Skip to main content

The Inverse Method Implements the Automata Approach for Modal Satisfiability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2083))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper ties together two distinct strands in automated reasoning: the tableau- and the automata-based approach. It shows that the inverse tableau method can be viewed as an implementation of the automata approach. This is of interest to automated deduction because Voronkov recently showed that the inverse method yields a viable decision procedure for the modal logic K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Areces, R. Gennari, J. Heguiabehere, and M. de Rijke. Tree-based heuristics in modal theorem proving. In W. Horn, editor, Proc. of ECAI2000, Berlin, Germany, 2000. IOS Press Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader and U. Sattler. An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and S. Tobies. The inverse method implements the automata approach for modal satisfiability. LTCS-Report 01-03, LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH Aachen, Germany, 2001. See http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Reports.html.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Blackburn, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema. Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, 2001. Publishing date May 2001, preliminary version available online from http://www.mlbook.org/.

  5. C. Courcoubetis, M. Y. Vardi, P. Wolper, and M. Yannakakis. Memory efficient algorithms for the verification of temporal properties. In E. M. Clarke and R. P. Kurshan, editors, Proc. of Computer-Aided Verification (CAV’ 90), volume 531 of LNCS, pages 233–242. Springer Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. M. Donini and F. Massacci. EXPTIME tableaux for ALC. Artificial Intelligence, 124(1):87–138, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W. F. Dowling and J. H. Gallier. Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional horn formulae. Journal of Logic Programming, 1(3):267-28, 1984.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Dyckhoff, editor. Proc. of TABLEAUX 2000, number 1847 in LNAI, St Andrews, Scotland, UK, 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Gerth, D. Peled, M. Y. Vardi, and P. Wolper. Simple on-the-fly Automatic verification of linear temporal logic. In Proc. of the 15th International Symposium on Protocol Specification, Testing, and Verification, pages 3–18, Warsaw, Poland, 1995. Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Goré. Tableau methods for modal and temporal logics. In M. D’Agostino, D. M. Gabbay, R. Hähnle, and J. Posegga, editors, Handbook of Tableau Methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Horrocks. Benchmark analysis with FaCT. In Dyckhoff[8], pages 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Hustadt and R. A. Schmidt. MSPASS: Modal reasoning by translation and first-order resolution. In Dyckhoff [8], pages 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. E. Ladner. The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM Journal on Computing, 6(3):467–480, 1977.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Lutz and U. Sattler. The complexity of reasoning with boolean modal logic. In Wolter F., H. Wansing, M. de Rijke, and M. Zakharyaschev, editors, Preliminary Proc. of AiML2000, Leipzig, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Schmidt. Resolution is a decision procedure for many propositional modal logics. In M. Kracht, M. de Rijke, H. Wansing, and M. Zakharyaschev, editors, Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 1, volume 87 of Lecture Notes, pages 189–208. CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Spaan. Complexity of Modal Logics. PhD thesis, Univ. van Amsterdam, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Y. Vardi and P. Wolper. Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 32:183–221, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Y. Vardi and P. Wolper. Reasoning about infinite computations. Information and Computation, 115:1–37, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Voronkov. How to optimize proof-search in modal logics: new methods of proving redundancy criteria for sequent calculi. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 1(4):35pp, 2001.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Tobies, S. (2001). The Inverse Method Implements the Automata Approach for Modal Satisfiability. In: Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2083. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45744-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45744-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42254-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45744-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics