Abstract
Soil is defined as weathered rock material consisting of organic substances, minerals, air and water. Soil being a dynamic and large habitat sustains the growth of numerous organisms and endows us with innumerable functions. Soil can therefore be considered as a multi-habitat ecosystem rather than just a component of any ecosystem. Owing to its enormously high physical and chemical heterogeneity, soil hosts a multifaceted and varied biological community which offers myriad services to us. Right from soil formation to its management, soil community helps in weathering, nutrient cycling, water cycling, supporting agriculture, regulating climate, maintaining fertility and remediating the contaminants present in soil. However, anthropogenic activities like intensive agriculture, use of excessive chemicals and deforestation have significantly affected the soils and associated communities. Soil is the major hub of nutrients and water supply that directly govern the growth, nutrient status and productivity of crops thereby indirectly influencing the human health. Therefore, in order to maintain the proper functioning of soil and its community, soil restoration is the need of the hour. This requires reducing the use massive machinery for agricultural and other purposes, shifting to organic farming, syncing nutrient release and water availability with requirement of plants and monitoring the biological activity.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Soils are a naturally produced intricate system made up of biotic and abiotic components that serve as the fundamental habitat for biological diversity and processes as well as a source of delivering a variety of ecosystem functions. The formation of soils takes place at the point of intersection of the lithosphere, biosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere. The pedosphere (soil mantle of the Earth), which is made up of mineral, fluid, gaseous and biological elements, works as a facilitator of biogeochemical transformations and fluxes into and out of the contiguous spheres. Soils seem to be the most diverse natural material on the Earth and perhaps most crucial for human life because they impact food availability and its quality, purify and deposit water, detoxify pollutants and bring minerals and chemicals into human contact. Soils control most of the ecological processes in ecosystems and are home to a huge percentage of the world’s biodiversity, and provide the structural foundation for a variety of human activities as well. Soils are a physically and chemically multifaceted ecosystem that supports a diverse microbiological and faunal taxonomic community. 109–1010 prokaryotic cells (bacteria and archaea), 104–107 protists, ∼100 m of fungal hyphae and 108–109 viruses can be found in 1 g of surface soil (Srinivasiah et al., 2008, Bates et al., 2013; Bardgett & Van der Putten, 2014; Brady & Weil, 2014). In some soils, these values equate to prokaryotic biomass surpassing 5 tonnes per hectare, while fungal biomass ranges from 1 to 15 tonnes (Brady & Weil, 2014). These diverse communities of organisms perform vital roles in maintaining soil and ecosystem function, offering a slew of advantages to planetary cycles and human survival.
Numerous ecosystem activities are supported by the activities and dynamic interplay among soil organisms. Due to the several critical functions that soil performs, it is unquestionably one of the most important and strategic resources. Soil plays a pivotal role in (i) providing food, fibre and fuel; (ii) decay and decomposition of organic matter; (iii) recycling of vital nutrients; (iv) bioremediation of organic pollutants; (v) carbon capture and storage; (vi) regulation of water quality and its replenishment and (vii) habit formation for a wide range of organisms (Yang et al., 2020). Soil functions are dependent on soil features and interactions and are influenced by the use and management of soil. Various natural processes such as landslides and erosion diminish soil nutrients and biodiversity, eventually leading to soil degradation which poses a grave worldwide threat to food security and ecosystem sustainability (Godfray et al., 2010; Montgomery, 2010; Oldeman, 1998). Aside from this, anthropogenic activities such as the overuse of fertilizers and heavy equipment for agricultural purpose, livestock overgrazing and deforestation endanger the soil ecosystem’s long-term sustainability. On a human life scale, soil is generally recognized as a non-renewable resource, since its recovery is an exceedingly sluggish process once it gets depleted (Camarsa et al., 2014; Lal, 2015). Considering the significance of soils for agriculture and livestock production, as well as delivering broader ecosystem services to local and global communities, retaining them in immaculate condition is crucial. In order to wisely manage the use of agricultural soils, decision-makers require science-based, convenient and cost-effective methods to analyze changes in soil quality and function.
2 Soil Organisms and Interlinkages Between Them
Soil harbors extremely rich and diversified biological community due to its exceptionally high physical and chemical variability at microscale and microclimatic properties that can support the establishment and maintenance of an enormously large number of niches (Tiedje et al., 2001; Ettema & Wardle, 2002). Based on their size, soil organisms are broadly classified as: microflora (1–100 μm, e.g. bacteria, fungi), microfauna (5–120 μm, e.g. protozoa, nematodes), mesofauna (80 μm–2 mm, e.g. collembola, acari) and macrofauna (500 μm–50 mm, e.g. earthworms, termites (Wall et al., 2001). The basic food web structure in soil is comparable to other food webs in that it also contains primary producers, consumers and detritivores, as in other food webs (Fig. 1). From the bottom to the top of the food chain, the number of soil organisms and their biomass per volume decreases by orders of magnitude. Soil food webs are perhaps more complex than other food webs, have longer food chains and greater cases of omnivory. Further, all fauna depend on primary producers (e.g. for litter). Debris of plants and other organic substances serves as habitat for soil organisms. Plants directly affect soil biota by producing organic matter above- and belowground and also indirectly influence soil organisms by providing them with shade, soil protection and source of water and nutrients. Energy and nutrients obtained by plants are ultimately integrated into detritus, which serves as the base of resources for a complicated soil food web.
Soil macrofauna disintegrate dead organic substance into smaller fragments, allowing soil bacteria and fungus to begin its degradation and convert it in the form of inorganic nutrients required for plant growth. This is followed by mineralization which is continued by organisms such as protozoa and nematodes that feed on bacteria and fungus, which are then eaten by first- and higher-order carnivores. Even in a distinct trophic classification, some species can be found “breaking the rules”. Collembolans, for example, which are widely thought to consume fungus, include few species that feed on nematodes instead (Chamberlain et al., 2005). Studies indicate that soil ecosystems can have long and stable food chains unlike the other ecosystems which can generally sustain very small food chains. Digel et al. (2014), for example, evaluated food webs in 48 different forest soils comprising 89–168 species and discovered 729–3344 various feeding linkages. Unfortunately, our existing knowledge of trophic interactions is insufficient, and we require a more precise picture of the abundance and characteristics of prospective consumers at various trophic levels. For instance, viruses and enchytraeids are frequently overlooked out of these food web studies, and only mites and nematodes can be divided in distinct groups while diverse ecological groups of earthworms and collembolans are normally left out. This is significant since the presence or absence of a particular food source may alter the overall understanding of the soil food webs. Our understanding of nutrient cycles and flow of energy in the soil community and the linkage between dynamics of soil food chain and agro-ecosystem stability has been aided by soil food web analysis (Susilo et al., 2004; Van der Putten et al., 2004). Several obstacles are now inhibiting our ability to fully comprehend the performance of soil food webs, including (i) redundant nature of organisms (i.e. various organisms depending on same food source) and complement functional groups (Setala et al., 2005), (ii) the ability of certain soil organisms to keep changing their feeding sources or show diverse rate of feeding throughout their lifetime and (iii) density-dependent impacts on their feeding behavior (Kaneda & Kaneko, 2008). To offer a more realistic estimate of energy fluxes across the different trophic levels, they must all be included in food web analysis.
3 Ecosystem Services Provided by Soil and Soil Organisms
The organisms dwelling in the soil provide a number of functions to the other biota (Fig. 2). Services provided by soil organisms can broadly be classified into regulatory, supporting and provisional.
3.1 Regulating Services
Few of the regulatory services delivered by soil microorganisms chiefly involve the functions that ensure regulation of climate, water management and purification, disease and pest control and bioremediation of pollutants.
3.1.1 Climate Regulation
The biggest store of terrestrial carbon (C) reserves in the world is soil. Soils are a significant component of the global carbon cycle, containing both soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC). Soil biodiversity is widely known for its function in limiting greenhouse gas emissions and regulating soil carbon storage (Jackson et al., 2017; de Graaff et al., 2015). The balance of C in soils is influenced by the interaction between climate, plant diversity and biodiversity of soil (Allison et al., 2010; Schimel & Schaeffer, 2012), and the short- and long-term fluxes and movements of carbon in and out of soils are ultimately controlled by the soil community.(Crowther et al., 2019). Litter breakdown and greenhouse gas emissions are also influenced by the soil community. Soil fauna enhance the surface area of litter by shredding leaves, which boosts the rate of its decomposition by microbes (Moore et al., 2004). The activity of earthworms can both stabilize soil C (Zhang et al., 2013) and augment greenhouse gas emissions (Lubbers et al., 2013) depending on the climate and conditions of local ecosystem.
3.1.2 Water Purification
Soil serves as a water purifier and reservoir, cleansing water as it flows through the soil and storing it for plant absorption. Better water infiltration also gives plants and soil organisms some additional opportunities to utilize dissolved and suspended nutrients like phosphates and nitrates, thereby lowering nutrient run-off into surface and groundwater. Phosphates and nitrates are recycled within terrestrial systems by the metabolic activity of soil microbes, which limits their export to aquatic systems (Elizabeth et al., 2020). Microorganisms play an important part in the filtration of water as it flows through soil because of their ability to breakdown a variety of pollutants. As an example, Rhodococcus wratislaviensis, a herbicide-degrading bacterium, has been found in soil as well as in groundwater samples that are contaminated with terbuthylazine indicating that it has the ability to detoxify contaminated soil and water systems. Additionally, soil microbes also have the ability to affect the quality and amount of soil organic matter, which can have an indirect effect on the rate of water infiltration (Turbé et al., 2010).
3.1.3 Disease and Pest Control
Biotic and abiotic components of soil can effectively inhibit plant diseases that are caused by soil-borne pathogens such as bacteria, filamentous fungus and oomycetes (Baker & Cook, 1974). Microbiota regulates the quality of soil organic matter (SOM) and availability of nutrients for plants growing in the respective soil, which is quite imperative for soil health maintenance (O’Donnell et al., 2005; Kibblewhite et al., 2008). Suppressive behavior is an inherent property of soil, which is widely recognized as a management technique for obtaining maximum agricultural output levels and ensuring low ecological footprints in systems that use intensive cropping techniques in presence of strong pathogen load (Kariuki et al., 2015). The biological activity of soil bacteria is thought to be the main mechanism driving this suppressive property of soil. Few examples of microorganisms that help in controlling of diseases include bacteria e.g. Bacillus and Pseudomonas, actinomycetes like Streptomyces and filamentous fungi such as Trichoderma, Fusarium and Aspergillus, which can elicit all mechanisms related to disease suppression and control.
3.1.4 Biodegradation of Organic Waste
One of the most serious risks to soil functions is pollution. Improper and unmanaged disposal of waste, industrial and mining activities, oil spills and agricultural practices are the main contributors of soil pollution. Microbial remediation of pollutants is recognized as a quick and cost-effective method that employs an extensive range of microbes to absorb organic contaminants as their carbon or nitrogen sources to support their growth (Chen et al., 2013; Mahmoud, 2016; Ortiz-Hernandez et al., 2018; Siles & Margesin, 2018; Zhan et al., 2018; Bhatt et al., 2020a). To support their growth and metabolic activity, microorganisms also use xenobiotic substances found in soil as their carbon or nitrogen sources (Mishra et al., 2021). Few examples of soil microorganisms involved in bioremediation of soil pollutants are bacteria like Pseudomonas, Alcaligenes, Microbacterium, Methanospirillum, Bacillus, Sphingobium and Rhodococcus, fungi such as Aspergillus, Penecillium, Trichoderma and Fusarium and yeasts like Pichia, Candida, Aureobasidium and Exophiala (Sathishkumar et al., 2008; Nzila, 2013; Sunita et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2017; Bharadwaj, 2018; Yang et al., 2018a, b; Yu et al., 2019; Bhatt et al., 2020b). However, interaction between ecological parameters such as soil salinity, pH, temperature, carbon and nitrogen sources available and moisture content have significant impact on microbial biodegradation capacity (Megharaj & Naidu, 2010; Wu et al., 2014a, b; Bhatt et al., 2019).
