Abstract
A flight after the unattainable. This is how Alfred North Whitehead (1929: 65) chose to characterise the “disturbing element,” the generative impulse which gives rise to the singular experience and practice of speculation. Not the conquest of the unknown, not the prophetic mastery over the future, not the progressive composition of a good common world, not the transcendental access to some great beyond—flight. The world suspended mid-air. Life in the imperfective. An immanent experience of fugitivity and divergence that is engendered in giving oneself over to an imaginative improvisation, to an unsettled dance, to the ongoing and unfinished experimentation with that which escapes even the most capacious of systems and shrugs at the most settled of foundations. Hence Whitehead’s proposition, despite his insistence on the immanent requirements of coherence and logic, that speculation is “in its essence untrammelled by method” (1929: 65). For its function is none other than that of inventing the very methods that here and there push thought and life out of bounds, over the guardrails, to the outlaw edges of the territory governed by the rational, the probable, and the plausible (Savransky, 2022). Its function is to pierce beyond habitual methodologies of life so as to give way to a homeless space that makes of flight itself its groundless ground and makes of the disturbance of the present its precarious chance to attend to that which insists and persists “below the rim of the world” (Whitehead, 1929: 65), in its interstices and crevices, fabricating possibles out of the impossible, inventing forms out of the unformed.
The really vital question for us all is, What is this world going to be? What is life eventually to make of itself? The centre of gravity of philosophy must therefore alter its place. The earth of things, long thrown into shadow by the glories of the upper ether, must resume its rights.
William James, Pragmatism (1975: 62)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanchot, M. (1993). The infinite conversation (S. Hanson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Clark, N., & Yusoff, K. (2017). Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(2–3), 3–23.
Clark, N., & Szerszynski, B. (2020). Planetary social thought: The Anthropocene challenge to the social sciences. Polity.
Crosby, A. (1986). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe 900-1900. Cambridge University Press.
Davis, M. (2017). Late Victorian holocausts: El Niño and the making of the third world. Verso.
Debaise, D. (2017). Nature as event (M. Halewood, Trans.). Duke University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Semiotext(e).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994), What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). Verso.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Dover.
James, W. (1975). Pragmatism and the meaning of truth. Harvard University Press.
James, W. (1996). A pluralistic universe. University of Nebraska Press.
Röckstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Ross, C. (2019). Ecology and power in the age of empire: Europe and the transformation of the tropical world. Oxford University Press.
Savransky, M. (2021a). Around the day in eighty worlds: Politics of the Pluriverse. Duke University Press.
Savransky, M. (2021b). Problems all the way down. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(2), 3–23.
Savransky, M. (2021c). After progress: Notes for an ecology of perhaps. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organisation, 21(1), 267–281.
Savransky, M. (2022). The principle of invention (outside in). In T. S. Criado & A. Estalella (Eds.), An ethnographic inventory: Field devices for anthropological inquiries. Routledge.
Savransky, M., & Lundy, C. (2022). After progress: Experiments in the revaluation of values. The Sociological Review, 70(2), 217-231.
Simone, A. M. (2019). Improvised lives: Rhythms of endurance in an urban south. Polity.
Stengers, I. (2015). Speculative philosophy and the art of dramatization. In R. Faber & A. Goffey (Eds.), The allure of things: Process and object in contemporary philosophy. Bloomsbury.
Wakefield, S. (2020). Anthropocene back loop: Experimentation in unsafe operating space. Open Humanities Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1927). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. Fordham University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The function of reason. Beacon Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Science and the modern world. Free Press.
Wynter, S. (1994). 1492: A new world view. In V. L. Hyatt & R. Nettleford (Eds.), Race, discourse, and the origin of the Americas: A new world view. Smithsonian Institution Press.
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the Coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.
Yusoff, K. (2018). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savransky, M. (2022). Afterword: Speculative Earth. In: Williams, N., Keating, T. (eds) Speculative Geographies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0691-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0691-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0690-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0691-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)