Abstract
Surfactants are the amphiphilic molecules that tend to alter the interfacial and surface tension. The fundamental property related to the structure of surfactant molecules is their self-aggregation resulting in the formation of association colloids. Apart from the packing of these molecules into closed structures, the structural network also results in formation of extended bilayers, which are thermodynamically stable and lead to existence of biological membranes and vesicles. From biological point of view the development of new knowledge and techniques in the area of vesicles, bilayers and multiplayer membranes and their polymerizable analogue provide new opportunities for research in the respective area. ‘Green Surfactants’ or the biologically compatible surfactants are in demand to replace some of the existing surfactants and thereby reduce the environmental impact, in general caused by classic surfactants. In this context, the term ‘natural surfactants or biosurfactants’ is often used to indicate the natural origin of the surfactant molecules. Most important aspect of biosurfactants is their environmental acceptability, because they are readily biodegradable and have low toxicity than synthetic surfactants. Some of the major applications of biosurfactants in pollution and environmental control are microbial enhanced oil recovery, hydrocarbon degradation, hexa-chloro cyclohexane (HCH) degradation and heavy-metal removal from contaminated soil. In this chapter, we tried to make a hierarchy from vital surfactant molecules toward understanding their behavioral aspects and application potential thereby ending into the higher class of broad spectrum ‘biosurfactants’. Pertaining to the budding promise offered by these molecules, the selection of the type and size of each structural moiety enables a delicate balance between surface activity and biological function and this represents the most effective approach of harnessing the power of molecular self-assembly.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Atwood D, Florence AT. Surfactant Systems; Their Chemistry, Pharmacy and Biology. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1983.
Rosen MJ. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomenon. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1978.
Tanford C. The Hydrophobic Effect. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1980.
Holmberg K, Jonsson B et al. Surfactants and polymers in solution. 2nd ed. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Holmes MC. Intermediate phases of surfactant-water mixtures. Current Opinion in Colloid Interface Sci 1998; 3:485–492.
Khan A. Phase science of surfactants. Current Opinion in Colloid Interface Sci 1996; 1:614–623.
Rosen MJ, Solash J. Factors affecting initial foam height in the Ross-Miles foam test. J Am Oil Chemists Soc 1969; 46(8):399–402.
Wyn-Jones E, Gormally J. Aggregation process in Solutions. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1983.
Schick MJ. ed. Non-ionic surfactants, New York, M. Dekker, 1967.
Jungermann E. ed. Cationic surfactants, New York, M. Dekker, 1970.
Linfield WM. ed. Anionic surfactants, New York, M. Dekker, 1973.
Somasundaran P, Kunjappu JT. In situ investigation of adsorbed surfactants and polymers on solids in solution. Colloids Surfaces 1989; 37:245–268.
Griffith JC, Alexander AE. Equilibrium adsorption isotherms for wool/detergent systems: I. The adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate by wool. J Colloid Interface Sci 1967; 25:311–316.
Giles GH. Surfactant Adsorption at Solid/Liquid Interface, in Anionic Surfactants; Physical Chemistry of Action, Surfactant Science Series, Vol. II, New York: M. Dekker, 1981.
Mukerjee P, Mysels KJ. Critical micelle concentration of aqueous surfactant systems, NSRDS-NBS 36, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 1971.
McBain JW. Colloids and their viscosity. Trans Faraday Soc 1913; 9:99.
Hartley GS. Aqueous solutions of paraffin chain salt. Peris: Harmann, 1936.
Harkins WD. A cylindrical model for the small soap micelle. J Chem Phys 1948; 16:156–57.
Debye P, Anacker EW. Micelle shape from dissymmetry measurements. J Phys Colloid Chem 1951; 55:644–655.
Reich I. Factors responsible for the stability of detergent micelles. J Phys Chem 1956; 60:257–262.
Moroi Y. Micelles: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. New York: Plenum Press, 1992.
Smith AL. Theory and Practice of Emulsion Technology. New York: Academic, 1976.
Greek BF. Sales of detergents growing despite recession. Chem Eng News 1991; 69:25–52.
