Skip to main content

Representing Indian Muslims: Parliamentary Questions as Instrument of Evaluating Substantive Representation in the Lok Sabha, 1999–2016

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics of Representation
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

In India, descriptive representation has been considered as one of the most suitable instruments to uplift historically disadvantage groups, such as the Scheduled Castes and Tribes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, Hilal. 2008. ‘Debating Muslim Political Representation’, Seminar, (586):https://www.india-seminar.com/2008/586/586_hilal_ahmed.htm.

  • Ahmed, Hilal. 2009.‘Muslim as a Political Community’, Seminar, (602):https://www.india-seminar.com/2009/602/602_hilal_ahmed.htm.

  • Ansari, Iqbal A. 1998. ‘Minorities and the Politics of Constitution Making in India’, in D.L. Seth and Gurpreet Mahajan (eds.), Minorities Identities and the Nation-State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, Iqbal A. 2001. ‘Minority Representation’, Seminar, (506):https://www.india-seminar.com/2001/506/506%20iqbal%20a.%20ansari.htm.

  • Ansari, Iqbal A. 2006. Political Representation of Muslims in India-1952–2004. Delhi: Manak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir, Nermin and Rens Vliegenthart. 2015. ‘Representatives in the Netherland: Supporting, Silencing or Suppressing?’, Journal of Parliamentary Affairs, 69 (1): 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, Rochana. 2011. Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, Rajeev. 2007. On the Persistent Under-Representation of Muslims in India, Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 1 (1): 1–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basant, Rakesh and Abusaleh Shariff. (eds). 2009. Handbook of Muslims in India: Empirical and Policy Perspective, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandhoke, Neera. 2002. ‘Individual and Group Rights: A View from India’, in Zoya Hasan et al. (eds.), India’s Living constitution: Ideas Practices, Controversies (pp. 207–241), New Delhi: Permanent Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, Esther. 2005. ‘Why Political Reservation?’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3 (2/3): 668-678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, Thad and Janhavi Nilekani. 2013. ‘Ethnic Quotas and Political Mobilization: Caste, Parties, and Distribution in Indian Village Councils’, American Political Science Review, 107 (1): 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooqui, Adnan. 2020, ‘Political Representation of a Minority: Muslim Representation in Contemporary India’, India Review, 19 (2): 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc. 1979. ‘Compensatory Discrimination in Political Representation: A preliminary Assessment of India’s Thirty-Year Experience with Reserved Seats in Legislatures’, Economic and Political Weekly, 14 (7-8): 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghurey, G.S. 1969. Caste and Race in India, Bombay: Popular Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Zoya. 2006a. Constitutional Equality and the Politics of Representation in India. Diogenes, 53 (4): 53-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Zoya. 2009. Politics of Inclusion: Caste, Minorities and Affirmative Action, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Riaz. (eds). 2016. Indian Muslims struggling for Equality of Citizenship, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, Christophe and Sanjay Kumar (eds). 2009. Rise of the Plebeians? The Changing face of Indian Legislative Assemblies, New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, Christophe and Laurent Gayer (eds). 2012. Muslims in Indian Cities: 593 Trajectories of Marginalisation, Delhi: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, Niraja Gopal. 2004. ‘A Malevolent Embrace? The BJP and Muslims in the Parliamentary Election of 2004’, Indian review, 3 (3): 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, Niraja Gopal. 2006. Representing India: Ethnic Diversity and the Governance of Public Institutions, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, Niraja Gopal. 2016. ‘Contending Representative Claims in Indian Democracy’, India Review, 15 (2): 172-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, Shefali. 2008. ‘Right versus Representation: Defending Minority Interests in the Constituent Assembly’, in Rajeev Bhargava (ed.), Politics and Ethics of the Indian Constitution, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, Shefali. 2002. ‘Secularism in the Constitutional Assembly Debates, 1946-1950’, Economic & Political Weekly, 37 (30): 3175-3180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalelkar, Kaka. 1955. The First Backward Classes Commission Report, GOI, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolpinskaya, Ekaterina. 2016. ‘Substantive Religious Representation in the UK Parliament: Examining Parliamentary Questions for Written Answers 1997–2012’, Journal of Parliamentary Affairs, 70 (1): 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, Amitabh. 2014. ‘Report of the Expert Group to Propose a Diversity Index and Workout the Modalities of Implementation’, 2014 (Available at http://www.minorityaffairs.gov.in/reports/report-expert-group-diversity-index-complete-report-1

  • Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes’, The Journal of Politics, 61 (199): 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Shane. 2011. ‘Parliamentary Questions: The Behaviour of Legislatures and the Function of Legislature: An Introduction’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17 (3): 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, Alistair. 2005. Standing at the Margins: Representation and Electoral Reservation in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra, Bishnu. 2010. ‘Minorities and Politics’, in Niraja Gopal Jayal and Pratap Bhanu Mehta (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Politics in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, Rohini. 2003. ‘Can Mandated Political Representation Increase Policy Influences for Disadvantaged Minorities? Theory and Evidence from India’, American Economic Review, 94 (4): 1132-1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachar, Rajinder. 2006. Social, Educational and Economic Status of the Muslim Community of India: A Report, New Delhi: Prime Minister High Level Committee, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Abdur. 2019. Denial and Deprivation: Indian Muslims after the Sachar Committee and Ranganath Mishra Commission Reports, New Delhi: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, Thomas and Daniel Bischof. 2012. ‘Minority Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011’, Journal of parliamentary Affairs, 66 (2): 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. ‘Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005-2010’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 16 (3): 271-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejani, Shabnum. 2007. Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, Ranikhet: Permanent Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejani, Shabnum. 2013. ‘Between Inequality and Identity: The Indian Constituent Assembly Debates and Religious Difference, 1946–1950’, South Asia Research, (33) 3: 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fakhruz-Zaman, Imtiyaz, A. (2022). Representing Indian Muslims: Parliamentary Questions as Instrument of Evaluating Substantive Representation in the Lok Sabha, 1999–2016. In: Pai, S., Thorat, S. (eds) Politics of Representation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1544-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics