Abstract
Oomycetes are a class of eukaryotic organisms that are similar to fungus in morphology and lifestyle. The cell wall of oomycetes is composed of cellulose, unlike fungus, where chitin is the main component. These organisms are generally considered saprophytes with the ability to cause secondary infection. However, some species are highly pathogenic and cause severe diseases in fish. Important fish pathogens of this class belong to the genus Saprolegnia, Achlya, and Aphanomyces under the order Saprolegniales. These organisms have caused huge economic loss in aquaculture and are even considered responsible for the decline in populations of wild fish and amphibians. Previously, these organisms were effectively controlled by use of malachite green, which was later banned. This has led to the emergence of these organisms with increased incidence, virulence, and host range. The diagnosis of the disease can be made by observing the gross lesion of white cotton wool-like growth at the site of infection, but identifying a causative agent is not possible. Identification of the genus and up to the species level is made through various ways such as microscopic observation of the reproductive structures, antibody-based methods, and molecular identification techniques. With advancement in technology, rapid, specific methods have been developed that can identify as well as quantify the causative agent in a given sample. Fast and accurate identification of pathogen will enable us to act promptly against the infection to prevent further spread.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
18.1 Introduction
Fungi constitute a group of heterotrophic, eukaryotic organisms that are now considered separate kingdom different from plants and animals. Fungi are usually filamentous and multicellular, though non-filamentous and unicellular ones also exist. The filaments, also known as hyphae, are cylindrical thread-like structures, which can grow up to several centimeters. Hyphae grow at the tip and at the branches, leading to the development of a network of fungal threads known as mycelium (Fricker et al. 2007). Fungi lack chloroplast and, hence, cannot photosynthesize. They instead obtain their food from the surroundings by absorbing dissolved molecules. They can utilize almost any carbon source as food (Leaño 2001). Fungi contain chitin in addition to glucans in their cell wall. This feature differentiates the fungi from other morphologically similar fungus-like organisms such as oomycetes (water molds).
Oomycetes are a phylogenetically distinct class of organism with similar morphology and lifestyle to fungus. Previously, they were considered a fungus, but, later, they were classified as Stramenopiles and phylogenetically grouped with diatoms and brown algae (Baldauf et al. 2000; Beakes et al. 2012; Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 2009; van West 2006). Unlike fungus, oomycetes have a cell wall, composed of cellulose (Van der Auwera et al. 1995). They rarely have septa in their hyphae or are present at the base of sporangia (Kortekamp 2005). They cause some of the most devastating diseases in plants and aquatic animals, resulting in huge economic loss and damage to natural ecosystems (Kamoun and Smart 2005; Phillips et al. 2008). Aquatic oomycetes have received lesser attention than their counterparts that infect plants (Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 2009; van West 2006). Majority of the oomycete species that cause diseases in fish belong to the genus Saprolegnia, Achlya, and Aphanomyces under the order Saprolegniales, while a few numbers are from the genus Pythium (Gozlan et al. 2014). Generally, these organisms are considered secondary pathogens growing on injured or stressed fish, but some are highly virulent and can cause primary infections (Willoughby 1978; Pickering and Christie 1980). For example, Aphanomyces invadans, the etiological agent of the epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS), can cause up to 100% mortality in farmed fish (Iberahim et al. 2018). Similarly, highly virulent Saprolegnia parasitica has been isolated from striped catfish farms in Uttar Pradesh, India, which can cause 100% mortality in experimental infection (Ravindra et al. 2022). The genus Achlya also has virulent species that can cause infections in fish (Khulbe et al. 1995; Sati 1991). Some Pythium species were found to infect fish in natural and experimental conditions (Czeczuga et al. 2004; Khulbe 2009).
Previously, diseases caused by oomycetes were controlled effectively by using malachite green. However, this compound has been banned due to its carcinogenic and mutagenic effects (Srivastava et al. 2004). Since then, there has been a recrudescence of the disease, and new host species of the pathogens are being identified (Sarowar et al. 2013; Choi et al. 2019; Sosa et al. 2007). Infections by Saprolegnia, Achlya, and Aphanomyces species are often observed as a white or gray cotton wool-like appearance at the site of infection (Greeff-Laubscher et al. 2019; Mondal and De 2002; Liu et al. 2017). Thus, it is not possible to identify the causative agent by observing only the gross lesion. Therefore, to initiate effective and appropriate control measures to prevent further spread of the disease, it is crucial to correctly identify the pathogen. This will also enable the selection of appropriate chemicals and optimum doses for treatment leading to judicious use of the therapeutic compound. Requirement of drug dose may vary depending on the species, and we have also observed that different species under the same genus, Saprolegnia, showed variable sensitivity to antifungal compounds (unpublished data). So, species identification is essential to develop suitable programs for controlling and treating infectious agents. Identification of oomycetes is conventionally done through morphological observation, but at present, molecular techniques using DNA markers are more commonly followed.
18.2 Morphological Identification
Isolation and culture of the causative agent from the lesion or water bodies have been integral for its identification. It is a time-consuming as well as a laborious process. In our laboratory, the isolation process involved direct inoculation of the sample on potato dextrose agar (PDA) incorporated with an antibiotic (Choi et al. 2019; Parra-Laca et al. 2015; Fregeneda-Grandes et al. 2007a, b). On PDA, Saprolegnia and Achlya species produced white hyphae, some growing inside the agar and the rest extending above the surface. Each colony showing different growth morphology is further sub-cultured until a pure culture is obtained (Shin et al. 2017). Morphological identification often requires observation of different reproductive stages. In the life cycle of oomycetes, several developmental stages can be observed microscopically for identification. Their reproduction occurs sexually and asexually. In asexual mode, motile zoospores are produced and released from sporangium or zoosporangium. The zoospores swim through a pair of flagella and exhibit a chemotactic response to infect new hosts (Walker and van West 2007). In Saprolegnia, the primary zoospore encysts, after a short time, release the secondary zoospore, which is the most important infective stage. In Aphanomyces, the primary zoospore immediately encysts at the tip of hyphae; hence, the secondary zoospore is the only motile stage (Cerenius et al. 1987). In Achlya, it is monoplanetic, that is, the released zoospores are the only dispersal form (Daugherty et al. 1998; Johnson et al. 2002). Sexual reproduction occurs through the production of oogonia and antheridia. Structurally, antheridia are usually small and filamentous carrying nuclei containing the genome. In contrast, oogonia are large, swollen filled with oospheres, each carrying a haploid nucleus. During fertilization, the antheridium fuses with the oogonium and releases the antheridial nuclei, which fuse with the oospheres inside the oogonium leading to the development of oospores. The oospores are spherical and double-walled and can survive in adverse environmental conditions (Gozlan et al. 2014).
Routine identification of oomycetes is made by microscopic examination of sexual reproductive structures Vandersea et al. 2006). For structural observation, oomycetes are cultured on PDA, containing sterile sesame seeds. The colonized seeds are then transferred to a new dish, containing sterile tap water and incubated for a few days. Later, the oomycetes on seeds are observed under a microscope for structures like zoosporangium, zoospores, hyphae, and sexual structures (Sandoval-Sierra and Diéguez-Uribeondo 2015). Usually, Saprolegnia strains, isolated from fish, do not exhibit any sexual structures in laboratory culture, and many a time, identification can be done up to genus level only (Stueland et al. 2005; Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 2007). In addition, many species may produce similar or overlapping structures which are not stable (Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 1996). Identification of species depending completely on morphological characteristics is not authentic and sometimes even impossible (Ke et al. 2009; Diéguez-Uribeondo et al. 2007). Instead, decorations on the secondary encysted zoospores such as long hooked hairs in bundles are considered as criteria for the identification of virulent Saprolegnia parasitica (Willoughby 1985; Beakes et al. 1994; Yuasa et al. 1997; Shin et al. 2017). Other saprophytic species, such as S. diclina and S. ferax, do not exhibit such characteristics (Stueland et al. 2005). In Achlya, the morphology of gemmae is one of the structures used for species identification. For example, spherical gemmae are a characteristic distinguishing feature of Achlya bisexualis (Barksdale 1962). Similarly, characteristic structures of zoospores encysted as a cluster at the orifice of zoosporangium, oogonium, and antheridium are observed to identify Aphanomyces species (Takuma et al. 2010). As morphological identification of oomycetes is often challenging, different detection methods based on an antibody, DNA, or RNA are being developed.
18.3 Antibody-Based Detection
The ability of antibodies to bind selectively to an antigen with high affinity has been extensively applied in many research and clinical applications. Antibodies are components of the immune system that helps the body to fight against foreign substance such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Antibodies may be used in diagnosis either in polyclonal or monoclonal form. Polyclonal antibodies are a mixture of antibodies that can react with a specific antigen, each identifying a different epitope (Sabeta and Ngoepe 2015). In contrast, monoclonal antibodies are derived from a single parent cell and have an affinity for the same epitope (Lipman et al. 2005). Lilley et al. (1997a, b) developed polyclonal antibodies for the detection of A. invadans but were found to cross react with other oomycete species. They concluded that monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against A. invadans hyphal material would provide a more specific probe for immunohistochemical detection of EUS.
Miles et al. (2003) used a monoclonal antibody against a hyphal protein of A. invadans for detection of the pathogen by immunofluorescent staining on tissue sections of infected fish. The antibody did cross-react with A. astaci but not with other oomycetes of fish. Moreover, the technique was more sensitive than the conventional methods for detection of A. invadans. Ganapathi et al. (2008) used monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based immunodot to screen for the presence of A. invadans in tissues of grossly healthy and ulcerated fishes. They found that this technique can detect the pathogen before the appearance of a lesion. They have also stated that the technique can be used for early detection of A. invadans and to predict EUS outbreaks at least 2 months ahead. Adil et al. (2013) have developed a monoclonal antibody-based flow-through immunoassay (FTA) to detect A. invadans. The assay has a detection limit of 7 μg/mL for A. invadans. The test is rapid, can be completed within 10 min, and is simple, cost-effective, and suitable for on-site screening to detect A. invadans in fish from disease outbreaks. Detection of Saprolegnia using monoclonal antibodies has also been reported (Bullis et al. 1996; Fregeneda-Grandes et al. 2007a, b). One group found that MAbs produced against S. parasitica ATCC 52719 recognized all S. parasitica isolates in an indirect immunofluorescence assay. Another group found variable affinity among the MAbs. They found a MAb that can recognize an epitope expressed mainly in the asexual isolates in the long-haired S. parasitica. They also discovered that isolates with bundles of long hairs share a number of antigens with other species of Saprolegnia.
18.4 Molecular Identification
In recent years, molecular detection and identification of microbes or infectious agents have become a routine work in many diagnostic laboratories. Molecular identification methods detect unique nucleic acid sequences specific to the pathogen. These techniques are more sensitive and specific than the conventional detection method. Molecular methods, owing to their high sensitivity, can detect infections at an early stage. Moreover, these methods have been successfully used for the identification of new and non-culturable agents (Morshed et al. 2007). These methods can complement the conventional method of morphological examination and serological methods for the identification of causative agents. Some highly specific methods can detect even a single nucleotide change in the nucleic acid sequence (Zaidi et al. 2003). The most powerful molecular detection method is the amplification of the target gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by sequencing for species identification. There are other advanced forms of PCR, and many have been applied in the detection and identification of oomycete species. In addition, molecular methods do not require amplification of the target gene or nucleic acid but use a complementary probe, for example, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The types of molecular techniques developed and used for detecting and identifying fish oomycete pathogens are discussed below.
18.4.1 PCR and Sequencing
Amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, followed by sequencing, is commonly done to identify oomycete species. The ITS region is routinely amplified because its copy number is high, enabling detection even in a small quantity of DNA, it is small in size, it has high variation even between closely related species, and it is flanked by highly conserved sequences (Baldwin et al. 1995). The ITS region is situated between 18S and 26S gene and includes ITS1 and ITS2 separated by 5.8S gene in the nrDNA. Amplification of ITS region is done by using universal primers, developed by White et al. (1990). In our study, ITS1 (forward, 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (reverse, 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) primers have been used. In Saprolegnia and Achlya, these primers yielded a PCR product of 750 bp approximately. The PCR products were cleaned and subjected to Sanger sequencing for species identification. The sequence is then compared with the available nucleotide sequences in the database through Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), and species was identified. Based on the sequences of the ITS region, 29 DNA-based molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) were identified, which supported the validity of 18 species of Saprolegnia and 11 potentially new species (Sandoval-Sierra et al. 2014). Another commonly targeted gene for the identification of oomycetes species is cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), which is a relatively new approach. Amplification of the ITS region uses genomic DNA, whereas mitochondrial DNA is used for COI. It has been reported that COI, in some case, is more delimiting than ITS at the species level (Robideau et al. 2011).
18.4.2 Identification Without Sequencing
Nucleotide sequencing is the process of determining the order of four nucleotides in nucleic acid. Identification of species by Sanger sequencing is time-consuming, and a higher cost is involved as often the service needs to be outsourced. Therefore, different types of PCR for species identification without sequencing have been developed or applied. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR was used to analyze the genetic diversity in Aphanomyces astaci, the etiologic agent of crayfish plague, and to trace the origin of outbreaks (Huang et al. 1994; Lilley et al. 1997a, b). Bangyeekhun et al. (2001) applied RAPD-PCR to characterize Saprolegnia, isolated from catfish, and confirmed the presence of three genetically distinct groups. In RAPD PCR, arbitrary primers are used to amplify random segments of the target gene. When separated in a gel, the PCR products give a distinct DNA fingerprint.
Another technique that has been used for species identification in oomycetes is restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). It is a technique in which one or more restriction endonucleases digest the DNA sample, and the digested fragments are separated in gel electrophoresis. The DNA fragments are then transferred to the membrane through Southern blotting. Then the RFLP probe is allowed to hybridize with the DNA fragments, giving a unique blotting pattern characteristic of a particular species. Since the isolation of enough DNA for RFLP is time-consuming and laborious, PCR amplification is performed before digestion with restriction enzymes. Molina et al. (1995) used restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) to characterize and identify Saprolegnia. They subjected amplified products of the ITS region to a number of restriction endonucleases to generate several fingerprints. They found that endonuclease BstUI generates identical fingerprints for all strains of S. parasitica, regardless of its origin. Like RFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) also uses restriction enzymes. It is a highly sensitive and reproducible technique. In this technique, genomic DNA is first digested, and adaptors are ligated to the sticky ends of the fragments. Then selective amplification of the fragments using primers complementary to the adaptor and restriction site is carried out. The amplicons are separated on denaturing gel, and the band pattern is visualized (Vos et al. 1995). Rezinciuc et al. (2014) stated that AFLP is an alternative method to RAPD-PCR for genotyping A. astaci. Elameen et al. (2021) used AFLP technique to study the genetic diversity and relationships of Saprolegnia spp. collected from different geographical locations. They found that AFLP analysis has a significant correlation with ITS sequence data.
Significant development of PCR technology is real-time PCR, also referred to as quantitative PCR. As the name indicates, this method detects and measures the generated products in real time. Here, the detection of the product can be achieved in two ways: (1) use of a non-specific fluorescent dye that intercalates with double-stranded DNA and emits fluorescence and (2) use of a sequence-specific probe labelled with fluorescent reporter, which emits fluorescence when cleaved by TaqDNA polymerase during extension of primer toward the probe. The intensity of the fluorescence is measured with a detector corresponding to the increase in the amplified product (Heid et al. 1996). Rocchi et al. (2017) developed a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify S. parasitica in a river as well as drinking water. Di Domenico et al. (2021) developed real-time PCR TaqMan assays to distinguish the five genotype groups of A. astaci. They stated that the technique is suitable for fast genotyping of A. astaci during crayfish plague outbreaks and in latent infections. Ghosh et al. (2021) have developed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to detect Saprolegnia species. The detection method targeted the ITS region and COI gene and was specific only to Saprolegnia genus. The method is highly sensitive, with a detection limit of 10 fg of DNA.
DNA probes labelled with a fluorescent dye are also used in the molecular cytogenetic technique known as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for species identification (Frickmann et al. 2017). This method can detect specific nucleic acid targets in cells and tissue samples. In this assay, the probe is allowed to hybridize to its complementary sequence in the denatured DNA present in the specimen. The hybridization between the probe and the target DNA can be visualized using a fluorescent microscope. Vandersea et al. (2006) have developed fluorescent peptide nucleic acid in situ hybridization (FISH) assays to detect A. invadans in ulcerated lesions. They found that the results of the assay exactly matched with PCR targeting the region containing the 18S gene and ITS1.
18.4.3 Visual Detection
Parra-Laca et al. (2015) designed a PCR-free Saprolegnia detection kit using hemolymph from the adult female insect Dactylopius coccus. They conceptualized the idea based on the reports that the immune components of the insect react with the fungal cell wall component such as N-acetylglucosamine and 1–3 glucan and form melanin, which can be observed visually. Their study found that Saprolegnia sp.-induced reaction was utilizing the pigment carminic acid of the insect hemolymph. Consequently, there was a formation of melanin which could be observed visually, and the presence of Saprolegnia was identified. The assay is capable of identifying the presence of Saprolegnia between 5 and 282 zoospores.
18.5 Conclusion
Fish disease, caused by oomycetes, is fast emerging, as there is no effective treatment against these pathogens. The disease is no longer confined to only freshwater fish. It has also been reported from marine species. This class of organism is generally considered secondary pathogens that infect only when there are injury or primary infections. However, some species are highly virulent and can cause huge mortality in farmed fish. Moreover, the new hosts of the pathogens are being discovered. Therefore, it is important to delineate the pathogenic species from the non-pathogenic ones. There have been many developments in the detection and identification methods of oomycetes, but point-of-care diagnostic system is lacking. Future research may aim to develop a rapid, easy, or user-friendly identification system having field application. This will help in early diagnosis at the farm level, and immediate necessary measures can be taken to prevent further spread of the disease.
References
Adil B, Shankar KM, Kumar BT, Patil R, Ballyaya A, Ramesh KS, Poojary SR, Byadgi OV, Siriyappagouder P (2013) Development and standardization of a monoclonal antibody-based rapid flow-through immunoassay for the detection of Aphanomyces invadans in the field. J Vet Sci 14(4):413–419
Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF (2000) A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972–977
Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82(2):247–277
Bangyeekhun E, Quiniou SM, Bly JE, Cerenius L (2001) Characterisation of Saprolegnia sp. isolates from channel catfish. Dis Aquat Org 45(1):53–59
Barksdale AW (1962) Concerning the species, Achlya Bisexualis. Mycologia 54:704–712
Beakes GW, Wood SE, Burr AW (1994) Features which characterize Saprolegnia isolates from salmon fish lesions—a review. In: Mueller GJ (ed) Salmon Saprolegniasis. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, pp 33–66
Beakes GW, Glockling SL, Sekimoto S (2012) The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete ‘fungi’. Protoplasma 249:3–19
Bullis RA, Noga EJ, Levy MG (1996) Production and preliminary characterization of monoclonal antibodies to Saprolegnia parasitica. Mycol Res 100(4):489–494
Cerenius L, Söderhäll K, Fuller MS (1987) Aphanomyces astaci and Aphanomyces sp. In: Fuller MS, Jaworsky A (eds) Zoosporic fungi in teaching and research. Southeastern Publishers, Athens, pp 64–65
Choi YJ, Lee SH, Nguyen T, Nam B, Lee HB (2019) Characterization of Achlya americana and A bisexualis (Saprolegniales, Oomycota) isolated from freshwater environments in Korea. Mycobiology 47(2):135–142
Czeczuga B, Kiziewicz B, Godlewska A (2004) Zoosporic fungi growing on eggs of Coregonus lavaretus holsatus Thienemann, 1916 from Lake Wdzydze in Kaszuby. Pol J Environ Stud 13:355–359
Daugherty J, Evans TM, Skillom T, Watson LE, Money NP (1998) Evolution of spore release mechanisms in the Saprolegniaceae (oomycetes): evidence from a phylogenetic analysis of internal transcribed spacer sequences. Fungal Genet Biol 24:354–363
Di Domenico M, Curini V, Caprioli R, Giansante C, Mrugała A, Mojžišová M, Cammà C, Petrusek A (2021) Real-time PCR assays for rapid identification of common Aphanomyces astaci genotypes. Front Ecol Evol 9:597585
Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K (1996) Physiological characterization of Saprolegnia parasitica isolates from brown trout. Aquaculture 140:247–257
Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Fregeneda-Grandes J, Cerenius L, Pérez-Iniesta E, Aller-Gancedo J, Telleria M, Söderhäll K, María M (2007) Re-evaluation of the enigmatic species complex Saprolegnia diclina-Saprolegnia parasitica based on morphological, physiological and molecular data. Fungal Genet Biol 44:585–601
Diéguez-Uribeondo J, García MA, Cerenius L, Kozubíková E, Ballesteros I, Windels C, Weiland J, Kator H, Söderhäll K, Martín MP (2009) Phylogenetic relationships among plant and animal parasites, and saprotrophs in Aphanomyces (oomycetes). Fungal Genet Biol 46:365–376
Elameen A, Stueland S, Kristensen R, Fristad RF, Vrålstad T, Skaar I (2021) Genetic analyses of Saprolegnia strains isolated from salmonid fish of different geographic origin document the connection between pathogenicity and molecular diversity. J Fungi (Basel) 7(9):713
Fregeneda-Grandes JM, Rodríguez-Cadenas F, Aller-Gancedo JM (2007a) Fungi isolated from cultured eggs, alevins and broodfish of brown trout in a hatchery affected by Saprolegniosis. J Fish Biol 71:510–518
Fregeneda-Grandes JM, Rodríguez-Cadenas F, Carbajal-González MT, Aller-Gancedo JM (2007b) Detection of ‘long-haired’ Saprolegnia (S. parasitica) isolates using monoclonal antibodies. Mycol Res 111(Pt 6):726–733
Fricker M, Boddy L, Bebber D (2007) Biology of the fungal cell. Springer, Cham, pp 309–330
Frickmann H, Zautner AE, Moter A, Kikhney J, Hagen RM, Stender H, Poppert S (2017) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the microbiological diagnostic routine laboratory: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol 43(3):263–293
Ganapathi MN, Rajesh KM, Sahoo AK, Shankar KM (2008) Monoclonal antibody-based detection of Aphanomyces invadans for surveillance and prediction of epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) outbreak in fish. In: Bondad-Reantaso MG, Mohan CV, Crumlish M, Subasinghe RP (eds) Diseases in Asian aquaculture VI. Fish Health Section. Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines, pp 157–168
Ghosh S, Straus DL, Good C, Phuntumart V (2021) Development and comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification with quantitative PCR for the specific detection of Saprolegnia spp. PLoS One 16(12):e0250808
Gozlan RE, Marshall WL, Lilje O, Jessop CN, Gleason FH, Andreou D (2014) Current ecological understanding of fungal-like pathogens of fish: what lies beneath? Front Microbiol 5:62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00062
Greeff-Laubscher MR, Christison KW, Smit NJ (2019) First record of the water mold Achlya bisexualis (Saprolegniaceae) isolated from ornamental fish in South Africa. J Aquat Anim Health 31(4):354–363
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6(10):986–994
Huang T, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K (1994) Analysis of genetic diversity in crayfish plague fungus, Aphanomyces astaci, by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Aquaculture 126:1–10
Iberahim NA, Trusch F, van West P (2018) Aphanomyces invadans, the causal agent of epizootic ulcerative syndrome, is a global threat to wild and farmed fish. Fungal Biol Rev 32(3):118–130
Johnson TW, Seymour RL, Padgett DE (2002) Biology and systematics of the Saprolegniaceae. University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, NC
Kamoun S, Smart CD (2005) Late blight of potato and tomato in the genomics era. Plant Dis 89:692–699
Ke X, Wang J, Gu Z, Li M, Gong X (2009) Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of two Saprolegnia sp. (oomycetes) isolated from silver crucian carp and zebra fish. Mycol Res 113(5):637–644
Khulbe RD (2009) Pathogenicity of some species of Pythium Pringsheim on certain fresh water temperate fishes. Mycoses 26:273–275
Khulbe RD, Chandra J, Bisht GS (1995) Fungal diseases of fish in Nanak Sagar, Nainital, India. Mycopathologia 130(2):71–74
Kortekamp A (2005) Growth, occurrence and development of septa in Plasmopara viticola and other members of the Peronosporaceae using light- and epifluorescence-microscopy. Mycol Res 109(Pt 5):640–648
Leaño EM (2001) Fungal diseases. In: Lio-Po GD, Lavilla CR, Cruz-Lacierda ER (eds) Health management in aquaculture. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Tigbauan, Iloilo, pp 43–53
Lilley JH, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K (1997a) RAPD evidence for the origin of crayfish plague outbreaks in Britain. Aquaculture 157:181–185
Lilley JH, Thompson KD, Adams A (1997b) Characterization of Aphanomyces invadans by electrophoresis and Western blot analysis. Dis Aquat Organ 30:187–197
Lipman NS, Jackson LR, Trudel LJ, s Weis-Garcia F. (2005) Monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies: distinguishing characteristics, applications, and information resources. ILAR J 46(3):258–268
Liu S, Song P, Ou R, Fang W, Lin M, Ruan J, Yang X, Hu K (2017) Sequence analysis and typing of Saprolegnia strains isolated from freshwater fish from Southern Chinese regions. Aquac Fish 2:227e233
Miles DJC, Thompson KD, Lilley JH, Adams A (2003) Immunofluorescence of the epizootic ulcerative syndrome pathogen, Aphanomyces invadans, using a monoclonal antibody. Dis Aquat Organ 55:77–84
Molina FI, Jong SC, Ma G (1995) Molecular characterization and identification of Saprolegnia by restriction analysis of genes coding for ribosomal RNA. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 68(1):65–74
Mondal SK, De AB (2002) A fatal oomycotic disease of the fresh water fish Aplocheilus panchax in India caused by Aphanomyces laevis. Mycopathologia 154:21–24
Morshed MG, Lee MK, Jorgensen D, Isaac-Renton JL (2007) Molecular methods used in clinical laboratory: prospects and pitfalls. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 49(2):184–191
Parra-Laca R, Hernández-Hernández FC, Lanz-Mendoza H, Borrego Enríquez LE, Gil FLG (2015) Isolation and identification of Saprolegnia sp. from freshwater aquarium fishes and the hemolymph immune response of Dactylopius coccus costa de 1835 (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopidae) against this oomycete. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 4:149
Phillips AJ, Anderson VL, Robertson EJ, Secombes CJ, van West P (2008) New insights into animal pathogenic oomycetes. Trends Microbiol 16:13–19
Pickering AD, Christie P (1980) Sexual differences in the incidence and severity of ectoparasitic infestation of the brown trout, Salmo trutta L. J Fish Biol 16(6):669–683
Ravindra KR, Ahmad N, Verma DK, Kantharajan G, Kumar CB, Paria A, Swaminathan TR, Rathore G, Sood N, Pradhan PK, Lal KK, Jena JK (2022) Mortalities in cultured Pangasianodon hypophthalmus due to oomycete Saprolegnia parasitica infection in Uttar Pradesh, India. Aquac Rep 23:101047
Rezinciuc S, Galindo J, Montserrat J, Diéguez-Uribeondo J (2014) AFLP-PCR and RAPD-PCR evidences of the transmission of the pathogen Aphanomyces astaci (oomycetes) to wild populations of European crayfish from the invasive crayfish species, Procambarus clarkii. Fungal Biol 118(7):612–620
Robideau GP, De Cock AW, Coffey MD, Voglmayr H, Brouwer H, Bala K, Chitty DW, Désaulniers N, Eggertson QA, Gachon CM, Hu CH, Küpper FC, Rintoul TL, Sarhan E, Verstappen EC, Zhang Y, Bonants PJ, Ristaino JB, Lévesque CA (2011) DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. Mol Ecol Resour 11(6):1002–1011
Rocchi S, Tisserant M, Valot B, Laboissière A, Frossard V, Reboux G (2017) Quantification of Saprolegnia parasitica in river water using real-time quantitative PCR: from massive fish mortality to tap drinking water. Int J Environ Health Res 27(1):1–10
Sabeta C, Ngoepe E (2015) Chapter seven preparation of fluorescent antibody conjugate in goats. In: Rupprecht C, Nagarajan T (eds) Current laboratory techniques in rabies diagnosis, research and prevention, vol 2. Academic Press, Washington, DC, pp 69–81
Sandoval-Sierra JV, Diéguez-Uribeondo J (2015) A comprehensive protocol for improving the description of saprolegniales (oomycota): two practical examples (Saprolegnia aenigmatica sp. nov and Saprolegnia racemosa sp nov). PLoS One 10(7):e0132999
Sandoval-Sierra JV, Martín MP, Diéguez-Uribeondo J (2014) Species identification in the genus Saprolegnia (oomycetes): defining DNA-based molecular operational taxonomic units. Fungal Biol 118(7):559–578
Sarowar MN, van den Berg AH, McLaggan D, Young MR, van West P (2013) Saprolegnia strains isolated from river insects and amphipods are broad spectrum pathogens. Fungal Biol 117(11–12):752–763
Sati SC (1991) Aquatic fungi parasitic on temperate fishes of Kumaun Himalaya, India. Mycoses 34:437–441
Shin S, Kulatunga D, Dananjaya S, Nikapitiya C, Lee J, De Zoysa M (2017) Saprolegnia parasitica isolated from rainbow trout in Korea: characterization, anti-saprolegnia activity and host pathogen interaction in zebrafish disease model. Mycobiology 45:297–311
Sosa ER, Landsberg JH, Stephenson CM, Forstchen AB, Vandersea MW, Litaker RW (2007) Aphanomyces invadans and ulcerative mycosis in estuarine and freshwater fish in Florida. J Aquat Anim Health 19(1):14–26
Srivastava S, Sinha R, Roy D (2004) Toxicological effects of malachite green. Aquat Toxicol 66(3):319–329
Stueland S, Hatai K, Skaar I (2005) Morphological and physiological characteristics of Saprolegnia spp. strains pathogenic to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J Fish Dis 28(8):445–453
Takuma D, Sano A, Wada S, Kurata O, Hatai K (2010) A new species, Aphanomyces salsuginosus sp. nov., isolated from ice fish Salangichthys microdon. Mycoscience 51:432–442
Van der Auwera G, De Baere R, Van de Peer Y, De Rijk P, Van den Broeck I, De Wachter R (1995) The phylogeny of the Hyphochytriomycota as deduced from ribosomal RNA sequences of Hyphochytrium catenoides. Mol Biol Evol 12(4):671–678
van West P (2006) Saprolegnia parasitica, an oomycete pathogen with a fishy appetite: new challenges for an old problem. Mycologist 20:99–104
Vandersea MW, Litaker RW, Yonnish B, Sosa E, Landsberg JH, Pullinger C, Moon-Butzin P, Green J, Morris JA, Kator H, Noga EJ, Tester PA (2006) Molecular assays for detecting Aphanomyces invadans in ulcerative mycotic fish lesions. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(2):1551–1557
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Marc ZM (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23(21):4407–4414
Walker CA, van West P (2007) Zoospore development in the oomycetes. Fungal Biol Rev 21(1):10–18
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, pp 315–322
Willoughby LG (1978) Saprolegnias of salmonid fish in Windermere: a critical analysis. J Fish Dis 1(1):51–67
Willoughby LG (1985) Rapid preliminary screening of Saprolegnia on fish. J Fish Dis 8:473–476
Yuasa K, Kitancharoen N, Hatai K (1997) Simple method to distinguish between Saprolegnia parasitica and saprolegnia diclina isolated from fishes with saprolegniasis. Fish Pathol 32:175–176
Zaidi N, Konstantinou K, Zervos M (2003) The role of molecular biology and nucleic acid technology in the study of human infection and epidemiology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127(9):1098–1105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chanu, K.V., Thakuria, D. (2023). Advances in Detection Techniques for Fungus-like Organisms of Aquaculture Importance. In: Pandey, P.K., Pandey, N., Akhtar, M.S. (eds) Fisheries and Aquaculture of the Temperate Himalayas. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8303-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8303-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8302-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8303-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)