Abstract
Extreme events are one of the serious challenges society is facing with the changing climate; extreme events like droughts have a significant impact on both human and animal livelihood. In India, one of the most frequent natural calamities is drought, and its assessment is required in order to support policy makers and water managers in the region. This study presented reliability–resilience–vulnerability (R–R–V) analysis of droughts, which uses the duration and severity of drought properties, estimated using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The study is carried out over Maharashtra (grid-wise) at 0.25° resolution using the precipitation data collected from India Meteorological Department (IMD) for a period of 41 years (1980–2020). The spatial variation of drought parameters, duration and severity at 50, 70, and 90 percentile levels are plotted and analysed to elucidate the regions that have higher drought risks. The most resilient areas are Amaravati, part of the Nashik, and Konkan division. Nagpur and Aurangabad divisions require utmost attention as they have the least reliability. The R-R-V maps of Maharashtra strongly show that the Aurangabad division has the highest drought risk among the other divisions. The results clearly show that Vidarbha and Marathwada are more prone to droughts. The RRV index map showed Latur, Beed, Parbhani, Chandrapur, and Nagpur fall under high to very high category of drought risk. The spatial plots give a clear picture of the areas that require immediate action and thus can be helpful for decision-makers and government bodies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In the natural climate cycle, drought is a prolonged dry period that can happen anywhere in the world. It is a calamity that develops slowly and is defined by a lack of precipitation that causes a water scarcity. In India, one of the most frequent natural calamities is drought. One third of the country is either prone to drought or covered by desert due to its increased frequency and wider distribution in recent years. Both in terms of agriculture and overall economic growth, these regions fall behind. Drought can have a terrible consequence on agriculture, health, energy, economies, and the environment. Drought is one of the extreme events which not only causes in a short-term impact, but it may also have a severe long-term impact, and it increases with its frequency and duration over the same region. The consequences lead to the migration of people and animals and leave behind barren land; hence it is very important to have a drought assessment for every region. Several studies over the globe and in India have shown an increasing trend of drought with climate change and global warming.
Extreme events are one of the serious challenges society is facing with the changing climate (Ganjir et al. 2022). The underlying processes causing the drought are reduction in precipitation or altered precipitation patterns, as well as increased evaporative demands brought on by higher temperatures. Around 30% of the emerging areas will experience current 100-year droughts (severe droughts that currently only happen once per 100 years) with a 3°C increase in temperature (Naumann et al. 2018). These scenarios show that if appropriate steps are not made to mitigate and adapt to climate change, the risk of drought will increase for many economic sectors and vulnerable areas. Droughts could cause major losses in many areas of the world with large population concentrations and susceptible communities that rely on local agricultural production. Drought management and adaptation will continue to be based on better-targeted impact monitoring and quantification in these areas. One consequence of recent climate change, characterized in particular by rising global temperatures, is a rise in the frequency of weather-related extreme events (IPCC 2014). Drought is not an exception, and in recent years, scientific literature has noted a general trend towards increasingly frequent and severe droughts (Dai 2013).
India is agriculture-based country, and a huge ratio of population is completely dependent on it. The below normal precipitation is great trouble for the farmers as they mostly relay on the monsoon. The drought is like curse for farmers. Mahmoudi et al. (2021) studied the change in spectral patterns of droughts in Iran based on the concepts of reliability, resilience, and vulnerability (RRV). Integration of climatic variables with R-R-V indicators is helpful for generating drought information (Hazbavi and Sadeghi 2017). The Drought Management Index (DMI) was calculated as a five-year time series at each grid point using joint cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of resilience and vulnerability by Chanda et al. (2014).
The reliability–resiliency–vulnerability (R-R-V) framework is used in this study to analyse drought. To evaluate potential changes in the drought features of Maharashtra, an aggregate index of RRV was applied. The region’s drought characteristics can be analysed using this method, and long-term drought planning strategies can be developed for the region. In the following, Sect. 2 contains study area and data details, Sect. 3 gives details of methodology, Sect. 4 discusses the application and results, and finally, the conclusions of the study are given in Sect. 5.
2 Study Area
The study area considered for drought analysis is Maharashtra state, in India. Maharashtra occupies 307,713 km2, or 9.36% of the nation’s total land area, and is situated in the western peninsular part of the country. The state is bounded on the north by Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, on the east by Chhattisgarh, on the south by Telangana, Karnataka, and Goa, and on the west by the Arabian Sea. It is situated between 15° 35′ N and 22° 02′ N latitude and 72° 36′ E and 80° 54′ E longitude. Deccan Plateau, Western Ghats, and West Coast are the three physiographic zones of the state. It has a tropical monsoon climate, which includes hot, rainy, and cold seasons as well as dry summers. The yearly temperature varies from 25 to 27 ℃, while the annual rainfall ranges from 400 to 6000 mm. Several rivers, including the Bhima, Godavari, Koyna, Krishna, Tapti, and Narmada, drain the state. Thirty-five districts, including 12 tribal and 7 hill districts, make up the state. According to the 2011 census, Maharashtra has a population of 112.37 million, or 9.28% of all the residents in India. While 45.22% of people reside in cities, 54.78% live in rural areas. 9.35% of the state’s population is tribal. The state has a 365 person per square kilometre population density, which is similar to the national average. Semiarid climatic conditions represent about 83% of Maharashtra’s land area. The study area map is shown in Fig. 1.
The rainfall data is taken from IMD daily data at 0.25° × 0.25° resolution for the period of 1980–2020. The daily data is converted into monthly data using the climate data operator (CDO) command.
3 Methodology
The meteorological drought is identified by using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). For the computation of SPI index, the frequency distribution of precipitation is modelled by a two- parameter gamma probability density function in the original SPI (McKee et al. 1993; Ganguli and Reddy 2012):
where Г(α) is the ordinary gamma function at α, (β) is a scale parameter, and (α) is a shape parameter.
A mixed distribution function (zeros and continuous precipitation amount) is utilized because the two-parameter gamma function is not established for zero values and the precipitation distribution may contain zeros and the cumulative distribution function (CDF) is stated as
where q is the probability of zero precipitation based on historical time series, and G(x) is the cumulative distribution function derived for nonzero precipitation. In order to convert the CDF of a mixed distribution to the CDF of a standard normal distribution with a zero mean and unit variance, an equiprobability transformation is performed (Panofsky et al. 1958) as precipitation is not normally distributed. The result is presented as
where Ψ is the standard normal distribution function, and F(x) is probability derived from Eq. (2). The transformed probability is referred as SPI. A positive SPI value indicates above-average precipitation, whereas a negative value indicates below-average precipitation.
The drought parameters, namely duration and severity, are defined as follows. The number of continuous periods (months) during which the SPI remains below the designated threshold value (SPI < 0.8) is considered the length or duration of the drought (D). The cumulative SPI readings over the course of the drought duration are drought severity (S).
The reliability, resilience, and vulnerability are calculated using the following definitions.
3.1 Reliability
The probability that a system is in a satisfactory state defines reliability (Hashimoto et al. 1982). Reliability in the context of SPI can be described as the probability that the SPI is higher than a specific threshold. Hence, the reliability is given as (Sung et al. 2018).
where d(j) is the duration of jth drought event, T is the total number of time intervals, and M is the total number of the drought events.
3.2 Resilience
Resilience measures how quickly a system can improve once it has dropped below the threshold for satisfactory performance (Sung et al. 2018).
3.3 Vulnerability
Vulnerability is the likely value of deficits v(i), if they occur. Vulnerability can be thought of as the average failure because it essentially indicates the intensity of failures. The vulnerability is calculated as the average of the overall deficit, which is calculated by dividing the total number of deficit events by the sum of all the deficits (Sung et al. 2018; Veetil et al. 2018).
where v(j) is the value of deficits of jth drought event. After calculating the reliability, resilience, and vulnerability, using the extreme standardization procedure, they were standardized to range from zero to one (Loucks 1997; Hazbavi and Sadeghi 2017).
where Xi is the value being considered, Xmin and Xmax are the minimum and maximum observed values, respectively, and N is the standardized value of each individual indicator. Since reliability and resilience fall in cost criteria, standardized value is given by (1 − N) and for vulnerability given by N. Finally, after standardization of R-R-V indicators, the geometric mean, as indicated in Eq. (9), was used to express the aggregated RRV index. Because it is more sensitive to changes in individual variables than other averages, the geometric mean was chosen for the study (Loucks 1997; Yu et al. 2013).
Where, Rel, Rev and Vul stands for standardized reliability, resilience, and vulnerability respectively. Based on the RRV index, a five-category classification scheme was devised to rate the drought- prone areas from high to low. This was suggested by Ding et al. (2008) and Yu et al. (2013) “Very high (0.81–1.00)”, “high (0.61–0.80)”, “moderate (0.41–0.60)”, “low (0.21–0.40)”, and “very low (0.00–0.20)” are the names of the five classes (I–V). The greater the value, the more susceptible the area is to drought. The flow chart of research methodology is shown in Fig. 2.
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Total Number of Drought Events
The spatial variation plot of total number of drought events occurred in the Maharashtra region (grid wise) is shown in Fig. 3. The figures clearly show that the Nagpur division and Aurangabad division and Solapur, Aloka, and Yavatmal districts have the highest number of drought events in years between 1980 and 2020 they have 40–45 drought events and other districts have drought events between 20 and 38. The least number of drought events is seen in the part of Nashik, Buldhana, Thane, and Pune districts.
4.2 Spatial Variation of Drought Parameters: Duration and Severity
The duration and severity grid-wise plot is shown in Fig. 4 with quantiles at 50, 70, and 90 percentile levels. The figure depicts duration (in months) and severity values corresponding to the percentile level. It can be clearly seen from the 50-percentile duration and severity plots 4(a) and 4(d) that the Marathwada region has high values of 2–2.5 (both duration and severity), suggesting that the 50% of the value at Marathwada region are high compared to the rest of Maharashtra, except the Marathwada region the rest shows the value of 1–1.5 months of drought duration which means that short duration drought events were more in that region. Buldhana District shows highest value at 50-percentile level with duration of 3 months. The 70- percentile duration and severity plots 4(b) and 4(e) shows that the duration lies between 1 and 4 months and the severity lies between 2 and 6. The spatial variation shows the part of Nagpur, Aurangabad and Amaravati regions have drought duration of 3.5–4 months for 70-percentile values, and the part of Nashik district has shown the highest values corresponding to 70-percentile level. The 70-percentile severity is highest in Buldhana and Washim districts.
The 90-percentile level plot of duration and severity shows that the Pune division (namely Sangli and Pune) and Nashik and Gadchiroli have the highest duration of 5–6 months. The 90-percentile severity plot also shows Pune division and Nagpur division have high severity values of 8–9. From the percentile plot, it can be clearly stated that the Pune division has a contrasting high and low duration and severity variation as 50% of the event have a duration between 1 and 1.5 months, whereas the Marathwada region has high values for all the percentile plots except the 90-percentile plot. That is also reflected in the reliability map.
4.3 Spatial Variability of Reliability, Resilience, and Vulnerability
The spatial variability of R-R-V is shown in Fig. 5. The Nagpur and Aurangabad division shows the least reliability compared to Nashik, Amravati, and Konkan division as shown in Fig. 5a. The reliability ranges from 0.8 to 0.9 (80–90%). As the probability that a system is in a satisfactory state defines reliability, i.e. the system having the least drought events will have high reliability. Hence, we can compare the total number of drought events in Fig. 3 and see that the area having high drought events have the least reliability. From reliability map (Fig. 5a), we can say that Nagpur and Aurangabad division requires utmost attention.
The spatial plot of drought resilience over Maharashtra at 0.25° grid level is shown in Fig. 5b. How soon a system can achieve a satisfactory condition again is measured by its resilience, and here, higher value of resilience is desirable. From Fig. 5b, we can see that the resilience varies from 0.35–0.55. The most resilient areas are Amaravati, part of the Nashik, and Konkan division. The least resilient part is some parts of Chandrapur and the lower part of Nashik. It can be noticed that those having the high mean severity and mean duration have the least resilience.
The spatial variation of vulnerability over Maharashtra is shown in Fig. 5c. The vulnerability ranges from 2.2 to 4.5. The higher vulnerability is the least desirable. Overall, the vulnerability mostly lies between 2.8 and 3 over most of the grids, but the high vulnerability can be seen at exact same grids, which have high severity as the severity is directly proportional to vulnerability.
4.4 RRV Index Map of Maharashtra
The RRV index map is shown in Fig. 6. The dark colour shows the region which is more prone to drought, and light colour shows region that is comparatively less drought-prone. The regions with very high drought are part of Chandrapur, Gagchiroli, Parbhani, Beed, and Latur. These districts also fall under high drought; other than that districts including Sangli, Satara, and eastern part of Maharashtra come under high drought region. The North-western Maharashtra falls under the low and very low drought scale. Most of the lower part of Maharashtra falls in moderate drought zone. Overall, we can precisely find from Fig. 6, which part of the district falls under which category of drought and accordingly, the action plans can be suggested to bring that region from high to moderate/low drought category.
5 Conclusions
This study presented a reliability–resilience–vulnerability (R–R–V) framework for analysing the droughts. The meteorological droughts are characterized using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). The study area of Maharashtra state in India is considered for drought analysis at spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° utilizing IMD monthly precipitation data over a 41-year period (1980–2020). To understand the spatial variation of drought parameters, duration and severity at 50, 70, and 90 percentile levels are computed and plotted, which clearly show that the Marathwada region has high duration and severity; the 90-percentile plot shows Pune division has high duration and severity, but it has low severity and duration at 50-percentile level. The presented plots depict which areas are more (or less) vulnerable to droughts. Amaravati, part of Nashik, and the Konkan division are the most resilient locations, and they require the least attention. The divisions of Nagpur and Aurangabad deserve special care because they are the least reliable. The R-R-V maps of Maharashtra firmly demonstrate that the Aurangabad and Nagpur division has the highest drought risk among the other divisions. The spatial plots provide a clear picture of locations that demand immediate action, which will be useful to decision-makers and government entities.
References
Chanda K, Maity R, Sharma A, Mehrotra R (2014) Spatiotemporal variation of long-term drought propensity through reliability-resilience-vulnerability based Drought Management Index. Water Resour Res 50(10):7662–7676
Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change 3(1):52–58
Ding Y, Wang W, Cheng X, Zhao S (2008) Ecosystem health assessment in inner Mongolia region based on remote sensing and GIS. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B1):1029–1034
Ganguli P, Reddy MJ (2012) Risk assessment of droughts in Gujarat using bivariate copulas. Water Resour Manag 26(11), 3301–3327
Ganjir G, Pattnaik S, Trivedi D (2022) Characteristics of dynamical and thermo-dynamical variables during heavy rainfall events over the Indian region. Dyn Atmos Oceans 99:101315
Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20
Hazbavi Z, Sadeghi SHR (2017) Watershed health characterization using reliability–resilience–vulnerability conceptual framework based on hydrological responses. Land Degrad Dev 28(5):1528–1537
Hazbavi Z, Baartman JE, Nunes JP, Keesstra SD, Sadeghi SH (2018) Changeability of reliability, resilience and vulnerability indicators with respect to drought patterns. Ecol Ind 87:196–208
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change
Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):513–530
Mahmoudi P, Maity R, Amir Jahanshahi SM, Chanda K (2021) Changing spectral patterns of long‐term drought propensity in Iran through reliability–resilience–vulnerability‐based drought management index. Int J Climatol
McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993, January) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on applied climatology, vol 17, no 22, pp 179–183
Naumann G, Alfieri L, Wyser K, Mentaschi L, Betts RA, Carrao H et al (2018) Global changes in drought conditions under different levels of warming. Geophys Res Lett 45(7):3285–3296
Panofsky HA, Brier GW, Best WH (1958) Some application of statistics to meteorology
Sung JH, Chung ES, Shahid S (2018) Reliability–resiliency–vulnerability approach for drought analysis in South Korea using 28 GCMs. Sustainability 10(9):3043
Veettil AV, Konapala G, Mishra AK, Li HY (2018) Sensitivity of drought resilience-vulnerability-exposure to hydrologic ratios in contiguous United States. J Hydrol 564:294–306
Wiegand AN, Walker C, Duncan PF, Roiko A, Tindale N (2013) A systematic approach for modelling quantitative lake ecosystem data to facilitate proactive urban lake management. Environ Syst Res 2(1):1–12
Yu G, Yu Q, Hu L, Zhang S, Fu T, Zhou X et al (2013) Ecosystem health assessment based on analysis of a land use database. Appl Geogr 44:154–164
Acknowledgements
The research work is financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology DST—Centre of Excellence in Climate Studies IIT Bombay DST/CCP/CoE/140/2018 (G) Code (RD/0117-DST0000-038).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ganjir, G., Janga Reddy, M., Karmakar, S. (2024). Reliability–Resilience–Vulnerability Analysis of Droughts Over Maharashtra. In: Patel, D., Kim, B., Han, D. (eds) Innovation in Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure. ISSI 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 364. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3557-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3557-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3556-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3557-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)