Abstract
Transcriptional interactions in a cell are modulated by a variety of mechanisms that prevent their representation as pure pairwise interactions between a transcription factor and its target(s). These include, among others, transcription factor activation by phosphorylation and acetylation, formation of active complexes with one or more co-factors, and mRNA/protein degradation and stabilization processes.
This paper presents a first step towards the systematic, genome-wide computational inference of genes that modulate the interactions of specific transcription factors at the post-transcriptional level. The method uses a statistical test based on changes in the mutual information between a transcription factor and each of its candidate targets, conditional on the expression of a third gene. The approach was first validated on a synthetic network model, and then tested in the context of a mammalian cellular system. By analyzing 254 microarray expression profiles of normal and tumor related human B lymphocytes, we investigated the post transcriptional modulators of the MYC proto-oncogene, an important transcription factor involved in tumorigenesis. Our method discovered a set of 100 putative modulator genes, responsible for modulating 205 regulatory relationships between MYC and its targets. The set is significantly enriched in molecules with function consistent with their activities as modulators of cellular interactions, recapitulates established MYC regulation pathways, and provides a notable repertoire of novel regulators of MYC function. The approach has broad applicability and can be used to discover modulators of any other transcription factor, provided that adequate expression profile data are available.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Friedman, N.: Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 303, 799–805 (2004)
Gardner, T.S., di Bernardo, D., Lorenz, D., Collins, J.J.: Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science 301, 102–105 (2003)
Elkon, R., Linhart, C., Sharan, R., Shamir, R., Shiloh, Y.: Genome-Wide In Silico Identification of Transcriptional Regulators Controlling the Cell Cycle in Human Cells. Genome Res. 13, 773–780 (2003)
Stuart, J.M., Segal, E., Koller, D., Kim, S.K.: A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 302, 249–255 (2003)
Basso, K., Margolin, A.A., Stolovitzky, G., Klein, U., Dalla-Favera, R., Califano, A.: Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nature Genetics 37, 382–390 (2005)
Zeitlinger, J., Simon, I., Harbison, C.T., Hannett, N.M., Volkert, T.L., Fink, G.R., Young, R.A.: Program-Specific Distribution of a Transcription Factor Dependent on Partner Transcription Factor and MAPK Signaling. Cell 113, 395–404 (2003)
Luscombe, N.M., Babu, M.M., Yu, H., Snyder, M., Teichmann, S.A., Gerstein, M.: Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 431, 308–312 (2004)
Segal, E., Shapira, M., Regev, A., Pe’er, D., Botstein, D., Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from expression data. Nature Genetics 34, 166–176 (2003)
de Lichtenberg, U., Jensen, L.J., Brunak, S., Bork, P.: Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle. Science 307, 724–727 (2005)
Pe’er, D., Regev, A., Tanay, A.: Minreg: Inferring an active regulator set. Bioinformatics 18, S258–S267 (2002)
Margolin, A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K., Klein, U., Wiggins, C., Stolovitzky, G., Dalla-Favera, R., Califano, A.: ARACNE: An algorithm for reconstruction of genetic networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics (in press, 2005), manuscript available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.MN/0410037
Nemenman, I.: Information theory, multivariate dependence, and genetic network inference KITP, UCSB, NSF-KITP-04-54, Santa Barbara, CA (2004), manuscript available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0406015
Butte, A.J., Kohane, I.S.: Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 418–429 (2000)
Friedman, N., Linial, M., Nachman, I., Pe’er, D.: Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. Journal of Computational Biology 7, 601–620 (2000)
Mendes, P.: Biochemistry by numbers: simulation of biochemical pathways with Gepasi 3. Trends Biochem Sci. 22, 361–363 (1997)
Ashburner, M., et al.: Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 1061–4036 (2000)
Sears, R., Nuckolls, F., Haura, E., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., Nevins, J.R.: Multiple Ras-dependent phosphorylation pathways regulate Myc protein stability. Genes Dev. 14, 2501–2514 (2000)
Patel, J.H., et al.: The c-MYC Oncoprotein Is a Substrate of the Acetyltransferases hGCN5/PCAF and TIP60. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10826–10834 (2004)
Levens, D.L.: Reconstructing MYC. Genes Dev. 17, 1071–1077 (2003)
Amati, B., Brooks, M.W., Levy, N., Littlewood, T.D., Evan, G.I., Land, H.: Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max. Cell 72, 233–245 (1993)
Peukert, K., et al.: An alternative pathway for gene regulation by Myc. EMBO J. 16, 5672–5686 (1977)
Luscher, B., Kuenzel, E.A., Krebs, E.G., Eisenman, R.N.: Myc oncoproteins are phosphorylated by casein kinase II. EMBO J. 8, 1111–1119 (1989)
Bousset, K., Henriksson, M., Luscher-Firzlaff, J.M., Litchfield, D.W., Luscher, B.: Identification of casein kinase II phosphorylation sites in Max: effects on DNA-binding kinetics of Max homo- and Myc/Max heterodimers. Oncogene 8, 3211–3220 (1993)
Noguchi, K., et al.: Regulation of c-Myc through Phosphorylation at Ser-62 and Ser-71 by c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32580–32587 (1999)
Gregory, M.A., Qi, Y., Hann, S.R.: Phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase-3 controls c-myc proteolysis and subnuclear localization. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 51606–51612 (2003)
Niiro, H., Clark, E.A.: Regulation of B-cell fate by antigen-receptor signals. Nature Reviews Immunology 2, 945–956 (2002)
Machida, N., et al.: Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase Kinase 4 as a Putative Effector of Rap2 to Activate the c-Jun N-terminal Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 15711–15714 (2004)
Salghetti, S.E., Kim, S.Y., Tansey, W.P.: Destruction of Myc by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: cancer-associated and transforming mutations stabilize Myc. EMBO J. 18, 717–726 (1999)
Anant, S., Davidson, N.O.: An AU-Rich Sequence Element (UUUN[A/U]U) Downstream of the Edited C in Apolipoprotein B mRNA Is a High-Affinity Binding Site for Apobec-1: Binding of Apobec-1 to This Motif in the 3’ Untranslated Region of c-myc Increases mRNA Stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1982–1992 (2000)
Brenner, C., et al.: Myc represses transcription through recruitment of DNA methyltransferase corepressor. EMBO J. 24, 336–346 (2005)
Robertson, K.D., et al.: DNMT1 forms a complex with Rb, E2F1 and HDAC1 and represses transcription from E2F-responsive promoters. Nature Genetics 25, 338–342 (2000)
Wingender, E., et al.: The TRANSFAC system on gene expression regulation Nucl. Acids Res. 29, 281–283 (2001)
Karolchik, D., et al.: The UCSC Genome Browser Database. Nucl. Acids Res. 31, 51–54 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, K., Nemenman, I., Banerjee, N., Margolin, A.A., Califano, A. (2006). Genome-Wide Discovery of Modulators of Transcriptional Interactions in Human B Lymphocytes. In: Apostolico, A., Guerra, C., Istrail, S., Pevzner, P.A., Waterman, M. (eds) Research in Computational Molecular Biology. RECOMB 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3909. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11732990_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11732990_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33295-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33296-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)