Abstract
It has become almost a critical commonplace at the outset of the twenty-first century to view the novel as a form that is past its prime. We have had to confront that idea as we prepare to edit the forthcoming volume eight of The Oxford History of the Novel in English, devoted to American fiction after 1940, and we find ourselves inclined to make the counterargument: that the novel has been reinvigorated over the past sixty years by its encounters with both emergent forms (such as film, television and digital media) and the emergent voices typically associated with multiculturalism in the United States. We believe that it is the task of the literary historian of this period to understand the novel’s place within a set of intersecting histories that function as an interpretative prism. The one thing the novel is not is ‘archaic’: it continues to have cultural force, even if it is increasingly being read on e-readers and tablet computers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and references
R. Williams (1977) Marxism and Literature (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 12.
See C. Patell (2008) ‘Sacvan Bercovitch and Cosmopolitan Conversation’, RSA Journal [Rivista di Studi Americani] 19 (2008): 106–8.
See K. Fitzpatrick (2006) The Anxiety of Obsolescence: The American Novel in the Age of Television (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press).
J. Arac (2009a) ‘Violence and the Human Voice: Critique and Hope in Native Speaker’, boundary 2 36.2 (2009): 55.
J. Arac (2009b) ‘What Kind of History Does a Theory of the Novel Require?’, Novel XLII.2, 194.
T. Gossett (1985) Uncle Tom’s Cabin and American Culture (Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press), p. 314.
See B. Anderson (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso).
J. Culler (1999) ‘Anderson and the Novel’, Diacritics 29.4, 20.
See F. Moretti (1998) Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900 (London: Verso), pp. 176–7.
J. Baldwin (1998) ‘Everybody’s Protest Novel’ in Notes of a Native Son in Collected Essays, ed. Toni Morrison (New York: Library of America), pp. 11, 15.
See J. Tompkins (1985) Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790–1860 (New York: Oxford University Press).
L. Fiedler (1982) What Was Literature?: Class, Culture, and Mass Society (New York: Simon and Schuster), p. 58.
R. Brodhead (1986) The School of Hawthorne (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 227.
See G. Graff (2007) Professing Literature: An Institutional History — Twentieth Anniversary Edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
M. McGurl (2009) The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), p. xvii.
N. Glazer (1997) We Are All Multiculturalists Now (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 94, 14.
H. Caldéron (1991) ‘Rereading Rivera’s y no se lo tragó la tierra’, in Criticism in the Borderlands: Studies in Chicano Literature, Culture, and Ideology, ed. H. Calderón and J. D. Saldívar (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), p. 99.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Cyrus R. K. Patell and Deborah Lindsay Williams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patell, C.R.K., Williams, D.L. (2014). The Dynamics of Residual and Emergent in the American Novel after 1940. In: Parrinder, P., Nash, A., Wilson, N. (eds) New Directions in the History of the Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026989_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026989_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43946-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02698-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)