Skip to main content

A Machine Learning Model for Review Rating Inconsistency in E-commerce Websites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management, Analytics and Innovation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1174))

Abstract

Online consumer reviews and ratings are two important paradigms of any e-commerce business. Based on the posted reviews and ratings, customers decide the product’s reliability and make their purchase decisions. Usually, reviews and ratings come together. In a review, the user writes all the pros and cons of the product, whereas the rating is a cumulative representation of the review text given on a scale of 1–5. If any review is positive, its associated ratings are 4 and 5, and if the review is negative, it comes with ratings 1 and 2. Sometimes, the rating does not represent the review text correctly, for example, a negative review gives a rating 4 or 5, or positive review gives a rating 1 or 2. This creates an inconsistency between reviews and ratings. This paper develops a machine learning-based model for identifying such inconsistency and prompting users for their posts. A Long Short-Term Memory-based model is developed to classify each review into either positive or negative polarity. The predicted polarity is then checked with the user’s rating for consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saumya, S., & Singh, J. P. (2018). Detection of spam reviews: a sentiment analysis approach. CSI Transactions on ICT, 6, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saini, S., Saumya, S., & Singh, J. P. (2017). Sequential purchase recommendation system for e-commerce sites. In IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management (pp. 366–375). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, J. P., Irani, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Saumya, S., & Roy, P. K. (2017). Predicting the helpfulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Business Research, 70, 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saumya, S., Singh, J. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Predicting the helpfulness score of online reviews using convolutional neural network. Soft Computing, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qazi, A., Syed, K. B. S., Raj, R. G., Cambria, E., Tahir, M., & Alghazzawi, D. (2016). A concept-level approach to the analysis of online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnamoorthy, S. (2015). Linguistic features for review helpfulness prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3751–3759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allahbakhsh, M., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H. R., & Benatallah, B. (2015). Robust evaluation of products and reviewers in social rating systems. World Wide Web, 18(1), 73–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chua, A. Y., & Banerjee, S. (2016). Helpfulness of user-generated reviews as a function of review sentiment, product type and information quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 547–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BrightLocal (2017). Local consumer review survey. Retrieved December 22, from www.brightlocal.com/learn/localconsumer-review-survey/.

  10. Saumya, S., Singh, J. P., Baabdullah, A. M., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Ranking online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mudambi, S. M., & D. Schuff (2010). What makes a helpful review? a study of customer reviews on amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saumya, S., Singh, J. P., & Kumar, P. (2016). Predicting stock movements using social network. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 567–572). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980.

  15. Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1992). Theory of the backpropagation neural network. In Neural networks for perception (pp. 65–93). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, S., & Choeh, J. Y. (2014). Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using multilayer perceptron neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 3041–3046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, 5(1), 1–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinav Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saumya, S., Singh, J.P., Kumar, A. (2021). A Machine Learning Model for Review Rating Inconsistency in E-commerce Websites. In: Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, A., Balas, V., Martinovic, J. (eds) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1174. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5616-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics