Abstract
The Arctic remains a hotly contested terrain. While many of the contentious issues are circumpolar-wide or even global in nature, issues of security and threats to sovereignty are more connected to the political domain of nation states. Nonetheless, this is changing as new scholarship explores political debates about sovereignty in relation to sub-national and non-state actors, Indigenous peoples organizations, and environmental change. With new surveillance technologies, the growing internationalization of Arctic travel, increased commercial activity, search and rescue operations, and ecological change, national governments and international organizations are now adjusting their approach to security, and protection of sovereignty. The result has been a shift in emphasis from conventional approaches to sovereignty and security to new mechanisms, structures, and processes that are more inclusive and that accommodate circumpolar-wide issues such as climate change and natural or man-made disaster. The development of an Arctic-specific approach to Northern North American security must, therefore, be mindful of the unique characteristics and pressures associated with the broader circumpolar region, as well as the particular characteristics of the Canada-US situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkire, Sabina. 2004. A Vital Core that Must Be Treated with the Same Gravitas as Traditional Security Threats. Security Dialogue 35 (3, Sep.): 359–360.
Arctic Domain Awareness Centre. 2018. Updated Draft: North American Arctic Maritime & Environmental Security Assessing Concern, Advancing Collaboration. A partnered workshop 18–20 September 2018, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska. http://arcticdomainawarenesscenter.org/css/images/newdesign/pdf/reports/ADAC-AMESW%202018_p01_Report_v1.pdf.
Everett, Karen G. 2018. Securitization, Borders, and the Canadian North: A Regional Approach. A dissertation submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of the Arts and Science, Trent University, Peterborough, ON.
Government of Canada. 2009. Canada’s Northern Strategy: Our North, Our Heritage, Our Future. http://www.northernstrategy.gc.ca/cns/cns.pdf.
Government of Canada. 2010. Statement on Canada’s Arctic Foreign Policy: Exercising Sovereignty and Promoting Canada’s Northernstrategy Abroad. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/amc-gac/FR5-111-2010-eng.pdf.
Griffiths, Franklyn. 2009. Towards a Canadian Arctic Strategy. Foreign Policy for Canada’s Tomorrow. CIC No. 1, Canadian International Council. http://carc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/North-2030-Towards-a-Canadian-Arctic-Strategy-Franklyn-Griffiths.pdf.
Heininen, Lassi. 2004. Circumpolar International Relations and Geopolitics. In Arctic Human Development Report (ADHR), ed. Niels Einarsson, Joan Nymand Larsen, Annika Nilsson, and Oran R. Young. Akureyri, Iceland: Stefansson Arctic Institute.
Heininen, Lassi, and Heather N. Nicol. 2007. The Importance of Northern Dimension of Foreign Policies in the Geopolitics of the Circumpolar North. Geopolitics 12: 133–135.
Hoag, Hanna. 2016. Mark Brzezinski: U.S. Arctic Policies and Priorities. Arctic Deeply, January 23. https://www.newsdeeply.com/arctic/community/2016/01/23/mark-brzezinski-u-s-arctic-policies-and-priorities.
Hoogensen, Gunhild, et al. 2009. Human Security in the Arctic: Yes it is Relevant! Journal of Human Security 5 (2): 1–10.
Hossain, Kamrul, and Harsh Barala. 2017. An Assessment of the US Chairmanship of the Arctic Council. Articles, 5 May 2017. University of Lapland. file://habitat/home/heathernicol/Desktop/kossain%20and%20Barla.pdf
Keskitalo, E.C.E. 2004. Negotiating the Arctic: The Construction of an International Region. New York: Routledge.
Kraska, James. 2016. Maritime Governance of the U.S. Arctic Region. In Climate Change from a Northern Point of View, ed. Lassi Heininen and Heather N. Nicol, 166–188. Waterloo: Centre for Foreign Policy and Federalism.
Lackenbauer, P. Whitney, and Ryan Dean. 2016. Canada’s Northern Strategy under Prime Minister Stephen Harper: Key Speeches and Documents on Sovereignty, Security, and Governance, 2006–15. Calgary and Waterloo: Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security.
Lackenbauer, P. Whitney, and Heather N. Nicol. 2017. Arctic Sovereignty Through a Whole of Government Lens. Waterloo: Centre on Federalism and Foreign Policy.
Lackenbauer, P. Whitney, Heather N. Nicol, and Wilfrid Greaves. 2017. One Arctic: The Arctic Council and Circumpolar Governance. Waterloo; Ottawa: Centre for Federalism and Foreign Policy; Canadian Arctic resources Committee (CARC).
Manson, Deanna. 2017. Planning Operation Nanook 2014: Lessons Learned from a Joint Task Force (North) Perspective. In Canadian Arctic Operations, 1941–2015 Lessons Learned, Lost, and Relearned, ed. Adam Lajeunesse and P. Whitney Lackenbauer. Fredericton, NB: The Gregg Centre for the Study of War & Society.
Nicol, Heather N. 2016. From Territory to Rights. Geopolitics 22 (4): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1264055.
Nicol, Heather N., and Lassi Heininen. 2013. Human Security, the Arctic Council and Climate Change. Polar Record: 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247412000666.
Schreiber, M. 2018. Outgoing Commandant Says Arctic has Become a Top Priority for US Coast Guard. Arctic Today, May 9. https://www.arctictoday.com/outgoing-commandant-says-arctic-become-top-priority-us-coast-guard/.
Swanström, Niklas. 2010. Traditional and Non-Traditional Security Threats in Central Asia: Connecting the New and the Old. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 8 (2): 35–51.
United Nations. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
———. 1994. Human Development Report. New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016a. Paris Agreement. United Nations Treaty Collection, 8 July 2016.
———. 2016b. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
United States. 2013. National Security Presidential Directive-41/Homeland Security Presidential Directive-13. https://www.dhs.gov/national-plan-achieve-maritime-domain-awareness.
———. 2014. U.S. National Strategy for the Arctic Implementation Plan.
United States. Congressional Research Service (CRS). 2018. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. Updated October 25, 2018. https://crsreports.congress.gov. R41153 accessed online at: https://news.usni.org/2018/11/02/report-congress-changes-arctic-2.
Williams, Michael C. 1998. Modernity, Identity and Security: A Comment on the ‘Copenhagen Controversy’. Review of International Studies 24: 435–439.
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nicol, H.N. (2020). The Evolving North American Arctic Security Context: Can Security Be Traditional?. In: Coates, K.S., Holroyd, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Arctic Policy and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20557-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20557-7_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20556-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20557-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)