Abstract
A chapter on the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) fits perfectly in an edited volume dedicated to multilateral institutions. Indeed, the CBD is not an international organization, if one defines international organizations strictly as demonstrating autonomy and permanence. It rather follows the definition of an international regime, organized around a core framework convention. More precisely, the CBD was adopted during the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, as the sister convention to the climate convention (see Chapter 13, this volume). While the CBD is not, strictly speaking, an international organization, it presents at least three features that are of particular interest and places the CBD in the category of noteworthy multilateral institutions. Firstly, while in theory just a treaty, the CBD has gained autonomy over time, with a small but active secretariat based in Montreal (and consequently distant from UNEP headquarters) described as a “lean shark” (Siebenhuner, 2009). Secondly, the CBD is one of the most dynamic global environmental treaties (with nearly universal membership, a notable exception being the United States), in contrast to the climate convention. Indeed, the CBD has deepened its work on biodiversity and regularly adopted new protocols, such as the Cartagena Protocol in 2000 or the Nagoya Protocol in 2010, one of the latest multilateral environmental agreements to have been adopted worldwide. Thirdly, the CBD demonstrates dynamism by also recently engaging in the estab-lishment of its own policy-science platform (following the model of the IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) that was created in April 2012 as the IPBES (Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CBD (2007). Overview of Recent Developments at National and Regional Levels Relating to Access and Benefit-sharing. Convention on Biological Diversity, UN doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/5/4, August 30. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Inter-national Institute for Sustainable Development. Available at: http://www.iisd.ca/[accessed September 7, 2013].
Gupta, Joyeeta and Ringius, Lasse (2001). “The EU’s Climate Leadership: Reconciling Ambition and Reality,” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1, 281–299.
Hopgood, Stephen (1998). American Foreign Environmental Policy and the Power of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurrell, Andrew and Sengupta, Sandeep (2012). “Emerging Powers, North- South Relations and Global Climate Politics,” International Affairs, 88(3), 463–484.
Intellectual Property Watch (2008). “TRIPS Council: Half of WTO Membership Backs Biodiversity Amendment,” Published online on March 14. Available from: http://www.ip-watch.org [accessed October 24, 2013].
Morin, Jean-Frédéric and Orsini, Amandine (2014). “Policy Coherency and Regime Complexes: The Case of Genetic Resources,” Review of International Studies, 40(2), 303–324.
Orsini, Amandine and Compagnon, Daniel (2013). “From Logics to Procedures: Arguing Within International Environmental Negotiations,” Critical Policy Studies, 7(3), 273–291.
Papa, Mihaela and Gleason, Nancy W. (2012). “Major Emerging Powers in Sustainable Development Diplomacy: Assessing Their Leadership Potential,” Global Environmental Change, 22, 915–924.
Rodary, Estienne and Castellanet, Christian (2003) “Les trois temps de la conservation,” in Estienne Rodary, Christian Castellanet and Georges Rossi (eds.), Conservation de la Nature et Développement. L’intégration impossible? Paris: GRET et Karthala, 5–44.
Rosendal, Kristin G. (2000). The Convention on Biological Diversity and Developing Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Scott, Robin (2003). “Bio-Conservation or Bio-Exploitation: An Analysis of the Active Ingredients Discovery Agreement Between the Brazilian Institutions Bioamazonia and the Swiss Pharmaceutical Company Novartis,” The George Washington International Law Review, 35(4).
Siebenhüner, Bernd (2009). “The Biodiversity Secretariat: Lean Shark in Troubled Waters,” in Franck Biermann and Bernd Siebenhüner (eds.), Managers of Global Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265–293.
Wallbott, Linda, Wolff, Franziska and PoZarowska, Justyna (2014). “The Negotiations of the Nagoya Protocol: Issues, Coalitions and Process,” in Sebastian Oberthür and Kristin Rosendal (eds.), Global Governance of Genetic Resources, London: Routledge, 35–59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Amandine Orsini and Rozenn Nakanabo Diallo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Orsini, A., Diallo, R.N. (2015). Emerging Countries and the Convention on Biological Diversity. In: Lesage, D., Van de Graaf, T. (eds) Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397607_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397607_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48504-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39760-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)