Abstract
This paper suggests two new heuristic algorithms for optimization of Value-at-Risk (VaR). By definition, VaR is an estimate of the maximum portfolio loss during a standardized period with some confidence level. The optimization algo- rithms are based on the minimization of the closely related risk measure Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). For continuous distributions, CVaR is the expected loss exceeding VaR, and is also known as Mean Excess Loss or Expected Shortfall. For discrete distributions, CVaR is the weighted average of VaR and losses exceeding VaR. CVaR is an upper bound for VaR, therefore, minimization of CVaR also reduces VaR. The algorithms are tested by minimizing the credit risk of a portfolio of emerging market bonds. Numerical experiments showed that the algorithms are efficient and can handle a large number of instruments and scenarios. However, calculations identified a deficiency of VaR risk measure, compared to CVaR. Minimization of VaR leads to an undesirable stretch of the tail of the distribution exceeding VaR. For portfolios with skewed distributions, such as credit risk, minimization of VaR may result in a significant increase of high losses exceeding VaR. For the credit risk problem studied in this paper, VaR minimization leads to about 16% increase of the average loss for the worst 1% scenarios (compared to the worst 1% scenarios in CVaR minimum solution). 1% includes 200 of 20000 scenarios, which were used for estimating credit risk in this case study.
This paper is based on the research project conducted by Nicklas Larsen during his visit to the University of Florida in Spring 2000. This research project has not been conducted in the framework of any legal agreement between the University of Florida and Algorithmic, Inc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acerbi, C., Nordio, C. and C. Sirtori, Expected shortfall as a tool for financial risk management. Working paper, (2001), (Can be downloaded from http://www.gloriamundi.org).
Acerbi, C., and D. Tasche, On the coherence of expected shortfall. Working paper, (2001), (Can be downloaded from http://www.gloriamundi.org).
Andersson, F., Mausser, H., Rosen, D. and S. Uryasev (2001): Credit Risk Optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk Criterion. Mathematical Programming, Series B, December, 2000, relevant Research Report 99–9 can be downloaded from http://www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/pubs.html#t.
Andersen, J.V., and D. Sornette (1999): Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: Increasing Returns While Lowering Large Risks. Working Paper, University of Los Angeles, can be downloaded from http://www.gloriamundi.org.
Artzner, P., Delbaen F., Eber, J.M., and D. Heath (1999) Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228.
Basak, S. and A. Shapiro (1998): Value-at-Risk Based Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices. Working Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, can be downloaded from http://www.gloriamundi.org.
Birge J.R. and F. Louveaux (1997): Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, New York.
Bucay, N. and D. Rosen (1999): Credit Risk of an International Bond Portfolio: a Case Study. ALGO Research Quarterly. Vol. 2, No. 1, 9–29.
CreditMetrics: The Benchmark for Understanding Credit Risk (1997): Technical Document, J.P.Morgan Inc., New York, NY.
CreditRisk+: A Credit Risk Management Framework(1997): Credit Suisse Financial Products, New York, NY.
Duffle, D. and J. Pan (1997): An Overview of Value-at-Risk. Journal of Derivatives. 4, 7–49.
Emmer S., Kluppelberg, C., and R. Korn. (2000): Optimal Portfolios with Bounded Capital at Risks. Working paper, Munich University of Technology, June.
Ermoliev, Yu. and R. J-B Wets (Eds.) (1988): Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization,Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 10.
Jorion, Ph. (1996): Value at Risk: A New Benchmark for Measuring Derivatives Risk. Irwin Professional Pub.
Gaivoronski, A.A. and G. Pflug (2000): Value at Risk in portfolio optimization: properties and computational approach, NTNU, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Working paper, July.
Gourieroux, C., Laurent, J.P. and O. Scaillet (2000): Sensitivity Analysis of Values-at-Risk.,Working paper, Universite de Louvan, January, can be downloaded from http://www.gloriamundi.org.
Grootweld H. and W.G. Hallerbach (2000): Upgrading VaR from Diagnostic Metric to Decision Variable: A Wise Thing to Do?, Report 2003 Erasmus Center for Financial Research, June.
Kall, P. and S.W. Wallace (1994) Stochastic Programming. Willey, Chichester.
Kan, Y.S., and Kibzun, A.I. (1996). Stochastic Programming Problems with Probability and Quantile Functions, John Wiley and Sons, 316.
Kast, R., Luciano, E., and L. Peccati (1998): VaR and Optimization. 2nd International Workshop on Preferences and Decisions, Trento, July 1–3 1998.
Kealhofer, S. (1997): Portfolio Management of Default Risk, KMV Corporation, Document # 999–0000–033, Revision 2. 1.
Lucas, A., and Klaassen, P. (1998): Extreme Returns, Downside Risk, and Optimal Asset Allocation. Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 71–79.
Markowitz, H.M. (1952): Portfolio Selection. Journal of finance. Vol. 7, 1, 77–91.
Mausser, H. and D. Rosen (1998): Beyond VaR: From Measuring Risk to Managing Risk, Algo Research Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2, 5–20.
Mausser, H. and D. Rosen (1999): Applying Scenario Optimization to Portfolio Credit Risk, Algo Research Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2, 19–33.
Mausser, H and D. Rosen (1999): Efficient Risk/Return Frontiers for Credit Risk, Algo Research Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4, 35–48.
Pflug, G.Ch. (2000): Some Remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk. In.“Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications”, Ed. S. Uryasev, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
Pritsker, M. (1997): Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies, Journal of Financial Services Research, 12: 2 /3, 201–242.
Prekopa, A. (1995) Stochastic Programming,Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Puelz, A. (1999): Value-at-Risk Based Portfolio Optimization. Working paper, Southern Methodist University, November.
RiskMetricsTM. (1996): Technical Document,4-th Edition, New York, NY, J.P.Morgan Inc., December.
Tasche, D. (1999): Risk contributions and performance measurement. Working paper, Munich University of Technology (July).
Wilson, T. (1997a): Portfolio Credit Risk I, Risk, No. 10 (9), 111–117.
Wilson, T. (1997b): Portfolio Credit Risk II, Risk, No. 10 (10), 56–61.
Rockafellar, R.T. and S.Uryasev. (2000): Optimization of Conditional Value-At-Risk. The Journal of Risk, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000, 21–41.
Rockafellar R.T. and S. Uryasev. (2001): Conditional Value-atRisk for General Loss Distributions. Research Report 2001–5. ISE Dept., University of Florida, April (2001) (Can be downloaded: www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/cvar2.pdf)
Ziemba, T.W. and M.J. Mulvey Eds. (1998): Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling, Cambridge Press,Publications of the Newton Institute.
Yamai, Y. and T. Yoshiba. (2001): On the Validity of Valueat-Risk: Comparative Analyses with Expected Shortfall. Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies. Bank of Japan. IMES Discussion Paper 2001-E-4. (Can be downloaded: www.imes.boj.or.jp/english/publication/edps/fedps2001index.html)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, N., Mausser, H., Uryasev, S. (2002). Algorithms for Optimization of Value-at-Risk. In: Pardalos, P.M., Tsitsiringos, V.K. (eds) Financial Engineering, E-commerce and Supply Chain. Applied Optimization, vol 70. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5226-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5226-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5222-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5226-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive