Skip to main content

Is the Next Frontier in Neuroscience a ‘Decade of the Mind’?

  • Chapter
Brain Theory

Abstract

In 2007, ten world-renowned neuroscientists, including James Albus, George Bekey, John Holland, Nancy Kanwisher, Jeffrey Krichmar, Mortimer Mishkin, Dharmendra Modha, Marcus Raichle, Gordon Shepherd, and Giulio Tononi advocated in a letter published in Science for “a major national research initiative called ‘A Decade of the Mind’” (Albus et al. 2007, 1321). Their contention was that, despite the successes of the Decade of the Brain, “a fundamental understanding of how the brain gives rise to the mind [was] still lacking” (ibid.). They identified four areas of research to be the focus of this new decade including: (1) healing mental disorders; (2) understanding “aspects of mind believed to be uniquely human” including “the notion of self, rational thought processes, theory of mind, language and higher order consciousness”; (3) “enriching the mind through education”; and (4) “modeling the mind by means of computational models and artificial intelligence” (ibid.). The proposed decade was to be “transdisciplinary and multi-agency in its approach,” incorporating insights from neuroscience, medicine, cognitive neuroscience, psychology, computer science, engineering, mathematics, robotics, systems biology, cultural anthropology and social science (ibid.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albus, J.S., G.A. Bekey, J.H. Holland, N.G. Kanwisher, J.L. Krichmar, M. Mishkin, S.M. Dharmendra, M.E. Raichle, G.M. Shepard, and G. Tononi. (2007). A Proposal for a Decade of the Mind Initiative. Science, 317, 1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barch, D., C. Carter, and J. Cohen. (2004). Factors Influencing Stroop Performance in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 18(3), 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra S., J. Sullivan, and D.S. Geldmacher. (2013). Qualitative Assessment of Self-Identity in Advanced Dementia. Poster presented at Dementia Care at the 13th Alzheimer’s Association International Conference: Translating Research to Practice, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M.R. and P.M.S. Hacker. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and Neuroscience: a Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, J. (2006). Reducing Mind to Molecular Pathways: Explicating the Reductionism Implicit in Current Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Synthese, 151, 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss T. and Lømo, T. (1973). Long-lasting Potentiation of Synaptic Transmission in the Dentate Area of the Anaesthetized Rabbit Following Stimulation of the Perforant Path. Journal of Physiology, 232 (2), 331–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. (1990). Presidential Proclamation 6158, Library of Congress website. (http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., J. Kerns, and J. Cohen. (2009). Cognitive Neuroscience: Bridging Thinking and Feeling to the Brain and Its Implications for Psychiatry. In Neurobiology of Mental Illness (pp. 168–178), 3rd edn, ed. D. Charney and E. Nestler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1981). Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., D. Barch, C. Carter, and D. Servan-Schreiber. (1999). Context-Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia: Converging Evidence from Three Theoretically Motivated Cognitive Tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108 (1), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2003). The Making of a Memory Mechanism. Journal of the History of Biology, 36(1), 153–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. and L. Darden. (2001). Discovering Mechanisms in Neurobiology: The case of Spatial Memory, in P.K. Machamer, R. Grush, and P. McLaughlin (eds), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Cronbach, L. and P. Meehl. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. and P. Meehl. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCharms, C.R., and A. Zador. (2000). Neural Representation and the Cortical Code. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 613–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hooge, R., and P. De Deyn. (2001). Applications of the Morris Water Maze in the Study of Learning and Memory. Brain Research Reviews, 36, 60–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudai, Y. (2002). Memory from a to z: Keywords, Concepts and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1968). Psychological Explanation. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Cromwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1960). The Concept of a Stimulus in Psychology. The American Psychologist: 694–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. (2010). Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1973). Constraints on Learning: An Introduction to the Problems. In R.A. Hinde and J. Stevenson Hinde, eds Constraints on Learning (pp. 1–19). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E.R., and W.A. Spencer. (1968). Cellular Neurophysiological Approaches in the Study of Learning. Journal of Physiology, 48, 65–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York: The New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lømo, T. (2003). The Discovery of Long-Term Potentiation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 707–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1965). Evolution and Modification of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P. (2009). Neuroscience, Learning and the Return to Behaviorism. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience, ed. J. Bickle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlstein, W., C. Carter, D. Barch, and J. Baird. (1998). The Stroop Task and Attention Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Critical Evaluation of Card and Single-Trial Stroop Methodologies. Neuropsychology, 12(3), 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinini, G. and Craver, C.F. (2011). Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches. Synthese, 183, 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, M. (2008). Decade of the Mind. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 3, 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.A. (2009). The Multiplicity of Experimental Protocols: A Challenge to Reductionist and Non-Reductionist Models of the Unity of Neuroscience. Synthese, 167, 511–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.A. (2010a). a Role for Representation in Cognitive Neurobiology. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 875–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.A. (2010b). Reconsidering Spatial Memory and the Morris Water Maze. Synthese, 177(2), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.A. (forthcoming). Stabilizing Mental Disorders: Prospects and Problems. In Classifying psychopathology: Mental kinds and natural kinds, eds H. Kincaid and J.A. Sullivan. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.A. and E. Thiels. (2011). The Place of the Mind in Contemporary Neuroscience. (Poster presented at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweatt, J.D. (2009). Mechanisms of Memory (2nd edn). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1964). The Explanation of Behavior. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Eckardt, B. (1993). What Is Cognitive Science? Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B. (1924 [1970]). Behaviorism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. (2007). Reengineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Jacqueline A. Sullivan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sullivan, J.A. (2014). Is the Next Frontier in Neuroscience a ‘Decade of the Mind’?. In: Wolfe, C.T. (eds) Brain Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369580_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics