Abstract
The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) represented one of the most ambitious regional governance projects of the post-Cold War era. It was ambitious not only in terms of the geographical scope of the zone that would have been established, one that spanned the entire Western Hemisphere, but more important, in terms of the variation in the characteristics of the different participating countries. Specifically, the FTAA encompassed some the world’s most developed economies as well as some of its poorest, underdeveloped economies. For example, in 2005, the year the FTAA negotiations collapsed, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in millions of the combined states of South America, the Caribbean, and Central America amounted to US$2,698,103, while the GDP of the United States alone amounted to US$12,665,857.1 These differences were limited to not only objective criteria such as GDP but also significant subjective ones, such as historical experience and identity. Therefore, the negotiation of the FTAA was made up of a group of unlikely, dissimilar, and, in some cases, distant participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “Nominal and Real GDP, Total and Per Capita, Annual, 1970–2013,” accessed Oct. 15, 2014, http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96.
See, for example, Nicola Phillips, “Hemispheric Integration and Sub-regionalism in the Americas,” International Affairs 79.2 (2003): 327–49;
Mario Carranza, “MERCOSUR and the End Game of the FTAA Negotiations: Challenges and Prospects after the Argentine Crisis,” Third World Quarterly 25.2 (2004): 319–37;
Jorge Mario Sanchez-Egozcue and Lourdes Regueiro Bello, “Latin America vis-à-vis the FTAA: Between Relaunching and Alternatives,” in The Bush Doctrine and Latin America, eds. Gary Prevost and Carlos Olivia Campos (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); or Nicolas Grinberg, “Where Is Latin America Going? FTAA or ‘Twenty-First-Century Socialism’?,” Latin American Perspectives 30.1 (2010).
Richard Feinberg, Summitry in the Americas: A Progress Report (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1997), 29.
Eric Hershberg and Fred Rosen, “Turning the Tide?,” in Latin America after Neoliberalism: Turning the Tide in the 21st Century?, eds. Eric Hershberg and Fred Rosen (New York: New Press, 2006), 10.
Kevin Danaher and Jason Mark, Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power (New York: Routledge, 2003).
William Smith and Roberto Patricio Korzeniewicz, “El Movimiento Doble: Actores Insider y Outsider en la Emergencia de una Sociedad Civil Transnacional en las Americas,” Colombia Internacional 63 (2006): 40–69.
Timothy Smith, “From Miami to Quebec and Beyond: Opposition to the Free Trade Area of the Americas,” Peace and Change 29.2 (2004): 221–94.
Zuleika Arashiro, Negotiating the Free Trade Area of the Americas. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 11.
Hector De La Cueva, “Mar del Plata: El ALCA no Paso una Victoria de la Cumbre de los Pueblos,” Observatorio Social de America Latina 6.18 (2005): 81–91.
Joel Wainwright and Rafael Ortiz, “The Battles in Miami: The Fall of the FTAA and the Promise of Transnational Movements,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24.3 (2006): 349–66.
Stephen Gill, “Contradictions of US Supremacy,” in Socialist Register 2005: The Empire Reloaded, eds. Leo Panitch and Colin Leys (Blackpoint, Nova Scotia: Fernwood, 2004), 30.
Abigail Bakan, “Capital, Marxism, and the World Economy: APEC and the MAI,” in Critical Political Studies: Debates and Dialogues from the Left, eds. Abigail Bakan and Eleanor MacDonald (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002), 236.
Peter Thomas, The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism (Boston: Brill, 2009), 285.
Philip Cerny, Susanne Soederberg, and Georg Menz, “Different Roads to Globalization: Neoliberalism, the Competition State, and Politics in a More Open World,” in Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neo-liberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism, eds. Philip Cerny, Susanne Soederberg, and Georg Menz (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 15.
Ray Kiely argues that—contrary to the claims of the theory of comparative advantage, which posits that economic development will accrue to states that specialize in exporting goods that they can produce efficiently—increased international economic integration has not led to a leveling out between the core and the periphery but has rather increased “domination and marginalization” between both elements. Ray Kiely, Rethinking Imperialism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 170.
Marc Lee, “The FTAA after Quebec: What Happened? What’s Next?,” Studies in Political Economy 66 (2001): 108.
James Mittleman, “Globalization: An Ascendant Paradigm?,” International Studies Perspectives 3.1 (2002): 2.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, eds. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (New York: International Publishers, 2003), 210–11.
Robert Cox, “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations,” in Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, ed. Stephen Gill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 61–61.
Martin Carnoy, The State and Political Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 70.
Raymond Ahearn, “Trade in the Americas,” Congressional Research Service Issue Brief for Congress (Washington, DC: CRS, 2001), 5.
Richard Feinberg, “Regionalism and Domestic Politics: U.S.-Latin American Trade Policy in the Bush Era,” Latin American Politics and Society 44.4 (2002): 138.
Gordon Macleod and Mark Goodwin, “Space, Scale and State Strategy: Rethinking Urban and Regional Governance,” Progress in Human Geography 23.4 (1999): 506.
Pia Riggirozzi, “Reconstructing Regionalism: What Does Development Have to Do with It?,” in The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America, eds. Pia Riggirozzi and Diana Tussie (New York: Springer, 2012), 26.
Copyright information
© 2015 Marcel Nelson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nelson, M. (2015). Introduction. In: A History of the FTAA. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412751_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412751_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48969-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41275-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)