Abstract
If we are to enable agents to handle increasingly greater levels of complexity, it is necessary to equip them with mechanisms that support greater degrees of autonomy. This is especially the case when it comes to agent-to-agent interaction which, in systems of selfish agents, often follows the format of negotiation. Within this context, a problem which has hitherto received little attention is that of identifying appropriate negotiation opponents. Furthermore, the problem is particularly difficult in dynamic systems where the need to negotiate over issues and the evaluation of resources may change over time. Such dynamics demand high degrees of autonomy from agents so that such factors can be handled at run-time and without the aid of human controllers. To that end, this paper draws inspiration from biological organisms and theories of motivation, and describes a motivation-based architecture comprising a number of motivation-based classification and selection mechanisms used to evaluate and select between negotiation opponents. Opponents are evaluated in terms of the likely issues they will want to negotiate over and the amount of conflict this might entail. Additionally, the expected cost of a negotiation with an opponent is examined in relation to the agent’s current motivational evaluation of its resources. The mechanisms allow prioritisation between each method of evaluation dependent upon motivational needs. Some preliminary evaluation of the model is also presented.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
David, E., Azoulay-Schwartz, R., Kraus, S.: Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attribute auctions. In: 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 77–85. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R., Noriega, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Rao, A., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1365, pp. 177–192. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, 159–182 (1998)
Urbig, D., Schroter, K.: C-IPS approach to negotiating agents: Specifying dynamic interdependencies between issue, partner, and step. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds.) AAMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3394, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
d’Inverno, M., Luck, M.: Understanding Agent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Social regret, a reputation model based on social relations. SIGecom Exch. 3, 44–56 (2002)
Ramchurn, S.D., Sierra, C., Godo, L., Jennings, N.R.: Devising a trust model for multi-agent interactions using confidence and reputation. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18, 833–852 (2004)
Tesfatsion, L.: A trade network game with endogenous partner selection. In: Computational Approaches to Economic Problems, pp. 249–269. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Banerjee, B., Sen, S.: Selecting partners. In: 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS 2000), pp. 261–262. ACM Press, New York (2000)
Dutta, P.S., Moreau, L., Jennings, N.R.: Finding interaction partners using cognition-based decision strategies. In: IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Cognitive Modeling of Agents and Multi-Agent Interactions, pp. 46–55 (2003)
Maslow, A.: The farther reaches of human nature. Penguin Books, New York (1971)
Tinbergen, N.: The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
Griffiths, N.: Motivated Cooperation. PhD thesis, University of Warwick (2000)
Coddington, A., Luck, M.: Towards motivation-based plan evaluation. In: Russell, I., Haller, S. (eds.) 16th International FLAIRS Conference, St. Augustine, FL, USA, pp. 298–302 (2003)
Morignot, P., Hayes-Roth, B.: Adaptable motivational profiles for autonomous agents. Technical report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University (1995)
Balkenius, C.: The roots of motivation. In: Mayer, J.A., Roitblat, H.L., Wilson, S.W. (eds.) From Animals to Animats 2. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)
Luck, M., Munroe, S., d’Inverno, M.: Autonomy: Variable and generative. In: Hexmoor, H., Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (eds.) Agent Autonomy, pp. 9–22. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)
Coddington, A.: Self-motivated Planning in Autonomous Agents. PhD thesis, University of London, London (2001)
López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Zhang, X., Lesser, V., Wagner, T.: A proposed approach to sophisticated negotiation. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Negotiation Methods for Autonomous Cooperative Systems (2001)
Munroe, S., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Towards motivation-based decisions for worth goals. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 17–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Munroe, S., Luck, M. (2005). Motivation-Based Selection of Negotiation Opponents. In: Gleizes, MP., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World V. ESAW 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3451. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11423355_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11423355_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27330-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31887-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)