Abstract
Ancient structures were constructed by considering only vertical static loads. The seismic response of ancient masonry structures depends on their material properties, the geometry of the structure, the types of connections between various structural components, the stiffness of the floors and the strength of the non-structural elements. The rich and diverse architectural traditions across India provide evidence of the structural efficiency and technological skill of Indian craftsmen and builders. Studying the structural behaviour of Indian heritage buildings has national importance. In this study, the seismic vulnerability of the Amritesvara temple was evaluated. Built in 1196 and is located 260.8 km from Bengaluru, India. This study involved a shake table test of the temple. Experiments were conducted at the Earthquake and Vibration Research Centre, Bengaluru. According to the size and payload capacity of the shaking table, a 1:3 scale model was adopted. The model was subjected to various peak ground accelerations from 0.05 to 0.1 g. The dynamic properties of the model were evaluated through the experiments. The experimental results were used for validating the numerical model, which was used to conduct further investigations on the prototype.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
1.1 Hoysala Architecture
The Hoysala Empire ruled southern India between 1026 and 1343 (Fig. 1) and constructed many large and small temples, including the Chennakesava temple at Belur (1117), the Hoysaleswara temple at Halebidu (1160) and the Kesava temple at Somanathapura (1268). These temple complexes have been proposed to be listed as UNESCO world heritage sites.
1.2 History of Earthquakes in Karnataka
In the present seismic zonation map of India (Fig. 2), Karnataka lies in zones 2 and 3 (i.e., seismically less active to moderately active). A literature survey indicates that 33 earthquakes have occurred in Karnataka from 1828 to 2001 [1]. Karnataka experienced high seismic activity during the 1970s, with five earthquakes occurring in 1971, four earthquakes occurring in 1972 and three earthquakes each occurring in 1970 and 1974. The aforementioned earthquakes had a magnitude ranging from 3.8 to 5 on the Richter scale.
1.3 Literature Review
Analysis of historic masonary monuments by numerical modeling has been carried out by other investigators, few with dynamic characteristics analysis. Benjapon Wethyavivon et al. [2] carried out analysis on Thai historic masonary monuments at the Ayuthaya world heritage site to understand structural behaviour and provide critical information for planning and prioritizing restoration as well as assess their safety. Measured in-situ frequency was found to be 3.9 Hz and 2.3 Hz for 62.1 m high bell-shaped and 31.6 m high corn-shaped structure, respectively. From numerical modeling, the frequency with fixed base is 2.98 Hz and 3.10 Hz whereas with subsoil inclusion it was found to be 1.23 Hz and 2.41 Hz, respectively. The properties considered for modeling are elastic modulus are 3.020 Mpa, poison’s ratio is 0.21 and compressive strength is 3.92 Mpa. Jaishi et al. [3] carried out analysis on dynamic and seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal. The in-situ measured frequency by ambient vibration test and analytical natural periods were compared. An empirical formula is established to estimate the natural period of vibration for nepalese temples. It was found that the largest period was 0.6 s for the highest tower (21.93 m).
The problem of testing the scaled model and subject them to ground motion tests was addressed by Daniel Ruiz et al. [4] for sixteenth and seventeenth century rammed earth-built churches in the Andean highlands. The purpose of testing the model was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the seismic performance of scaled model of rammed earth-built doctrinal churches, with and without confining reinforcements by wood elements. The displacements were reinforcement by wood elements. The displacements were found to be between 4 and 7.1 mm for unreinforced model and 1.2–1.4 mm with LVDT located at different positions.
A Meher Prasad, Arun Menon et al. [5] worked on seismic vulnerability of south Indian temples, in their effort to protect the monuments from earthquakes as the studies focussing on south Indian temples are not reported in the literature. The temple considered for the study is Ekambaranathar temple in Kanchipuram. Fundamental frequency of the site is estimated to be 3.63 Hz which is closely matching with the fundamental frequency of the mandapam. From FEM analysis using commercially available package ABAQUS 6.6.4 the frequency for 4 pillared mandapam is 3.53 Hz and for 16 pillared mandapam is 3.46 Hz in Y-direction being the first mode. Through ambient vibration the frequency was found to be 3.56 Hz for 4 pillared mandapam and 3.10 Hz for 16 pillared mandapam.
2 Description of the Amritesvara Temple
The Amritesvara temple is a heritage stone masonry structure that was constructed in the ekakuta style (single Vimana). The temple comprises the sanctum sanctorum, which is also known as the garbhagriha and is where the deity resides; the mandapa, which is a pillared hall provided in front of the garbhagriha for devotees to gather for activities such as chanting and meditation; and the antara, which is a chamber that joins the main sanctuary and the mandapa of the temple. The various components of the temple are illustrated in Fig. 3.
To study the behaviour of the Amritesvara temple (a heritage structure) under seismic loads, a part of the temple, namely the mandapa (a space frame), was considered. The mandapa consists of four columns, four beams and a dome.
2.1 Structural System Modelling
The geometric scaling factor of the model was decided on the basis of shake table dimensions of 1.5 m × 1.5 m. The actual space frame measures 2.92 m × 2.92 m. Therefore, a 1:3 scale model was adopted. The temple columns comprise five table joints. The beams are placed on the capital and are tied using clamps, as observed in the prototype. The dome is placed on the beam without any joints. The joints of the temple column were replicated in the model (Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7). The column base (pedestal) was fixed to a steel base plate, and this arrangement was assumed to be the fixed condition. The base plate was connected to the shake table by using 20 mm bolts (Fig. 5).
2.2 Scaling Factors
Simulation laws were followed when performing geometric scaling. Material used in the prototype and model is the same. Scale factors obtained using modelling principles are specified in Table 1 (Si = Sp/Sm).
2.3 Experimental Setup
The designed components with shear keys (model elements) were assembled on the shake table at the Earthquake and Vibration Research Centre, Central Power Research Institute, Bengaluru (Fig. 8). The provisional assemblage is displayed in Fig. 9. A fully assembled model of the space frame and the instrumentation are depicted in Fig. 5.
2.4 Seismic Loading Characteristics
Sine sweep tests were conducted on the assembled structure with peak ground accelerations (PGAs) of 0.05 g, 0.075 g and 0.1 g in the X-direction from 1 to 50 Hz at the rate of 1 octave per minute. Figures 10 and 11 display a typical input time history for the sine sweep tests corresponding to PGAs of 0.05 and 0.075 g, respectively.
3 Experimental Testing on the Shaking Table
Four accelerometers were mounted on different components of the model (shake table, column, beam and dome), and an infrared linear variable displacement transducer was projected on the part of the dome where the maximum displacement was expected. After assembling the model, the accelerometers were placed on it and seismic testing was initiated. Three shake table tests were performed with PGAs of 0.05 g, 0.075 g and 0.1 g. The PGA was not increased further because the maximum displacement was observed at 0.1 g. The maximum displacement for a PGA of 0.1 g was 20.67 mm. At a PGA of 0.1 g, the column rotated due to torsion (Fig. 12) and the gap between the beams visibly widened at the joints. Therefore, the test was discontinued (Fig. 13).
4 Damping
The logarithmic decrement method was used to determine the damping value of the constructed scaled temple model from the free vibration records collected during the shake table test. The damping value was found to be 6%. The structural damping ratio obtained through the experimental process was used for numerically modelling of the scaled temple model. The graph of the free vibration records is displayed in Figs. 14 and 15.
5 Numerical Modelling of the Scaled Temple Model
Considering the details of the scaled temple model, which is a replica of a part of the Amritesvara temple, a finite element (FE) model with joints was designed in ANSYS Workbench 16.0 by using 45 solid elements (Fig. 16). The numerical model consisted of four columns, four beams, one slab, and one dome. The material properties used in the design were obtained by conducting various experiments, such as the uniaxial compression test for determining the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio as well as the compressive strength and Brazilian tests for determining the tensile strength. The obtained results are summarised in Table 2. In the designed model, the building materials were assumed to be homogenous, isotropic and linearly elastic. Constraints were applied to the joints; the base was considered to be rigid; and the domes were designed to rest on the beams.
6 Results
6.1 Natural Frequency
The natural frequencies obtained from the resonance test of the shake table are presented in Table 3. Because the space frame did not act as a single unit, different frequencies were observed for different components of the space frame (Figs. 17, 18 and 19). Table 4 summarises the results obtained from the numerical model for the natural frequency. Table 5 provides a comparison of the natural frequency obtained through experiments and numerical analysis.
7 Conclusion
In the present study, a scaled model of the Amritesvara temple with the Hoysala architecture style was designed, constructed and commissioned. Shake table tests were conducted on the scaled model, and the natural frequency and damping were determined. Furthermore, a numerical model of the constructed scaled model was designed, and numerical analysis was performed. The results from numerical analysis and the laboratory measurements are in good agreement. Thus, the scaled structural model can replicate the behaviour of the real temple model with reasonable accuracy. In conclusion, the scaled temple model is a valid and qualified model that can be used for further experimental investigations. The numerical results indicated that the vulnerability of the mandapa is mainly due to a lack of suitable interconnection between structural members.
In the experimental tests, the columns were rotated and hairline cracks were observed. Moreover, the gap between the beams at the joints visibly widened. This behaviour suggests that the beam and column behaved independently during the testing, as indicated by the obtained results. Thus, the experimental results also indicate that the vulnerability of the mandapa is primarily due to a lack of proper interconnection between structural members.
This study conclusively proves that torsion is the primary mode of vibration of the temple structure, and the temple structure may collapse during future earthquakes, even those of relatively low magnitude.
References
Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P, Mahesh GU, Bharathi K, Nischala Reddy P (2005) Seismic hazard studies using geotechnical borehole data and GIS. In: Symposium on seismic hazard analysis and microzonation, 23–24 Sept 2005, Roorkee
Wethy Avivorn B et al (2014) Model verification of Thai historic masonary monuments. J Perform ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000697
Jaishi B, Ren et al (2003) Dynamic and seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal. Eng Struct 25(14):1827–1839
Ruiz D et al (2014) Seismic rehabilitation of sixteenth and seventeenth century rammed earth-built Churches in the Andean highlands: field and laboratory study. J Perform ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000605
Ronald JA, Menon A et al (2018) Modelling and analysis of South Indian temple structures under earthquake loading. Indian Academy of Science
Harris HG, Sabnis GM (1999) Structural modelling and experimental techniques. CRC Press, USA
Lakshmana Murthy K (1997) Structural conservation of monuments in South India. Bharatiya Kala Prakashan, Delhi
Sharma A, Reddy GR, Vaze KK (2012) Shake table tests on a non-seismically detailed RC frame structure. Struct Eng Mech 41:1–24. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.1.001
Mikolic Z, Krstenska L, Maronic P, Smoljanovic H (2017) Shaking table test of scaled model of protiron dry-stone masonry structure. In: X international conference on structural dynamics, EVRODYN (2017)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Vision Group of Science and Technology (VGST). The authors acknowledge the Archaeology Department of Karnataka for providing the structural details of the temple; the National Institute of Rock Mechanics, Kolar, for testing the stone samples; the Central Power Research Institute for their assistance; and K. S. School of Engineering and Management for their encouragement. The authors also thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gudasali, V.L., Akella, V., Raghuprasad, B.K. (2022). Seismic Performance of the Amritesvara Temple: Shake Table Test of a Dry Stone Masonry Structure. In: Sitharam, T.G., Kolathayar, S., Jakka, R. (eds) Earthquakes and Structures. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 188. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5673-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5673-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5672-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5673-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)