Abstract
Since the late 1980s, wildlife toxicology has grown considerably as an important field of laboratory and field research. It focuses on the effects of various chemicals on the reproduction, health, and well-being of wildlife, including essential and nonessential elements. Deficiency of essential elements (e.g., copper, manganese, nickel, zinc, selenium) can lead to adverse effects in endothermic vertebrates, while their excess may result in significant intoxication or even death. However, the greatest concern is the contamination with highly toxic nonessential elements such as mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic.
Human activity results in the introduction of large amounts of essential and nonessential trace elements into biogeochemical cycles. Particularly exposed to excessive levels of trace elements are top avian and mammalian predators at the end point of biological pathways along which contaminants may accumulate in increasing concentrations. Determinations of trace elements in samples from selected species serving as biomonitors can be used to indirectly assess the condition of terrestrial ecosystems, including herbivorous, omnivorous, and predatory wildlife. Biomonitors are usually native species common in the area (involving hunted animals) but also invasive species (in Europe American mink and raccoon from North America; in the USA and Canada wild boar and common starling from Europe). Biomonitoring using terrestrial birds and mammals can be local, regional, or continental and is well developed in many countries of the Northern Hemisphere, especially in North America and Europe.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Since the 1950s, the dynamic growth of the world’s population has been accompanied by growing levels of environmental pollution, resulting in a multifaceted destruction of natural biological systems, as observed both locally and globally. This has been accompanied by an increase in interest in environmental phenomena and developments in ecology, including ecotoxicology. Research has shown that measurements of the levels of various substances in air, water, and soil from chemical monitoring of the environment are still not sufficient to properly assess the health hazards to humans, animals, plants, and entire ecosystems. Currently, the use of living or deceased organisms in biotesting, bioindication, and biomonitoring is an established method of determining inorganic and organic contaminants and pollutions (Burger 2006a; Bealey et al. 2008; Holt and Miller 2011; Markert 2013).
The terms “bioindicator,” “biomonitor,” “bioaccumulator,” and “biomarker” have all been used in varying ways to describe different approaches and techniques for studying biological responses to pollution of the air and other environmental components. In ecological and environmental sciences, the terms “biomonitor” and “bioindicator” have been and still are used interchangeably, and the terminology in this area can be ambiguous. However, since the early 1990s, we may observe a certain distinction in the use of these terms (Burger 2006a, b; Wilkomirski 2013; Sidding et al. 2016). Biomonitoring can include both a qualitative (bioindicator) and quantitative (biomonitor) approach in pollution control. For example, chemical analysis of biomonitors (an organism or its part or a community of organisms) contains information on the quantitative aspects of quality of the environment. A biomonitor is also a bioindicator, except that it quantifies the impact or eventual outcome on an organism or ecosystem and their health (O’Brien et al. 1993; Markert et al. 2003; Burger 2006a; Bealey et al. 2008). Large-scale biomonitoring uses plant and animal bioaccumulators, or organisms that accumulate various chemicals (including contaminants) in the tissues. Bioaccumulation is result of the biological sequestering of many substances often at a higher concentrations than that at which they occur in the surrounding environment or/and in food of animals.
2 Trace Elements
Some elements present in inorganic/organic forms in organisms are essential elements and others nonessential. In biochemistry, an essential trace element (or micronutrient) is a dietary mineral that is needed in very minute quantities (expressed in micrograms or milligrams) for the proper growth, development, and physiology of the organism. In humans the requirement per day is below 100 mg, with a deficiency leading to disorders that may even prove fatal.
In endothermic vertebrates, the biochemical functions of essential trace elements include enzyme activity, transport of oxygen (iron and copper), organization and structure of macromolecules, vitamin activity (cobalt and vitamin B12), or hormonal activity, e.g., iodine and thyroid hormones (Taylor 1996). All essential elements may even be toxic in animals and humans if ingested at sufficiently high levels and for a long enough period (Fig. 2.1). This aspect has been well recognized in humans, domesticated and laboratory animals, yet very poorly in wildlife (WHO 1973; Wada 2004; NRC 2005; Aras and Atman 2006; Lopez-Alonso 2012; Yatoo et al. 2013; Prashanth et al. 2015; Bhattacharya et al. 2016).
According to the National Research Council (NRC 2005), heavy metals (accepting as a criterion a density of at least 5.0 g cm−3) such as cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), and zinc (Zn) and two nonmetal elements (iodine (I) and selenium (Se)) are considered essential trace elements for higher animals. NRC (2005) classified nickel (Ni) as a possible essential element, while in the case of fluorine (F), which is nonmetallic, opinions are divided. Some researchers believe that F is an essential element for animals and humans while others consider the available evidence for indispensability to be insufficient. Elements essential to domestic, laboratory, or wild mammals and birds may not be essential to humans and vice versa.
In the document by the WHO (2002), the following trace elements are described as essential for human health: Cu, Zn, Fe, Cr, Mo, Se, Co, and I (the list includes Cr but its status as an essential element is controversial, where CrIII is beneficial for animals and humans but CrVI is a human carcinogen). The next smaller group is composed of Si (silicon), Mn, Ni, B (boron), and V (vanadium) with those elements classified as probably essential elements for humans. There are some differences between the NRC (2005) and WHO (2002) reports concerning the essentiality of elements for animals and humans, and the discussion on essentiality of some of those elements is still open (Aras and Ataman 2006; Bhattacharya et al. 2016; Maret 2016).
The term “trace element” is also used in analytical chemistry and geochemistry. In analytical chemistry it is an element whose average concentration is less than 100 mg kg−1 (<100 ppm) but in geochemistry it is less than 1000 mg kg−1 (<1000 ppm) or 0.1% of a rock’s composition. Elements from mineral deposits are activated as a result of natural processes, but their contribution to the biogeochemical cycles is very much driven by human economic activity, especially over the last 100–150 years (Klee and Graedel 2004). The natural distribution and concentration of elements in the Earth’s crust are very diverse as a result of the geological structure, but they are subject to strong anthropogenic modification having a significant impact on the mineral composition of plants, animals, and people and consequently on their condition, health, and reproduction (Adriano 2001; Yaroshevsky 2006; Steinnes 2009; Kabata-Pendias 2011). Among the elements, which can occur in living creatures, special attention is paid to all the essential and some of the nonessential trace elements, the latter having no biological function. For a long time, the greatest concerns have been triggered by heavy metals which are highly toxic to endothermic vertebrates, such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As), the latter being metalloids (Nriagu and Pacyna 1988; Adriano 2001; Anke et al. 2001; Jarup 2003; Hubner et al. 2010; Tchounwou et al. 2012). Additionally, for several decades, there has been an increasing interest on other metallic xenobiotics such as silver (Ag) and aluminum (Al) due to their high neurotoxicity and increasing distribution in the environment, including man-made Ag and Al nanoparticles (Ray et al. 2010; Stensberg et al. 2011; Jaishankar et al. 2014; Karmakar et al. 2014). Table 2.1 summarizes the concentrations and densities of selected trace elements found in the Earth’s crust, which in varying amounts accumulate in wild-living endothermic vertebrates (Selinus and Finkelman 2011). Some of them are classified as essential elements and some as nonessential elements, all of which are discussed in more detail in the respective chapters of this book. In the case of wildlife, the ranges of mean concentrations of elements are shown for the liver, because this organ plays a key role in trace element regulation, bioaccumulation, and detoxification (Vikøren et al. 2005; Horai et al. 2006; Neuschwander-Tetri 2007). In addition, the liver is one of the most extensively used biological materials in ecotoxicological studies for quantifying trends in medium- to long-term contaminant exposure, with most data in this field existing from hepatic tissue (Burger et al. 2000; Gamberg et al. 2005; Braune and Malone 2006; Taggart et al. 2006; Vikøren et al. 2011; Gall et al. 2015; Espin et al. 2016; Kitowski et al. 2017).
In the group of essential elements, mean concentrations in the liver may in some cases reach one (Cr, Cu, Mo, Zn) or three (Se) orders of magnitude higher than their level in the Earth’s crust. Liver concentrations of nonessential and highly toxic elements such as Cd, Hg, Ag may also be three orders of magnitude higher than in the crust. In the case of As and Sn, average hepatic concentrations may exceed those in the crust by two or one order of magnitude, respectively.
Eukaryotic organisms, including vertebrates, have evolutionarily developed mechanisms that enable them to maintain a proper level of various essential trace elements and homeostasis (Zhang and Gladyshev 2010). Terrestrial vertebrates via physiological and anatomical means have regulated and/or stored essential elements, including heavy metals up to certain exposure levels such that metals may not be present in their bodies in a concentration, form, or place that can result in a toxic effect. In such regulation, the gastrointestinal tract and the liver play crucial roles in the uptake and transport of cations (e.g., Cu, Fe, Zn). The anionic group such as Mo and Se is more water-soluble and is less reactive with nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and oxygen, as well as hydroxide groups, than are cations. They are absorbed very efficiently through the intestine. In general, total body burden is regulated by renal excretion (WHO 1996; Rutherford and Bird 2004; US EPA 2007; Lopez-Alonso 2012; Sakulsak 2012; Kim and Oh 2013). Toxic elements strongly affect some essential element metabolisms because they compete for binders for these elements in the biological system. Concentrations of various essential and nonessential elements in birds and mammals depend on many factors and processes, including their forms, oxidation state, and the amount in habitats; biotransformation, bioavailability, diet, and position in the food chains of endothermic vertebrates; absorption (in which the intestinal route is the most important); and the duration of exposure (Chapman 1996; Adriano 2001; Martelli et al. 2006; Diaz-Bone and van de Wiele 2010; García-Barrera et al. 2012; Bhargava and Bhargava 2013). Heavy metals (both essential and nonessential) and metalloids (such as Se, As) in wildlife are the most often analyzed pollutants (Burger 2006b; Jaishankar et al. 2014; Stankovic et al. 2014; Gall et al. 2015; Espin et al. 2016), wherein pollution is defined as contamination that does or can result in adverse biological effects to resident communities. All pollutants are contaminants (substances which are present at places where they should not be or at concentrations above background), but not all contaminants are pollutants (Chapman 2007). Unlike plants and lichens, domestic and wild animals do not usually show qualitative morphological and/or physiological changes as a consequence of chronic bioabsorption of trace elements and the undesirable effects caused by them, which would allow these animals to be considered as bioindicators. There are only a few examples in this field from areas where a natural excess of these elements is noticed. These include loss of hair and malformations of hooves as a result of excessive selenium in food sources and dental fluorosis as a result of a high uptake of fluoride dissolved in groundwater (James and Shupe 1984; Al-Dissi et al. 2011; Choubisa et al. 2011). Wildlife is very often used as a biomonitor where they chronically bioaccumulate trace elements and other substances, but the reaction of the animals to them are generally invisible. These substances qualitatively and quantitatively can be assayed in laboratories using highly specialized and sensitive equipment, from samples of the appropriate biota (Markert et al. 2003).
3 Terrestrial Endothermic Vertebrates as Biomonitors
Since the 1970s there has been a steady and dynamic growth in research and implementation of biomonitoring programs that use organisms from various taxonomic groups as biomonitors of environmental pollution. Of the terrestrial endothermic vertebrates, mainly wild animals but sometimes also breeding birds and mammals (including furbearers) are chosen (Wren 1984; O’Brien et al. 1993; López Alonso et al. 2002; Golden and Rattner 2003; Tataruch and Kierdorf 2003; Ji et al. 2006; Wolfe et al. 2007; Rabinowitz et al. 2009; Reis et al. 2010; Rajaganapathy et al. 2011; Kalisinska et al. 2012a). The consequence of this has been an increase in the number of reports in this field concerning wildlife. Of particular interest are persistent organic pollutants (including organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)), but much attention is also devoted to trace elements (Golden and Rattner 2003; Markert et al. 2003, 2008; Stolen et al. 2005; Burger 2006b; Hollamby et al. 2006; Holt and Miller 2011). Warm-blooded biomonitors can be used for information on:
-
Essential and nonessential element concentrations and relations between them in selected species (especially in rare and threatened birds and mammals, common species, including game animals, which are used by humans as food and potentially valuable source of minerals but may also contained toxic contaminants)
-
Concentrations and bioavailability of essential elements in an area of interest important for the detection of their deficiency or excess and which may be referenced in proper steps in the management and health protection both in animals and humans (e.g., level of selenium is significant in protection against mercury toxicity)
-
Bioindicators can be used as information about various temporal and spatial changes occurring in a specific area (including those from anthropogenic and natural sources such as atmospheric deposition, floods), especially in the case of xenobiotic metals and metalloids
-
Differences in trace element concentrations among animals from the same area (or from control and contaminated sites) and the various trophic levels
-
Ecotoxicological situation of selected species which are widely distributed in various provinces, states, countries, and even continents
Depending on the purpose of the research or the biomonitoring program being implemented, one or several of the above points may be taken into account, but there may also be others not mentioned above (Talmage and Walton 1991; Stolen et al. 2005; Burger 2006a; Smith et al. 2007; Zhang and Ma 2011; Garcia-Fernandez 2014; Espin et al. 2016; Herzke et al. 2017). Species that are targeted as candidates of bioindicators of trace elements should have desirable characteristics including:
-
Are sensitive and indicative of change
-
Broad distribution with accompanying data
-
Easily measured and readily observable
-
Well-known ecology and life history
-
Suitable for lab studies
-
Significant to humans
-
Economical/cost-effective
-
Well-developed and usable with existing data
-
Common enough not to impact populations
Lists of characteristics may differ from one another to a certain point, and a potential or suitable terrestrial candidate may fulfill only some of the desired features (O’Brien et al. 1993; Hollamby et al. 2006; Espin et al. 2016; Herzke et al. 2017). It seems that the list of avian species is much longer than that of mammalian species. This is due not only to the greater number of bird species found in the world, which is almost twice as much as mammals (9993 and 5416 species, respectively), but also from a much larger and more active group of people professionally and amateurly researching and observing birds (ornithologists, volunteers, and bird-watchers) compared to the analogous “mammalian” group (Jones and Safi 2011; Jetz et al. 2012). The highest biodiversity of birds and mammals is recorded in tropical regions. Mammalian and avian fauna in Europe in comparison to other parts of the Northern Hemisphere is poorly diversified, with the avifauna of eastern Asia about 50% richer than Europe and North America, and Western North America the richest region with 14% and 44% more species than eastern Asia and Europe, respectively (Monkkonen and Viro 1997). However, wildlife researchers and observers mainly operate in Europe and North America, which are dominated by animal species of temperate and boreal biomes, with a much better knowledge of their biology. For example, in Europe about 270 mammalian species and 400 avian species are noticed, and in continental North America (USA and Canada) over 710 and 540 species, respectively (Leveque and Mounolou 2003; Arita et al. 2005; Thuiller et al. 2014; Sauer et al. 2017). For biomonitoring goals, much more numerous and more diverse avian samples and information on them than mammalian have been gathered. It concerns terrestrial wildlife too (Frank 1986; Ma et al. 1991; Furness and Greenwood 1993; Golden and Rattner 2003; Rattner et al. 2005; Burger 2006b; Smith et al. 2007; Schmeller et al. 2012; Carneiro et al. 2016; Sauer et al. 2017).
3.1 Mammals as Biomonitors
In Europe, North America, and Asia (mainly in Korea and Japan), samples in which trace elements are determined usually come from several or a dozen selected species of wildlife found on those continents. Among inland mammals there are mainly representatives of the following animal groups: even-toed ungulates (ordo Artiodactyla), lagomorphs (ordo Lagomorpha including hares and rabbits), carnivores (ordo Carnivora), bats (ordo Chiroptera), and Micromammalia, which comprises both rodents (ordo Rodentia) and insectivores (ordo Insectivora). Many researchers prefer micromammals because of their frequent occurrence in the environment, small individual areas, relatively easy acquisition for research, and the possibility of comparison and/or verification of laboratory rodent species results. In addition, their small size makes it possible to assess trace element content in the whole body and an assessment of their transmission to predatory animals (Wren 1986; Ma et al. 1991; Talmage and Walton 1991; Shore and Douben 1994; Kramarova et al. 2005; Sánchez-Chardi et al. 2007; Wijnhoven et al. 2007; Mendez-Rodriguez and Alvarez-Castaneda 2014; Gall et al. 2015). In addition, micromammals are an important part of the diet of avian and mammalian predators and participate in the transmission of trace elements between the links of terrestrial food chains (Gall et al. 2015; Knopper et al. 2006; Herzke et al. 2017). However, the transformation of trace elements in these small mammals is poorly correlated with that occurring in humans and medium-sized long-lived mammals because micromammals have a much higher metabolic rate, usually a short life (1–2 years), and the samples taken, e.g., kidneys or brain, have very low mass, which may cause some analytical problems, including the risk of contamination of the research material (Speakman 2005; Wijnhoven et al. 2007).
Trace elements in the environment generally occur in low concentrations (including highly toxic metals), but their impact on long-lived organisms, including many animals and humans, lasts many years. In the indirect evaluation of their chronic impact on mammals, medium-sized carnivores have been used successfully such as canids (family Canidae: red fox (Vulpes vulpes), Arctic fox (V. lagopus), golden jackal (Canis aureus), and raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides)), mustelids (family Mustelidae: river otter (Lontra canadensis), Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra), American mink (Neovison vison) (previously Mustela vison), voloine (Gulo gulo), European badger (Meles meles), and martens among others), and raccoon (Procyon lotor) belonging to family Procyonidae (Wren 1984, Van den Brink and Ma 1998; Lord et al. 2002; Hoekstra et al. 2003; Millan et al. 2008; Heltai and Markov 2012; Kalisinska et al. 2016; Markov et al. 2016; Herzke et al. 2017). They are positioned on the top of the food pyramid, and their feed consists of field and forest rodents, hares, birds, seeds, fruits, or fish in various amounts in semiaquatic species (otters, American mink, raccoon). Many medium-sized carnivores are widely distributed in forest, agricultural, and urban landscapes of the Northern Hemisphere, with some species introduced into areas beyond their natural occurrence (Gehrt et al. 2011; Lesmeister et al. 2015; Poessel et al. 2017). For example, native North American raccoon and American mink are common as alien species in many European countries, while the raccoon dog present in Eastern and Central Europe originated from Asia (Genovesi et al. 2009). Fish-eating wildlife is particularly exposed to mercury biomethylated in water and sediments, and methylmercury product undergoing biomagnification in food chains. For this reason Hg achieves its highest concentrations in fish and piscivorous birds and mammals from the ends of food chains. In inland ecosystems fish-eating carnivores are preferred in studies on mercury contamination. Many reports concerning Hg (and sometimes other heavy metal levels) in American minks, river otters, and raccoons inhabiting North America have been published over the years (e.g., Wobeser and Swift 1976; Wren et al. 1980; Wren 1986; Lord et al. 2002; Wolfe et al. 2007; Sleeman et al. 2010; Basu 2012), but increasing numbers of European studies using American minks and raccoons have also been observed (Norheim et al. 1984; Kalisinska et al. 2012a, 2016, 2017; Brzezinski et al. 2014; Lanocha et al. 2014; Ljungvall et al. 2017).
In contrast to mesocarnivores, publications on trace element concentrations in large predatory Northern Hemisphere mammals, such as cats, are rare (e.g., Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), North American cougar (Puma concolor), bears, and wolves) due to their usually small population sizes, dispersion, and very large anthropogenic limitations of natural ranges, making it difficult to obtain biological samples from them and perform spatiotemporal comparisons (Gamberg and Braune 1999; Shore et al. 2001; Newman et al. 2004; Millan et al. 2008; Celechovska et al. 2006; Noel et al. 2014; Lazarus et al. 2017).
In ecotoxicology, herbivorous game mammals (especially deer; red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) among others), moose/elk (Alces alces), reindeer/caribou (Rangifer tarandus), and hares play an important role. Determination of trace elements in these species allows not only identification of the adverse effects connected with excess or deficiency of micronutrients in the animals themselves and on their populations, identification of the contamination of the food chains by nonessential elements, and estimation of human health risks (Adriano 2001; O’Hara et al. 2003; Tataruch and Kierdorf 2003; Vikøren et al. 2005; Mysłek and Kalisińska 2006; Pedersen and Lierhagen 2006; Kursa et al. 2010; Al-Dissi et al. 2011; Ertl et al. 2016). Venison (mainly muscle and to a lesser extent the liver and other offal) is consumed as an important source of protein and micronutrients, but when it contains elevated amounts of toxic elements (e.g., Pb incorporated in tissues), this may contribute to consumer intoxication (Strmiskova and Strmiska 1992; Borch-Iohnsen et al. 1996; Frank et al. 2000; Wolfe et al. 2010; Roug et al. 2015; Skibniewski et al. 2015; Ertl et al. 2016) and a threat to wild mammalian and avian raptors and scavengers, including threatened species (Rogers et al. 2012; Haig et al. 2014; Behmke et al. 2015; Arnemo et al. 2016; Herring et al. 2016).
Omnivorous animals occupy an intermediate trophic position between herbivorous and carnivorous mammals. In Eurasia, one of the most widespread hunted species in this group is wild boar Sus scrofa, the progenitor of the domestic pig, and is very often used in European ecotoxicological studies (Santiago et al. 1998; Kursa et al. 2010; Rudy 2010; Amici et al. 2012; Danieli et al. 2012; Dlugaszek and Kopczynski 2013; Gasparik et al. 2017). In North America, the wild boar (feral hog) is classified as an invasive rapidly spreading species and is now abundant in the south and southwest of the USA (Snow et al. 2017; McClure et al. 2018). Although it is a hunted animal in the USA and its meat is often consumed by people, its tissues are rarely tested for the presence of trace elements. Therefore, this type of data is very seldom used for indirect assessment of environmental pollution and consumer health exposure in North America (Oldenkamp 2016; Oldenkamp et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2018). The trophic chain position of the raccoon in North America and Europe is similar to that of the wild boar. In an effort to protect native fauna, the populations of these (and other) species are being deliberately reduced outside their natural ranges, so their tissues can be easily obtained for ecotoxicological studies and intercontinental comparisons. Selenium concentration comparisons in this aspect in omnivorous wild-living mammals seem particularly interesting. Selenium is an element with a very uneven distribution in the earth’s crust. Much of Central and Northern Europe’s soils are Se-deficient, while North American soils are generally rich in this microelement; in some areas its levels are even excessive. A comparison of Se concentrations in wild boar muscles from Europe (Czech Republic) and the USA (Georgia) indicates that Se levels in the European population are an order of magnitude smaller than in the USA, at 0.10 mg kg−1 vs 1.0 mg kg−1 dw (Kursa et al. 2010; Oldenkamp 2016). Considering that Se counteracts the absorption of Hg from the diet, areas with an elevated amount of Hg and food poor in Se (e.g., fish) would exhibit increased Hg intoxication of animals compared to individuals of the same species from areas of comparable Hg concentration but more abundant in Se. In relation to raccoon and American mink from Poland, such a suggestion was put forward by Kalisinska et al. (2017) after comparisons of data on Se and Hg in the muscles of these species in Europe (NW Poland) and North America.
3.2 Birds as Biomonitors
Avifauna, especially inland birds, is the longest (over 100 years) and the most intensively methodically observed group of animals in Europe and North America. In contrast, in Asia large-scale observations were initiated as late as the 1970s–1980s (Bibby 2003; Li and Mundkur 2006; Keck 2015). Various bird monitoring programs in Europe and North America, from local to pancontinental, have been introduced for at least 50 years, and some of them include pollution testing (Lambert et al. 2009; Schmeller et al. 2012; Gomez-Ramirez et al. 2014; Ahrestani et al. 2017; Sauer et al. 2017). There are many examples in the history of ecotoxicology where birds have been used as sentinels of environmental and human health. Canaries used to be taken to mines to indicate dangerous concentrations of methane. A dramatic reduction in the populations of birds of prey showed the dangers associated with the widespread use of pesticides in agriculture, including DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), organochlorine substances, and alkyl mercury compounds. The use of the latter, highly neurotoxic and undergoing biomagnification in the trophic chains, resulted in the considerable exposure of piscivorous wildlife and humans to mercury (Scheuhammer 2008; Rabinowitz et al. 2009; Rattner 2009; Basu 2012; Holt et al. 2012; Espin et al. 2016).
Yet another and very spectacular example is the impact of lead contained in hunting ammunition on the health and fitness of individual birds and its effects at the population level. Waterfowl such as ducks and geese (also some landfowls) are a unique group in this respect, because they swallow small pebbles as gastroliths, which are retained in the gizzard and used to grind food. However, the birds do not distinguish pebbles from spent lead shot pellets. Incidental mortality from waterfowl hunting reached population-level effects when over two million ducks and geese (~2% of all waterfowl) in North America were poisoned annually by ingestion of spent lead shot deposited on the grounds and in sediments (Bellrose 1951). Waterfowl, in addition to shot pellets, also swallow leaded fishing gear used in recreational fishing, which eventually also results in the intoxication of animals and people. In addition, waterfowls and other game animals may retain hunting ammunition in their bodies, which can then be swallowed by predators and scavengers. Thanks to numerous field observations of professionals, bird watchers, volunteers, and ecotoxicological research, the use of DDT and pesticides containing mercury was eventually banned in many developed countries (Smith et al. 2007; Espin et al. 2016; Movalli et al. 2017). In the USA, the use of lead pellets in waterfowl hunting was discontinued, as in a few European Union countries. The scientific arguments and the strong voice of the public resulted in a change of policy in the USA and Canada which used the prevalence of lead poisoning among birds as the basis of policy and law introduced to reduce lead use at the continental level, including leaded petrol (Thomas and Guitart 2010; Golden et al. 2016). However, the problem of metallic lead poisoning of rare, endangered birds and the so-called flagship species remains one of the most important in wildlife toxicology, because lead pellets scattered in the environment are still swallowed by waterfowl and landfowl, and lead bullets used in large-game hunts contaminate viscera (offal) left by hunters in the field (Pain et al. 2009; Haig et al. 2014; Espin et al. 2016; Herring et al. 2016). Tranel and Kimmel (2009), based on data from Minnesota (USA), estimated that among terrestrial vertebrates such as reptiles, mammals, and birds, lead ammunition had the greatest effect on birds (about 95%), mostly water birds (38%), raptors, and scavengers (24%). In this respect, the situation may be similar in other parts of the world where hunters use lead ammunition (Pain et al. 2009; Saito 2009; Nadjafzadeh et al. 2013; Golden et al. 2016). Another source of intoxication of birds and humans with lead are remnants of paint containing this metal and leaded gasoline (Nriagu 1990; Cai and Calisi 2016). Therefore, birds are also used in the biomonitoring of cities, e.g., urban pigeons (Ohi et al. 1981; Dauwe et al. 2005; Deng et al. 2007; Roux and Marra 2007; Behmke et al. 2015; Cai and Calisi 2016; Pollack et al. 2017).
In addition to a large number of studies on lead in birds, there is also a considerable body of research on mercury, especially in North America (Rattner et al. 2000, 2005). In inland ecosystems, exposure to mercury is the highest among piscivorous species, and in North America key research in this field includes common loon (Gavia immer), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), mergansers, and grebes (DesGranges et al. 1998; Scheuhammer et al. 1998; Stout and Trust 2002; Mierzykowski et al. 2011, 2013; Rutkiewicz et al. 2011; Shore et al. 2011; Depew et al. 2012; Schoch et al. 2014). There are also many studies on other aquatic birds, especially game waterfowls (Gerstenberger 2004; Rothschild and Duffy 2005; Braune and Malone 2006). For a long time, it was thought that mercury is only marginally accumulated in terrestrial songbirds. This view changed after the publication of Cristol et al. (2008) which showed that in areas historically anthropogenically contaminated with mercury it is transferred from the river (the South River, Virginia, USA) and riverside areas to arthropods (spiders and insects) and then songbirds feeding on them. This discovery inspired broader studies on songbirds as sentinels of mercury in terrestrial habitats (Jackson et al. 2015). The flagship species in European studies on mercury contamination is the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) (Norheim and Frøslie 1978; Falandysz et al. 2001; Kenntner et al. 2001; Kalisinska et al. 2016; Kitowski et al. 2017), but observational studies show this species is not at risk of mercury intoxication, as opposed to lead. However, elevated amounts of this metal were found in some of the common merganser (Mergus merganser) wintering on the southern coast of the Baltic Sea (Kalisinska et al. 2010).
In ecotoxicological studies, elements are rarely determined in many types of samples from wild birds to characterize their distribution in the body. Such exceptions include two papers describing the distribution of Hg and trace elements in piscivorous great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) (Nam et al. 2005; Misztal-Szkudlińska et al. 2018) and one report concerning Hg in young osprey (DesGranges et al. 1998). The muscles of an adult cormorant had the largest amount of Cu (>65%), a significant part of Hg and Cr (about 35%), as well as about 30% of Se and Co accumulated in the body (Nam et al. 2005). In osprey nestlings, about 85% of absorbed Hg gets to feathers during their growth, and from the remaining a dozen or so percent, half of them accumulate in muscles (DesGranges et al. 1998). The quoted works show that the highest amount of Hg in soft tissues is found in the muscles of birds, but its distribution is strongly influenced by the intense transfer of Hg to feathers during their growth.
The usefulness of various bird tissues to monitor the abundance of the environment with elements essential to life and its contamination with toxic metals is constantly discussed. Although the samples most frequently selected in biomonitoring include liver and kidneys, it is important to study their concentration in the muscles and target tissues because of the transfer of various elements up the terrestrial food chains. Interpretation of the obtained concentrations of elements in avian samples requires their reference to threshold values, as in the book by Beyer and Meador (2011) for Cd, Hg, Pb, and Se. However, most trace elements have not been researched in such a thorough fashion for very large and species-diverse clusters of birds. Due to this lack of data, certain reference may come from values calculated for unanalyzed tissues based on the known concentration in the examined tissues through the use of appropriate equations (when the concentrations between these tissues correlate with each other) (Mochizuki et al. 2011; Ackerman et al. 2016; Evers 2018).
3.3 Tissues of Terrestrial Vertebrates Used in Biomonitoring
In wildlife toxicology, various types of biological samples may be collected from live animals captured then released (mainly feathers, hair/fur, blood; less frequently fragments of claws or oil from the uropygial gland) or from dead birds and mammals (most of all internal tissues such as liver, kidney, muscle, bone, and brain, but also external tissues). Studies on environmental contaminants, including toxic trace elements, often use avian eggs, with one egg usually taken from individual broods, assaying contaminants in the eggshell, whole egg content, or white and yolk separately (Leonzio and Massi 1989; Burger and Gochfeld 2003; Hashmi et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016; Orlowski et al. 2016; Movalli et al. 2017; Pollack et al. 2017). In addition, researchers often use feathers (e.g., in nests or nearby), hair, mammalian scat, cervid antlers, and avian pellets. Those biological materials are taken mainly from endangered, threatened, or sensitive species; such noninvasive sampling methods are recommended as valuable tools to monitor wildlife and minimally affect free-ranging animals. So-called “postlethal” animal samples are obtained from those already killed by hunters, trappers, museum collectors, or vehicles or found in the field (Kierdorf and Kierdorf 2003; Pokorny 2006; Pauli et al. 2010; Movalli et al. 2017; Trapp and Flaherty 2017).
Different trace elements are deposited in different wildlife tissues at different rates and amounts. The liver, kidney, muscle, and bone from internal tissues are major locations where the largest part of the absorbed essential trace elements are deposited, but concentrations in these tissues are not necessarily representative of the entire body burden, and it can be difficult to detect trace element deficiencies within critical organs (Taylor 1996; Demesko et al. 2018). Essential and nonessential trace elements in different tissues and organs may be subject to temporary or long-term accumulation in various body parts, biotransformation (including methylation and demethylation), and removal mainly with feces and urine, and to a small extent also with saliva, sweat, tears and respiration (Nollet et al. 2008; Lopez-Alonso 2012; Jan et al. 2015; Prashanth et al. 2015). Additional methods of metal and metalloid excretion in birds are eggs and feathers and in mammals the fur (Burger et al. 1993; Burger 1994; Leonzio et al. 2009; Rendón-Lugo et al. 2017). The organ or tissue in which trace metal/metalloid toxicity occurs may differ from the organ or tissue(s) where the element bioaccumulates, which may be connected with its kinetics. Target organs (where the toxic effects are produced) may differ between species of endothermic vertebrates, mainly owing to differences in absorption, distribution, and excretion (US EPA 2007). Table 2.2 presents the main target organs/tissues of nonessential elements and internal body parts where the elements achieve typically highest levels in terrestrial endothermic animals.
Among the internal tissues of wildlife, a number of essential and nonessential elements are predominantly measured in the liver and kidney; however, fluoride and lead are mainly investigated in the bones (Mateo et al. 2003; Demesko et al. 2018). For the past two to three decades, nondestructive samples (hair, feathers, and blood) have been preferred, which are often taken from birds and bats (Russo and Jones 2015; Pauli et al. 2010; Wada et al. 2010; Langner et al. 2012; Lodenius and Solonen 2013; Stankovic et al. 2014; Gall et al. 2015; Flache et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016). Sampling of live animals does not reduce the population, which is important in the case of their small numbers, especially with regard to protected species, and such action is usually socially acceptable. It is estimated that plumage and mammalian pelts contain the largest part of methylmercury (MeHg) accumulated in the body. Therefore these tissues are frequently used in the detection of mercury exposure in wildlife, but many other heavy metals are also investigated in these keratin structures. Feathers (similar to hair) are metabolically inert after their formation, so for those avian species with well-known molt schedules, the analyses of specific individual feathers provide unique chemical information of a very discrete time. For many bird species, the molt schedules are poorly recognized, and metal concentrations in feathers are highly variable within an individual bird. Therefore, proper interpretation of chemical results is very difficult or impossible. For these reasons some researchers state that feathers and hair have a low priority as preferred tissues for sampling in ecotoxicological studies (Furness and Greenwood 1993; Leonzio et al. 2009; Ackerman et al. 2016; Rendón-Lugo et al. 2017).
Generally, metal levels in blood samples reflect short-term exposure (immediate dietary intake), the liver and kidney reflect longer terms, while the bones reflect the longest because their mineral remodeling occurs very slowly (Stankovic et al. 2014; Gall et al. 2015; Espin et al. 2016). Cadmium is bioaccumulated in bird and mammal kidneys almost over the entire lifetime, and a strong correlation between nephric Cd level and animal age is observed (Wayland and Scheuhammer 2011; Rendón-Lugo et al. 2017). Many trace elements achieve their highest concentrations in the liver and kidneys, (Table 2.2), but together these organs constitute no more than 4%–6% of the animal’s body weight. The muscles (40%–50% of body weight) are most significant in the transfer of trace elements between animals from different trophic levels, depending on the type of consumer (Kalisinska et al. 2017). This is especially important in the case of Hg. The level of intestinal absorption of Hg in terrestrial vertebrates depends on its chemical form, and in animal muscle about 90% Hg is present as MeHg, which is almost completely absorbed from the digestive tract. Hg in the liver and kidney is mostly inorganic Hg with low intestinal absorption (<10%). In the kidneys and liver, the percentage of MeHg in total mercury (THg) can be small (especially when THg reaches high concentrations), which is why these organs play a small role in the transfer of Hg between animals. Unfortunately, few papers provide information about the absolute and relative weight of tissues and organs as well as the percentage composition of the consumer’s diet, so it is difficult to estimate the amount of transfer of trace elements between different trophic levels. Among terrestrial birds and mammals, Hg concentration increases from herbivores to omnivores and carnivores, but in the case of other trace elements, this type of regularity is not always clearly determined (Tete et al. 2013; Stankovic et al. 2014; Kalisinska et al. 2017).
The most numerous group of ecotoxicological studies concerns a small group of trace elements (<10). They are dominated by toxic elements (Cd, Hg, Pb, As), usually analyzed in 1–3 types of biological samples. Publications in which several or dozens of elements were determined in samples obtained from terrestrial birds and mammals are much less numerous, but this has been made possible due to technical progress in chemical analysis (e.g., Harding et al. 1998; Falandysz et al. 2001; Horai et al. 2006; Deng et al. 2007; Dailey et al. 2008; Zimmerman et al. 2008; Ertl et al. 2016; Lazarus et al. 2017). In literature, data concerning trace elements in soft and hard tissues tend to be presented as mean wet/fresh or dry weight. In scientific studies, the diversity of samples and the multiplicity of the elements determined are subject to various comparisons and discussions. Then it is necessary to present concentrations of elements not only in the same units (mainly expressed as mg kg−1, which is analogous to μg g−1 or ppm) but also selecting dry or wet weight. Conversion of wet weight to dry weight (or vice versa) requires knowledge of the percentage of water in the samples, but such information is seldom presented in the reports. Furthermore, samples are dried at temperatures ranging from 50 °C to 105 °C (not always to constant weight), depending on the methodology and the analytical requirements. Therefore, various comparisons use the average percentage of water in vertebrate tissues (Ackerman et al. 2016; Zukal et al. 2015). For the purposes of this book, the average water content in the four most commonly analyzed tissues of birds and mammals was calculated using data from seven and ten species, respectively (data for birds were taken from Honda et al. 1985; Cosson et al. 1988: Kalisinska et al. 2010, 2014; Binkowski et al. 2013; for mammals from Weiner 1973; Reinoso et al. 1997; Blus and Henny 1990; Gamberg et al. 2005; Rudy 2010; Sleeman et al. 2010; Kalisinska et al. 2012a, b; Lanocha et al. 2014). Table 2.3 shows the average percentage of water in the tissues of birds and mammals and also proposed coefficients for wet to dry mass conversion.
When collecting samples from wild mammals and birds, it is advisable to obtain and record important information about them, including species, sex, age, location (latitude and longitude), and season/year. This kind of data is needed for intra- and interspecies analyses of differences in the concentration of trace elements and may reveal time-spatial changes on a regional, continental, and even global scale (Tataruch and Kierdorf 2003; Hollamby et al. 2006; Burger 2007; Traas and van Leeuwen 2007; Zukal et al. 2015; Gochfeld 2017).
Depending on the assumed objective of research in wildlife toxicology, samples used in analysis may come from one or more species representing the same or different trophic categories (e.g., herbivores, omnivores, predators). Particularly important are studies analyzing the concentration of selected highly toxic elements (Hg, Pb, Cd) due to the range of research and the very large number of samples (sometimes exceeding 1000). For example, a study on Hg levels in North American birds analyzed blood samples of 102 songbird species from terrestrial habitats (Jackson et al. 2015). The review by Ackerman et al. (2016) compiled literature data on Hg in approximately 27,000 samples (eggs, blood, liver, muscle, and feathers) from 225 species of birds from various systematic groups found in western North America. They concluded that avian Hg concentrations were greatest in ocean and salt marsh habitats and lowest in terrestrial habitats. Their analysis identified multiple hotspots contaminated by the metal in the western part of North America. Finally, Jackson et al. (2016) studied Hg in the blood of 20 avian piscivorous species (including a few target species: bald eagle, osprey, common loon) and those species turned out to be much more exposed to Hg than non-piscivorous species including songbirds.
Biomonitoring of heavy metals in Europe uses bird species on a smaller scale. The leading role is played by diurnal and nocturnal avian raptors, mostly tested for lead and to a lesser extent mercury, the two most preferred metals in such studies (Gomez-Ramirez et al. 2014; Espin et al. 2016). Unlike birds, it is difficult to find extensive studies on toxic metals in North American and European mammals that would allow intra- and intercontinental comparisons (Tranel and Kimmel 2009; Yates et al. 2014). Such publications can only be found for mercury in otters. Mercury in white-tailed eagle and Eurasian otter has been of great interest in Europe for years and sporadically in Asia. In relation to these two species, their North American counterparts are the bald eagle and river otter, which have also been extensively studied. Below we present an example of intercontinental comparisons concerning hepatic mercury concentrations in these species (Fig. 2.2). Median hepatic Hg concentrations in both otter species were similar, but Hg levels in the bald eagle were higher than in the white-tailed eagle (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05).
Also other piscivorous wildlife species are used in Hg biomonitoring, including both native and alien species occurring in Europe and North America, with well-known biology and reactions to Hg (Table 2.4). However, the volume of European research is much smaller than in North America (e.g., because of lower Hg contamination), and it is difficult to perform comprehensive intercontinental comparisons. For example, there are many American and Canadian papers on Hg in species such as American mink or raccoon (native mammals from North America introduced in Europe), but in Europe the research has been scarce so far. Birds such as common loon or common merganser are native to both continents, but the volume of research in North America is also much greater than in Europe (especially with regard to common loon). With time, when the number of European studies on Hg in their bodies will become sufficiently large (especially American mink and raccoon in Europe), it will be possible to deepen intercontinental comparative studies.
Biomonitoring potential is one of the few acceptable effects of introducing alien game animals. It is associated with good knowledge of the biology of most of these species (e.g., American mink, raccoon, wild boar, red fox), social approval for acquiring material for research from specimens during culling of their populations. Nevertheless, in various European countries and some parts of North America (rarely in Asia), biomonitoring programs for various contaminants in terrestrial ecosystems, including trace elements, are created mainly on the basis of selected native species of birds and mammals. An interesting European example is the Norwegian program “Environmental pollutants in the terrestrial and urban environment,” now having been conducted for several years and based mainly on the research on the following animals: earthworms, brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), red fox, fieldfare (Turdus pilaris), Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), and tawny owl (Strix aluco) (Herzke et al. 2017).
4 Conclusions
The collection and analysis of a sufficiently large number of diverse data on trace elements determined in many species of wildlife allow, among other things, to select candidate species as biomonitors accumulating specific elements in their tissues (e.g., piscivorous species for mercury biomonitoring) and identify existing threats from toxic substances for endangered species, localization of hotspots, and levels of human exposure to trace elements. In order to carry out comparisons in this respect on a large scale, i.e., covering the large terrestrial areas of the Northern Hemisphere, it would be necessary to focus on widespread and numerous species representing different trophic levels.
References
Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Herzog M, Hartman C, Peterson S, Evers DC et al (2016) Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: a synthesis. Sci Total Environ 568:749–769
Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in the terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risks of metals. Springer, New York
Ahrestani FS, Saracco JF, Sauer JR, Pardieck KL, Royle JA (2017) An integrated population model for bird monitoring in North America. Ecol Appl 27:916–924
Al-Dissi AN, Blakley BR, Woodbury MR (2011) Selenium toxicosis in a white-tailed deer herd. Can Vet J 52:70–73
Al-Ganzoury HH, El-Shaer ME (2008) Aluminum residues in meat and edible tissues of some ruminant and its relation to public health in Sharkia Governorate. SCVMJ 13:361–366
Amici A, Danieli PP, Russo C, Primi R, Ronchi B (2012) Concentrations of some toxic and trace elements in wild boar (Sus scrofa) organs and tissues in different areas of the Province of Viterbo, Central Italy. Ital J Anim Sci 11:354–362
Anke M, Muller M, Anke S, Gurtler H, Muller R, Schafer U, Angelow L (2001) The biological and toxicological importance of aluminium in the environment and food chain of animals and humans. In: Ermidou-Pollet S, Pollet S (eds) 3rd international symposium on trace elements in human: new perspectives, Greece
Aras NK, Ataman OY (2006) Trace element analysis of food and diet. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 344 pp
Arita HT, Rodriguez P, Ella Vazquez-Dominguez E (2005) Continental and regional ranges of North American mammals: Rapoport’s rule in real and null worlds. J Biogeogr 32:961–971
Arnemo JM, Andersen O, Stokke S, Thomas VG, Krone O, Pain DJ et al (2016) Health and environmental risks from lead-based ammunition/science versus socio-politics. EcoHealth 13:618–622
ATSDR (2005) Toxicological profile for tin and tin compounds. US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 425 pp
Basu N (2012) Piscivorous mammalian wildlife as sentinels of methylmercury exposure and neurotoxicity in humans. In: Ceccatelli S, Aschner M (eds) Methylmercury and neurotoxicity. Current topics in neurotoxicity, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 357–370
Bealey WJ, Long S, Spurgeon DJ, Leith I, Cape JN (2008) Review and implementation study of biomonitoring for assessment of air quality outcomes. Environment Agency, Bristol UK, Science report SC030175/SR2, p 181
Behmke S, Fallon J, Duerr AE, Lehner A, Buchweitz J, Katzner T (2015) Chronic lead exposure is epidemic in obligate scavenger populations in eastern North America. Environ Int 79:51–55
Bellrose FC (1951) Effects of ingested lead shot upon waterfowl populations. North Am Wildl Conf Trans 16:125–133
Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) (2011) Environmental contaminants in biota. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Bhargava S, Bhargava S (2013) Ecological consequences of the acid rain. IOSR JAC 5:19–24
Bhattacharya PT, Misra SR, Hussain M (2016) Nutritional aspects of essential trace elements in oral health and disease: an extensive review. Scientifica, Article ID 5464373
Bibby CJ (2003) Fifty years of bird study. Bird Study 50(3):194–210
Binkowski ŁJ, Sawicka-Kapusta K, Szarek J, Strzyżewska E, Felsmann M (2013) Histopathology of liver and kidneys of wild living mallards Anas platyrhynchos and coots Fulica atra with considerable concentrations of lead and cadmium. Sci Total Environ 450–451:326–333
Bird DM, Carriere D, Lacombe D (1992) The effect of dietary sodium fluoride on internal organs, breast muscle, and bones in captive American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 22:242–246
Blus LJ, Henny CJ (1990) Lead and cadmium concentrations in mink from northern Idaho. Northwest Sci 64:2019–2223
Borch-Iohnsen B, Nilssen KJ, Norheim G (1996) Influence of season and diet on liver and kidney content of essential elements and heavy metals in Svalbard reindeer. Biol Trace Elem Res 51:235–247
Braune BM, Malone BJ (2006) Mercury and selenium in livers of waterfowl harvested in northern Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:284–289
Bridges CC, Zalups RK (2010) Transport of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in target tissues and organs. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part B 13:385–410
Brzezinski M, Zalewski A, Niemczynowicz A, Jarzyna I, Suska-Maławska M (2014) The use of chemical markers for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink populations. Ecotoxicology 23:767–778
Burger J (1994) Heavy metals in avian eggshells: Another excretion method. J Toxicol Environ Health 41:207–220
Burger J (2006a) Bioindicators: types, development, and use in ecological assessment and research. Environ Bioindic 1:22–39
Burger J (2006b) Bioindicators: a review of their use in the environmental literature 1970–2005. Bioindicators 1:136–144
Burger J (2007) A framework and methods for incorporating gender-related issues in wildlife risk assessment: gender-related differences in metal levels and other contaminants as a case study. Environ Res 104:153–162
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns in metal levels in eggs of common terns (Sterna hirundo) in New Jersey. Sci Total Environ 311:91–100
Burger J, Seyboldt S, Morganstein N, Clark K (1993) Heavy metals and selenium in feathers of three shorebird species from Delaware Bay. Environ Monit Assess 28:189–198
Burger J, Lord CG, Yurkow EJ, McGrath L (2000) Metals and metallothionein in the liver of raccoons: utility for environmental assessment and monitoring. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 60:243–261
Cai F, Calisi RM (2016) Seasons and neighborhoods of high lead toxicity in New York City: the feral pigeon as a bioindicator. Chemosphere 161:274–279
Carneiro M, Colaço B, Colaço J, Faustino-Rocha AI, Colaço A, Lavin S, Oliveira PA (2016) Biomonitoring of metals and metalloids with raptors from Portugal and Spain: a review. Environ Rev 24(1):63–83
Celechovska O, Literak I, Ondrus S, Pospisil Z (2006) Heavy metals in brown bears from the central European Carpathians. Acta Vet Brno 75:501–506
Chapman PM (1996) Hazard identification, hazard classification and risk assessment for metals and metal compounds in the aquatic environment. ICME, The International Council on Metals and the Environment, Ottawa, 36 pp
Chapman PM (2007) Determining when contamination is pollution—weight of evidence determinations for sediments and effluents. Environ Int 33:492–501
Choubisa SL, Mishra GV, Sheikh Z, Bhardwaj B, Mali P, Jaroli VJ (2011) Osteo-dental fluorosis in domestic horses and donkeys in Rajasthan, India. Adv Pharmacol Toxicol 12:29–37
Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006) The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Clin Rev Toxicol 36:609–662
Connors PG, Anderlini VC, Risebrough RW, Martin JH, Schroeiber RW, Anderson DW (1972) Heavy metal concentrations in brown pelicans from Florida and California. Cal-Neva Wildl 1972:56–64
Cosson RP, Amiard JC, Amisard-Triquet C (1988) Trace elements in little egrets and flamingos of Camargue, France. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 15:107–116
Cristol DA, Brasso RL, Condon AM, Fovargue RE, Friedman SL, Hallinger KK et al (2008) The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs. Science 320:335
Dailey RN, Raisbeck MF, Siemion RS, Cornish TE (2008) Liver metal concentrations in greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). J Wildl Dis 44:494–498
Danieli PP, Serrani F, Primi R, Ponzetta MP, Ronchi B, Amici A (2012) Cadmium, lead, and chromium in large game: a local-scale exposure assessment for hunters consuming meat and liver of wild boar. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 63:612–627
Dauwe T, Janssens E, Bervoets L, Blust R, Eens M (2005) Heavy-metal concentrations in female laying great tits (Parus major) and their clutches. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:249–256
Demesko J, Markowski J, Słaba M, Hejduk J, Minias P (2018) Age-related patterns in trace element content vary between bone and teeth of the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 74:330–338
Deng H, Zhang Z, Chang C, Wang Y (2007) Trace metal concentration in great tit (Parus major) and greenfinch (Carduelis sinica) at the Western Mountains of Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 148:620–626
Depew DC, Basu N, Burgess NM, Campbell LM, Evers DC, Grasman KA et al (2012) Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (Gavia immer): rationale for use in ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2399–2407
DesGranges JL, Rodrigue J, Tardif B, Laperle M (1998) Mercury accumulation and biomagnification in ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the James Bay and Hudson Bay Regions of Quebec. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:330–341
Diaz-Bone RA, van de Wiele T (2010) Biotransformation of metal(loid)s by intestinal microorganisms. Pure Appl Chem 82:409–427
Dlugaszek M, Kopczynski K (2013) Elemental composition of muscle tissue of wild animals from central region of Poland. Int J Environ Res 7:973–978
Dornbos P, Strom S, Basu N (2013) Mercury exposure and neurochemical biomarkers in multiple brain regions of Wisconsin river otters (Lontra canadensis). Ecotoxicology 22:469–475
Ertl K, Kitzer R, Goessler W (2016) Elemental composition of game meat from Austria. Food Addit Contam Part B 9:120–126
Espin S, Garcia-Fernandez AJ, Herzke D, Shore RF, van Hattum B, Martinez-Lopez E et al (2016) Tracking pan-continental trends in environmental contamination using sentinel raptors—what types of samples should we use? Ecotoxicology 25:777–801
Evans ED (1993) Mercury and other metals in bald eagle feathers and other tissues from Michigan, Nearby Areas of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio, Ontario and Alaska 1985-1989. Wildlife Division Report No. 3200, Michigan Dep Nat Res, Lansing, 57 pp
Evans RD, Addison EM, Villeneuve JY, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Distribution of inorganic and methylmercury among tissues in mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis). Environ Res 84:133–139
Evers D (2018) The effects of methylmercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review and approach for interpretation. In: DellaSala DA, Goldstein MI (eds) The Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, vol 5. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 181–194
Evers DC, Burgess NM, Champoux L, Hoskins B, Major A, Goodale WM et al (2005) Patterns and interpretation of mercury exposure in freshwater avian communities in northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:193–221
Facemire C, Augspurger T, Bateman D, Brim M, Conzelmann P, Delchamps S, Douglas E, Inmon L, Looney K, Lopez F, Masson G, Morrison D, Morse N, Robison A (1995) Impacts of mercury contamination in the southeastern United States. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:923–926
Falandysz J, Ichihashi H, Szymczyk K, Yamasaki S, Mizera T (2001) Metallic elements and metal poisoning among white-tailed sea eagles from the Baltic South Coast. Marine Pollut Bull 42:1190–1119
Flache L, Becker NI, Kierdorf U, Czamecki S, Düring RA, Encarnacao JA (2015) Hair samples as monitoring units for assessing metal exposure of bats: a new tool for risk assessment. Mamm Biol 80:178–181
Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A (2012) Toxicity of lead: a review with recent updates. Interdiscip Toxicol 5:47–58
Fortin C, Beauchamp G, Dansereau M, Larivière N, Bélanger D (2001) Spatial variation in mercury concentrations in wild mink and river otter carcasses from the James Bay territory, Quebec, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:121–127
Frank A (1986) In search of biomonitors for cadmium: cadmium content of wild Swedish fauna during 1973-1976. Sci Total Environ 57:57–65
Frank A, Danielsson R, Jones B (2000) The ‘mysterious’ disease in Swedish moose. Concentrations of trace elements in liver and kidneys and clinical chemistry. Comparison with experimental molybdenosis and copper deficiency in the goat. Sci Total Environ 249:107–122
Franson JC, Pain DJ (2011) Lead in birds. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota: interpreting tissue concentrations. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 563–593
Furness RW, Greenwood JJD (1993) Birds as monitors of environmental change. Chapman & Hall Press, London
Gall JE, Boyd RS, Rajakaruna N (2015) Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review. Environ Monit Assess 187:201
Gamberg M, Braune BM (1999) Contaminant residue levels in arctic wolves (Canis lupus) from the Yukon Territory, Canada. Sci Total Environ 243–244:329–338
Gamberg M, Boila G, Stern G, Roach P (2005) Cadmium, mercury and selenium concentrations in mink (Mustela vison) from Yukon, Canada. Sci Total Environ 351–352:523–529
García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL, González-Fernández M, Moreno F, García-Sevillano MA, Gómez-Jacinto V (2012) Biological responses related to agonistic, antagonistic and synergistic interactions of chemical species. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:2237–2225
Garcia-Fernandez AJ (2014) Ecotoxicology, avian. In: Wexler P (ed) Encyclopedia of toxicology, vol 2, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 289–294
Gasparik J, Binkowski LJ, Jahnatek A, Smehyl P, Dobias M, Lukac N et al (2017) Levels of metals in kidney, liver, and muscle tissue and their influence on the fitness for the consumption of wild boar from western Slovakia. Biol Trace Elem Res 177:258–266
Gehrt SD, Riley SPD, Cypher BL (eds) (2011) Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Genovesi P, Bacher S, Kobelt M, Pascal M, Scalera R (2009) Alien mammals of Europe. In: DAISIE (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 119–129
Gerstenberger SL (2004) Mercury concentrations in migratory waterfowl harvested from Southern Nevada Wildlife Management areas, USA. Environ Toxicol 19:35–44
Gochfeld M (2017) Sex differences in human and animal toxicology: toxicokinetics. Toxicol Pathol 45:172–189
Golden NH, Rattner BA (2003) Ranking terrestrial vertebrate species for utility in biomonitoring and vulnerability to environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 176:67–136
Golden NH, Warner SE, Coffey MJ (2016) A review and assessment of spent lead ammunition and its exposure and effects to scavenging birds in the United States. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 237:123–191
Gomez-Ramirez P, Shore RF, van den Brink NW, van Hattum B, Bustnes JO, Duke G et al (2014) An overview of existing raptor contaminant monitoring activities in Europe. Environ Int 67:12–21
Grove RA, Henny CJ (2008) Environmental contaminants in male river otters collected from Oregon and Washington, USA, 1994-1999. Environ Monit Assess 145:49–73
Gutleb AC, Kranz A, Nechay G, Toman A (1998) Heavy metal concentrations in livers and kidneys of the otter (Lutra lutra) from central Europe. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 60:273–279
Haig SM, D’Elia J, Eagles-Smith C, Fair JM, Gervais J, Herring G et al (2014) The persistent problem of lead poisoning in birds from ammunition and fishing tackle. Condor 116:409–428
Halbrook RS, Jenkins JH, Bush PB, Seabolt ND (1994) Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: monitoring environmental contamination. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27:306–310
Harding LE, Harris ML, Elliott JE (1998) Heavy and trace metals in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) captured on rivers receiving metals discharges. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61:600–607
Hashmi MZ, Abbasi NA, Tang X, Malik RN (2015) Egg as a biomonitor of heavy metals in soil. In: Sherametiand I, Varma A (eds) Heavy metal contamination of soils: monitoring and remediation. Springer International, Cham, Switzerland, pp 127–143
Heltai M, Markov G (2012) Red fox (Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758) as biological indicator for environmental pollution in Hungary. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:910–914
Herring G, Eagles-Smith CA, Wagner MT (2016) Ground squirrel shooting and potential lead exposure in breeding avian scavengers. PLoS One 11:e0167926
Herzke D, Nygård T, Heimstad ES (2017) Environmental pollutants in the terrestrial and urban environment 2016. Kjeller, NILU, Norwegian Environment Agency report M-752/2017
Hoekstra PF, Braune BM, Elkin B, Armstrong FAJ, Muir DCG (2003) Concentrations of selected essential and non-essential elements in arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) and wolverines (Gulo gulo) from the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ 309:81–92
Hollamby S, Afema-Azikuru J, Waigo S, Cameron K, Gandolf AR, Norriset A et al (2006) Suggested guidelines for use of avian species as biomonitors. Environ Monit Assess 118:13–20
Holt EA, Miller SW (2011) Bioindicators: using organisms to measure environmental impacts. Nat Educ Knowl 2:8
Holt G, Frøslie A, Norheim G (1979) Mercury, DDE, and PCB in the avian fauna in Norway 1965-1976. Acta Vet Scand Suppl 70:1–28
Holt YS, Kim YM, Lee KE (2012) Methylmercury exposure and health effect. J Prev Med Public Health 45:353–363
Honda K, Min BY, Tatsukawa R (1985) Heavy metal distribution in organs and tissues of the eastern great white egret Egretta alba modesta. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 35:781–789
Horai S, Minagawa M, Ozaki H, Watanabe I, Takeda Y, Yamada K et al (2006) Accumulation of Hg and other heavy metals in the Javan mongoose (Herpestes javanicus) captured on Amamioshima Island, Japan. Chemosphere 65:657–665
Hubner R, Astin KB, Herbert RJH (2010) ‘Heavy metal’—time to move on from semantics to pragmatics. J Environ Monit 12:1511–1514
Inkielewicz I, Krechniak J (2003) Fluoride content in soft tissues and urine of rats exposed to sodium fluoride in drinking water. Fluoride 36:263–266
Jackson AK, Evers DC, Adams EM, Cristol DA, Eagles-Smith C, Edmonds ST et al (2015) Songbirds as sentinels of mercury in terrestrial habitats of eastern North America. Ecotoxicology 24:453–467
Jackson A, Evers DC, Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Willacker JJ, Elliott JE et al (2016) Mercury risk to avian piscivores across Western United States and Canada. Sci Total Environ 568:685–696
Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Jaishankar BKN et al (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7:60–72
James LF, Shupe JL (1984) Selenium poisoning in livestock. Rangelands 6:64–67
Jan AT, Azam M, Siddiqui K, Ali A, Choi I, Haq QMR (2015) Heavy metals and human health: mechanistic insight into toxicity and counter defense system of antioxidants. Int J Mol Sci 16:29592–29630
Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Brit Med Bull 68:167–182
Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Moores AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448
Ji X, Hu W, Cheng J, Yuan T, Xu F, Qu L et al (2006) Oxidative stress on domestic ducks (Shaoxing duck) chronically exposed in a mercury-selenium coexisting mining area in China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 64:171–177
Jones KE, Safi K (2011) Ecology and evolution of mammalian biodiversity. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:2451–2461
Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Kalisinska E, Budis H, Podlasinska J, Łanocha N, Kavetska KM (2010) Body condition and mercury concentration in apparently healthy goosander (Mergus merganser) wintering in the Odra estuary, Poland. Ecotoxicology 19:1382–1399
Kalisinska E, Budis H, Łanocha N, Podlasińska J, Baraniewicz E (2012a) Comparison of hepatic and nephric concentrations of mercury between feral and ranch American mink (Neovison vison) from NW Poland. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88:802–806
Kalisinska E, Lisowski P, Kosik-Bogacka DI (2012b) Red fox Vulpes vulpes (L., 1758) as a bioindicator of mercury contamination in terrestrial ecosystems of north-western Poland. Biol Trace Elem Res 145:172–180
Kalisinska E, Gorecki J, Lanocha N, Okonska A, Melgarejo JB, Budis H et al (2014) Total and methyl mercury in soft tissues of white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) and osprey (Pandion haliaetus) collected in Poland. Ambio 43:858–870
Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Lanocha-Arendarczyk N, Budis H, Podlasinska J, Popiolek M et al (2016) Brains of native and alien mesocarnivores in biomonitoring of toxic metals in Europe. PLoS One 11(8):e159935
Kalisinska E, Lanocha-Arendarczyk N, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Budis H, Pilarczyk B, Tomza-Marciniak A et al (2017) Muscle mercury and selenium in fishes and semiaquatic mammals from a selenium-deficient area. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 136:24–30
Kannan K, Falandysz J (1997) Butyltin residues in sediment, fish, fish-eating birds, harbour porpoise and human tissues from the Polish coast of the Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 34:203–207
Karmakar A, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2014) Neurotoxicity of nanoscale materials. J Food Drug Anal 22:147–160
Keck F (2015) Sentinels for the environment. China Perspect 2:43–52
Keeyask Hydropower Limited Partnership (2012) Keeyask Generation Project. Environmental Impact Statement, 75 pp [http://keeyask.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Section-8-Wildlife-and-Mercury.pdf]
Kenntner N, Tataruch F, Krone O (2001) Heavy metals in soft tissue of white-tailed eagles found dead or moribund in Germany and Austria from 1993 to 2000. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1831–1837
Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H (2003) Temporal variation of fluoride concentration in antlers of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) living in an area exposed to emissions from iron and steel industry, 1948–2000. Chemosphere 52:1677–1681
Kim J, Oh JM (2013) Assessment of trace metals in four bird species from Korea. Environ Monit Assess 185:6847–6854
Kitowski I, Jakubas D, Wiącek D, Sujak A (2017) Concentrations of lead and other elements in the liver of the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla), a European flagship species, wintering in Eastern Poland. Ambio 46:825–841
Klee RJ, Graedel TE (2004) Elemental cycles: a status report on human or natural dominance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:69–107
Klenavic K, Champoux L, O’Brien M, Daoust PY, Evans RD, Evans HE (2008) Mercury concentration in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otters (Lontra canadensis) collected from eastern and Atlantic Canada: relationship to age and parasitism. Environ Pollut 156:359–366
Knopper LD, Mineau P, Scheuhammer AM, Bond DE, Mckinnon DT (2006) Carcasses of shot Richardson’s ground squirrels may pose lead hazards to scavenging Hawks. J Wildl Manag 70:295–299
Kramarova M, Massanyi P, Jančová A, Toman R, Slamečka J, Tataruch F et al (2005) Concentration of cadmium in the liver and kidneys of some wild and farm animals. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 49:465–469
Krewski D, Yokel RA, Nieboer E, Borchelt D, Cohen J, Harry J, Kacew S et al (2007) Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B Crit Rev 10(Suppl 1):1–269
Krone O, Willie F, Kenntner N, Boertmann D, Tataruch F (2004) Mortality factors, environmental contaminants, and parasites of white-tailed sea eagles from Greenland. Avian Dis 48:417–424
Krone O, Stjernberg T, Kenntner N, Tataruch F, Koivusaari J, Nuuja I (2006) Mortality factors, helminth burden, and contaminant residues in white-tailed sea eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) from Finland. Ambio 35:98–104
Kruuk H, Conroy JWH, Webb A (1997) Concentration of mercury in otters (Lutra lutra) in Scotland in relation to rainfall. Environ Pollut 96:13–18
Kucera E (1983) Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can J Zool 61:2250–2256
Kuo HW, Kuo SM, Chou C-H, Lee TC (2000) Determination of 14 elements in Taiwanese bones. Sci Total Environ 255:45–54
Kurdi MS (2016) Chronic fluorosis: the disease and its anaesthetic implications. Ind J Anaesth 60:157–162
Kursa J, Herzig I, Trávníček J, Illek J, Kroupová V, Fuksová S (2010) Iodine and selenium contents in skeletal muscles of red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Czech Republic. Acta Vet Brno 79:403–407
Lambert JD, Hodgman TP, Laurent EJ, Brewer GL, Iliff MJ, Dettmers R (2009) The northeast bird monitoring handbook. American Bird Conservancy, The Plains, VA, 32 pp
Langner HW, Greene E, Domenech R, Staats M (2012) Mercury and other mining-related contaminants in ospreys along the Upper Clark Fork River, Montana, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 62:681–695
Lanocha N, Kalisinska E, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Budis H, Podlasinska J, Jedrzejewska E (2014) Mercury levels in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from the Warta Mouth National Park, north-western Poland. Biol Trace Elem Res 159:152–160
Lazarus M, Sekovanić A, Orct T, Reljić S, Kusak J, Jurasović J, Huber D (2017) Apex predatory mammals as bioindicator species in environmental monitoring of elements in Dinaric Alps (Croatia). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:23977–23991
Lemarchand C, Rosoux R, Berny P (2010) Organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, heavy metals and anticoagulant rodenticides in tissues of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) from upper Loire River catchment (France). Chemosphere 80:1120–1124
Leonzio C, Massi A (1989) Metal biomonitoring in bird eggs: a critical experiment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 43:402–406
Leonzio C, Bianchi N, Gustin M, Sorace A, Ancora S (2009) Mercury, lead and copper in feathers and excreta of small passerine species in relation to foraging guilds and age of feathers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83:693–697
Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM, Hellgren E (2015) Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern North America. Wildl Monogr 191:1–61
Leveque C, Mounolou J (2003) Biodiversity. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
Li ZWD, Mundkur T (2006) Monitoring waterbirds in the Asia-Pacific region. In: Boere GC, Galbraith CA, Stroud DA (eds) Waterbirds around the world. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK, pp 339–342
Liu J, Waalkes MP (2008) Liver is a target of arsenic carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci 105:24–32
Ljungvall K, Magnusson U, Korvela M, Norrby M, Bergquist J, Persson S (2017) Heavy metal concentrations in female wild mink (Neovison vison) in Sweden: sources of variation and associations with internal organ weights. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:2030–2035
Llacuna S, Gorizz A, Sanpera C, Nadal J (1995) Metal accumulation in three species of passerine birds (Emberiza cia, Parus major, and Turdus merula) subjected to air pollution from coal-fired power plant. Arch Environ Toxicol 28:298–303
Lodenius M, Solonen T (2013) The use of feathers of birds of prey as indicators of metal pollution. Ecotoxicology 22:1319–1334
Lodenius M, Skaren U, Hellstedt P, Tulisalo E (2014) Mercury in various tissues of three mustelid and other trace metals in liver o European otter from eastern Finland. Environ Monit Assess 186:325–333
Lopez-Alonso M (2012) Trace minerals and livestock: not too much not too little. ISRN Vet Sci 2012:704825
López Alonso M, Benedito JL, Miranda M, Castillo C, Hernández J, Shore RF (2002) Cattle as biomonitors of soil arsenic, copper, and zinc concentrations in Galicia (NW Spain). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 43:103–108
Lord CG, Gaines KF, Boring CS, Brisbin IL, Gochfeld M Jr, Burger J (2002) Raccoon (Procyon lotor) as a bioindicator of mercury contamination at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 43:356–363
Lucia M, Andre JM, Gontier K, Diot N, Veiga J, Davail S (2010) Trace element concentrations (mercury, cadmium, copper, zinc, lead, aluminum, nickel, arsenic, and selenium) in some aquatic birds of the Southwest Atlantic Coast of France. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:844–853
Ma WC, Denneman W, Faber J (1991) Hazardous exposure of ground-living small mammals to cadmium and lead in contaminated terrestrial ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20:266–270
Madsen AB, Dietz HH, Henriksen P, Clausen B (1999) Survey of Danish free living otters Lutra lutra—a consecutive collection and necropsy of dead bodies. IUCN Spec Group Bull 16:65–75
Mandal P (2017) An insight of environmental contamination of arsenic on animal health. Emerg Contam 3:17–22
Maret W (2016) The metals in the biological periodic system of the elements: concepts and conjectures elements. Int J Mol Sci 17:66
Markert B (2013) Bioindication and biomonitoring as innovative biotechniques for controlling heavy metal data of the environment. Proceedings of 15th international conference on heavy metals in the environment, ICHMET, Poland, Gdansk 2010, pp 44–48
Markert B, Breure AM, Zechmeister HG (2003) Definitions, strategies and principles for bioindication/biomonitoring of the environment. In: Markert BA, Breure AM, Zechmeister HG (eds) Bioindicators and biomonitors. Principles, concepts and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–39
Markert B, Wuenschmann S, Fraenzle S, Wappelhorst O, Weckert V, Breulmann G, Djingova R, Herpin U, Lieth H, Schroder W, Siewers U, Steinnes E, Wolterbeek B, Zechmeister H (2008) On the road from environmental biomonitoring to human health aspects: monitoring atmospheric heavy metal deposition by epiphytic/epigeic plants: present status and future needs. Int J Environ Pollut 32(4):486
Markov G, Kocheva M, Gospodinova M (2016) Assessment of heavy metal accumulation in the golden jackal (Canis aureus) as a possible bioindicator in an agricultural environment in Bulgaria. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96:458–464
Martelli A, Rousselet E, Dycke C, Bouron A, Moulis JM (2006) Cadmium toxicity in animal cells by interference with essential metals. Biochimie 88:1807–1814
Martinez MA, Ballesteros S, Piga FJ, Sánchez de la Torre C, Cubero CA (2007) The tissue distribution of fluoride in a fatal case of self-poisoning. J Anal Toxicol 31:526–533
Mateo R, Taggart M, Meharg AA (2003) Lead and arsenic in bones of birds of prey from Spain. Environ Pollut 126:107–114
Mayack DT (2012) Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination. Environ Monit Assess 184:2497–2516
McClure ML, Burdett CL, Farnsworth ML, Sweeney SJ, Miller RS (2018) A globally-distributed alien invasive species poses risks to United States imperiled species. Sci Rep 8(1):5331
Mendez-Rodriguez LC, Alvarez-Castaneda ST (2014) Influence of trace elements in the epigenetic of mammals. Therya 5:817–829
Mierle G, Addison EM, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Mercury levels in tissues of otters from Ontario, Canada: variation with age, sex, and location. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:3044–3051
Mierzykowski SE, Smith JEM, Todd CS, Kusnierz D, DeSorbo CR (2011) Liver contaminants in bald eagle carcasses from Maine. USFWS. Specific Project Report FY09-MEFO-6-EC. Maine Field Office, Orono, ME, 53 pp
Mierzykowski SE, Todd CS, Pokras MA, Oliveira RD (2013) Lead and mercury levels in livers of bald eagles recovered in New England. USFWS. Specific Project Report FY13-MEFO-2-EC. Maine Field Office, Orono, ME, 26 pp
Millan J, Mateo R, Taggart MA, López-Bao JV, Viota M, Monsalve L et al (2008) Levels of heavy metals and metalloids in critically endangered Iberian lynx and other wild carnivores from southern Spain. Sci Total Environ 399:193–201
Misztal-Szkudlińska M, Kalisińska E, Szefer P, Konieczka P, Namieśnik J (2018) Mercury concentration and the absolute and relative sizes of the internal organs in cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo (L. 1758) from the breeding colony by the Vistula Lagoon (Poland). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 154:118–126
Mizukawa H, Takahashi S, Nakayama K et al (2009) Contamination and accumulation feature of organotin compounds in common cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from Lake Biwa, Japan. In: Obayashi Y, Isobe T, Subramanian A, Suzuki S, Tanabe S (eds) Interdisciplinary studies on environmental chemistry – environmental research in Asia, Terrapub, pp 153–161
Mochizuki M, Kaitsuka C, Mori M, Hondo R, Ueda F (2011) An innovative approach to biological monitoring using wildlife. In: Ekundayo E (ed) Environmental monitoring, InTech
Monkkonen M, Viro P (1997) Taxonomic diversity of the terrestrial bird and mammal fauna in temperate and boreal biomes of the northern hemisphere. J Biogeogr 24:603–612
Movalli P, Bode P, Dekker R, Fornasari L, van der Mije S, Yosef R (2017) Retrospective biomonitoring of mercury and other elements in museum feathers of common kestrel Falco tinnunculus using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:25986–26005
Mysłek P, Kalisińska E (2006) Contents of selected heavy metals in the liver, kidneys, and abdominal muscle of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) in Central Pomerania, Poland. Pol J Vet Sci 9:31–41
Nadjafzadeh M, Hofer H, Krone O (2013) The link between feeding ecology and lead poisoning in white-tailed eagles. J Wildl Manag 77:48–57
Nam DH, Anan Y, Ikemoto T, Okabe Y, Kim EY, Subramanian A et al (2005) Specific accumulation of 20 trace elements in great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from Japan. Environ Pollut 134:503–514
Nath R (2000) Tin. In: Nath R (ed) Health and disease role of micronutrients and trace elements: recent advances in the assessment of micronutrients and trace elements deficiency in humans. APH Publishing, New Delhi, pp 385–389
Nemsadze K, Sanikidze T, Ratiani L, Gabunia L, Sharashenidze T (2009) Mechanisms of lead-induced poisoning. Georgian Med News 172–173:92–96
Neuschwander-Tetri BA (2007) Trace elements and the liver. In: Rodés J, Benhamou JP, Blei A, Reichen J, Rizzetto M, Dufour JF, Friedman SL et al (eds) Textbook of hepatology: from basic science to clinical practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp 233–241
Newman J, Zillioux E, Rich E, Liang L, Newman C (2004) Historical and other patterns of monomethyl and inorganic mercury in the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:75–80
Noel M, Spence J, Harris KA, Robbins CT, Fortin JK, Ross PS et al (2014) Grizzly bear hair reveals toxic exposure to mercury through salmon consumption. Environ Sci Technol 48:7560–7567
Nollet L, Huyghebaert G, Spring P (2008) Effect of different levels of dietary organic (bioplex) trace minerals on live performance of broiler chickens by growth phases. J Appl Poult Res 17:109–115
Norheim G, Frøslie A (1978) The degree of methylation and organ distribution of mercury in some birds of prey in Norway. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 43:196–204
Norheim G, Sivertsen T, Brevik EM, Frøslie A (1984) Mercury and selenium in wild mink (Mustela vision) from Norway. Nord Vet Med 36:43–48 (in Norveriann Norwegian)
NRC (2005) Mineral Tolerance of Animals. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Nriagu JO (1990) The rise and fall of leaded gasoline. Sci Total Environ 92:13–28
Nriagu JO, Pacyna J (1988) Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soil by trace metals. Nature 333:134–139
O’Brien DJ, Kaneene JB, Poppenga RH (1993) The use of mammals as sentinels for human exposure to toxic contaminants in the environment. Environ Health Perspect 99:351–368
O’Hara TM, George JC, Blake J, Burek K, Carroll G, Dau J et al (2003) Investigation of heavy metals in a large mortality event in caribou of Northern Alaska. Arctic 56:125–135
Ohi G, Seki H, Minowa K, Ohsawa M, Mizoguchi I, Sugimori F (1981) Lead pollution in Tokyo – the pigeon reflects its amelioration. Environ Res 26:125–129
Oldenkamp RE (2016) Exposure of game species to trace elements and radiocesium on the Savannah River site in South Carolina. MSc Thesis, University of Georgia, 164 pp
Oldenkamp RE, Bryan AL Jr, Kennamer RA, Leaphart JC, Webster SC, Beasley JC (2017) Trace elements and radiocesium in game species near contaminated sites. J Wildl Manag 81:1338–1350
Orlowski G, Halupka L, Pokorny P, Klimczuk E, Sztwiertnia H, Dobicki W (2016) Variation in egg size, shell thickness, and metal and calcium content in eggshells and egg contents in relation to laying order and embryonic development in a small passerine bird. Auk 133:470–483
Pain DJ, Fisher IJ, Thomas VG (2009) A global update of lead poisoning in terrestrial birds from ammunition sources. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG (eds) Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife and humans. The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, pp 1–21
Pauli JN, Whiteman JP, Riley MD, Arthur D. Middleton AD 2010 Defining noninvasive approaches for sampling of vertebrates. Conserv Biol 24:349–352
Pedersen S, Lierhagen S (2006) Heavy metal accumulation in arctic hares (Lepus arcticus) in Nunavut, Canada. Sci Total Environ 368:951–955
Poessel SA, Gese EM, Young JK (2017) Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of coyotes and conflicts in urban areas. Lands Urban Plan 157:259–269
Pokorny B (2006) Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) antlers as an accumulative and reactive bioindicator of lead pollution near the largest Slovene thermal power plant. Vet Arhiv 76:131–142
Pollack L, Ondrasek NR, Calisi R (2017) Urban health and ecology: the promise of an avian biomonitoring tool. Curr Zool 63:205–212
Prashanth L, Kattapagari KK, Chitturi RT, Baddam VR, Prasad LK (2015) A review on role of essential trace elements in health and disease. J NTR Univ Health Sci 4:75–85
Rabinowitz P, Scotch M, Conti L (2009) Human and animal sentinels for shared health risks. Vet Ital 45:23–24
Rajaganapathy V, Xavier F, Sreekumar D, Mandal PK (2011) Heavy metal contamination in soil, water and fodder and their presence in livestock and products: a review. J Environ Sci Technol 4:234–249
Rattner BA (2009) History of wildlife toxicology. Ecotoxicology 18:773–783
Rattner BA, Pearson JL, Golden NH, Cohen JB, Ervin RM, Ottinger MA (2000) Contaminant exposure and effect – terrestrial vertebrates database: trends and data gaps for Atlantic coast estuaries. Environ Monit Assess 63:131–142
Rattner BA, Eisenreich KM, Golden NH, McKernan MA, Hothem RL, Custer TW (2005) Retrospective ecotoxicological data and current information needs for terrestrial vertebrates residing in coastal habitat of the United States. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:257–265
Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP (2010) Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health Part C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27:1–35
Reinoso RF, Telfer BA, Rowland M (1997) Tissue water content in rats measured by desiccation. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 38:87–92
Reis LSLS, Pardo PL, Camargos AS, Oba E (2010) Mineral element and heavy metal poisoning in animals. J Med Med Sci 1:560–579
Rendón-Lugo AN, Santiago P, Puente-Lee I, León-Paniagua L (2017) Permeability of hair to cadmium, copper and lead in five species of terrestrial mammals and implications in biomonitoring. Environ Monit Assess 189:640
Rogers TA, Bedrosian B, Graham J, Foresman KR (2012) Lead exposure in large carnivores in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. J Wildl Manag 76:575–582
Rothschild RFN, Duffy LK (2005) Mercury concentrations in muscle, brain and bone of Western Alaskan waterfowl. Sci Total Environ 349:277–283
Roug A, Swift PK, Gerstenberg G, Woods LW, Kreuder-Johnson C, Torres SG et al (2015) Comparison of trace mineral concentrations in tail hair, body hair, blood, and liver of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in California. J Vet Diagn Invest 27:295–305
Roux KE, Marra PP (2007) The presence and impact of environmental lead in passerine birds along an urban to rural land use gradient. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 53:261–268
Rudy M (2010) Chemical composition of wild boar meat and relationship between age and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in muscle and liver tissue. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 27:464–472
Russo D, Jones G (2015) Bats as bioindicators: an introduction. Mammal Biol 80:157–158
Rutherford JC, Bird AJ (2004) Metal-responsive transcription factors that regulate iron, zinc, and copper homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. Eukaryot Cell 3:1–13
Rutkiewicz J, Nam DH, Cooley T, Neumann K, Padilla IB, Route W et al (2011) Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states. Ecotoxicology 20:1669–1676
Saito K (2009) Lead poisoning of Steller’s sea-eagle (Haliaeetus pelagicus) and white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) caused by the ingestion of lead bullets and slugs, in Hokkaido Japan. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG (eds) Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife and humans. The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, pp 1–8
Sakulsak N (2012) Metallothionein: an overview on its metal homeostatic regulation in mammals. Int J Morphol 30:1007–1012
Sánchez-Chardi A, Marques CC, Nadal J, Da Luz Mathias M (2007) Metal bioaccumulation in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula, inhabiting an abandoned pyrite mine site. Chemosphere 67:121–130
Sanchez-Virosta P, Espin S, Garcia-Fernandez AJ, Eeva T (2015) A review on exposure and effects of arsenic in passerine birds. Sci Total Environ 512-513:506–525
Santiago D, Motas-Guzmán M, Reja A, María-Mojica P, Rodero B, García-Fernández AJ (1998) Lead and cadmium in red deer and wild boar from Sierra Morena Mountains (Andalusia, Spain). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61:730–737
Sauer JR, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ, Smith AC, Hudson MAR, Vicente Rodriguez V et al (2017) The first 50 years of the North American breeding bird survey. Condor 119:576–593
Scheuhammer AM (2008) Recent advances in the toxicology of methylmercury in wildlife. Ecotoxicology 17:67–68
Scheuhammer AM, Atchison CM, Wong AHK, Evers DC (1998) Mercury exposure in breeding common loons (Gavia immer) in central Ontario, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:191–196
Schmeller DS, Henle K, Loyau A, Besnard A, Henry P-Y (2012) Bird-monitoring in Europe—a first overview of practices, motivations and aims. Nat Conserv 2:41–57
Schoch N, Jackson AK, Duron M, Evers DC, Glennon MJ, Driscoll CT, Yu X, Simonin H, Sauer AK (2014) Wildlife criterion value for the common loon (Gavia immer) in the Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Waterbirds 37(sp1):76–84
Selinus O, Finkelman RB (2011) Geochemical aspects of medical geology. J Geol Soc Sri Lanka 14:1–9
Sellers P (2010) A survey of chemical contaminants in wild meat harvested from the traditional territories of Wabauskang First Nation (Wabauskang), Asubpeeschoseewagong Netum Anishinaabek (Grassy Narrows), and Wabaseemong Independent Nation (Whitedog). First Nations Environmental Contaminants Program (National) as Partial fulfillment of Project No. HQ0900055, 6 pp
Sheffy TB, Amant JR (1982) Mercury burdens in furbearers in Wisconsin. J Wildl Manag 46:1117–1120
Shore RF, Douben PE (1994) Predicting ecotoxicological impacts of environmental contaminants on terrestrial small mammals. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 134:49–89
Shore RF, Casulli A, Bologov V, Wienburg CL, Afsar A, Toyne P et al (2001) Organochlorine pesticide, polychlorinated biphenyl and heavy metal concentrations in wolves (Canis lupus L. 1758) from north-west Russia. Sci Total Environ 280:45–54
Shore RF, Pereira MG, Walker LA, Thompson DR (2011) Mercury in nonmarine birds and mammals. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 609–642
Sidding AAH, Ellison AM, Ochs A, Villar-Leeman C, Lau MK (2016) How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Ecol Indic 60:223–230
Silbergeld EK, Sauk J, Somerman M, Todd A, McNeill F, Fowler B et al (1993) Lead in bone: storage site, exposure source, and target organ. Neurotoxicology 14:225–236
Skibniewski M, Skibniewska EM, Kosla KM (2015) The molybdenum content in the muscles of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Acta Sci Pol Zootechnica 14:175–182
Sleeman JM, Cristol DA, White AE, Evers DC, Gerhold RW, Keel MK (2010) Mercury poisoning in a free-living northern river otter (Lontra canadensis). J Wildl Dis 46:1035–1039
Smith PN, Cobb GP, Godard-Codding C, Hoff D, McMurry ST, Rainwater TR et al (2007) Contaminant exposure in terrestrial vertebrates. Environ Pollut 150:41–64
Smith JB, Tuberville TD, Beasley JC (2018) Hunting and game consumption patterns of hunters in South Carolina. J Fish Wildl Manag 9:321–329
Snow NP, Jarzyna MA, VerCauteren KC (2017) Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs. J Appl Ecol 54:2022–2032
Speakman JR (2005) Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan. J Exp Biol 208:1717–1730
Stankovic S, Kalaba P, Stankovic AR (2014) Biota as toxic metal indicators. Environ Chem Lett 12:63–84
Stansley W, Velinsky D, Thomas R (2010) Mercury and halogenated organic contaminants in river otters (Lontra canadensis) in New Jersey, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2235–2242
Steinnes E (2009) Soils and geomedicine. Environ Geochem Health 31:523–535
Stensberg MC, Wei Q, McLamore ES, Porterfield DM, Wei A, Sepúlveda MS (2011) Toxicological studies on silver nanoparticles: challenges and opportunities in assessment, monitoring and imaging. Nanomedicine (Lond) 6:879–898
Stolen ED, Breininger DR, Frederick PC (2005) Using waterbirds as indicators in estuarine systems: successes and perils. In: Bartone S (ed) Estuarine indicators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 409–422
Stout JH, Trust KA (2002) Elemental and organochlorine residues in bald eagles from Adak Island, Alaska. J Wildl Dis 38:511–517
Strmiskova G, Strmiska F (1992) Contents of mineral substances in venison. Nahrung 36:307–308
Strom SM (2008) Total mercury and methylmercury residues in river otters (Lutra canadensis) from Wisconsin. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:546–554
Taggart MA, Figuerola J, Green AJ, Mateo R, Deacon C, Osborn D et al (2006) After the Aznalcollar mine spill: arsenic, zinc, selenium, lead and copper levels in the livers and bones of five waterfowl species. Environ Res 100:349–361
Talmage SS, Walton BT (1991) Small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 119:48–143
Tataruch F, Kierdorf H (2003) Mammals as biomonitors. In: Markert BA, Breure AM, Zechmeister HG (eds) Bioindicators and biomonitors. principles, concepts and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 737–772
Taylor A (1996) Detection and monitoring of disorders of essential trace elements. Ann Clin Biochem 33:486–510
Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metals toxicity and the environment. EXS 101:133–164
Tete N, Fritsch C, Afonso E, Coeurdassier M, Lambert JC, Giraudoux P et al (2013) Can body condition and somatic indices be used to evaluate metal-induced stress in wild small mammals? PLoS One 8(6):e66399
Thomas VG, Guitart R (2010) Limitations of European Union policy and law for regulating use of lead shot and sinkers: comparisons with North American regulation. Env Pol Gov 20:57–72
Thuiller W, Pironon S, Psomas A, Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Lavergne S et al (2014) The European functional tree of bird life in the face of global change. Nat Commun 5:3118
Traas TP, van Leeuwen CJ (2007) Ecotoxicological effects. In: Leeuwen CJ, van Vermeire TG (eds) Risk assessment of chemicals: an introduction. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 281–355
Tranel MA, Kimmel RO (2009) Impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife, the environment, and human health – a literature review and implications for Minnesota. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG (eds) Ingestion of lead from spent ammunition: implications for wildlife and humans. The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, pp 1–20
Trapp SE, Flaherty EA (2017) Noninvasive and cost-effective trapping method for monitoring sensitive mammal populations. Wildl Soc Bull 41:770–775
Tsunoda M, Aizawa Y, Nakano K, Liu Y, Horiuchi T, Itai K, Humio Tsunoda H (2005) Changes in fluoride levels in the liver, kidney, and brain and in neurotransmitters of mice after subacute administration of fluoride. Fluoride 38:284–292
US EPA (2007) Framework for metals risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 120/R-07/001, 172 pp [https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/metals-risk-assessment-final.pdf]
Van den Brink NW, Ma WC (1998) Spatial and temporal trends in levels of trace metals and PCBs in the European badger Meles meles (L., 1758) in The Netherlands: implications for reproduction. Sci Total Environ 222:107–118
Vikøren T, Bernhoft A, Waaler T, Handeland K (2005) Liver concentrations of copper, cobalt, and selenium in wild Norwegian red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Wildl Dis 41:569–579
Vikøren T, Kristoffersen AB, Lierhagen S, Handeland K (2011) A comparative study of hepatic trace element levels in wild moose, roe deer, and reindeer from Norway. J Wildl Dis 47:661–672
Wada O (2004) What are trace elements? Their deficiency and excess states. JMAJ 47:351–358
Wada H, Yates DE, Evers DC, Taylor RJ, Hopkins WA (2010) Tissue mercury concentrations and adrenocortical responses of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) near a contaminated river. Ecotoxicology 19(7):1277–1284
Walker LA, Lawlor AJ, Chadwick EA, Potter E, Pereira MG, Shore RF (2010) Inorganic elements in the liver of Eurasian otters, Lutra lutra, from England and Wales in 2007 & 2008: a Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS) report. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK, 13 pp
Walker LA, Lawlor AJ, Chadwick EA, Potter E, Pereira MG, Shore RF (2011) Inorganic elements in the livers of Eurasian otters, Lutra lutra, from England and Wales in 2009: a Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS) report. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK, 12 pp
Wayland M, Scheuhammer AM (2011) Cadmium in birds. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota: interpreting tissue concentrations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 645–666
Weech SA, Wilson LK, Langelier KM, Elliott JE (2003) Mercury residues in livers of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) found dead or dying in British Columbia, Canada (1987–1994). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:562–569
Weiner J (1973) Dressing percentage, gross body composition and caloric value of the roe-deer. Acta Theriol 18:209–222
WHO (1973) Trace elements in human nutrition. Report of a WHO Expert Committee, WHO Technical Report Series, No. 532, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
WHO (1996) Trace elements in human nutrition and health. World Health Organization, Switzerland, Geneva
WHO (2002) Principles and methods for the assessment of risk from essential trace elements. Environmental Health Criteria 228. World Health Organization, Switzerland, Geneva. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc228.htm
Wijnhoven S, Leuven RSEW, van der Velde G, Jungheim G, Koelemij EI, de Vries FT et al (2007) Heavy-metal concentrations in small mammals from a diffusely polluted floodplain: importance of species- and location-specific characteristics. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:603–613
Wilkomirski B (2013) History of bioindication. Monit Srod Przyrod 14:137–142
Wobeser G, Swift M (1976) Mercury poisoning in a wild mink. J Wildl Dis 12:335–340
Wolfe MF, Atkeson T, Bowerman W, Burger K, Evers DC, Murray MW et al (2007) Wildlife indicators. In: Harris R, Krabbenhoft DP, Mason R, Murray MW, Reash R, Saltman T (eds) Ecosystem response to mercury contamination: indicators of change. SETAC, CRC Press, Webster, NY, pp 123–189
Wolfe LL, Conner MM, Bedwell CL, Lukacs PM, Miller MW (2010) Select tissue mineral concentrations and chronic wasting disease status in mule deer from North-central Colorado. J Wildl Dis 46:1029–1034
Wood PB, White JH, Steffer A, Wood JM, Facemire CF, Percival HF (1996) Mercury concentrations in tissues of Florida bald eagle. J Wildl Manag 60:178–185
Wren CD (1984) Distribution of metals in tissues of beaver, raccoon and otter from Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 34:177–184
Wren CD (1986) Mammals as biological monitors of environmental metal levels. I. Mercury. Environ Monit Assess 6:127–144
Wren CD, MacCrimmon H, Frank R, Suda P (1980) Total methylmercury levels in wild mammals from the Precambrian shield area of south central Ontario, Canada. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 25:100–105
Yaroshevsky AA (2006) Abundances of chemical elements in the Earth’s crust. Geochem Int 44:48–55
Yates DE, Mayack DT, Munney K, Evers DC, Major A, Kaur T, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:263–274
Yates DE, Adams EM, Angelo SE, Evers DC, Schmerfeld J, Moore MS et al (2014) Mercury in bats from the northeastern United States. Ecotoxicology 23:45–55
Yatoo MI, Saxena A, Deepa PM, Habeab BP, Devi S, Jatav RS et al (2013) Role of trace elements in animals: a review. Vet World 6:963–967
Zhang Y, Gladyshev VN (2010) General trends in trace element utilization revealed by comparative genomic analyses of Co, Cu, Mo, Ni, and Se. J Biol Chem 285:3393–3405
Zhang WW, Ma JZ (2011) Waterbirds as bioindicators of wetland heavy metal pollution. Proc Environ Sci 10:2769–2774
Zimmerman TJ, Jenks JA, Leslie DM Jr, Neiger RD (2008) Hepatic minerals of white-tailed and mule deer in the southern black hills, South Dakota. J Wild Dis 44:341–350
Zukal J, Pikula J, Bandouchova H (2015) Bats as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution: history and prospect. Mamm Biol 80:220–227
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalisińska, E. (2019). Endothermic Animals as Biomonitors of Terrestrial Environments. In: Kalisińska, E. (eds) Mammals and Birds as Bioindicators of Trace Element Contaminations in Terrestrial Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00121-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00121-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00119-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00121-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)