3.2 Supporting Services
Supporting services are additional services which are not directly used by humans but are required for sustenance of ecosystem functioning. Soil microbial communities are involved in providing several supporting services such soil formation, nutrient and water cycling and primary production. In order to support and sustain plant growth, soil needs to be fertile and ensure sufficient supply of nutrients and adequate recycling of organic matter. Various species of bacteria and fungi are involved in the activities that lead to the breaking down and mineralization of nutrients and their cycling in the atmosphere. Soil microorganisms are identified as crucial drivers of plant diversity and primary production, and restoration of degraded terrestrial ecosystems can be done through manipulation of soil communities using microbes (Wubs et al., 2016). A large portion of microbial diversity stimulates plant productivity through a variety of microbial methods. A variety of bacterial species including members of the Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes genus have the ability to produce organic chemicals that affect plant root system proliferation (Haas & Defago, 2005; Doornbos et al., 2011). Soil microorganisms also help in nitrogen fixation. Symbiotic bacteria e.g. Rhizobium sp. and Frankia sp. and free-living bacteria such as Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Bacillus and Klebsiella spp. and some Cyanobacteria species notably add to atmospheric N fixation. Furthermore, numerous bacterial sp. like Pseudomonas, Frankia and Streptomyces and fungal sp. like Aspergillus have demonstrated the capability to create iron-chelating chemicals, hence boosting iron availability for plants. Siderophore-producing Streptomyces species have shown promise in biofertilization and microbial remediation of metal-contaminated soils (Dimkpa et al., 2008). Drought, excessive soil salinity, harsh temperatures, nutrient inadequacy and heavy metal toxicity can all be alleviated through plant–rhizobacteria interactions (Dimkpa et al., 2009). Identification of salt-and drought-tolerant microorganisms could be very useful in overcoming yield losses owing to water constraint around the world (Ali et al., 2014; Forni et al., 2017).
3.3 Provisioning Services
Provisioning services of soil refers to products formed by soil ecosystem services that can be brought to use by humans. Provisioning services encompass food, water, fibre, fuel, genetic resources, drugs and pharmaceuticals, all of which are derived from ecosystems. Soil bacteria are responsible for several of the benefits that soils offer to humans, including food production. This valuable soil service is produced by a healthy relationship between plants, microbes and soil, and humans rely on it for survival.
Many soil microbes assist the plants in obtaining inaccessible nutrients by transforming them into plant-available forms in exchange for energy from their host (Ango & Abdu, 2021). Several beneficial bacteria and fungi encourage plant growth by producing metabolites or by interacting physically with the host plant (Bender et al., 2016; Ragnarsdottir et al., 2015; Hayes & Krause, 2019). Antimicrobial agents and enzymes are also produced by soil microorganisms which are exploited in the field of biotechnology. Actinomycetes are one of the most abundant microbial groupings in the soil in nature. Species Streptomyces and Micromonospora are accountable for derivation of about 80% of the world’s antibiotics (Sudha et al., 2011; Hassan et al., 2011; Brevik et al., 2020). Additionally, microbes can also be utilized to make bio-ethanol, biodiesel and bio-methane, which are all next-generation biofuels (Singh, 2015; Singh & Seneviratne, 2017; Peralta-Yahya & Keasling, 2010; Medipally et al., 2015).
4 Anthropogenic Activities Affecting Soil Community and Processes
4.1 Soil Pollutants
Maintenance of soil health and resilience to external conditions requires a healthy soil microbial community. Pollution has a significant impact on the growth and functioning of microorganisms, as well as the makeup and variety of the community in a soil ecosystem (Chen et al., 2014). Widespread incidence of organic pollution and its negative consequences have piqued popular interest. Many contaminants make their way to the soil, where they tend to accumulate over time, disrupting the soil ecosystem and processes.
4.1.1 Heavy Metals
Heavy metals, namely copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn), garnered considerable attention due to their toxic and persistent nature and their tendency to bio-accumulate in ecosystems (Gan et al., 2017). While some of the heavy metals function as micronutrients for plants and are also required by microorganisms to maintain biological activities, copious amounts of heavy metals cause bio-toxicity, restrict microbial activity and disrupt the composition of soil community (Choppala et al., 2014; Khan et al., 2007). Heavy metals have the potential to alter the abundance and richness of microorganisms. (Tipayno et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019). Soil microorganisms can also interact with heavy metals and affect metal functional groups, resulting either in their mobilization (by dissolving, leaching or transforming them) or in their immobilization (by organic-metal binding and precipitation) (Gadd, 2004).
4.1.2 Antibiotics
Antibiotics are complex substances having different functional groups in their chemical structures and are categorized into several classes depending on their mode of action. Since most antibiotics are not entirely metabolized in the bodies of humans and animals, a significant amount of them is disposed into soil and water via municipal wastewater, livestock manure, sewage and organic wastes. (Bouki et al., 2013; Daghrir & Drogui, 2013; Wu et al., 2014a, b). Several studies have found that even low concentrations of antibiotics can alter a variety of soil processes facilitated by microbes. Soils containing sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine and trimethoprim demonstrated a significant reduction in soil respiration (SR) (Kotzerke et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2009) Antibiotic exposure is known to have an effect on nitrification and/or denitrification rates, and the effects are dependent on the type of antibiotic and the time of exposure. Antibiotics may also alter the rate of iron turnover in soil (Toth et al., 2011).
4.1.3 Agrochemicals
Agrochemical is a broad term used to define the chemical substances used for agricultural purposes, which comprise of pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, growth agents and raw manures. These agrochemicals may boost agricultural yields, but their widespread usage poses a significant harm to the environment, particularly soil biology. Some pesticides can disrupt association between plants and rhizobia, reducing the critical mechanism of biological nitrogen fixation. Pesticide-contaminated soils can also inactivate phosphorus-solublizing and nitrogen-fixing potential of bacteria (Hussain et al., 2009a, b). A substantial variation in microbial population has been detected between soils that were treated with pesticides and untreated ones, indicating that indiscriminate application of pesticides in the soil leads to reduction in microbial population and even their extinction (Ubuoh et al., 2012). Pesticides also affect microbial and enzymatic activities that underlie soil biochemical processes. (Demanou et al., 2004). In the literature, adverse effects of the use of agrochemicals on enzymatic activity of soil microbes have also been observed (Kalam et al., 2004; Menon et al., 2005; Gil-Sotres et al., 2005; Hussain et al., 2009a, b).
4.2 Intensive Agricultural Practices
One of the most prominent challenges of the twenty-first century is agricultural expansion. To keep up with the world’s growing population, the total area under cultivation has been expanded by nearly 500% in the previous decades (FAO, 2018), with a 700% increase in fertilizer consumption and a several-fold increase in the use of agrochemicals (Tilman et al., 2002). Agricultural intensification has raised an extensive range of environmental concerns like chemical accumulation in soil and their leaching leading to groundwater eutrophication, increase in emissions of greenhouse gases, degradation of soil quality and soil erosion (Bender et al., 2016). Microbial communities play an indispensable role in ecosystems and render a wide range of services (Wall et al., 2001; Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2016; Graham et al., 2016). Inadequate nutrient efficiency, increase in the amount of greenhouse gas emissions, groundwater eutrophication, loss of soil quality and soil erosion are all issues that have arisen as a result of agricultural intensification (Bender et al., 2016). Agricultural intensification, which involves high resource usage and limited crop diversification, can have an impact on soil- and plant-associated bacteria, as well as ecosystem services (de Vries et al., 2013). Current agricultural methods in many developing countries follow unsustainable practices, resulting in a massive volume of hazardous effluents being discharged directly or indirectly into the soil (Yanez et al., 2002). The introduction of nanotechnology and nanomaterials has complicated the picture of soil inputs and degradation even further (Mishra et al., 2017, 2018). Currently, numerous chemical fertilizers are used in an indiscriminate manner (Meena et al., 2016), causing harm to the soil biota. Furthermore, heavy machinery is a substantial contributor to soil compaction and change. Soil compaction reduces porosity, limiting oxygen and water delivery to soil microbes and plants, resulting in detrimental effects on soil ecology and forest productivity. Compaction has major repercussions in terms of runoff and erosion of the top soil, especially when restricted in ruts. In compacted soils, regeneration can be hampered or even blocked for lengthy periods of time, resulting in a significant reduction in microbial diversity in the soil and a negative impact on soil functioning.
4.3 Desertification
Desertification is a term used to describe the degradation of land in arid, semi-arid and sub-humid environments as a result of a variety of factors such as climatic changes and human activity. Desertification is mostly caused by overgrazing in many parts of the world. Other causes that contribute to desertification include urbanization, climate change, groundwater overdraft, deforestation, natural catastrophes and agricultural tillage practices. Desertification is one of the world’s most serious social, economic and environmental problems. Total area impacted by desertification currently is 6–12 million km2, and about 1–6% of residents live in these desertified areas (World Bank, 2009). The process of desertification introduces a significant alteration in the dominant species of the community, plant community structure and landscape pattern change. Desertification results in deficiency of several nutrients which also diminishes the carbon and nitrogen sources of microbes living in the soil, therefore hugely affecting their survival and decreasing their richness. As a result of which, the overall quality of soil deteriorates and soil functioning is severely affected.
5 Practices to Manage Soil and Achieve Optimum Functionality of Soil Community
Diverse, interacting forces shape soil microbial populations. Crop rotation, fertilizer and tillage practices all modify the physicochemical properties of soil, thereby influencing the variety and composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities (Francioli et al., 2016). Therefore, management of soil nutrients, promoting organic farming, practicing no tillage, using biological pest control methods etc. can hugely help in the maintenance of soil microbial community and ensuring soil sustainability.
5.1 Managing Soil Nutrients
Agricultural management influences microbial community composition and structure and their function of nutrient-cycling by establishing soil physicochemical features. Organic fertilizers improve soil microbial diversity and heterogeneity (Lupatini et al., 2017), and the bacterial and fungal community structure of organically managed soil systems is markedly different from that of conventional systems. (Francioli et al., 2016; Mader et al., 2002; Li et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2016). Organic fertilizers play a critical role in accumulation of soil organic matter and aggregate formation and hugely influence the composition of microbial community and their co-occurrence in microhabitats. Microbial communities provide nitrogen to plants in available forms through biological N fixation and mineralization of organic forms, and also limit N losses by immobilizing it in soil organic matter. The abundance, diversity and activity of soil microorganisms is hugely modified by the organic inputs such as compost and cover crop residues used for agriculture purpose (Li et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2010), while synthetic fertilizers mostly result in increased abundance of Acidobacteria (Francioli et al., 2016) and decrease the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (Muema et al., 2016). Synthetic fertilizers may affect microbial community structure by changing the soil pH and acidifying the soil, thereby indirectly increasing the abundance of acid-tolerant taxa. Modification in the structure and activity of microbial communities present in soil influences not only the rates but also the outcomes of agriculturally and environmentally important N-cycling processes like denitrification (Bhowmik et al., 2017).
5.2 Tillage Practices
No-tillage practices aid soil conservation by limiting the disturbance in soil and resulting negative carbon (C) mineralization, thereby acting as a C sink rather than being a source of carbon. In comparison to tillage systems, no tillage practice allows residue storage in soil itself, which provides additional benefits to the soil such as better soil fertility, minimized erosion and increased accessible moisture (West & Post, 2002; Lal, 2004; Franzluebbers, 2005). White and Rice (2007) concluded that in comparison to conventionally tilled soils, no-tillage soils showed higher microbial abundance. Crop rotation method and bio-covers can cause alterations in archaeal and bacterial composition and abundance (White & Rice, 2007). Agricultural conservation methods like crop rotations, animal manures and cover crops are said to preserve and enhance soil quality for long-term increase in agricultural output (DeBruyn et al., 2011). Cropping sequence diversity and crop rotations are also important factors in bacterial assemblages and species richness. Soybeans and legume cover crops with high protein content are said to create more fragile residues than cereals with a high C:N ratio, such as maize (Sarrantonio & Gallandt, 2003). In addition, increased diversity of cropping sequence and cover crops sustain more microbial biomass and encourage more fungal-based community structures, resulting in higher amounts of microbially derived organic matter (Six et al., 2006).
5.3 Biological Pest Management
Biopesticides are naturally occurring compounds that can be obtained from microorganisms, plants or other naturally occurring products to provide pest control (Lacey & Gerorgis, 2012). Biopesticides are important components of pest management strategies that aim to provide better and more environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional pesticides while avoiding soil pollution and contamination and preserving soil microbial ecosystems. While pathogenic microorganism-based biopesticides are particular to a target pest, biopesticides derived from beneficial interactors are a superior and more environmentally friendly option. Furthermore, unlike conventional chemical pesticides, biopesticides do not affect the ecosystem or soil bacteria (Gupta & Dikshit, 2010). Active substances released by several plants are also used as biocontrol agents. For example, strigolactones (a sesquiterpene) production promotes symbiotic associations by attracting Glomeromycota mycorrhizal fungi (Akiyama & Hayashi, 2006). The legumes produce flavonoids, which act as signalling molecules, attracting N-fixing bacteria to the rhizospheric zone and allowing rhizobial symbioses to form (Pathan et al., 2018). The release of organic acids by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) benefits other soil microbes. For example, tomato roots emit citric and fumaric acids, which attract Pseudomonas fluorescence (Gupta, 2003). Another good example of a biopesticide is neem cake oil, which provides critical sustenance for soil microbes and enhances soil physicochemical qualities while also controlling a variety of pests (Gopal et al., 2007).
6 Conclusion
Soils support a diverse microbiological and faunal taxonomic community, which contributes to a wide range of ecosystem services that are critical for long-term viability of natural and agricultural ecosystems. These services have been classified as those related to the provision of products, the regulation of ecological processes and supporting services. The intricacy of demonstrating soil food webs under field conditions has been a major stumbling block to fully appreciating the contributions of soil microorganisms to soil processes and ecosystem services. As new analytical techniques and instruments become available, there is a continual need to identify, investigate and manage additional groupings of soil biota. For a better understanding of the links between soil biodiversity, their functioning and ecosystem services provided by them, multidimensional approaches that integrate new and existing information are required. However, there are also several natural and anthropogenic activities that pose serious threat to the survival of soil community, thereby hindering the ecosystem services provided by them. Therefore, there is also a pressing need to introduce and expand soil conservation methods in order to ensure appropriate soil functioning and long-term sustainability.
References
Akiyama, K., & Hayashi, H. (2006). Strigolactones: Chemical signals for fungal symbionts and parasitic weeds in plantroots. Annals of Botany, 97, 925–931.
Ali, S. Z., Sandhya, V., & Venkateswar Rao, L. (2014). Isolation and characterization of drought- tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Annales de Microbiologie, 64, 493–502.
Allison, S. D., Wallenstein, M. D., & Bradford, M. A. (2010). Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbialphysiology. Nature Geoscience, 3, 336–340.
Ango, Z., & Abdu, I. (2021). Microbial contributions to provisioning service of soil. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 7, 7.
Baker, K., & Cook, R. J. (1974). Biological control of plant pathogens. Freeman WH Publisher.
Bardgett, R. D., & Van der Putten, W. H. (2014). Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature, 515, 505–511.
Bates, S. T., Clemente, J. C., Flores, G. E., et al. (2013). Global biogeography of highly diverse protistan communities in soil. The ISME Journal, 7, 652–659.
Bender, S. F., Wagg, C., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2016). An underground revolution: Biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 440–452.
Bharadwaj, A. (2018). Bioremediation of xenobiotics: An eco-friendly cleanup approach. In V. S. Parmar, P. Malhotra, & D. Mathur (Eds.), Green chemistry in environmental sustainability and chemical education (pp. 1–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8390-7_1
Bhatt, P., Huang, Y., Hui, Z., & Chen, S. (2019). Insights into microbial applications for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb201901778
Bhatt, P., Joshi, T., Bhatt, K., Zhang, W., Huang, Y., & Chen, S. (2020a). Binding interaction of glyphosate with glyphosate oxidoreductase and C–P lyase: Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat2020124927
Bhatt, P., Rene, E. R., Kumar, A. J., Zhang, W., & Chen, S. (2020b). Binding interaction of allethrin with esterase: Bioremediation potential and mechanism. Bioresource Technology, 315, 123845. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbiortech2020123845
Bhowmik, A., Cloutier, M., Ball, E., & Bruns, M. A. (2017). Underexplored microbial metabolisms for enhanced nutrient recycling in agricultural soils. Aims Microbiology, 3, 826–845.
Bouki, C., Venieri, D., & Diamadopoulos, E. (2013). Detection and fate of antibiotic resistant bacteria in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 91, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/jecoenv201301016
Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2014). The nature and properties of soils. Pearson Education.
Brevik, E. C., Lindsey, S., Bal, R. S., Joshua, J. S., David, C., Paul, B., & Paulo, P. (2020). Soil and human health: Current status and future needs. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1–23.
Camarsa, G., Toland, J. S. J., Hudson, T., Nottingham, S., Rosskopf, N., & Thévignot, C. (2014). Life and soil protection life and the environment European Commission (p. 65). DG Environment.
Chamberlain, P. M., Bull, I. D., BlackHIJ, I. P., & Evershed, R. P. (2005). Fatty acid composition and change in Collembola fed differing diets: Identification of trophic biomarkers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 1608–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio200501022
Chen, S., Dong, Y. H., et al. (2013). Characterization of a novel cyfluthrin-degrading bacterial strain Brevibacteriumaureum and its biochemical degradation pathway. Bioresource Technology, 132, 16–23.
Chen, J., He, F., Zhang, X., Sun, X., & Zheng, J. (2014). Heavy metal pollution decreases microbial abundance, diversity and activity within particle-size fractions of a paddy soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 87, 164–181.
Choppala, G., Saifullah, N., Bolan, S., Bibi, M., Iqbal, Z., Rengel, A., Kunhikrishnan, N., & Ashwath, Y. S. (2014). Cellular mechanisms in higher plants governing tolerance to cadmium toxicity. Plant Science, 33, 374–391.
Crowther, T. W., van den Hoogen, J., Wan, J., Mayes, M. A., Keiser, A. D., Mo, L., Averill, C., & Maynard, D. S. (2019). The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science, 365, eaav0550.
Daghrir, R., & Drogui, P. (2013). Tetracycline antibiotics in the environment: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 11, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0404-8
de Graaff, M. A., Adkins, J., Kardol, P., & Throop, H. L. (2015). A meta-analysis of soil biodiversity impacts on thecarbon cycle. The Soil, 1, 257–271.
de Vries, F. T., Thebault, E., Liiri, M., Birkhofer, K., Tsiafouli, M. A., & Bjornlund, L. (2013). Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14296–14301.
DeBruyn, J. M., Nixon, L. T., Fawaz, M. N., Johnson, A. M., & Radosevich, M. (2011). Global biogeography and quantitative seasonal dynamics of Gemmatimonadetes in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 6295–6300.
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F. T., Reich, P. B., Jeffries, T. C., Gaitan, J. J., & Encinar, D. (2016). Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nature Communications, 7, 10541–10548.
Demanou, J., Monkiedje, A., Njine, T., Foto, S. M., Nola, M., Zebaze Togouet, S. H., & Kemka, N. (2004). Changes in soil chemical properties and microbial activities in response to the fungicide Ridomil Gold plus copper. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 1(1), 26–34.
Digel, C., Curtsdotter, A., Riede, J., Klarner, B., & Brose, U. (2014). Unravelling the complex structure of forest soil food webs: Higher omnivory and more trophic levels. Oikos, 123, 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik00865
Dimkpa, C. O., Svatos, A., Dabrowska, P., Schmidt, A., Boland, W., & Kothe, E. (2008). Involvement of siderophores in the reduction of metal-induced inhibition of auxin synthesis in Streptomyces spp. Chemosphere, 74, 19–25.
Dimkpa, C., Weinand, T., & Asch, F. (2009). Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32, 1682–1694.
Doornbos, R. F., Loon, L. C., & Bakker, P. A. (2011). Impact of root exudates and plant defense signaling on bacterial communities in the rhizosphere a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 227–243.
Elizabeth, M., Bach, K. S., Ramirez Tandra, D., & Fraser, D. H. (2020). Soil biodiversity integrates solutions for a sustainable future. Sustainability, 12, 2662.
Ettema, C. H., & Wardle, D. A. (2002). Spatial soil ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(4), 177–183.
FAO. (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org
Forni, C., Duca, D., & Glick, B. R. (2017). Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria. Plant and Soil, 410, 335–356.
Francioli, D., Schulz, E., Lentendu, G., Wubet, T., Buscot, F., & Reitz, T. (2016). Mineral vs organic amendments: Microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1446.
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2005). Soil organic carbon sequestration and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the southeastern USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 120–147.
Gadd, G. M. (2004). Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma, 122, 109–119.
Gan, Y., Wang, L., Yang, G., Dai, J., Wang, R., & Wang, W. (2017). Multiple factors impact the contents of heavy metals in vegetables in high natural background area of China. Chemosphere, 184, 1388–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/jchemosphere201706072
Gil-Sotres, F., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leiros, M. C., & Seoane, S. (2005). Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 877.
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., et al. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.
Gopal, M., Gupta, A., Arunachalam, V., & Magu, S. P. (2007). Impact of azadirachtin, an insecticidal allelochemical fromneem on soil microflora, enzyme and respiratory activities. Bioresource Technology, 98, 3154–3158.
Graham, E. B., Knelman, J. E., Schindlbacher, A., Siciliano, S., Breulmann, M., & Yannarell, A. (2016). Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: When does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1–10.
Gupta, S., & Dikshit, A. K. (2010). Biopesticides: An ecofriendly approach for pest control. Journal of Biopesticides, 3, 186.
Gupta Sood, S. (2003). Chemotactic response of plant-growth-promoting bacteria towards roots of vesicular-arbuscularmycorrhizal tomato plants. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 45, 219–227.
Haas, D., & Défago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogensby fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Review Microbiology, 3, 307–319.
Hassan, A. A., El-Barawy, A. M., Mokhtar, E., & Nahed, M. (2011). Evaluation of biological compounds of Streptomyces species for control of some fungal diseases. Journal of American Science, 7(4), 752–760.
Hayes, C., & Krause, M. S. (2019). The basics of beneficial soil microorganisms BioWorks, Inc, 072419.
Hussain, S., Siddique, T., Saleem, M., Arshad, M., & Khalid, A. (2009a). Impact of pesticides onsoil microbial diversity, enzymes, and biochemical reactions. Advances in Agronomy, 102, 159–200.
Hussain, S., Siddique, T., Arshad, M., & Saleem, M. (2009b). Bioremediation and phytoremediation ofpesticides: Recent advances. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 843–907.
Jackson, R. B., Lajtha, K., Crow, S. E., Hugelius, G., Kramer, M. G., & Piñeiro, G. (2017). The ecology of soil carbon: Pools,vulnerabilities, and biotic and abiotic controls. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 48, 419–445.
Kalam, A., Tah, J., & Mukherjee, A. K. (2004). Pesticide effects on microbial population and soil enzymeactivities during vermicomposting of agricultural waste. Journal of Environmental Biology, 25, 201–208.
Kaneda, S., & Kaneko, N. (2008). Collembolans feeding on soil affect carbon and nitrogen mineralization by their influence on microbial and nematode activities. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0222-x
Kariuki, G. M., Muriuki, L. K., & Kibiro, E. M. (2015). The impact of suppressive soils on plant pathogens and agricultural productivity. In M. K. Meghvansi & A. Varma (Eds.), Organic amendments and soil suppressiveness in plant disease management (pp. 3–24). Springer.
Khan, S., Qing, C., Hesham, A. E. L., Yue, X., & He, J. Z. (2007). Soil enzymatic activities and microbial community structure with different application rates of Cd and Pb. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(7), 834–840.
Kibblewhite, M. G., Ritz, K., & Swift, M. J. (2008). Soil health in agricultural systems. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 363, 685–701.
Kong, A. Y. Y., Hristova, K., Scow, K. M., & Six, J. (2010). Impacts of different N management regimes on nitrifier and denitrifier communities and N cycling in soil microenvironments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 1523–1533.
Kotzerke, A., Sharma, S., Schauss, K., Heuer, H., Thiele-Bruhn, S., & Smalla, K. (2008). Alterations in soil microbial activity and N-transformation processes due to sulfadiazine loads in pig-manure. Environmental Pollution, 153, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/jenvpol200708020
Lacey, L. A., & Georgis, R. (2012). Entomopathogenic nematodes for control of insect pests above and below groundwith comments on commercial production. Journal of Nematology, 44, 218.
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304, 1623–1627.
Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 7, 5875–5895.
Li, F., Chen, L., Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Huang, S. (2017). Bacterial community structure after long-term organic and inorganic fertilization reveals important associations between soil nutrients and specific taxa involved in nutrient transformations. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 187.
Liu, F., Ying, G. G., Tao, R., Zhao, J. L., Yang, J. F., & Zhao, L. F. (2009). Effects of six selected antibiotics on plant growth and soil microbial and enzymatic activities. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/jenvpol200812021
Lubbers, I. M., Jan van Groenigen, K., Fonte, S. J., Six, J., Brussaard, L., & Willem van Groenigen, J. (2013). Greenhouse-gasemissions from soils increased by earthworms. Nature Climate Change, 3, 187–194.
Lupatini, M., Korthals, G. W., de Hollander, M., Janssens, T. K. S., & Kuramae, E. E. (2017). Soil microbiome is more heterogeneous in organic than in conventional farming system. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 2064.
Mader, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., & Niggli, U. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296, 1694–1697.
Mahmoud, Y. A. G. (2016). Advancement in bioremediation process: A mini review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3, 83–94.
Medipally, S. R., Yusoff, F. M., Banerjee, S., & Shariff, M. (2015). Microalgae as sustainable renewable energy feedstock for biofuel production. Bio Med Research International, 2015, 519513.
Meena, H., Meena, R. S., Rajput, B. S., & Kumar, S. (2016). Response of bio-regulators to morphology and yield ofclusterbean [Cyamopsistetragonoloba (L) Taub] under dierent sowing environments. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8, 715–718.
Megharaj, M., & Naidu, R. (2010). Soil and brown field bioremediation. Microbial Biotechnology, 10, 1244–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-791512840
Menon, P., Gopal, M., & Parsad, R. (2005). Effects of chlorpyrifos and quinalphos on dehydrogenaseactivities and reduction of Fe3+ in the soils of two semi-arid fields of tropical India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 108, 73–83.
Mishra, P. K., Gregor, T., & Wimmer, R. (2017). Utilising Brewer’s spent grain as a source of cellulose nanofibres following separation of protein-based biomass. BioResources, 12, 107–116.
Mishra, P. K., Giagli, K., Tsalagkas, D., Mishra, H., Talegaonkar, G. V., & Wimmer, R. (2018). Changing face of wood science in modern era: Contribution of nanotechnology. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology, 12, 13–21.
Mishra, S., Lin, Z., Pang, S., Zhang, W., Bhatt, P., & Chen, S. (2021). Recent advanced technologies for the characterization of xenobiotic-degrading microorganisms and microbial communities. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 31.
Montgomery, H. L. (2010). How is soil made? Crabtree Publishing.
Moore, J. C., Berlow, E. L., Coleman, D. C., et al. (2004). Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 584–600.
Muema, E. K., Cadisch, G., Musyoki, M. K., & Rasche, F. (2016). Dynamics of bacterial and archaeal amoA gene abundance after additions of organic inputs combined with mineral nitrogen to an agricultural soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 104, 143–158.
Nzila, A. (2013). Update on the catabolism of organic pollutant by bacteria. Environmental Pollution, 178, 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/jenvpol201303042
O’Donnell, A. G., Colvan, S. R., & Malosso, E. (2005). Twenty years of molecular analysis of bacterial communities in soils and what have we learned about function? In R. D. Bardgett, M. B. Usher, & D. W. Hopkins (Eds.), Biological diversity and function in soils (pp. 44–73). Cambridge University Press.
Oldeman, L. R. (1998). Soil degradation: A threat to food security. International Soil Reference and Information Center, Wageningen.
Ortiz-Hernandez, M. L., Castrejon-Godinez, M. L., Popoca-Ursino, E. C., & Cervantes-Decasac, F. R. (2018). Strategies for biodegradation and bioremediation of pesticides in the environment. In M. S. Fuentes, V. L. Colin, & J. M. Saez (Eds.), Strategies for bioremediation of organic and inorganic pollutants (pp. 95–115). CRC Press.
Pathan, S. I., Vetrovský, T., Giagnoni, L., Datta, R., Baldrian, P., Nannipieri, P., & Renella, G. (2018). Microbial expressionprofiles in the rhizosphere of two maize lines diering in N use efficiency. Plant and Soil, 433, 401–413.
Peralta-Yahya, P. P., & Keasling, J. D. (2010). Advanced biofuel production in microbes. Biotechnology Journal, 5, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot200900220
Ragnarsdóttir, K. V., Steven, A., Banwart, Davidsdottir, B., Dimitrov, E., Jonsson, J. Ö. G., Kercheva, M., de Souza, D. M., Menon, M., Nikolaidis, N., Rousseva, S., & Shishkov, T. (2015). Soil: The life supporting skin of earth international year of soils. University of Sheffield, (UK) and the University of Iceland, Reykjavík (Iceland). ISBN 978-0-9576890-2-2.
Sarrantonio, M., & Gallandt, E. (2003). The role of cover crops in North American cropping systems. Journal of Crop Production, 8(53), 74.
Sathishkumar, M., Binupriya, A. R., Balk, S., & Yun, S. (2008). Biodegradation of crude oil by individual bacterial strains and mixed bacterial consortium isolated from hydrocarbon contaminated areas. Clean, 36, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen200700042
Schimel, J. P., & Schaeffer, S. M. (2012). SM Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3, 348.
Setälä, H., Berg, M. P., & Jones, T. H. (2005). Trophic structure and functional redundancy in soil communities. In R. Bardgett, M. Usher, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Biological diversity and function in soils (pp. 236–249). Cambridge University Press.
Siles, J. A., & Margesin, R. (2018). Insights into microbial communities mediating the bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil from Alpine former military site. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102, 4409–4421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8932-6
Singh, J. S. (2015). Plant-microbe interactions: A viable tool for agricultural sustainability. Applied Soil Ecology, 92, 45–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/japsoil.03.004
Singh, J. S., & Seneviratne, G. (2017). Agro- environmental sustainability: Volume 2: Managing environmental pollution (pp. 1–251). Springer.
Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K., & Batten, K. M. (2006). Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 555–559.
Srinivasiah, S., Bhavsar, J., Thapar, K., et al. (2008). Phages across the biosphere: Contrasts of viruses in soil and aquatic environments. Research in Microbiology, 159, 349–357.
Sudha, S. S., Karthik, R., Francis, M., Saumya, T. S., & Ramanujan, J. R. (2011). Isolation and preliminary characterization of associated microorganisms from spirulina products and their silver mediated nanoparticle synthesis. Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization, 2, 1–8.
Sunita, V. J., Dolly, P. R., Bateja, S., & Vivek, U. N. (2013). Isolation and screening for hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria (HUB) from petroleum samples. International Journal of Current Applied Science, 2, 48–60.
Susilo, F. X., Neutel, A. M., van Noordwijk, M., Hairiah, K., Brown, G., & Swift, M. J. (2004). Soil biodiversity and food webs. In M. van Noordwijk, G. Cadisch, & C. K. Ong (Eds.), Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems (pp. 285–302). CAB International.
Tiedje, J. M., Cho, J. C., Murray, A., Teves, D., Xia, B., & Zhou, J. (2001). Soil teeming with life: New frontiers to soil science. In R. M. Rees, B. C. Ball, C. D. Campbell, & C. A. Watson (Eds.), Sustainable management of soil organic matter (pp. 393–412). CAB International.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.
Tipayno, S. C., Truu, J., Samaddar, S., Truu, M., Preem, J. K., Oopkaup, K., Espenberg, M., Chatterjee, P., Kang, Y., Kim, K., & Sa, T. (2018). The bacterial community structure andfunctional profile in the heavy metal contaminated paddy soils, surrounding a nonferrous smelter in South Korea. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 6157–6168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece34170
Toth, J. D., Feng, Y., & Dou, Z. (2011). Veterinary antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations inhibit soil iron reduction and nitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 2470–2472. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio201109004
Turbé, A., De Toni, A., Benito, P. et al. (2010). Soil biodiversity: Functions, threaths and tools for policy makers. Bio Intelligence Service, IRD, and NIOO, Report for European Commission (DG Environment), 254pp.
Ubuoh, E. A., Akhionbare, S. M. O., & Akhionbare, W. N. (2012). Effects of pesticide application on soilmicrobial spectrum: Case study-fecolart demonstration farm, Owerri-West, Imo state, Nigeria. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 3(2), 34.
Van der Putten, W. H., De Ruiter, P. C., Bezemer, T. M., Harvey, J. A., Wassen, M., & Wolters, V. (2004). Trophic interactions in a changing world. Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 487–494.
Wall, D. H., Adams, G., & Parsons, A. N. (2001). Soil biodiversity. In F. S. Chapin III, O. E. Sala, & E. Huber-Sannwald (Eds.), Global biodiversity in a changing environment: Scenarios for the 21st century (pp. 47–82). Springer.
Wang, W., Wang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, L., Xiao, X., & Xi, Y. (2016). Consistent responses of the microbial community structure to organic farming along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Scientific Reports, 6, 35046.
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002). Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: A global data analysis. Soil Science and Society of America Journal, 66, 1930–1946.
White, P. M., & Rice, C. W. (2007). Tillage effects on microbial and carbon dynamics during plant residue decomposition. Soil Science and Society of America Journal, 73, 138–145.
World Bank. Gender in agriculture sourcebook. Washington DC: World Bank Publications; 2009. p. 454
Wu, X., Yin, Y., Wang, S., & Yu, Y. (2014a). Accumulation of chlorothalonil and its metabolite, 4-hydroxychlorothalonil in soil after repeated applications and its effects on soil microbial activities underground greenhouse conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 3452–3459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2318-1
Wu, X. L., Xiang, L., Yan, Q. Y., Jiang, Y. N., Li, Y. W., & Huang, X. P. (2014b). Distribution and risk assessment of quinolone antibiotics in the soils from organic vegetable farms of a subtropical city, Southern China. Science of the Total Environment, 487, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/jscitotenv201404015
Wubs, E. R. J., van der Putten, W. H., Bosch, M., & Bezemer, T. M. (2016). Soil inoculation steers restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. Nature Plants, 2, 16107.
Yáñez, L., Ortiz, D., Calderón, J., Batres, L., Carrizales, L., Mejía, J., Martínez, L., García-Nieto, E., & Díaz-Barriga, F. (2002). Overview of human health and chemical mixtures: Problems facing developing countries. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 901–909.
Yang, J., Feng, Y., Zhan, H., Liu, J., Yang, F., Zhang, K., et al. (2018a). Characterization of a pyrethroid-degrading Pseudomonas fulva strain P31 and biochemical degradation pathway of D-phenothrin. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb201801003
Yang, T., Ren, L., Jia, Y., Fan, S., Wang, J., Nahurira, R., et al. (2018b). Biodegradation of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate by Rhodococcusruber YC-YT1 in contaminated water and soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050964
Yang, T., Siddique, K. H., & Liu, K. (2020). Cropping systems in agriculture and their impact on soil health-A review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01118.
Yu, Y., Yin, H., Peng, H., Lu, G., & Dang, Z. (2019). Proteomic mechanism of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) biodegradation by microbacterium Y2 and its potential in remediation of BDE-209 contaminated water-sediment system. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 387, 121708. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat2019121708
Zhan, H., Wang, H., et al. (2018). Kinetics and novel degradation pathway of cypermethrin in Acinetobacterbaumannii ZH-14. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb201800098
Zhang, W., Hendrix, P. F., Dame, L. E., Burke, R. A., Wu, J., Neher, D. A., Li, J., Shao, Y., & Fu, S. (2013). Earthworms facilitate carbon sequestration through unequal amplification of carbon stabilization compared with mineralization. Nature Communications, 4, 2576.
Zhang, M., Wu, Z., Sun, Q., Ding, Y., Ding, Z., & Sun, L. (2019). The spatial and seasonal variations of bacterial community structure and influencing factors in river sediments. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109293.
Zhao, Q., Yue, S., Bilal, M., Hu, H., Wang, W., & Zhang, X. (2017). Comparative genomic analysis of 26 Sphingomonas and Sphingobium strains: Dissemination of bioremediation capabilities, biodegradation potential and horizontal gene transfer. Science of the Total Enviroment, 609, 1238–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/jscitotenv201707249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Punetha, A., Punetha, S., Khan, A. (2022). Soil Community Composition and Ecosystem Processes. In: Rukhsana, Alam, A. (eds) Agriculture, Environment and Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10406-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10406-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10405-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10406-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)