Volkering F, Breure AM et al. Microbiological aspects of surfactant use for biological soil remediation Biodegradation 1998; 8:401–417.
Karanath NGK, Deo PG et al. Microbial production of biosurfactants and their importance. Curr Sci 1999; 77:116.
Desai JD, Banat IM. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1997; 61:47–64.
Banat IM, Makkar RS et al. Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000; 53(5):495.
Desai AJ, Patel KM et al. Emulsifier production by Pseudomonas fluorescents during the growth on hydrocarbons. Curr Sci 1988; 57:500–501.
Rosenberg E. Microbial surfactants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 1986; 3:109–132.
Rosenberg E, Ron EZ. High-and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1999; 52(2):154.
Gautam KK, Tyagi VK. Microbial surfactants: a review. J Oleo Sci 2006; 55:155–166.
Jarvis FG, Johnson MJA. A glycolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1949; 71:4124–4126.
Li ZY, Lang S et al. Formation and identification of interfacial-active glycolipids from resting microbial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984; 48:610–617.
Yakimov MM, Timmis KN et al. Characterization of a new lipopeptide surfactant produced by thermotolerant and halotolerant subsurface Bacillus licheniformis BAS50. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:1706–1713.
Kappeli O, Finnerty WR. Partition of alkane by an extracellular vesicle derived from hexadecane-grown Acinetobacter. J Bacteriol 1979; 140:707–712.
Cooper DG, MacDonald CR et al. Enhanced production of surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by continuous product removal and metal cation additions. Appl Environ Microbiol 1981; 42:408–412.
Hisatsuka K, Nakahara T et al. Formation of rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its function in hydrocarbon fermentation. Agric Biol Chem 1971; 35:686–692.
Mclnerney MJ, Javaheri M et al. Properties of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus liqueniformis strain JF-2 I. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1990; 5:95–102.
Poremba K, Gunkel W et al. Toxicity testing of synthetic and biogenic surfactants on marine microorganisms. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 1991; 6:157–163.
Singh A, Van Hamme JD et al. Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25:99–121.
Post FJ, Al-Harjan FA. Surface activity of halobacteria and potentail use in microbial enhanced oil recovery System. Appl Microbiol 1988; 11:97–101.
Voigt B, Mueller H et al. Antiphytovirale Aktivität von lipophilen Fraktionen aus der Hefe Lodderomyces elongisporus IMET H 128. Acta Biotechnol 1985; 5:313–317.
Lindley ND, Heydemann MT. The uptake of n-alkanes from alkane mixtures during growth of the hydrocarbon-utilizing fungus Cladosporium resinae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1986; 23(5):384–388.
Foght JM, Gutnick DL et al. Effect of Emulsan on Biodegradation of Crude Oil by Pure and Mixed Bacterial Cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989; 55:36–42.
Atlas RM. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45(1):180–209.
Doris MS, Ramesha N et al. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Advances in Seed Science and Technology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India, 1990, p. 368.
Therisod M, Klibanov AM. Facile enzymatic preparation of monoacylated sugars in pyridine. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1986; 108:5638–5640.
Imura T, Yanagishita H et al. Coacervate formation from natural glycolipid: one acetyl group on the headgroup triggers coacervate-to-vesicle transition. J Am Chem Soc 2004; 126:10804–10805.
Imura T, Yanagishita H et al. Thermodynamically stable vesicle formation from glycolipid biosurfactant sponge phase. Colloids Surfaces B 2005; 43:115–121.
Sanchez M, Aranda FJ et al. Aggregation behaviour of a dirhamnolipid biosurfactant secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aqueous media. J Colloid Interface Sci 2007; 307:246–253.
Rosen MJ, Li F et al. The relationship between the interfacial properties of surfactants and their toxicity to aquatic organisms. Environ Sci Technol 2001; 35:954–959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mehta, S.K., Sharma, S., Mehta, N., Cameotra, S.S. (2010). Biomimetic Amphiphiles: Properties and Potential Use. In: Sen, R. (eds) Biosurfactants. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 672. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5979-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5979-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5978-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5979-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)