex. Langmuir 22:7318–7323
Leung KM, Wanger G, El-Naggar MY, Gorby Y, Southam G, Lau WM, Yang J (2013) Shewanella oneidensis Mr-1 bacterial nanowires exhibit P-type, tunable electronic behavior. Nano Lett 13:2407–2411
Li Y (2002) Ximaxi controlled release special fertilizer and its preparation. CN 1349958 A. China Patent Application CN 01106895
Lim JH, Sisco P, Mudalige TK, Sanchez-Pomales G, Howard PC, Linder SW (2015) Detection and characterization of Sio2 and Tio2 nanostructures in dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem 63:3144–3152
Lintern M, Anand R, Ryan C, Paterson D (2013) Natural gold particles in eucalyptus leaves and their relevance to exploration for buried gold deposits. Nat Commun 4:2274
Ma YH, Kuang LL, He X, Bai W, Ding YY, Zhang ZY, Zhao YL, Chai ZF (2010) Effects of rare earth oxide nanoparticles on root elongation of plants. Chemosphere 78:273–279
Malshe VC, Malshe AP (2010) Non-metallic nano/micro particles coated with metal, process and applications. US 20100047546 A1. US 12/227,716
Manceau A, Nagy KL, Marcus MA, Lanson M, Geoffroy N, Jacquet T, Kirpichtchikova T (2008) Formation of metallic copper nanoparticles at the soil-root interface. Environ Sci Technol 42:1766–1772
Metak AM, Nabhani F, Connolly SN (2015) Migration of engineered nanoparticles from packaging into food products. Lwt - Food Sci Technol 64:781–787
Min K (2003) Compound application technology for nano-biological fertilizer and soil conditioner. CN 1413963 A. China Patent Application
Mohammadinejad R, Karimi S, Iravani S, Varma RS (2016) Plant-derived nanostructures: types and applications. Green Chem 18:20–52
Morman SA, Plumlee GS (2013) The role of airborne mineral dusts in human disease. Aeol Res 9:203–212
Murr LE, Soto KF (2004) TEM comparison of chrysotile (asbestos) nanotubes and carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci 39:4941–4947
Murr LE, Esquivel EV, Bang JJ, De La Rosa G, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2004) Chemistry and nanoparticulate compositions of a 10,000 year-old ice core melt water. Water Res 38:4282–4296
Nair R, Poulose AC, Nagaoka Y, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS (2011) Uptake of FITC labeled silica nanoparticles and quantum dots by rice seedlings: effects on seed germination and their potential as biolabels for plants. J Fluoresc 21:2057–2068
Nano-Argentum NG. Available: Http://Www.Nanosys.Ch/Global/Kolloide/Nano_Argentum_Flakon_E.Html#Reload
Nath D, Banerjee P (2013) Green nanotechnology – a new hope for medical biology. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36:997–1014
Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–22
Pacheco-Blandino I, Vanner R, Buzea C (2012) Toxicity of nanoparticles. In: Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S, Fucic A (eds) Toxicity of building materials. Woodhead, Cambridge
Painter TH, Barrett AP, Landry CC, Neff JC, Cassidy MP, Lawrence CR, Mcbride KE, Farmer GL (2007) Impact of disturbed desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover. Geophys Res Lett 34:L12502
Park B, Donaldson K, Duffin R, Tran L, Kelly F, Mudway I, Morin JP, Guest R, Jenkinson P, Samaras Z, Giannouli M, Kouridis H, Martin P (2008) Hazard and risk assessment of a nanoparticulate cerium oxide-based diesel fuel additive – a case study. Inhal Toxicol 20:547–566
Pico Y, Blasco C (2012) Nanomaterials in food, which way forward? In: Farre M, Barcelo D (eds) Analysis and risk of nanomaterials in environmental and food samples. Elsevier, Oxford
Prasad DY (2013) Production of novel precision customized control release fertilizers. US 8375629 B2. US 12/312,328
Prasad R, Kumar V, Prasad KS (2014) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: present concerns and future aspects. Afr J Biotechnol 13:705–713
Prasad R, Pandey R, Barman I (2016) Engineering tailored nanoparticles with microbes: quo vadis. Wires Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8:316–330
Prospero JM, Mayol-Bracero OL (2013) Understanding the transport and impact of African dust on the Caribbean Basin. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1329–1337
Prospero JM, Collard FX, Molinie J, Jeannot A (2014) Characterizing the annual cycle of African dust transport to the Caribbean Basin and South America and its impact on the environment and air quality. Global Biogeochem Cycles 28:757–773
Quester K, Avalos-Borja M, Castro-Longoria E (2013) Biosynthesis and microscopic study of metallic nanoparticles. Micron 54–55:1–27
Reith F, Campbell SG, Ball AS, Pring A, Southam G (2014) Platinum in earth surface environments. Earth-Sci Rev 131:1–21
Rossi M, Cubadda F, Dini L, Terranova ML, Aureli F, Sorbo A, Passeri D (2014) Scientific basis of nanotechnology, implications for the food sector and future trends. Trends Food Sci Technol 40:127–148
Sakamoto Y, Oba Y, Maki H, Suda M, Einaga Y, Sato T, Mizumaki M, Kawamura N, Suzuki M (2011) Ferromagnetism of Pt nanoparticles induced by surface chemisorption. Phys Rev B 83:4420
Sardari S, Soltani S, Mirzazadeh R (2013) Silicon nanocarrier for delivery of drug, pesticides and herbicides, and for waste water treatment. US 20130225412 A1. US 13/406,538
Servin A, Elmer W, Mukherjee A, De La Torre-Roche R, Hamdi H, White JC, Bindraban P, Dimkpa C (2015) A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J Nanopart Res 17:1–21
Sharma VK, Filip J, Zboril R, Varma RS (2015) Natural inorganic nanoparticles – formation, fate, and toxicity in the environment. Chem Soc Rev 44:8410–8423
Sielicki P, Janik H, Guzman A, Namiesnik J (2011) Particulate matters to be used as a standard monitoring method for air dust pollution. Crit Rev Anal Chem 41:314–334
Soto KF, Carrasco A, Powell TG, Garza KM, Murr LE (2005) Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of some manufactured nanoparticulate materials characterized by transmission electron microscopy. J Nanopart Res 7:145–169
Taillefert M, Lienemann CP, Gaillard JF, Perret D (2000) Speciation, reactivity, and cycling of Fe and Pb in a Meromictic lake. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:169–183
Tang SCN, Lo IMC (2013) Magnetic nanoparticles: essential factors for sustainable environmental applications. Water Res 47:2613–2632
Verma HC, Upadhyay C, Tripathi A, Tripathi RP, Bhandari N (2002) Thermal decomposition pattern and particle size estimation of iron minerals associated with the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary at Gubbio. Meteorit Planet Sci 37:901–909
Wang J, Yang LX, Fan Y, Wu Y, Zheng W, Zhao F (2005) Application of oxide nano rare earth. CN 1686957 A. China Patent Application CN 200510066394
Wang J, Yang LXS, Fan Y, Wu Y, Zheng W, Zhao F, Han X (2007) Application of hydroxide of nano rare earth. CN 1314629 C. CN 200510066392
Wang HF, Du LJ, Song ZM, Chen XX (2013) Progress in the characterization and safety evaluation of engineered inorganic nanomaterials in food. Nanomedicine 8:2007–2025
Wilson MA, Tran NH, Milev AS, Kannangara GSK, Volk H, Lu GQM (2008) Nanomaterials in soils. Geoderma 146:291–302
Wu X (2002) Active nano grade organic fine humic fertilizer and its production. CN 1472176 A. China Patent Application CN 02139321
Xia YS, Tang ZY (2012) Monodisperse hollow supraparticles via selective oxidation. Adv Funct Mater 22:2585–2593
Xu PA, Zeng GM, Huang DL, Feng CL, Hu S, Zhao MH, Lai C, Wei Z, Huang C, Xie GX, Liu ZF (2012) Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ 424:1–10
Yadav T, Mungray AA, Mungray AK (2014) Fabricated nanoparticles: current status and potential phytotoxic threats. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, New York
Yamamoto K, Otsuka H, Wada SI, Sohn D, Takahara A (2005) Preparation and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/imogolite hybrid via surface modification using phosphoric acid ester. Polymer 46:12386–12392
Ying X, Liu Y, Tian W (2012) Preparation of a nano long-acting selenium fertilizer. US 8246713 B2. US 12/879,813
Yu E (2005) Nano diatomite and zeolite ceramic crystal powder. US 20050115469 A1. US Patent Application US 10/351,518
Zhang FT (2004a) Production technology of coating cement for nanometer sulfonated lignin mixture fertilizer. CN 1164531 C. China Patent Application CN 02149247
Zhang FT (2004b) Production technology of nano-clay-polyester mixed polymer fertilizer coating cementing agent. CN 1171948 C. China Patent Application CN 02126009
Zhang F (2006a) Nano-micron foam plastic mixed polymer fertilizer adhesive coating agent preparation method. CN 1279095 C. China Patent Application CN 200410088477
Zhang FT (2006b) Nanometer-scale olefin-starch mixed polymer fertilizer envelope cementing agent production method. CN 1279074 C. CN 200310116857
Zhang ZY, He X, Zhang HF, Ma YH, Zhang P, Ding YY, Zhao YL (2011) Uptake and distribution of ceria nanoparticles in cucumber plants. Metallomics 3:816–822
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. (2017). Nanomaterial and Nanoparticle: Origin and Activity. In: Ghorbanpour, M., Manika, K., Varma, A. (eds) Nanoscience and Plant–Soil Systems. Soil Biology, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46835-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46835-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46833-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46835-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)