Abstract
Biological diversity or biodiversity is a term used to define the variability of all living organisms on Earth. While research confirms that maintaining high levels of biodiversity is desirable due to the ecosystem services provided, as well as the emotional and cultural values that nonhuman life holds for many of us, it is difficult to measure biodiversity accurately. This Chapter provides an overview of biodiversity and the threats that humanity’s activities pose to it. It aims to both catalogue the damage to and provide reasons to protect biodiversity, as well as to provide an overview of global responses to biodiversity losses with a particular focus on the Convention on Biological Diversity, a global instrument that was conceived to specifically coordinate national action to conserve and promote the sustainable use of biodiversity, including equitable access to these resources by low-income countries. The Chapter also outlines issues related to bioprospecting and biopiracy and concludes with some thoughts on how to better harness the power of international cooperation to address biodiversity and species losses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
African Wildlife Foundation (2017) African mammal trade: wildlife trade and seizure maps. African Wildlife Foundation. https://campaign.awf.org/wildlife-trade-and-seizure-maps/
Altherr S, Hodgins N (2018) Small cetaceans, Big Problems: a global review of the impacts of hunting on small whales, dolphins and porpoises. https://whales.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/small-cetaceans-big-problems.pdf
Arjjumend H (2018) Nagoya Protocol and participation of indigenous people and local communities in policy making process and benefit sharing. J Polit Gov 7(1):39–47
Ayling J (2013) What sustains wildlife crime? Rhino horn trading and the resilience of criminal networks. J Int Wildl Law Policy 16(1):57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2013.764776
Baldwin EA (2011) Twenty-five years under the convention on migratory species: migration conservation lessons from Europe. Environ Law 41(2):535–571
Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (2018) The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(25):6506–6511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115
Bell DE (1992) The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity: the continuing significance of U.S. Objections at the Earth Summit. George Wash J Int Law Econ 26:479
Birnie PW (1989) International legal issues in the management and protection of the whale: a review of four decades of experience. Nat Resour J 29:903
Bodansky D (1995) International law and the protection of biological diversity. Vanderbilt J Transl Law 28:623
Boisvert V, Vivien F-D (2012) Towards a political economy approach to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Camb J Econ 36(5):1163–1179
Bowman M, Davies P, Redgwell C (2010) Lyster’s international wildlife law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301
Brand U, Vadrot ABM (2013) Epistemic selectivities and the valorisation of nature: the cases of the Nagoya protocol and the intergovernmental science-policy platform for biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES). Law Environ Dev J 9:202
Broggiato A, Dedeurwaerdere T, Batur F, Coolsaet B (2015) Access benefit-sharing and the Nagoya Protocol: the confluence of abiding legal doctrines. In: Coolsaet B, Batur F, Broggiato A, Pitseys J, Dedeurwaerdere T (eds) Implementing the Nagoya Protocol: comparing access and benefit-sharing regimes in Europe. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp 1–32
Brunnée J (1996) A conceptual framework for an international forests convention: customary law and emerging principles. In: G. F. I. E. Law, C. C. o. I. Law (eds) International environmental law & policy series. Kluwer Law International, pp 41–77
Carrington D (2018, 2018-10-15) Humanity is ‘cutting down the tree of life’, warn scientists. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/15/humanity-is-cutting-down-the-tree-of-life-warn-scientists
CBD (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/
CBD (2019) Biodiversity mainstreaming: mainstreaming under the convention. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/mainstreaming/
CBD (2021a) List of parties. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/information/parties.shtml
CBD (2021b) Parties to the Nagoya Protocol. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/abs/nagoya-protocol/signatories/
CBD (2021c) Thematic programmes and cross-cutting issues. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/programmes/
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Science. Advances 1(5). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(30):E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
CITES (2021a) How CITES works. https://www.cites.org/eng/disc/how.php
CITES (2021b) Member countries. http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/parties/index.php
CITES (2021c) What is CITES? Secretariat of the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species. https://cites.org/eng/disc/what.php
CMS (1979) Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals
CMS (2017) Resolution 11.33 guidelines for assessing listing proposals to appendices I and II of the convention. https://www.cms.int/en/document/guidelines-assessing-listing-proposals-appendices-i-and-ii-convention-0
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (1971) https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/scan_certified_e.pdf
Cox L (2019) ‘Almost certain extinction’: 1,200 species under severe threat across world. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/mar/13/almost-certain-extinction-1200-species-under-severe-threat-across-world
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) Anthropocene. The International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Newsletter, 41
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2013) The future of nature: documents of global change. In: Libby R, Sverker S, Paul W (eds) “The ‘Anthropocene”’ (2000). Yale University Press, pp 479–490. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300188479-041
Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC (2018) Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361(6407):1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445
Dauvergne P (2001) Loggers and degradation in the Asia-Pacific: corporations and environmental management. Cambridge University Press
Deplazes-Zemp A, Abiven S, Schaber P, Schaepman M, Schaepman-Strub G, Schmid B, Shimizu KK, Altermatt F (2018) The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South. Nat Ecol Evol 2(6):917–919
Downes DR (1993) New diplomacy for the biodiversity trade: biodiversity, biotechnology, and intellectual property in the convention on biological diversity. Touro J Transl Law 4:1
Downes DR (1994) The convention on biological diversity: seeds of green trade? Tulane Environ Law J 8(1):163–180
Escobar A (1998) Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J Polit Ecol 5(1):53–82
Fieseler C (2021, 2021-08-05) The case against the concept of biodiversity: it’s more controversial than you might think. https://www.vox.com/22584103/biodiversity-species-conservation-debate
Gillespie A (2005) Small cetaceans. In: Whaling diplomacy: defining issues in international environmental Law. Edward Elgar, pp 276–317. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845425616
Gillespie A (2011) Conservation, biodiversity and international law. Edward Elgar
Guruswamy LD (1999) The convention on biological diversity: exposing the flawed foundations. Environ Conserv 26(2):79–82
Harper JL, Hawksworth DL (1994) Preface. Philos Trans Biol Sci 345(1311):5–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/56133
Harrop SR, Pritchard DJ (2011) A hard instrument goes soft: the implications of the convention on biological diversity’s current trajectory. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.014
Hawksworth DL, Lücking R (2017) Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiol Spectr 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0052-2016
Hendrickx F, Koester V, Prip C (1993) Convention on biological diversity: access to genetic resources: a legal analysis. Environ Policy Law 23:250
Hoang NT, Kanemoto K (2021) Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat Ecol Evol 5(6):845–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z
Humber F, Godley BJ, Broderick AC (2014) So excellent a fishe: a global overview of legal marine turtle fisheries. Divers Distrib 20(5):579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12183
Huxley C (2000) CITES: the vision. In: Hutton JM, Dickson B (eds) Endangered species. Threatened convention: the past, present, and future of CITES. Earthscan, pp 3–12
InforMEA (2021) Treaties and MEAs in Biological Diversity. United Nations. https://www.informea.org/en/topics/biological-diversity?page=0%2C0
IUCN (2021) Red List Index. https://www.iucnredlist.org/assessment/red-list-index/
IUCN RedList (2021) The IUCN Red List of threatened species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/en
IWC (2021) Commission | overview. International Whaling Commission. https://iwc.int/iwcmain
Janssen J, Shepherd CR (2018) Challenges in documenting trade in non CITES-listed species: a case study on crocodile skinks (Tribolonotus spp.). ScienceDirect 11(4):476–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.09.003
Jenks DT (1994) The convention on biological diversity – an efficient framework for the preservation of life on Earth. Northwest J Int Law Bus 15:636
Kamau EC, Fedder B, Winter G (2010) The Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: what is new and what are the implications for provider and user countries and the scientific community. Law Environ Dev J 6:246
Kean Z (2021) Culture shock: how loss of animals’ shared knowledge threatens their survival. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/13/culture-shock-how-loss-of-animals-shared-knowledge-threatens-their-survival
King MD, Howat IM, Candela SG, Noh MJ, Jeong S, Noël BPY, van den Broeke MR, Wouters B, Negrete A (2020) Dynamic ice loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet driven by sustained glacier retreat. Commun Earth Environ 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-0001-2
Kingsford RT, Bino G, Finlayson CM, Falster D, Fitzsimons JA, Gawlik DE, Murray NJ, Grillas P, Gardner RC, Regan TJ, Roux DJ, Thomas RF (2021) Ramsar wetlands of international importance–improving conservation outcomes [Perspective]. Front Environ Sci 9:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643367
Le Prestre P (2002) The convention on biological diversity: negotiating the turn to effective implementation. Isuma Can J Policy Res 3:92–98
Leopold A (1949) A sand county Almanac. Oxford University Press
Lyster S (1989) The convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals (the “Bonn Convention”). Nat Resour J 29:979
Mazor T, Doropoulos C, Schwarzmueller F, Gladish DW, Kumaran N, Merkel K, Di Marco M, Gagic V (2018) Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss. Nat Ecol Evol 2(7):1071–1074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0563-x
Milliken T, Shaw J (2012) The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus. http://www.trafficj.org/publication/12_The_SouthAfrica-VietNam_RhinoHorn_Trade_Nexus.pdf
Milman O (2019) The killing of large species is pushing them towards extinction, study finds. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/06/the-killing-of-large-species-is-pushing-them-towards-extinction-study-finds
Moens J (2021) Ignoring this one vulnerable form of life could be dooming our planet. Inverse.com. https://www.inverse.com/science/are-mushrooms-endangered-lichen-fungus
