Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Arakawa, A. (2000). “A Personal Perspective on the Early Years of General Circulation Modeling at UCLA”, in D.A. Randall (ed.),General Circulation Model Development, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 1–66.
Carrier, M. (2004). “Knowledge gain and practical use: Models in Pure and Applied Research”, in D. Gillies (ed.), Laws and Models in Science, London: King’s College Publications, pp. 1–17.
CCSM (2004). Community Climate System Model, Version 3.0, Coupler Documentation, http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/ccsm3.0/cpl6/index.html (acc. November 2005).
Demeritt, D. (2001a). “The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91: 307–337.
Demeritt, D. (2001b). “Science and the understanding of science: A reply to Schneider”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92: 345–348.
Eady, E. (1956). “Discussions”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 82: 535–539.
Edwards, P.N. (2000). “A brief history of atmospheric general circulation modeling”, in D.A. Randall (ed.), General Circulation Development, Past Present and Future: The Proceedings of a Symposium in Honor of Akio Arakawa, New York: Academic Press, pp. 67–90.
Galison, P. (1996). “Computer simulations and the trading zone”, in P. Galison and D.J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, andPower, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 118–157.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Humphreys, P. (1991). “Computer simulations”, in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 497–506.
Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method, New York: Oxford University Press.
Keller, E.F. (2003). “Models, simulation, and ‘computer experiments”’, in H. Radder (ed.), The Philosophy of ScientificExperimentation, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 198–215.
Kerr, R.A. (1994). “Climate change – Climate modeling’s fudge factor comes under fire”, Science, 265:1528.
Krück, C.C. and J. Borchers (1999), “Science in politics: A comparison of climate modelling centres”, Minerva, 37: 105–123.
Küppers, G. (2002). “Complexity, self-organisation and innovation networks: A new theoretical approach”, in A. Pyka and G. Küppers (eds.), Innovation Networks, Theory and Practice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 22–52.
Küppers, G. and J. Lenhard (2004). “The controversial status of computer simulations”, Proceedings of the 18th European Simulation Multiconference (2004), pp. 271–275.
Küppers, G. and J. Lenhard (2005). “Computersimulationen: Modellierungen zweiter Ordnung”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36 (2): 305–329 (to appear 2006).
Lenhard, J., H. Lücking and H. Schwechheimer (2006). “Expertise, mode 2, and scientific disciplines: Two contrasting views”, to appear in Science and Public Policy.
Lewis, J.M. (1998). “Clarifying the dynamics of the general circulation: Phillips’s 1956 experiment”, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,79: 39–60.
Lorenz, E. (1967). The Nature of the Theory of the General Circulation of the Atmosphere, Geneva: World Meteorological Organization WMO, No. 218, TP. 115: 161.
Metropolis, N. and S. Ulam (1949). “The Monte Carlo Method”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44: 335–341.
Miller, C.A. and P.N. Edwards (2001). Changing the Atmosphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT: Press.
Morrison, M. (1999). “Models as autonomous agents”, in M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–65.
Neumann von, J. and R.D. Richtmyer (1947). “Statistical methods in neutron diffusion”, in S.M. Ulam, A.R. Bednarek and F. Ulam (eds.), Analogies Between Analogies. The Mathematical Reports of S.M. Ulam and his Los Alamos Collaborators, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 17–36.
Norton, S.D. and F. Suppe (2001). “Why atmospheric modeling is good science”, in C.A. Miller and P.N. Edwards (eds.), Changing the Atmosphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–105.
Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz (1994). “Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences”, Science, 263: 641–646.
Petersen, A.C. (2000). “Philosophy of climate science”, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81: 265–271.
Phillips, N. (1956). “The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 82: 123–164.
Pyka, A. and G. Küppers (eds.), (2002). Innovation Networks: Theory and Practice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rohrlich, F. (1991). “Computer simulation in the physical sciences”, in F. Forbes and F. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 507–518.
Schneider, S.H. (2001). “A constructive deconstruction of deconstructionists: A response to Demeritt”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92: 338–344.
Schweber, S. and M. Wächter (2000). ‘Complex systems, modelling and simulation”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(4): 583–609.
Shackley, S., P. Young, S. Parkinson and B. Wynne (1998). “Uncertainty, complexity and the concepts of good science in climate change modelling: Are GCMs the best tools?”, Climatic Change, 38: 159–205.
Ulam, S. (1952). “Random processes and transformations”, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 1950, vol. 2, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 264–275.
Ulam, S. M., A.R. Bednarek and F. Ulam (eds.), (1990). Analogies Between Analogies. The Mathematical Reports of S.M. Ulam and his Los Alamos Collaborators, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Winsberg, E. (2003). “Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 105–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Küppers, G., Lenhard, J. (2006). From Hierarchical to Network-Like Integration: A Revolution of Modeling Style in Computer-Simulation. In: Lenhard, J., Küppers, G., Shinn, T. (eds) Simulation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5375-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5375-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5374-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5375-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)