Skip to main content

The Legal Discourse on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century

Abstract

The principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Africa has been the subject of intense debates over the years. Having taken root within the framework of the African Union (AU), as the principle of non-indifference, R2P conveys a responsibility to intervene, in a member state, in response to war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity. The AU’s predecessor, the Organization of African Unity (OAU), was limited in this regard as a consequence of the principle of non-intervention. However, AU member states continue to negotiate how to find a balance within its legal framework, between this responsibility and the established principle of sovereignty which protects them from external intervention, thereby challenging at the same time the legal status of the R2P. While the necessity for a principle like this has been justified by several reputable scholars, others have argued that the R2P is just a means of justifying unilateral intervention in the affairs of other states. Against this background, the objective of this chapter is to explore the legal discourse on R2P in Africa. Using extant literature and other secondary sources, the chapter examines more specifically, with a focus on the African context, the legal dimensions of the three (3) major pillars of the R2P within the context of the challenges of implementation, and against the background of the continent’s unique political and security environment. We find that the R2P principle in Africa has its legal basis within the AU Constitutive Act and international law but it does have some legal hurdles to overcome. However, regardless of the legal challenges, the R2P principle supports the rule of law as well as multilateral and democratic institutions. The responsibility of the AU and its Regional Economic Communities (RECs) to protect remains a legal commitment made and accepted collectively by African states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatan, E., & Spies, Y. (2016). African Solutions to African Problems? The AU, R2P and Côte d’Ivoire. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, M. K., & Cohen, W. S. (2008). Preventing Genocide: A Blueprint for U.S. Policymakers, Genocide Prevention Task Force. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, The American Academy of Diplomacy and the Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansong, A. (2016). The Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law. Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Law Review, 2(1), 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • AU Constitutive Act. (2000, July 1). Constitutive Act of the AU Published by the Organization of African Unity (OAU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A.J. (2014). A Trojan Horse? In A. Bellamy (Eds.), The Responsibility to Protect: A Defence (pp. 112–132). Oxford University Press, Oxford Online. https://academic.oup.com/book/9588/chapter-abstract/156619198?redirectedFrom=fulltext

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect Five Years On. Ethics in International Affairs, 24(2), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, A. (2005). International Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2016). A New Generation Draws the Line: Humanitarian Intervention and the “Responsibility to Protect” Today. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, A. (2015). The Case for R2P. La Frontera, 35(2), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, J., Gumedze, S., & Mbadlanyana, T. (2009). Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: What Role for the ICC? Irish Studies in International Affairs, 20(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., & Deng, F. (1996). Normative Framework of Sovereignty. In F. M. Deng, K. Sadikel, L. Terrence, D. Rothchild, & W. Zartman (Eds.), Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa (pp. 1–33). The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembinski, M., & Reinold, T. (2011). The AU and R2P—From Non-intervention to Non-indifference? Libya and the Future of the Responsibility to Protect—African and European Perspectives. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep14497.5.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A31069ed04b1af394b93e63f3a751c19d&ab_segments=&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1. Accessed 13 June 2023.

  • De Waal, A. (2009, May 20). R2P in Theory and Politics (1). African Arguments. https://africanarguments.org/2009/05/r2p-in-theory-and-politics-1/. Accessed 9 May 2023.

  • Deng, F. M. (2010). From ‘Sovereignty as Responsibility’ to the ‘Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(4), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinstein, Y. (2011). War, Aggression and Self Defence (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Djilo, F. (2021). Unscrambling Subsidiarity in the African Union: From Competition to Collaboration. Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Africa Report 37. December 2021. https://issafrica.org/research/africa-report/unscrambling-subsidiarity-in-the-african-union-from-competition-to-collaboration. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • Evans, G., Thakur, R., & Pape, R. A. (2013). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 37(4), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezulwini Consensus. (2005). The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the UN: The Ezulwini Consensus Executive Council 7th Extraordinary Session 7–8 March 2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ext/EX.CL/2(VII).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafore, O. A. (2020). The African Union Collective Security Mechanisms and the Challenge of Armed Non-State Actors. Journal of African Union Studies (JoAUS), 9(3), 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitlin, H. (2012) A Problem of Mixed Motives: The Responsibility to Protect in Syria. Student Works. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/20/. Accessed 5 June 2023.

  • Geldenhuys, D. (2014). The African Union Responsibility Sovereignty and Contested State. Global Responsibility to Protect, 6(3), 350–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, R. (2015, February 15). Rhetoric of Responsibility: R2P’s Harmful Application in Humanitarian Practice. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2015/02/15/rhetoric-of-responsibility-r2ps-harmful-application-in-humanitarian-practice/. Accessed 14 June 2023.

  • Ifediora, O. F. (2021). Why African Norms Matter: Subsidiarity and Agency in Peacemaking. https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/api-gateway/apsa/assets/orp/resource/item/61904e1b58bc4b15cb9221a2/original/why-african-norms-matter-subsidiarity-and-agency-in-peacemaking.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. International Development Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyi, J. M. (2016). From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect In Iyi, J. M (eds). Humanitarian Intervention and the AU-ECOWAS Intervention Treaties Under International Law Springer International Publishing (pp. 41–88).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2004). The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ki-moon, B. (2007, September 25). Annual Address to the General Assembly. SG/SM/11182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwesi-Aning, S. A. (2009). Responsibility to Protect in Africa: An Analysis of the African Union’s Peace and Security Architecture. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 90–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwali, D. (2009a). The African Union and the Challenges of Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Policy Notes 2009/4 The Nordic Africa Institute. Uppsala, Sweden. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/105531/2009_4.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • Kuwali, D. (2009b). The End of Humanitarian Intervention: Evaluation of the African Union’s Right of Intervention. African Journal of Conflict Resolution AJCR, 2009(1). Governance and Human Rights. https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/the-end-of-humanitarian-intervention/. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • Kuwali, D. (2015). From Stopping to Preventing Atrocities: Actualization of Article 4(h). African Security Review, 24(3), 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwabukuna, O. (2021). The Responsibility to Protect Internally Displaced Persons in Africa. Journal of African Law, 65(S1), 73–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2009). Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror. Scandbook AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, J. (2008). Whose Responsibility to Protect? The Duties of Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Military Ethics, 7(4), 262–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peace and Security Council (PSC) Report. (2022, March 3). The Ambiguities of Subsidiarity ISS PSC Report. https://issafrica.org/pscreport/psc-insights/the-ambiguities-of-subsidiarity. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • Reinold, T. (2019). When Is More More? The Proliferation of International Courts and Their Impact on the Rule of Law in Africa. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(8), 1337–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, C. (2021, June 2). R2P: An Idea Whose Time Never Comes. The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/r2p-idea-whose-time-never-comes. Accessed 12 June 2023.

  • Rosenberg, S. P. (2009). Responsibility to Protect: A Framework for Prevention. Global Responsibility to Protect (GR2P), 1(4), 442–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, D. (2007). Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40(1), 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, T. (2008). Responsibility, Sovereignty, and Cooperation—Reflections on the ‘Responsibility to Protect.’ In D. König, P.-T. Stoll, V. Röber, & N. Matz-Luck (Eds.), International Law Today: New Challenges and Need for Reform? (pp. 1–16). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. R. (2022). UN Security Council and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legal Foundations of the Responsibility to Protect in International Law. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 37(1), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2006). The Duty to Protect. In T. Nardin & M. S. Williams (Eds.), Humanitarian Intervention (pp. 84–116). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitt, S. (2017). Sovereignty as Responsibility. In T. Dunne & C. Reus-Smit, C. (Eds.), The Globalization of International Society (pp. 325–344). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, J.-F. (2007). La responsabilité de protéger et le problème de l’autorité appropriée. In J. Coulon (Ed.), Guide du maintien de la paix 2008 (pp. 103–117). Athéna/Cepes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachira, G. M. (2007). Sovereignty and the United States of Africa: Insights from the EU ISS Paper 144 June 2007. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/98932/PAPER144H.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.

  • Wester, K. (2020). Intervention in Libya: The Responsibility to Protect in North Africa. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldemichael, S. (2021, January 7). The Reality of the AU’s Response to Crises. Institute for Security Studies (ISS). https://reliefweb.int/report/world/reality-au-s-response-crises. Accessed 13 June 2023.

  • Wyse, C. (2018). The African Union’s Right of Humanitarian Intervention as Collective Self Defense. Chicago Journal of International Law, 19(1), 295–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dodeye Uduak Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, D.U. (2024). The Legal Discourse on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Africa. In: Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (eds) Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics