Skip to main content

Before Climate Change, ‘Nuclear Safety’ Was There—A Retrospective Study and Lessons Learned of Changing Security Premises in the Arctic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Arctic Security

Abstract

This chapter is about the environment as a special feature of Arctic geopolitics and security. The focus is on (long-range) pollution, as the first trigger of global changes in the Arctic, and ‘environmental awakening’ as a consequent reaction. This is also a retrospective study on ‘nuclear safety’ in the European Arctic, as a part of ‘environmental awakening’ and environmental politics in the North, and how it caused a shift in security premises of the Arctic states. Discourses of critical security studies—the risk society theory and ecological security—are applied to broaden our understanding of narrow traditional—national, competitive, military—security towards comprehensive one, as well as to analyze and illustrate changes in both Arctic security nexus and Arctic geopolitics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACIA. 2004. Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP. 1997. Arctic Pollution Issues: A State of the Arctic Environmental Report. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP. 2002. Arctic Pollution: Persistent Organic Pollutants, Heavy Metals, Radioactivity, Human Health, Changing Pathways. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. From Industrial Society to Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment. In Cultural Theory and Cultural Change, ed. M. Featherestone. London: Sage.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, R., A. Baklanov, and B. Segerståhl. 1996. Overview of Nuclear Risks on the Kola Peninsula: Summary Report. IIASA Radiation Safety of the Biosphere. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • The CAOF Agreement. 2018. The Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean. Signed on 3 October 2018 in Ilulissat, Greenland.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARC, CMSS, and CPC. 2002. On Thinning Ice: Climate Change and New Ideas About Sovereignty and Security in the Canadian Arctic. Presentation Abstracts.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fairbanks Declaration. 2017. On the Occasion of the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, May 11, Fairbanks, Alaska. On-line available at http://www.arctic-council.org.

  • Finger, M. 2016. The Arctic, Laboratory of the Anthropocene. In Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate, ed. L. Heininen, 121–137. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. 1982. Environment, Development and Military Activity: Towards Alternative Security Doctrines. Oslo: Oslo-Bergen-Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goes, M. 2018. Extracting Human Security from the Shtokman Gas Field: Security Assemblage in the Murmansk Region (2007–2012). PhD degree in Humanities and Social Sciences (Field Political Science) at UiT—Norwegian University of the Arctic (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y. 2001. Johdanto: Mikä ympäristö? In Ympäristöpolitiikka. Mikä ympäristö, kenen politiikka, ed. Y. Haila and P. Jokinen, 9–20. Jyväskylä: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y., and L. Heininen. 1995. Ecology: A New Discipline for Disciplining? Social Text 42 (Spring): 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyrynen, N. 2003. Environmental Security: The Case of the Kursk. Environmental Politics 12 (3, Autumn): 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyrynen, N., and L. Heininen. 2002. Changes in Problem Definition—A Case Study of Nuclear Risks in the Barents Sea Region. In Proceedings from the 5th International Conference on Environmental Radioactivity in the Arctic and Antarctic, ed. P. Strand, T. Jölle, and Å. Sand, 113–115, June 16–20, St. Petersburg, Russia. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. 1999. The Nuclear Problem and Different Actors—The Problem onto a Political Agenda. In Security in the European North—From ‘Hard’ to ‘Soft’, ed. L. Heininen and G. Lassinantti. Rovaniemi: Arctic Centre Reports 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. 2000. Sodan ja sotilaallisen toiminnan ympäristövaikutukset [Environmental Influences of War and the Military]. Kosmopolis 30 (4): 99–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. 2013. Politicization’ of the Environment: Environmental Politics and Security in the Circumpolar North. In The Fast-Changing Arctic: Rethinking Arctic Security for a Warmer World, ed. B.S. Zellen, 35–55. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. 2016. Security of the Global Arctic in Transformation—Changes in Problem Definition of Security. In Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate, ed. L. Heininen, 12–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L. 2018. Arctic Geopolitics from Classical to Critical Approach—Importance of Immaterial Factors [PEEX Special Issue, ed. S. Chalov]. Geography, Environment, Sustainability 11 (1): 171–186. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-1-1771-186.

  • Heininen, L., and M. Finger. 2017. The ‘Global Arctic’ as a New Geopolitical Context and Method. Journal of Borderlands Studies 33 (2): 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heininen, L., and B. Segerståhl. 2002. International Negotiations Aiming at a Reduction of Nuclear Risks in the Barents Sea Region. In Containing the Atom: International Negotiations on Nuclear Security and Safety, ed. R. Avenhaus, V. Kremenyuk, and G. Sjöstedt, 243–270. New York: Lexington Books and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogensen Gjörv, G., D.R. Bazely, M. Goloviznina, and A.J. Tanentzap. 2013. Environmental and Human Security in the Arctic. Tonbridge, Kent: Routledge and Eartscan from Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hönneland, G., and A.-K. Jörgensen. 1999. Integration vs. Autonomy: Civil–Military Relations on the Kola Peninsula. Gateshead, Tyne and Wear: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Inari Declaration. 2002. The Third Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, October 10. Inari, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Inuit Declaration. 2009. A Circumpolar Inuit Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic. Adopted by the Inuit Circumpolar Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Iqaluit Declaration. 2015. Adopted at the Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council in May 2015 in Iqaluit, Canada. On-line available at http://www.arctic-council.org.

  • The Kiruna Declaration. 2013. Adopted at the Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, May 15, Kiruna, Sweden. On-line available at http://www.arctic-council.org.

  • Lamy, S.L., J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens. 2013. Introduction to Global Politics, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempinen, H. 2017. The Elusive Social? Remapping the Soci(et)al in the Arctic Energyscape. PhD dissertation at Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafeed, A. 2014. Nasa-Funded Study: Industrial Civilisation Headed for ‘Irreversible Collapse’? The Guardian, International Edition, March 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, H. 1986. Collective Security. Common Security and Alternative Security: A Conceptual Comparison. Peace Research Reviews 10 (3): 1–8 and 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek. 2002. Science&Technology, 44–45, February 11, “Waiting For Nukes”.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nuuk Declaration. 2011. Adopted at the Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council in May 2011 in Nuuk, Greenland. On-line available at http://www.arcticcouncil.org.

  • The Ottawa Declaration. 1996. Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, September 19. Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci, J., C. Dickson, S. Nikels, L. Chan, and C. Furgal. 2004. Food Security of Northern Indigenous Peoples in a Time of Uncertainly. Position Paper for the 3rd NRF Open Meeting, September 15–18, Yellowknife, NWT, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsson, T. 1988. Islannin ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikka. In Paasikivi-Seuran monistesarja nro 77. Helsinki: Paasikivi Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popova, L., A. Yablokov, E. Kriusanov, and I. Gale. n.d. Statement of Non-Governmental Environmental Organizations on the Plan to Export–Import Spent Nuclear Fuel (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursiainen, C. 2001. Soft Security Problems in Northwest Russia and Their Implications for the Outside World: A Framework for Analysis and Action (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Reykjavik Declaration. 2004. The Fourth Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, November 24. Reykjavik.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Rovaniemi Declaration. 1991. Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy. Rovaniemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzankin, A. 2004. Problems of Nuclear and Radiation Safety in the Murmansk Region. Position Paper for the 3rd NRF Open Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1982. The Relationship Between Disarmament and Development. United Nations, Study Series 5. A/36/597. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1983. Common Security. A Blueprint for Survival. UN/A/CN.10/38, Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report. 1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablokov, A., V. Karasev, V. Rumyantsev, M. Kokeev, O. Petrov, V. Lystsov, A. Yemelyanenkov, and P. Rubtsov. 1993. Radioactive Waste Disposal in Seas Adjacent to the Territory of the Russian Federation (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lassi Heininen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heininen, L. (2020). Before Climate Change, ‘Nuclear Safety’ Was There—A Retrospective Study and Lessons Learned of Changing Security Premises in the Arctic. In: Heininen, L., Exner-Pirot, H. (eds) Climate Change and Arctic Security. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20230-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20230-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20229-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20230-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics