Abstract
The principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Africa has been the subject of intense debates over the years. Having taken root within the framework of the African Union (AU), as the principle of non-indifference, R2P conveys a responsibility to intervene, in a member state, in response to war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity. The AU’s predecessor, the Organization of African Unity (OAU), was limited in this regard as a consequence of the principle of non-intervention. However, AU member states continue to negotiate how to find a balance within its legal framework, between this responsibility and the established principle of sovereignty which protects them from external intervention, thereby challenging at the same time the legal status of the R2P. While the necessity for a principle like this has been justified by several reputable scholars, others have argued that the R2P is just a means of justifying unilateral intervention in the affairs of other states. Against this background, the objective of this chapter is to explore the legal discourse on R2P in Africa. Using extant literature and other secondary sources, the chapter examines more specifically, with a focus on the African context, the legal dimensions of the three (3) major pillars of the R2P within the context of the challenges of implementation, and against the background of the continent’s unique political and security environment. We find that the R2P principle in Africa has its legal basis within the AU Constitutive Act and international law but it does have some legal hurdles to overcome. However, regardless of the legal challenges, the R2P principle supports the rule of law as well as multilateral and democratic institutions. The responsibility of the AU and its Regional Economic Communities (RECs) to protect remains a legal commitment made and accepted collectively by African states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abatan, E., & Spies, Y. (2016). African Solutions to African Problems? The AU, R2P and Côte d’Ivoire. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1), 21–38.
Albright, M. K., & Cohen, W. S. (2008). Preventing Genocide: A Blueprint for U.S. Policymakers, Genocide Prevention Task Force. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, The American Academy of Diplomacy and the Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace.
Ansong, A. (2016). The Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law. Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Law Review, 2(1), 14–34.
AU Constitutive Act. (2000, July 1). Constitutive Act of the AU Published by the Organization of African Unity (OAU).
Bellamy, A.J. (2014). A Trojan Horse? In A. Bellamy (Eds.), The Responsibility to Protect: A Defence (pp. 112–132). Oxford University Press, Oxford Online. https://academic.oup.com/book/9588/chapter-abstract/156619198?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect Five Years On. Ethics in International Affairs, 24(2), 143–169.
Cassese, A. (2005). International Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2016). A New Generation Draws the Line: Humanitarian Intervention and the “Responsibility to Protect” Today. Routledge.
Chung, A. (2015). The Case for R2P. La Frontera, 35(2), 22–29.
Cilliers, J., Gumedze, S., & Mbadlanyana, T. (2009). Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: What Role for the ICC? Irish Studies in International Affairs, 20(1), 55–67.
Cohen, R., & Deng, F. (1996). Normative Framework of Sovereignty. In F. M. Deng, K. Sadikel, L. Terrence, D. Rothchild, & W. Zartman (Eds.), Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa (pp. 1–33). The Brookings Institution.
Dembinski, M., & Reinold, T. (2011). The AU and R2P—From Non-intervention to Non-indifference? Libya and the Future of the Responsibility to Protect—African and European Perspectives. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep14497.5.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A31069ed04b1af394b93e63f3a751c19d&ab_segments=&origin=&initiator=&acceptTC=1. Accessed 13 June 2023.
De Waal, A. (2009, May 20). R2P in Theory and Politics (1). African Arguments. https://africanarguments.org/2009/05/r2p-in-theory-and-politics-1/. Accessed 9 May 2023.
Deng, F. M. (2010). From ‘Sovereignty as Responsibility’ to the ‘Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(4), 353–370.
Dinstein, Y. (2011). War, Aggression and Self Defence (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Djilo, F. (2021). Unscrambling Subsidiarity in the African Union: From Competition to Collaboration. Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Africa Report 37. December 2021. https://issafrica.org/research/africa-report/unscrambling-subsidiarity-in-the-african-union-from-competition-to-collaboration. Accessed 17 June 2023.
Evans, G., Thakur, R., & Pape, R. A. (2013). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 37(4), 199–214.
Ezulwini Consensus. (2005). The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the UN: The Ezulwini Consensus Executive Council 7th Extraordinary Session 7–8 March 2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ext/EX.CL/2(VII).
Fafore, O. A. (2020). The African Union Collective Security Mechanisms and the Challenge of Armed Non-State Actors. Journal of African Union Studies (JoAUS), 9(3), 87–109.
Gaitlin, H. (2012) A Problem of Mixed Motives: The Responsibility to Protect in Syria. Student Works. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/20/. Accessed 5 June 2023.
Geldenhuys, D. (2014). The African Union Responsibility Sovereignty and Contested State. Global Responsibility to Protect, 6(3), 350–376.
Hao, R. (2015, February 15). Rhetoric of Responsibility: R2P’s Harmful Application in Humanitarian Practice. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2015/02/15/rhetoric-of-responsibility-r2ps-harmful-application-in-humanitarian-practice/. Accessed 14 June 2023.
Ifediora, O. F. (2021). Why African Norms Matter: Subsidiarity and Agency in Peacemaking. https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/api-gateway/apsa/assets/orp/resource/item/61904e1b58bc4b15cb9221a2/original/why-african-norms-matter-subsidiarity-and-agency-in-peacemaking.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. International Development Research Council.
Iyi, J. M. (2016). From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect In Iyi, J. M (eds). Humanitarian Intervention and the AU-ECOWAS Intervention Treaties Under International Law Springer International Publishing (pp. 41–88).
Kennedy, D. (2004). The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton University Press.
Ki-moon, B. (2007, September 25). Annual Address to the General Assembly. SG/SM/11182.
Kwesi-Aning, S. A. (2009). Responsibility to Protect in Africa: An Analysis of the African Union’s Peace and Security Architecture. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 90–113.
Kuwali, D. (2009a). The African Union and the Challenges of Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Policy Notes 2009/4 The Nordic Africa Institute. Uppsala, Sweden. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/105531/2009_4.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.
Kuwali, D. (2009b). The End of Humanitarian Intervention: Evaluation of the African Union’s Right of Intervention. African Journal of Conflict Resolution AJCR, 2009(1). Governance and Human Rights. https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/the-end-of-humanitarian-intervention/. Accessed 17 June 2023.
Kuwali, D. (2015). From Stopping to Preventing Atrocities: Actualization of Article 4(h). African Security Review, 24(3), 248–269.
Lwabukuna, O. (2021). The Responsibility to Protect Internally Displaced Persons in Africa. Journal of African Law, 65(S1), 73–100.
Mamdani, M. (2009). Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror. Scandbook AB.
Pattison, J. (2008). Whose Responsibility to Protect? The Duties of Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Military Ethics, 7(4), 262–283.
Peace and Security Council (PSC) Report. (2022, March 3). The Ambiguities of Subsidiarity ISS PSC Report. https://issafrica.org/pscreport/psc-insights/the-ambiguities-of-subsidiarity. Accessed 17 June 2023.
Reinold, T. (2019). When Is More More? The Proliferation of International Courts and Their Impact on the Rule of Law in Africa. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(8), 1337–1355.
Renshaw, C. (2021, June 2). R2P: An Idea Whose Time Never Comes. The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/r2p-idea-whose-time-never-comes. Accessed 12 June 2023.
Rosenberg, S. P. (2009). Responsibility to Protect: A Framework for Prevention. Global Responsibility to Protect (GR2P), 1(4), 442–477.
Scheffer, D. (2007). Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40(1), 319–324.
Stoll, T. (2008). Responsibility, Sovereignty, and Cooperation—Reflections on the ‘Responsibility to Protect.’ In D. König, P.-T. Stoll, V. Röber, & N. Matz-Luck (Eds.), International Law Today: New Challenges and Need for Reform? (pp. 1–16). Springer.
Subramanian, S. R. (2022). UN Security Council and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legal Foundations of the Responsibility to Protect in International Law. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 37(1), 20–40.
Tan, K. (2006). The Duty to Protect. In T. Nardin & M. S. Williams (Eds.), Humanitarian Intervention (pp. 84–116). New York University Press.
Teitt, S. (2017). Sovereignty as Responsibility. In T. Dunne & C. Reus-Smit, C. (Eds.), The Globalization of International Society (pp. 325–344). Oxford University Press.
Thibault, J.-F. (2007). La responsabilité de protéger et le problème de l’autorité appropriée. In J. Coulon (Ed.), Guide du maintien de la paix 2008 (pp. 103–117). Athéna/Cepes.
Wachira, G. M. (2007). Sovereignty and the United States of Africa: Insights from the EU ISS Paper 144 June 2007. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/98932/PAPER144H.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2023.
Wester, K. (2020). Intervention in Libya: The Responsibility to Protect in North Africa. Cambridge University Press.
Woldemichael, S. (2021, January 7). The Reality of the AU’s Response to Crises. Institute for Security Studies (ISS). https://reliefweb.int/report/world/reality-au-s-response-crises. Accessed 13 June 2023.
Wyse, C. (2018). The African Union’s Right of Humanitarian Intervention as Collective Self Defense. Chicago Journal of International Law, 19(1), 295–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, D.U. (2024). The Legal Discourse on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Africa. In: Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (eds) Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8162-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8163-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)