Skip to main content

The Many Uses of Error

Twelve Steps to a Unified Framework

  • Chapter
Experimental Slips and Human Error

Part of the book series: Cognition and Language ((CALS))

Abstract

Human activity is rife with momentary control problems: hesitations, dysfluencies, false starts, memory lapses, and errors. This seems rather strange, because normal human action also tends to be effective, complex, adaptive, and fast. Clearly our action control system is the product of many millions of years of evolution: Why then is it so prone to control problems? This is a paradox that emerges most clearly in the case of inadvertent slips, which may be defined as actions that reveal a mismatch between a reportable intention and overt performance (Baars, 1988; MacKay, 1987; Norman, 1981; Reason, 1979).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, K., & Bever, T. G. (1969). Syntactic structure modifies attention during speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 280–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1977). The planning of speech: Is there semantic editing prior to speech articulation? Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1980a). The competing plans hypothesis: An heuristic viewpoint on the causes of errors in speech. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1980b). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1983). Conscious contents provide the nervous system with coherent, global information. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 3, pp. 47–76). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1987). What is conscious in the control of action? A modern ideomotor theory of voluntary control. In D. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), Learning and memory: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Symposium, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J., & MacKay, D. G. (1978). Experimentally eliciting phonetic and sentential speech errors: Methods, implications, and work in progress. Language in Society, 7, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). Consciousness and intention: A framework and some evidence. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4(3), 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J., & Motley, M. T. (1976). Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited errors. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. (1987). The case against accommodation: Evidence from German speech error data. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., & Cohen, P. R. (1982). Emotional influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory. In M. S. Clarke & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 291–331). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. L. (1980). Some constraints on models of language production. In B. L. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. L. (1982). Speech errors: Old data in search of new theories. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue. Amsterdam: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchial connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D. (1980). Transformational errors. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 111–122). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay in faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1901/1938). The psychopathology of everyday life. Trans. A. A. Brill, in A. A. Brill (Ed.), The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (1968). Speculations on performance models. Journal of Linguistics, 4, 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.). (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin. V. A. (Ed.). (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors of linguistic performance: Slips of the pen, tongue, and hand (pp. 263–271). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972). Pauses, clauses, and sentences. Language and Speech, 15, 103–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1982). The panda’s thumb: More reflections on natural history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. (1972). Problems of organization of motor systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 3, 303–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. (1980). Unitization and automaticity in perception. In J. H. Flowers (Ed.), 1980 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 53–71). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Imber, L. G. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2014–2024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 78(2), 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1981). Speech errors: Retrospect and prospect. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 319–332). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory of language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. A. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, M. E. (1987). Sources of competing activation in action errors. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, M. E., & Baars, B. J. (1985). Competition in activation networks: A test using laboratory-induced action blends and spoonerisms. Paper given at the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1970). A functional model of memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1976). Semantic bias effects on the outcomes of verbal slips. Cognition, 4, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1978). Laboratory verification of ”Freudian” slips of the tongue as evidence of pre-articulatory semantic editing. In B. Ruken (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1979). Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory-induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421–432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., Baars, B. J., & Camden, C. T. (1979). Personality and situational influences upon verbal slips. Human Communication Research, 5, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., Baars, B. J., & Camden, C. T. (1981). Syntactic criteria in prearticulatory editing: Evidence from laboratory-induced slips of the tongue. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(5), 503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1976). Memory and attention. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention and action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. La Jolla: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1979). Actions not as planned: The price of automatization. In G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness: Vol. 1. Psychological issues (pp. 67–89). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1982, June). Learning from absent-minded mistakes. SSRC Newsletter, 46, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1983). Absent-mindedness and cognitive control. In J. Harris & P. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions and absentmindedness (pp. 19–26, 113-132). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1984a). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 515–549). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1984b). Little slips and big disasters. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,9(2), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1992). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absent-minded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1978). The dominant action system: An information-processing approach to consciousness. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigation into the flow of experience. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 2. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speech scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, A. (1973). Availability: An heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1912/1973). An introduction to psychology. London: G. Allen. (Reprinted, New York: Arno Press.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baars, B.J. (1992). The Many Uses of Error. In: Baars, B.J. (eds) Experimental Slips and Human Error. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1166-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1164-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics