Abstract
Boundaries of belonging are not fixed in time and vary substantially in space. The chapters of this volume underline that boundary making and its results — concepts, markers and measures of ‘us and them’ — differ substantially between the countries compared so far and underlie changes during the last decades. (Re)Constructing boundaries of belonging is a social processes in which perceptions and ascriptions of ‘us’ and ‘them’ are shaped. Concerning the categories by which residents and citizens, in general, and labour migrants, in particular, are grouped and distinguished, national societies like the British, the Chinese, the Dutch, the French, and the German follow very different institutionalised traditions. These national patterns of categorising and distinguishing migrants’ and especially labour migrants’ rights and status from those of the majority of society are institutionalised in the sense of being cemented in legal rules and in taken-for-granted perceptions and expectations. Next to substantial national variations in the dominant categories and boundaries of belonging, substantial dynamics of change in these institutional arrangements have also been analysed. In the first section of this chapter, these pathways of national settings and change will be highlighted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altglas, Véronique (2010) ‘Laïcité is What Laïcité Does. Rethinking the French Cult Controversy’, Current Sociology, Vol. 58(3): 489–510.
Brubaker, Rogers (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Doyle, Jack (July 24, 2009). ‘EU migrants “good for UK economy”’, The Independent (London), accessed February 17, 2012.
Glick, Schiller, Nina, Basch, Linda, Blanc Szanton, Cristina (ed.) (1992) Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Hollinger, David (2005) Postethnic America. Beyond Multiculturalism (revised and updated tenth anniversary edition). New York: Basic Perseus Books.
Luhmann, Niklas (2003) Theories of Distinction. Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pries, Ludger (2005) ‘Configurations of Geographic and Societal Spaces: A Sociological Proposal between “Methodological Nationalism” and the “Spaces of Flows”’, Global Networks Vol. 5, No. 2: 167–190.
Pries, Ludger (2012) ‘Ambiguities of Global and Transnational Collective Identities’, Global Networks Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. (forthcoming: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471–0374.2012.00368.x/abstract).
Pries, Ludger and Seeliger, Martin (2012) Transnational Social Spaces between Methodological Nationalism and ‘Cosmo-Globalism’, in Amelina, Anna, Devrimsel, Nergiz, Faist, Thomas/Glick Schiller, Nina (eds.), Beyond Methodological National-ism: Social Science Research Methodologies in Transition. London/New York: Routledge (pp. 219–238).
Copyright information
© 2013 Ludger Pries
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pries, L. (2013). Migration and the Shifting Boundaries of Belonging. In: Shifting Boundaries of Belonging and New Migration Dynamics in Europe and China. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369726_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369726_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35061-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36972-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)