Abstract
The Israeli NGO Zochrot recently hosted a public hearing modelled on the South African ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commissions’. The hearing focused on events that took place from 1948 to 1960 in the South of Israel. Elderly Palestinians gave testimonies about how their villages and locations were destroyed and how they and their relatives were expelled from their land after the establishment of the State of Israel. Jewish Israelis who had fought in the Zionist Armed forces and later in the Israeli army bore witness to the orders they received and the deeds they had done. The event was titled ‘Truth Commission’; the term ‘reconciliation’ was deliberately avoided. “We cannot talk about reconciliation when the Nakba is ongoing. We are still in a situation where there is apartheid, constant violations of human rights and 70 percent of the Palestinian community are refugees”, Liat Rosenberg, director of Zochrot, pointed out.1 The Truth Commission indicates a change of paradigm taking place since 2000 in the Israeli-Palestinian peace movement. The peace agenda used to focus on reconciliation, dialogue and on the acknowledgment of two different narratives -Arab-Palestinian and Jewish-Israeli. Today it focuses on solidarity with the oppressed, on justice, and on truth. Zochrot is but one example of this change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an extensive analysis of the Beit Sahour dialogue, see S. Berlowitz (2012) Die Erfahrung der Anderen. Konfliktstoff im palästinensisch-israelischen Dialog (Konstanz: Konstanz University Press) and
Y.-J. Zupnik (2000) ‘A Face-Driven Account of Identity Exchanges in Israeli-Palestinian “Dialogue” Events’ in Mary Jane Collier (ed.) Constituting Cultural Difference Through Discourse (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications), pp. 271–294.
S. Hall (1991) ‘Ethnicity: Identity and Difference’, Radical America, 23, 4, pp. 9–20.
F. Breithaupt (2012) ‘A Three-Person Model of Empathy’, in: Emotion Review, Vol. 4, No, 1 (January 2012), pp. 84–91.
F. Breithaupt (2009) Kulturen der Empathie (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a.M.), pp. 157ff.
Y. Zerubavel (1995) Recovered Roots. Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition (Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Shelley Berlowitz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berlowitz, S. (2016). Unequal Equals: How Politics Can Block Empathy. In: Assmann, A., Detmers, I. (eds) Empathy and its Limits. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55955-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55237-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)