4. Conclusion
As the textbook is the medium that articulates what should be taught in the curriculum, a study of the mathematics textbooks will reveal critical characteristics of both the intended and the implemented curricula in different countries, which may in turn reflect important differences between the cultural values in these countries.
As shown above, differences in various aspects of the textbooks in East Asia and the West reflect dissimilar social and cultural values. As the textbook is a powerful means through which students acquire both knowledge and values, these textbook differences may in turn reinforce the underlying cultural differences. The discussions above also show that each of the Eastern and Western approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses. For instance, textbooks in the West may help students realize how useful mathematics can be in their lives, but if the link between a mathematical concept and the corresponding real life situation is not made clear, sometimes students may not be able to completely grasp the mathematical concept. By contrast, the East Asian textbooks may succeed in conveying ideas in an economical way, but they often fail to motivate students to learn. Therefore it is important to take a critical view of each approach. It is through a critical understanding of the differences between different cultures that we are able to learn from each other and to put the results of such comparative studies to better use in the future.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Beaton, A.E., Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L. and Smith, T.A., 1996, Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years, Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College, Boston.
Briggs, S., 1996, Oxford Mathematics (Foundation Link, Higher Link). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Billstein, R., and Williamson, J., 1999, Middle Grades MATH Thematics. McDougal Littell Inc, Evanston, IL.
Brousseau, G., 1984, The Crucial Role of the Didactical Contract in the Analysis and Construction of Situations in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, in: Theory of Mathematics Education (TME), H.G. Steiner, ed., (ICME 5-Topic Area and Miniconference: Adelaide, Austrailia, pp. 110–119). Institute für Didacktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, F. R.
Brousseau, G., 1997, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
Fuson, K., Stigler, J., and Bartsch, K., 1988, Grade Placement of Addition and Subtraction Topics in Japan, Mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19:449–456.
Fukumori, N., 1997, Lower Secondary School Mathematics Textbook. Keirinkan, Osaka. (in Japanese)
Kang, W., 1990, Didactic Transposition of Mathematical Knowledge in Textbooks. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
Kim, Y.S., and Kim, H.K., 1997, Mathematics, the Grade 8. Dusan Donga Publishing Company, Seoul. (in Korean)
Lapointe, A.E., Mead, N.A. and Askew, J.W., eds., 1992, The International Assessment of Educational Progress Report No. 22-CAEP-01: Learning Mathematics. The Centre for the Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service, New Jersey.
Leung F.K.S., 1995, The Mathematics Classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29:297–325.
McGuire, P. and Smith, K., 1996, Oxford Mathematics: Link Books-Intermediate Link Year 9. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Beaton, A.E., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L. and Smith, T.A., 1997, Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College, Boston.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O, Gonzalez, E.J., Gregory, K.D., Garden, R.A., O’Connor, K.M., Chrostowski, S.J. and Smith, T.A., 2000, TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Boston.
People’s Education Press, 1999, Geometry, Book 2. People’s Education Press, Wuhan. (in Chinese)
Schmidt W.H., McKnight, C.C., Valverde, G.A., Houang, R.T. and Wiley, D.E., 1997, Many Visions, Many Aims (Volume 1). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Stevenson, H.W. and Stigler, J.W., 1992, The Learning Gap. Simon & Schuster, New York.
Stigler, J.W. and Hiebert, J., 1999, The Teaching Gap, Free Press, New York.
Yang, K.S., 1981, Social Orientation and Individual Modernity among Chinese Students in Taiwan, Journal of Social Psychology, 113:159–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, K., Leung, K.S.F. (2006). A Comparative Study of the Mathematics Textbooks of China, England, Japan, Korea, and the United States. In: Leung, F.K.S., Graf, KD., Lopez-Real, F.J. (eds) Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions-A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West. New ICMI Study Series, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29723-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29723-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29722-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29723-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)