Abstract
The coming into force of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 has made North America a significant and influential experiment in regional integration, aimed at competitiveness gains and continent-wide production and investment. The concluding chapter takes stock of NAFTA’s economic and social impacts on its three states parties, with a focus on employment. Such impacts are crucial to understand the dissatisfaction that led to its renegotiation. It is considered whether its successor, the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), is likely to address these concerns and produce a stable and prosperous North American space. Rather than a new model, the USMCA constitutes an update and a slight rebalancing of the existing North American integration model, although much less significant and influential than at NAFTA’s advent. North American economic integration will remain a contested work in progress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcalde, Arturo, and Graciela Bensusan. 2013. El sistema de justicia laboral en México: Situación actual y perspectivas. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung México, No. 1, June. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/mexiko/10311.pdf.
Bensusán, Graciela, and Landy Sánchez (eds.). 2021. Estudio sobre la Subcontratación en México: Tendencias, modalidades y regulación. El Colegio de México.
Blecker, Robert A., and Gerardo Esquivel. 2013. Trade and the Development Gap. In Mexico and the United States: The Politics of Partnership, ed. Peter H. Smith and Andrew Selee, 83–110. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Bouzas, José Alfonso (ed.). 2007. Contratación Colectiva de Trabajo en México: Informe a la Organización Regional Interamericana de Trabajadores (ORIT).
Caliendo, Lorenzo, and Fernando Parro. 2015. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA. Review of Economic Studies 82 (1): 1–44. https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/82/1/1/1547758.
Escobar, Agustin, Philip Martin, and Omar Stabridis. 2019. Farm Labor and Mexico’s Export Produce Industry. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, October. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/farm_labor_and_mexico_export_produce_industry.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2020.
Gagné, Gilbert, and Jean-Frédéric Morin. 2006. The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from Recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT. Journal of International Economic Law 9 (2): 357–382.
Gallagher, Kevin, Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, and Roberto Porzecanski. 2008. The Dynamism of Mexican Exports: Lost in (Chinese) Translation? World Development 36 (8): 1365–1380.
Gandolfi, Davide, Timothy Halliday, and Raymond Robertson. 2015. Trade, Migration, and the Place Premium: Mexico and the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, Working Paper 396, March. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/trade-migration-and-place-premium-mexico-and-united-states-working-paper-396.
González, Humberto. 2019. What Socioenvironmental Impacts Did 35 Years of Export Agriculture Have in Mexico? (1980–2014): A Transnational Agri-food Field Analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 163–187. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joac.12343.
Gutiérrez Haces, Maria Teresa. 1995. From Protectionism to Free Trade: Mexico’s Problematic Transition. Critical Sociology 21 (2): 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/089692059502100205.
Hakobyan, Shushanik, and John McLaren. 2016. Looking for Local Labor Market Effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (4): 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00587.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). https://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/.
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2014. Informal Employment in Mexico: Current Situation, Policies and Challenges. ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/documents/publication/wcms_245889.pdf.
Kessler, Glenn. 2017. The Trump Administration’s Claim That the U.S. Government ‘Certified’ 700,000 Jobs Lost by NAFTA. The Washington Post, August 18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/08/18/the-trump-administrations-claim-that-the-u-s-government-certified-700000-jobs-lost-by-nafta/.
Meyer, Peter J., and Ian F. Fergusson. 2021. Canada–U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service, Report 96–397, Updated February 10. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/96-397.pdf.
Morales, Isidro. 1999. NAFTA: The Governance of Economic Openness. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 565 (1): 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956500103.
Moreno-Brid, Juan Carlos, Jesus Santamaria, and Juan Carlos Rivas. Valdivia. 2005. Industrialization and Economic Growth in Mexico after NAFTA: The Road Travelled. Development and Change 36 (6): 1095–1119.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Signed December 17, 1992, Entered into Force January 1, 1994. https://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Legal-Texts/North-American-Free-Trade-Agreement.
Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). n.d. United States-Mexico-Canada Trade Fact Sheet: Modernizing NAFTA into a 21st Century Trade Agreement. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/fact-sheets/modernizing.
Pastor, Robert. 2011. The North American Idea: A Vision of a Continental Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
Polaski, Sandra. 2004. Jobs, Wages and Household Income. In NAFTA’s Promise and Reality: Lessons from Mexico for the Hemisphere, ed. John J. Audley, Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Sandra Polaski, and Scott Vaughan, 11–37. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/pdf/files/NAFTA_Report_ChapterOne.pdf.
Public Citizen. 2020. Trade Adjustment Assistance Database. https://www.citizen.org/article/trade-adjustment-assistance-database/.
Rubin, Jeff. 2017. How Has Canadian Manufacturing Fared Under NAFTA? A Look at the Auto Assembly and Parts Industry. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation, CIGI Paper No. 138, August 8. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/how-has-canadian-manufacturing-fared-under-nafta-look-auto-assembly-and-parts-industry.
Shaiken, Harley. 2014. The Nafta Paradox. Berkeley Review of Latin American Studies, Spring: 37–43. https://clas.berkeley.edu/research/trade-nafta-paradox.
Statistics Canada. 2020. Employment by Industry. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1410020101.
Trachtenberg, Danielle. 2019. Local Labor-Market Effects of NAFTA in Mexico: Evidence from Mexican Commuting Zones. Inter-American Development Bank, IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-01078. November. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Local_Labor-Market_Effects_of_NAFTA_in_Mexico_Evidence_from_Mexican_Commuting_Zones_en.pdf.
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Signed February 4, 2016. https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/tpp-ptp/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng.
Trefler, Daniel. 2004. The Long and Short of the Canada–U.S. Free Trade Agreement. American Economic Review 94 (4): 870–895. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828042002633.
United States – Canada Free Trade Agreement (USCFTA), Signed January 2, 1988, Entered into Force January 1, 1989. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/cusfta-e.pdf.
United States, Congressional Budget Office (USCBO). 2003. The Effects of NAFTA on U.S.-Mexican Trade and GDP. May. https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/108th-congress-2003-2004/reports/report_0.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2020.
United States International Trade Commission (USITC). 2016. Economic Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Authorities Procedures, 2016 Report. June. Publication Number: 4614, Investigation Number: 332–555. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4614.pdf.
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Signed November 30, 2018, Entered into Force July 1, 2020. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/agreement-between.
University of California (UC) Davis Rural Migration Blog. 2019. Workers on Mexico’s Export Farms. November 19. https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/blog/post/?id=2367. Accessed April 24, 2020.
Vicario, Maria Elena, Sandra Polaski, and Dalil Maschino. 2003. North American Labor Markets: A Comparative Profile. Washington, DC: Secretariat of the North American Commission for Labor Cooperation.
Villarreal, M. Angeles, and Ian F. Fergusson. 2014. NAFTA at 20: Overview and Trade Effects. Congressional Research Service, Report R42965, April 28. http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/R42965.pdf.
Villarreal, M. Angeles, and Ian F. Fergusson. 2017. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Congressional Research Service, Report R42965, May 24. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42965.pdf.
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2003. World Trade Report 2003. Geneva: World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/world_trade_report_2003_e.pdf.
Zahniser, Steven, J. Edward Taylor, Thomas Hertz, and Diane Charlton. 2018. Farm Labor Markets in the United States and Mexico Pose Challenges for U.S. Agriculture. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, EIB No. 201, November. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/90832/eib-201.pdf?v%3D1521.2. Accessed April 28, 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rioux, M., Polaski, S., Gagné, G. (2022). Conclusion—NAFTA’s Impacts: Can the USMCA Do Better?. In: Gagné, G., Rioux, M. (eds) NAFTA 2.0. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81694-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81694-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81693-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81694-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)