Skip to main content

Speculation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

“Speculation” originally meant “reflective observation.” It came to mean “conjecture” or “mere conjecture” as philosophers strove for certainty, consecrating science as rigorously acquired knowledge accumulated through application of the scientific method, and devalued the cognitive status of other discourses. The present conventional meaning of speculation, where the place of observation has disappeared, is a by-product of this consecration. In this entry I show how, through efforts to defend the status of these other discourses, the original meaning of “speculation” was not only revived but built upon by speculative philosophers. They showed that speculation is primordial to all experience and thinking, with past speculations embodied in language as “dead” metaphors. Revealing the possibility of elaborating alternative metaphors frees us from not only these dead metaphors to overcome the dead ends of current science, opening up new possibilities for enquiry, but the possibility of reconceiving ourselves and our place in nature. In this way, speculation makes it possible to transform ourselves, creating radically new ways of living and new forms of life. On this view, speculation, by opening new possibilities, could free us from the destructive trajectories of current civilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., & Harman, G. (2011). The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism. Prahran: Re-press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. (2012). The transformative humanities: A manifesto. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare, A. (2011). From Kant to Schelling to process metaphysics: On the way to ecological civilization. Cosmos & History, 7(2), 26–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Hegel’s logic (3rd ed.). Trans. Wallace, W. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996). Critique of pure reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce II (1893–1913). The Peirce Editions Project (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speculation. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed. CD version). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verene, D. P. (2009). Speculative philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The function of reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of ideas. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (corrected edition). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arran Gare .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gare, A. (2020). Speculation. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_160-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_160-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics