Abstract
The immune system is one of the most affected systems of the human body during spaceflights. The microbial environment of a spacecraft consists of numerous microorganisms, many of them pathogenic, as well as species with biodestructive properties. Biological contaminants may affect life support systems and hardware and cause material damage. During spaceflight conditions, enhanced microbial proliferation, increased virulence, and increased resistance to antibiotics were observed. The combination of a complex immune dysfunction with an altered endogenous microbial flora and particularly resistant and virulent bacteria can be considered as a significant risk for serious infections during long-term space missions.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
During spaceflights, the immune system is one of the most affected systems of the human body (Ullrich and Paulsen 2011). To determine the medical risks of long-term spaceflights and to develop prophylactic and therapeutic arrangements, it is important to know the microbial flora on board of a spacecraft or space station and its specific factors influencing this microflora. It is well known from several space missions that crew members suffered from bacterial and viral infections like influenza, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and B streptococci. Also on long-term habitation on space station Mir and ISS, astronauts suffered from acute airway infections, conjunctivitis, and dental infections, and also reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus was observed. An overview of microbial infections, pathogens, and general observations is given in Table 6.1. Figure 6.1 shows the variables impacting the risk of infections and their transmission during space travel, on which the following headings are related to.
2 Microbial Colonization of Spacecrafts
In an orbiting spacecraft, airborne microorganisms (and dust) do not settle due to the absence of gravity, and thermodiffusion or electrostatic forces gain in importance. This results in a more persistent (bio)aerosol and higher microbial contamination level in cabin air, and thus a continuous active removal of the aerosols from the air is necessary (Van Houdt et al. 2012).
On board of the Soviet space station Mir, several microbial studies were established during its operating time from 1986 to 2001 (Table 6.1). In one study, 58 forms of bacteria and 36 forms of mold and yeast forms were found, of which a significant part were pathogen microorganisms (Viktorov et al. 1992). Fungi types with material destructive properties were also identified. Another study found 108 types of bacteria and 206 types of fungi, again with many pathogen and/or material destructive types among them (Novikova 2004). Condensed water was contaminated with Serratia liquefaciens, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and even radioresistant bacteria (Ott et al. 2004). Examination of optically hazy condensed water from behind instrumental panels aboard of the Mir revealed enterobacteria, Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, Legionella sp., spirochetes, protozoa, and mites (Ott et al. 2004). Bacteriofungal associations primarily resided on surfaces and structural materials of space interiors and equipment which gather anthropogenic organic compounds and air condensate enough to allow a full vegetative cycle and reproduction of heterotrophic microorganisms and molds (Novikova 2004). The microbial loading dynamic did not have linearly progressing character within the isolated environment of the Mir, but it was a wavy process of alternations of the microflora with changes of the dominating species (Novikova 2004). Fluctuating alterations in solar activity, degree of radiation, and gradients of magnetic fields can be considered parameters capable of initiating quantitative variations in the microflora of the space station (Novikova 2004). Also the ISS is by now severely colonized by microorganisms (Table 6.1): a 6-year study about the microbial environment on board of the ISS revealed that Staphylococcus sp., Aspergillus sp., and Penicillium sp. within the breathing air, Sphingomonas sp. and Methylobacterium sp. within the water, and Staphylococcus sp., Aspergillus sp., and Cladosporium sp. on surfaces were dominating, respectively (Novikova et al. 2006). Examinations with cultivation-independent verification procedures revealed many gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms, Actinomyces and fungi (Ullrich and Paulsen 2011). Even within the drinking water, pathogenic microorganisms were found. The identified spectrum of bacterial and fungal species of the ISS was very similar to the spectrum on board the Mir (Table 6.1). Additionally, the main species of bacteria and fungi as found on 15-year-old Mir are the same as those on board of the space shuttle (Pierson 2001). It must be assumed that each and every spacecraft or station is microbially contaminated with comparable spectra as soon as it was in contact with human beings. This leads to the conclusion that the primary source of the contamination is neither the spacecraft nor the food or water brought along but mainly the endogen flora of the astronauts (Ullrich and Paulsen 2011) (Figs. 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5).
3 Alterations Within the Microflora of Crew Members
Investigations on crew members of the Apollo and Skylab missions and also on Soviet cosmonauts revealed that there were fundamental changes in the intestinal, oral, and nasal microflora under spaceflight conditions. Within the nasal flora, a decrease of apathogen and an increase of pathogen bacteria were found (Nefedov et al. 1971). The causation of this change can be found on the one hand by the crew members themselves, because under the condition of the isolation on board, an obviously considerable mutual exchange of microorganisms occurs between them. This exchange is not only affecting the upper respiratory tract but also intestinal bacteria (Taylor and Sommer 2005). The intestinal flora changes a lot, and after 2 weeks of space flight, the amount of detectable bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract is decreasing significantly (Taylor and Sommer 2005). The food on board could be a further reason, because the continuous consumption of sterilized, dehydrated nourishment leads to a rapid decrease in the amount of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and is therefore promoting the expansion of resistance against antimicrobial drugs and the infection with opportunistic agents (Taylor and Sommer 2005). The construction of spacecraft and components of space stations under clean room conditions is followed by a settlement of the flora brought in by the crew. This is proven by the fact that microorganisms in the air and on surfaces are derived from the crew members (Makimura et al. 2011).
4 Raised Resistance Under Space Flight Conditions
Space flight conditions seam to alter the properties of many microorganisms (Table 6.2): on board of spacecrafts, an enhancement of the microbial proliferation, an altered microbial flora, an increased virulence, and a decreased effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs can be reported (Juergensmeyer et al. 1999; Leys et al. 2004). The alteration of susceptibility or resistance to antibiotics is very different, and the resistance effect is quickly lost upon return to earth. Each bacterial species responds differently to the suite of antibiotics, frequently becoming less resistant but occasionally even more resistant to antibiotics (Juergensmeyer et al. 1999). Bacteria seem better to be able to protruse stressors like changes in osmolarity, pH, temperature, and antimicrobial substances in absence of gravity (Rosenzweig et al. 2010). In weightlessness, a thickening of the cell wall of bacteria could be observed, which showed reversible after returning to terrestrial environment. The decreased stress on surfaces of microorganisms in microgravity can directly alter gene expression and affect physiological functions. In Salmonella typhimurium, for example, mechanisms associated with microgravity are mediated by the RNA chaperone. Hfq is a global transcriptional regulator, which plays an important role in the translation in answer to “envelope stress” and environmental stress (Wilson et al. 2007; Crabbe et al. 2011) (see also chapter 1). This chaperone is evolutionary highly conserved and could absolutely be one of the basic principles of the molecular mediation of changes in gravity on cells. Hfq even represents the first spaceflight-induced regulator acting across bacterial species (Crabbe et al. 2011). In addition to the influence of gravity acting on microorganisms on board of a spacecraft, also high doses of cosmic rays do cause an increase in mutation frequency (Horneck et al. 2010). In general it can be said that space conditions may significantly increase the mutation frequency of certain genes in microorganisms (Su et al. 2013). Spaceflight conditions therefore lead most likely to increased proliferation and selection of bacteria that are better adapted to microgravity and to the special environment of a spacecraft or space station (Juergensmeyer et al. 1999; Leys et al. 2004). In addition to these processes of adaptation, the bacterial phenotype trained in weightlessness seems to be particularly resistant to environmental influences. Unlike human cells, such as cells of the immune system (Ullrich and Thiel 2012), bacteria seem to be well prepared for a life under space conditions.
5 Material Damage Due to Microbial Contamination
Not only human health is affected by the microbial flora on board, but also the spacecraft, equipment, and different materials can be colonized or even degraded or inhibited in function by fungi or bacterial biofilms. An overview is summarized in Table 6.1, contaminations and control mechanisms in the chapter about contamination monitoring and control. Among the proven microorganisms on the Mir were many species with biodestructive properties that significantly damaged the cabin interior, the plastic seals, cables, and lighting (Novikova 2004; Van Houdt et al. 2012; Viktorov et al. 1992). For example, an expansion of Penicillium chrysogenum was observed, a material degrading, and biodestructive fungus (Viktorov et al. 1998). Thin biofilms, which are able to degrade many materials occurring on the ISS, are mostly formed at interfaces (Gu et al. 1998). Bacteria organized in biofilms show a very solid resistance against antibiotics (Mah and O’Toole 2001).
6 Conclusion
The ultimate target and attraction to explore the universe remain in human beings to discover and experience space, despite the benefits of using robots. The spaceship or space station that will be the home for a quite long time for future astronauts and the understanding of its microbial environment play a crucial role in making any space intention a success (Nicogossian and Gaiser 1992).
References
Ball JR, Evans CH (2001) Safe passage: Astronaut care for exploration missions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Bolshakova O, Ullrich O (2012) Mikrobiologie an Bord von Raumfahrzeugen. Flugmedizin Tropenmedizin Reisemedizin 19(5):222–226
Bouloc P, D‘Ari R (1991) Escherichia coli metabolism in space (CNES). Erasmus Experiment Archive. ESA
Brown LR, Fromme WJ, Handler SF, Wheatcroft MG, Johnston DA (1976) Effect of Skylab missions on clinical and microbiologic aspects of oral health. J Am Dent Assoc 93(2):357–363
Cheng X, Xu X, Chen J, Zhou X, Cheng L, Li M, Li J, Wang R, Jia W, Li YQ (2014) Effects of simulated microgravity on Streptococcus mutans physiology and biofilm structure. FEMS Microbiol Lett 359(1):94–101. doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12573
Crabbe A, Schurr MJ, Monsieurs P, Morici L, Schurr J, Wilson JW, Ott CM, Tsaprailis G, Pierson DL, Stefanyshyn-Piper H, Nickerson CA (2011) Transcriptional and proteomic responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to spaceflight conditions involve Hfq regulation and reveal a role for oxygen. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(4):1221–1230. doi:10.1128/AEM.01582-10
Decelle JG, Taylor GR (1976) Autoflora in the upper respiratory tract of Apollo astronauts. Appl Environ Microbiol 32(5):659–665
Fukuda T, Fukuda K, Takahashi A, Ohnishi T, Nakano T, Sato M, Gunge N (2000) Analysis of deletion mutations of the rpsL gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae detected after long-term flight on the Russian space station Mir. Mutat Res 470(2):125–132
Gu JD, Roman M, Esselman T, Mitchell R (1998) The role of microbial biofilms in deterioration of space station candidate materials. Int Biodeter Biodegr 41(1):25–33
Harada K (2001) Microflora investigation experiment. Uchu Seibutsu Kagaku 15 Suppl:S190
Horneck G, Klaus DM, Mancinelli RL (2010) Space microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74(1):121–156. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00016-09
Ilyin VK (2005) Microbiological status of cosmonauts during orbital spaceflights on Salyut and Mir orbital stations. Acta Astronaut 56(9–12):839–850
Juergensmeyer MA, Juergensmeyer EA, Guikema JA (1999) Long-term exposure to spaceflight conditions affects bacterial response to antibiotics. Microgravity Sci Technol 12(1):41–47
Klaus DM, Howard HN (2006) Antibiotic efficacy and microbial virulence during space flight. Trends Biotechnol 24(3):131–136
La Duc MT, Kern R, Venkateswaran K (2004) Microbial monitoring of spacecraft and associated environments. Microb Ecol 47(2):150–158. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-1012-0
Lapchine L, Moatti N, Gasset G, Richoilley G, Templier J, Tixador R (1986) Antibiotic activity in space. Drugs Exp Clin Res 12(12):933–938
Lencner AA, Lencner CP, Mikelsaar ME, Tjuri ME, Toom MA, Valjaots ME, Silov VM, Liz’ko NN, Legenkov VI, Reznikov IM (1984) The quantitative composition of the intestinal lactoflora before and after space flights of different lengths. Nahrung 28(6–7):607–613
Leys NM, Hendrickx L, De Boever P, Baatout S, Mergeay M (2004) Space flight effects on bacterial physiology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 18(2):193–199
Mah TF, O’Toole GA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol 9(1):34–39
Makimura K, Satoh K, Sugita T, Yamazaki T (2011) Fungal biota in manned space environment and impact on human health. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi 66(1):77–82
Mermel LA (2012) Infection prevention and control during prolonged human space travel. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):123–130
Nefedov YG, Shilov VM, Konstantinova IV, Zaloguyev SN (1971) Microbiological and immunological aspects of extended manned space flights. Life Sci Space Res 9:11–16
Nickerson CA, Ott CM, Mister SJ, Morrow BJ, Burns-Keliher L, Pierson DL (2000) Microgravity as a novel environmental signal affecting Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium virulence. Infect Immun 68(6):3147–3152
Nicogossian AE, Gaiser KK (1992) The space life sciences strategy for the 21st century. Acta Astronaut 26(6):459–465
Novikova N (2004) Review of the knowledge of microbial contamination of the Russian manned spacecraft. Microb Ecol 47(2):127–132. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-1055-2
Novikova N, De Boever P, Poddubko S, Deshevaya E, Polikarpov N, Rakova N, Coninx I, Mergeay M (2006) Survey of environmental biocontamination on board the International Space Station. Res Microbiol 157(1):5–12. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2005.07.010
Ott CM, Bruce RJ, Pierson DL (2004) Microbial characterization of free floating condensate aboard the Mir space station. Microb Ecol 47(2):133–136. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-1038-3
Pierson DL (2001) Microbial contamination of spacecraft. Gravit Space Biol Bull 14(2):1–6
Pierson DL, Stowe RP, Phillips TM, Lugg DJ, Mehta SK (2005) Epstein-Barr virus shedding by astronauts during space flight. Brain Behav Immun 19(3):235–242. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2004.08.001
Rosenzweig JA, Abogunde O, Thomas K, Lawal A, Nguyen YU, Sodipe A, Jejelowo O (2010) Spaceflight and modeled microgravity effects on microbial growth and virulence. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(4):885–891. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2237-8
Sonnenfeld G (2002) The immune system in space and microgravity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(12):2021–2027. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000039073.04569.B5
Su L, Chang D, Liu C (2013) The development of space microbiology in the future: the value and significance of space microbiology research. Future Microbiol 8(1):5–8. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.127
Taylor PW, Sommer AP (2005) Towards rational treatment of bacterial infections during extended space travel. Int J Antimicrob Agents 26(3):183–187. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.06.002
Tixador R, Richoilley G, Gasset G, Planel H, Moatti N, Lapchine L, Enjalbert L, Raffin J, Bost R, Zaloguev SN, Bragina MP, Moroz AF, Antsiferova NG, Kirilova FM (1985) Preliminary results of Cytos 2 experiment. Acta Astronaut 12(2):131–134
Tixador R, Gasset G, Eche B, Moatti N, Lapchine L, Woldringh C, Toorop P, Moatti JP, Delmotte F, Tap G (1992) Studies on penetration of antibiotic in bacterial cells in space conditions. Erasmus Experiment Archive. ESA
Ullrich O, Paulsen K (2011) Funktion des Immunsystems in Schwerelosigkeit – Von Astronauten für die Erde lernen. Flug Reisemedizin (18):118–122
Ullrich O, Thiel C (2012) Gravitational Force: Triggered Stress in Cells of the Immune System. In: Chouker A (ed) Stress Challenges and Immunity in Space. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 187–202. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22272-6_14
Van den Ende H, Van den Briel W (1997) Changes in dividing Chlamydomonas monoica cells caused by microgravity (ALGAE 3). Erasmus Experiment Archive. ESA
Van Houdt R, Mijnendonckx K, Leys N (2012) Microbial contamination monitoring and control during human space missions. Planet Space Sci 60(1):115–120. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.09.001
Viktorov AN, Novikova ND, Deshevaia EA (1992) The cabin microflora of manned space vehicles and the problem of the biological destruction of the construction materials used in them. Aviakosm Ekolog Med 26(3):41–48
Viktorov AN, Novikova ND, Deshevaia EA, Bragina MP, Shnyreva AV, Sizova TP, D’Iakov Iu T (1998) Residential colonization of orbital complex “Mir” environment by penicillium chrysogenum and problem of ecological safety in long-term space flight. Aviakosm Ekolog Med 32(5):57–62
Wilson JW, Ott CM, Honer zu Bentrup K, Ramamurthy R, Quick L, Porwollik S, Cheng P, McClelland M, Tsaprailis G, Radabaugh T, Hunt A, Fernandez D, Richter E, Shah M, Kilcoyne M, Joshi L, Nelman-Gonzalez M, Hing S, Parra M, Dumars P, Norwood K, Bober R, Devich J, Ruggles A, Goulart C, Rupert M, Stodieck L, Stafford P, Catella L, Schurr MJ, Buchanan K, Morici L, McCracken J, Allen P, Baker-Coleman C, Hammond T, Vogel J, Nelson R, Pierson DL, Stefanyshyn-Piper HM, Nickerson CA (2007) Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(41):16299–16304. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707155104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work is based on the article
Olga Bolshakova and Oliver Ullrich (2012) Mikrobiologie an Bord von Raumfahrzeugen. Flugmedizin · Tropenmedizin · Reisemedizin 19 (5):222–226
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lauber, B.A., Bolshakova, O., Ullrich, O. (2016). Spacecraft Microbiology. In: The Immune System in Space: Are we prepared?. SpringerBriefs in Space Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41466-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41466-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41464-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41466-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)