Morgera E, Tsioumani E (2010) Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: looking afresh at the convention on biological diversity. Yearb Int Environ Law 21(1):3–40
Morton O, Scheffers BR, Haugaasen T, Edwards DP (2021) Impacts of wildlife trade on terrestrial biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol 5(4):540–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01399-y
Myers N (1989) The future of forests. In: Friday LE, Laskey RA (eds) The fragile environment: the Darwin College lectures. Cambridge University Press, pp 22–40
Nagoya Protocol (2011) Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity secretariat of the convention on biological diversity. https://www.cbd.int/abs/text/
Nagtzaam GJ (2020) Biological diversity. In: Nagtzaam G, Van Hook E, Guilfoyle D (eds) International environmental Law: a case study analysis, 1st edn. Routledge
Nuwer R (2018) The vast majority of animals in the wildlife trade are not protected. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2018/12/animals-dying-without-protection/
Oberthür S, Pożarowska J (2013) Managing institutional complexity and fragmentation: the Nagoya Protocol and the global governance of genetic resources. Glob Environ Polit 13(3):100–118
Orsini A (2016) Do non-state perspectives matter for treaty ratification and implementation? The case of the European Consultation on the Nagoya protocol. Environ Policy Gov 26(5):377–393
Pauchard N (2017) Access and benefit sharing under the convention on biological diversity and its protocol: what can some numbers tell us about the effectiveness of the regulatory regime? Resources 6(1):11
Powers MA (1993) The United Nations framework convention on biological diversity: will biodiversity preservation be enhanced through its provisions concerning biotechnology intellectual property rights. Wis Int Law J 12:103
Prathapan KD, Rajan PD (2019) Convention on biological diversity: need for a review. Econ Polit Wkly 54(3):60
Rabitz F (2015) Biopiracy after the Nagoya Protocol: problem structure, regime design and implementation challenges. Braz Polit Sci Rev 9(2):30–53
Rackleff K (1992) Preservation of biological diversity: toward a global convention. Columbia J Int Environ Law Policy 3:405
Rainforest Action Network (n.d.) Follow the Money Behind Deforestation. https://www.ran.org/campaign/follow-the-money-behind-deforestation/
Raustiala K (1997) Domestic institutions and international regulatory cooperation: comparative responses to the convention on biological diversity. World Polit 49(4):482–509
Romañach SS, DeAngelis DL, Koh HL, Li Y, Teh SY, Sulaiman R, Barizan R, Zhai L (2018) Conservation and restoration of mangroves: global status, perspectives, and prognosis. Ocean Coast Manag 154:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.01.009
Rosendal GK (1995) The convention on biological diversity: a viable instrument for conservation and sustainable use. In: Bergesen HO, Parmann G, Thommessen ØB (eds) Green globe yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development. Oxford University Press, pp 69–81
Rosendal GK (2006) The convention on biological diversity: tensions with the WTO TRIPs agreement over access to genetic resources and the sharing of benefits. In: Oberthür S, Gehring T (eds) Institutional interacton in global environmental governance. The MIT Press, pp 79–102
Rosendal GK, Tvedt MW (2015) Biological diversity. In: Pattberg PH, Zelli F (eds) Encyclopedia of global environmental governance and politics. Edward Elgar, pp 322–328
Shine C, Kohona PT (1992) The convention on biological diversity: bridging the gap between conservation and development. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 1:278
Smagadi A (2006) Analysis of the objective of the convention on biological diversity: their interrelation and implementation guidance for access and benefit sharing. Columbia J Environ Law 31:243
Snape WJ III (2009) Joining the convention on biological diversity: a legal and scientific overview of why the United States must wake up. Sustain Dev Law Policy 10:6
Stevenson H (2017) Global environmental politics: problems, policy and practice. Cambridge University Press
Sweetlove L (2011) Number of species on earth tagged at 8.7 million. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.498
Tejera V (1998) Tripping over property rights: is it possible to reconcile the convention on biological diversity with article 27 of the TRIPs agreement? N Engl Law Rev 33:967
Tinker CA (1995) A “new breed” of treaty: the United Nations convention on biological diversity. Pace Environ Law Rev 13:195
U.N. Biodiversity Lab (2021) https://unbiodiversitylab.org/
Vermeylen S (2013) The Nagoya Protocol and customary law: the paradox of narratives in the law. Law Environ Dev J 9:185
Waller CL, Griffiths HJ, Waluda CM, Thorpe SE, Loaiza I, Moreno B, Pacherres CO, Hughes KA (2017) Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: an emerging area of research. Sci Total Environ 598:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283
Ward WR (1995) Man or beast: the convention on biological diversity and the emerging law of sustainable development. Vand J Transl Law 28:823
WWF (2020) Living planet report 2020: bending the curve of biodiversity loss. https://livingplanet.panda.org/about-the-living-planet-report
Wyborn C, Montana J (2019) Thought piece: revisiting biodiversity in a village of mixed perspectives – Luc Hoffmann Institute. Luc Hoffmann Institute. https://luchoffmanninstitute.org/thought-piece-revisiting-biodiversity-in-a-village-of-mixed-perspectives/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nagtzaam, G., Brady, U. (2023). Global Biodiversity: Trends and Regulation. In: Brinkmann, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01949-4_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01949-4_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-01948-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-01949-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences