Abstract
Increasing concentrations of the atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs) are serious threats to the living beings and their niches. The rapid increase in GHGs is undoubtedly related to anthropogenic activities. Literature related to GHG emissions and mitigation approaches is widely available, but very few reviews concentrated on spatial-temporal trends of GHG emission from the agriculture sector. Agriculture is a potent contributor to GHG emissions, involving different agricultural practices followed by the farmers, which affect the rate of emission either positively or negatively. Agricultural soil management practices add excess nutrients, which disturb the natural mineral cycling leading to soil and water pollution and increase emission from soil to atmosphere, thus contributing to climate change. Research papers and reports related to GHG emission from different agricultural sectors in different parts of the world were reviewed to find the variations in emission pattern and intensities, and the factors influencing the emissions from the soil. The soil GHG emissions are directly or indirectly modified by natural as well as anthropogenic factors, like pH, soil texture, tilling, fertilizer application, mulching, irrigation, etc. The determinants taking part in the soil GHG emissions varied with region and different agricultural practices. Different mitigation approaches for GHGs from the agriculture sector were also compared for their efficacy in reducing emissions. A variety of advanced techniques developed to enhance the yield of crops were found to influence GHG emissions by direct influence on soil pH, temperature, and moisture. The conditions favorable for GHG emissions can be modified to reduce the emissions as the soil acts both as a reservoir and as an emitter of GHGs based on local natural and anthropogenic factors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
14.1 Introduction
Climate change is a long-term alteration in weather conditions that include major changes in temperature, precipitation, wind patterns, etc., that occur over several decades or longer (IPCC 2014). The significant changes in weather variables may lead to large and potentially dangerous shifts in climate and weather. The Earth’s average surface temperature has risen by 0.93 °C through 2016, since the start of global record in 1880 (Dahlman 2017). The ongoing rise in global mean temperature near the Earth surface is global warming. The major causes of global warming are the increasing concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere. Water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), etc. present in the atmosphere absorb the thermal infrared radiation that is emitted and reflected by the Earth surface and reradiate back to keep the Earth warmer. Thus, the GHGs are responsible for maintaining the optimum temperature of the Earth. If GHGs do not exist, the average temperature of the Earth would have been −18 °C. Due to the presence of GHGs, there is an increase in the temperature by 34 °C (NASA 2010). The greenhouse effect is the process of trapping and reradiating the thermal infrared radiation by GHGs into the atmosphere. The current increases in GHGs due to anthropogenic activities retain more thermal infrared radiation close to the Earth surface resulting in an increase in global mean temperature and thus to global warming. GHGs and their characteristics are given in Table 14.1.
The continuous increases in the concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere are not only implicated the global warming, but also sea level rise and reductions in carbon sequestration in terrestrial and oceanic carbon pools (IPCC 2007). GHG emissions are rising every decade, but the anthropogenic emissions were highest during 2000–2010 (IPCC 2014). In 2010, from total anthropogenic emissions, CO2 accounted for 76%, CH4 for 16%, N2O for 6.2%, and 2% was contributed by fluorinated gases (IPCC 2014). Emissions from the agriculture sector also come under anthropogenic inputs. Major sources of agricultural soil pollution are applications of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, organic manure, and other inputs that are used vigorously to increase the productivity of plants. The nutrients from these inputs are not totally utilized by the plants and lost due to leaching, run off, and also emitted to the atmosphere, thus disturbing the nutrient cycle. These practices affect the emission of GHGs from soil. This review paper focuses on the current knowledge of GHG emissions from the agricultural sector, the local environmental and anthropogenic factors governing the emissions, and the effect on agriculture and the available strategies to reduce the concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere.
14.2 Methodology
A literature review was performed by using world wide web for related keywords such as greenhouse gas, agriculture, agricultural practices, soil emission, factors affecting GHG emission, effects of GHGs on agriculture, GHG emission mitigation etc., on Google Scholar and PubMed. Based on the related information, 250 eligible papers relevant to the topic were selected for further consideration. For analysis of the concentration and emission trend of GHGs, data from IPCC, NASA, ESRL (Earth System Research laboratory), and WDCGG (World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases) were downloaded from respective websites. Relevant peer-reviewed papers were also extracted from the cited reference of most important papers in this field. Relevant information observed from those studies such as different agricultural practices influencing the emission of GHGs, soil conditions modifying GHG emissions, the contribution of agriculture in total GHGs emissions, and mitigation strategies in controlling GHG emissions were briefly explored. More emphasis was given to studies in developing countries. The data of WDCGG (2016) for the time period of 2005–2016 were used for the time series analysis of CO2, CH4, and N2O using the Theil-Sen approach in R-statistical software.
14.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Natural sources of GHGs are decomposition, enteric fermentation in ruminants, anaerobic respiration in wetlands, denitrification, volcanic eruptions, etc. GHGs emitted from the natural sources are mainly CO2, CH4, and N2O. Major anthropogenic sources of GHGs include energy production through fossil fuel burning like coal, petrol etc., biomass burning, waste decomposition, land-use change, industries, leakage during oil and gas exportation and transportation, leakage from air conditioners and refrigerators, cleaning of electronic components, production of plastic foams, propellants, and sprays, etc. (IPCC 2014). Anthropogenic sources contributing to global GHGs are given in Table 14.2.
Burning of fossil fuels is one of the major contributors in elevating the concentrations of GHGs and is involved in almost all the processes related to energy generation, electricity, industry, agriculture, transportation, etc. 9.4 and 9.6 billion metric tons of CO2 were emitted globally from fossils fuel burnt during 2011 and 2012, respectively (ESRL GMD 2014). Emission with this rate is estimated to increase the CO2 concentration by 11.5% over a period of 10 years. In 2012, Asia contributed to 46% in global GHG emissions and it has reached 14.5 Gt CO2-e (CO2-e is the concentration of CO2 that would cause the same radiative forcing as a given mixture of CO2 and other forcing components (IPCC 2014; US EIA 2016)). In Asia, GHG emissions are maximally contributed by energy production (48%) followed by agriculture (18%), industry (11%), residential (9%), transportation (9%), and waste (5%) (Marcotullio et al. 2012). According to a report of INCCA (2010), energy sector including electricity (37.8%) and transport (7.5%) produced higher CO2-e whereas agriculture contributed to 17.6% of total emission in India (Fig. 14.1). CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons), HFCs (hydro-fluorocarbons) and PFCs (per-fluorocarbons) having very high global warming potential and lifespan are emitted only by human activities. CFCs are non-toxic, inert, and harmless gases in the lower atmosphere, but break down O3 molecules in the stratosphere and thus contribute to O3 depletion. The concentrations of CFCs decrease in response to the Montreal protocol.
14.4 Recent Temporal Trend of Major GHGs
Recent temporal variations in the CO2 concentration showed a linear significant increase of 2.1 (CI, 2.01–2.2) ppm with distinct seasonal variations, whereas CH4 and N2O showed linear increases of 6.1 (CI, 5.74–6.62) and 0.9 (CI, 0.89–0.9) ppb per year, respectively (Table 14.1 and Fig. 14.2). There are a clear and prominent pattern of variations in CO2 and CH4 concentrations during different months with least values in July, August, and September.
14.5 Greenhouse Gas Emission from Agriculture
Agriculture has occupied 179.7 M ha land in India and 1.5 billion ha globally (FAO 2003). Due to population pressure, the requirement for agricultural land continues to increase to fulfill the increasing demand for food. The contribution of agriculture in GHG emissions is increasing. Land-use, land cover change, and agricultural practices like tilling, fertilizer application, and mulching contributed about 24% (12 Gt CO2-e) of total GHG emissions globally in 2010 (IPCC 2014). According to Scialabba and Müller-Lindenlauf (2010), global food production contributed almost one-third of total anthropogenic GHG emissions. In the United States, 9% contribution in GHGs was estimated from agriculture (USEPA 2016). In India, emission from agriculture is 334.41 million tons of CO2 equivalent (INCCA 2010).
GHG emission from soil is due to microbial activity, root respiration, chemical decomposition processes, litter decomposition, heterotrophic respiration by soil fauna, oxidation of soil organic matter etc. The disintegration of carbon-based organic substrates emits CO2. Root respiration utilizes intercellular and intracellular substrate molecules. The soil may act as a sink or source for GHGs depending upon the physicochemical properties of the soil and the local environment (Muñoz et al. 2010). The aerobic condition leads to the emission of CO2, whereas anaerobic condition leads to CH4 emission. The decomposition process also plays a major role in the carbon cycle and the process emits a significant amount of CO2 and CH4 (da Cunha-Santino et al. 2016). Decomposers break down organic materials in the plant and animal residues and the organic carbon present in organic materials gets converted into CO2. In the tropical climate zone, CO2 and CH4 emissions are 14 tons of C ha−1 year−1 and 7.0 kg of C ha−1 year−1, respectively, from drained croplands (IPCC 2014). Rice cultivation is a potential anthropogenic source of GHG emissions. Developing countries are reported to contribute about 94% GHG emissions globally from rice cultivation during 2000–2010 and contribution of Asia was estimated to be about 90% (Tubiello et al. 2013).
CO2 is although cycled in huge amounts but emitted in less amounts comparatively. It is emitted by deforestation, land-use change, fossil fuel burning, respiration, etc. Reay and Grace (2007) found that autotrophic respiration emits 60 Pg C year−1 to the atmosphere and about the same amount is emitted by heterotrophic respiration. Water-filled pore space (WFPS) also emits a considerable amount of CO2. In grassland soil, 20 to 40% WFPS emits high CO2 (Schaufler et al. 2010).
Anaerobic respiration is an important source of CH4 emission from soil. Wetlands are the major site of CH4 emission, although they occupy a little global surface area. The rate of CH4 emission has more than doubled over the last 25 years due to human activities (IPCC 2007). It is estimated that rice fields contribute about 11% of the total CH4 emission globally (IPCC 2014). In 2007, 3327 thousand tons of CH4 emission was reported from rice field, which contributed 24% of total emission from the agricultural sector in India (INCCA 2010). The live-stock management contributes maximally to total methane (73%) emission from agricultural sector (INCCA 2010) (Fig. 14.3).
In plants, methane is emitted through aerenchyma and micropores located in the leaves. As plants develop during their growing cycle, aerenchyma contribution is more than 90% in CH4 diffusion to the atmosphere. While ebullition and diffusion through flooded water are less significant but ebullition provides major contribution during early stages (Le Mer and Roger 2001; Gupta et al. 2016). The diffusion rate is higher in the air than water so gas exchange through diffusion is very slow under waterlogged conditions. Bouwman (1990) reported that through aerenchyma, CH4 diffusion varies on a daily basis due to the effects of environmental factors on the rate of photosynthesis/respiration. Biochemical reactions involved in methanogenesis are following:
This involves various substrates mainly acetic acid, CO2, and other organic compounds, involving a number of coenzymes and cofactors.
Due to the highest global warming potential among the three major GHGs, N2O has a high impact on the environment despite being in very low concentration. The agriculture system potentially emits N2O due to fertilizer application and denitrification processes. The denitrification process is the conversion of NO3− to N2, which includes many intermediates as shown below. N2O is one of the intermediates that escape in the atmosphere. In some cases, NO3− is converted to ammonia through the process of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and N2O is released into the environment. Agricultural activities contribute about 77% of total N2O emission in U.S. (USEPA 2016). It is emitted under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Urea and ammonium sulfate are major fertilizers used in rice and other crop fields and are primary sources for N2O emission.
14.6 Factors Affecting GHG Emissions from Soil
Different agricultural practices affect the pool of soil organic carbon and in turn, affect the emission of GHGs. Not only the management practices during agriculture but also the local environmental factors influence the emission of GHGs from the soil (Fig. 14.4). Effects of different factors on emissions of GHGs are described below.
14.6.1 Agricultural Practices Affecting GHG Emissions
Different agricultural practices that are utilized by the farmers to enhance the productivity like tilling, use of fertilizers, etc. may modify the GHG emissions significantly. Roles of agricultural practices in modifying GHG emissions are discussed below and the results are summarized in Table 14.3.
14.6.1.1 Fertilizer Application
To increase the productivity of crops, the use of fertilizers has risen dramatically. Both organic and inorganic chemical fertilizers affect GHG emissions but organic fertilizers having carbon emit comparatively high CH4. Mulching and organic manure application increase CH4 emission (Ma et al. 2007). Emission of N2O from soil is largely dependent upon nitrogen availability in the soil (Pandey et al. 2012; Pathak et al. 2010). Application of nitrogen fertilizers greatly enhanced N2O flux from the rice-wheat system (Pandey et al. 2012) and fluxes of both N2O and CO2 from sugarcane field (Pandey and Agrawal 2015). Nitrous oxide fluxes increased linearly with the nitrogenous fertilizer application rate (Gregorich et al. 2005), which may be due to increase in the substrate for microbes (Pandey et al. 2012). Organic manure amendment sites showed higher GHG fluxes (Thangarajan et al. 2013). Application of nitrogen fertilizer increases the plant growth and the carbon supply to methanogens, which leads to more production and transport of CH4 to the atmosphere. According to a report of INCCA (2010), 0.115 million tons of CH4 and 0.07 thousand tons of N2O were emitted in India due to manure addition mainly using dung cakes.
Chemical fertilizers like urea increase the emission of CH4 by increasing the plant biomass and productivity thus providing more organic substrates to methanogens for biomass decomposition and root exudation (Jia et al. 2001). In contrast, nitrogen fertilizer application was reported to decrease CH4 emission by 35–50% in paddy fields (Yao et al. 2012). This may be due to rhizospheric development, which may have improved oxygen transport and increment in methanotrophic activity (Bodelier et al. 2000). Chemical fertilizers affect the microbial community leading to low or high emission. Urea produces CO2 after conversion into bicarbonate (HCO3−) in the presence of water. The mode of fertilizer application and the type of fertilizer have significant effects on CH4 and N2O emission (Yao et al. 2017). When anhydrous ammonia is injected into the soil in the gaseous form, it produces a highly alkaline zone with a high ammonium concentration, which leads to high N2O emission (Bouwman 1996). KNO3 application in soil emits three to eight times higher N2O than ammoniacal fertilizer (Abbasi and Adams 2000). When the fertilizer is applied in dry weather, then the emission of N2O is small compared to humid conditions (Zhang and Han 2008). Ma et al. (2007) observed that CH4 emission is enhanced when a low-nitrogen fertilizer is applied, but when high rates of fertilizer are applied, emission decreased. Deep placement of urea decreased CH4 and N2O emission in the rice field and also increased the rice yield (Yao et al. 2017).
14.6.1.2 Use of Pesticides
Excessive and improper use of pesticides can be a major environmental hazard and also a human health concern. Pesticide application usually decreases CH4 emission. Mohanty et al. (2001) reported 20% decrease in CH4 emission when herbicide Butachlor was applied in direct seeded flooded rice field. Glyphosate and Propanil inhibit N2O production in laboratory condition under organic amendment (Kyaw and Toyota 2007). Das et al. (2011) reported that when two herbicides Bensulfuron methyl and Pretilachlor were applied separately, CH4 and N2O emissions decreased, but when applied in combination, the emissions increased. The population of methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria is influenced significantly by herbicides (Das et al. 2011).
14.6.1.3 Soil Cover
Plant residues are used as a soil cover to reduce erosion, maintain soil moisture, and increase soil quality, but they contribute to GHG emissions. Plant residues get colonized by decomposers that produce simpler, low molecular weight compounds from complex compounds such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, proteins, etc. which may produce or consume GHGs. According to Muhammad et al. (2011) plant residues like sugarcane trash, maize and sorghum straw, cotton residues, and lucerne increased the cumulative N2O emission by about a factor of 3. In the crop rotation system, incorporation of maize and wheat straw increases N2O emission by increasing the temperature of soil due to its heat retention capacity (Liu et al. 2011). Baggs et al. (2000) observed increased N2O emission for about 2 weeks after the incorporation of crop residues. Biochemical composition of residue also affects the emission due to the availability of nutrients (Gomes et al. 2009). N2O emission is higher where soil receives residues with a low C/N ratio (Toma and Hatano 2007). Gupta et al. (2016) have also reported that a high C/N ratio in the rice residue reduces N2O emission by 12.8% and 11.1% in 2 consecutive years. Further high C/N ratio in residue increases the rate of immobilization, thus lowering the substrate availability for nitrification and denitrification. Kallenbach et al. (2010) reported that nonlegume cover crops like winter cereals reduced N2O emission possibly due to their deep roots taking up N more efficiently than legumes.
14.6.1.4 Tillage
Tillage breaks down soil aggregates, help in mixing soil and organic particles, and improve infiltration and water-holding capacity of the soil. Tilling of the crop field influences the emission of GHGs due to disturbances in the soil, addition of residues in soil, and also decomposition of soil organic matter leading to changes in the properties of soil. According to Nath et al. (2017), higher emission of CO2 occurs due to weak stabilization as tilling causes oxidation of carbon. Gaseous transport is affected under no tilling condition due to soil compactness and low mobility of gases along the soil profile. Almaraz et al. (2009) reported that soil with no tilling acts as a sink for N2O due to consumption in soil layer. In contrast, Liu et al. (2006) and Nath et al. (2017) reported greater N2O emission under no-tillage condition compared to conventional tilling. Gupta et al. (2016) found that N2O emission was 8–11% higher under zero tillage in wheat-cropped soil than conventional tillage. Tilling causes aeration of soil and denitrifiers are not able to produce N2O under aerobic conditions. CH4 and N2O emissions are reduced, while CO2 emission increased when tillage frequency is reduced in rice-wheat cropping system (Pandey et al. 2012). Conservation tillage and no-tillage lead to an increase in the carbon storage of soil. Minimum tillage resulted in highest N2O emission after surface application of the nitrogen fertilizer (Bouwman 1996).
14.6.1.5 Water Management
Flooding or water-logging conditions lead to CH4 emission. Rice is grown usually under submerged conditions. Nishiwaki et al. (2015) reported that highest emission of CH4 occurs from the continuous-flooding treatment and small emission from low-water-level treatment. It was also reported that GHG fluxes were larger from rice growing fields than bare areas. Reduced timing for draining may decrease CH4 emission. Rice field acted as a CO2 sink and was not affected by variation in water treatments, while N2O fluxes did not show any specific pattern (Nishiwaki et al. 2015). Water management practices that limit CH4 production, generally enhance N2O production (Zou et al. 2005). Intermittent irrigation in paddy fields emits less CH4 compared to permanent flooding conditions (Pathak et al. 2010; Peyron et al. 2016). Under wetting and drying conditions of rice-wheat system, CH4 emission was reduced under drying period as aerobic conditions prevailed at that time leading to higher methanotrophic compared to methanogenic activity but CH4 flux was higher under wet conditions (Gupta et al. 2016).
14.6.1.6 Crop Commodity
Vegetable cultivation is the major contributor to GHG emissions and the emission is largely dependent on use of fertilizers, mulching, etc. (Tongwane et al. 2016). Among the cereal crops, maize and wheat emit significantly higher GHGs in South Africa followed by sugarcane (Tongwane et al. 2016). Among the legumes and oilseeds, soybeans, sunflower, and ground nut are reported as the highest emitter of GHGs (Tongwane et al. 2016). Similarly, potato, cabbage, and tomato from the vegetable group contribute significantly to GHG emissions. Jain et al. (2016) observed no particular variations in CO2 emission in different crops, but reported higher CO2 emission from rabi crops due to temperature variations. The emission of N2O was more from wheat and maize than rice crop that might be due to a high rate of aerobic decomposition. On application of N fertilizer, N2O emission was found to be the highest in the case of pulses as compared to cereals and oilseeds (Jain et al. 2016). Metanalysis done by Linquist et al. (2012) also showed that wheat cropping emitted higher N2O than rice, and maize led to highest emission among them. CH4 emission was higher from rice field and wheat and maize acted sinks for CH4. Even the crop rotation helped in reducing the emission as lower fertilizer application was done (Gao et al. 2014). Pandey and Agrawal (2015) compared the emission between pigeon pea and sugarcane and found that pigeon pea emitted higher CO2 than sugarcane, while a little difference was observed in N2O emission and both the crops acted as sinks for CH4. Leguminous crops emit less N2O as no N fertilizer application is needed and also help in carbon sequestration (Jensen et al. 2012). Crop rotation with corn and soybean is reported to reduce N2O emission and increase in the yield compared to continuous corn or soybean cropping systems (Behnke et al. 2018).
14.6.2 Environmental Factors Affecting GHG Emissions from the Soil
The GHGs from the soil are produced as a result of microbial processes and hence largely depend on temperature, water availability, pH, nutrient availability, soil type, texture, etc.
14.6.2.1 Soil Temperature
Microbial metabolism usually increases with increasing temperature and thus high respiration leads to high CO2 emission and decreases in the O2 concentration, which may produce anaerobic conditions leading to N2O and CH4 production. Tang et al. (2003) reported that N2O and CO2 emissions increase exponentially with temperature. The temperature response of gas emissions from soil is expressed as the temperature sensitivity factor (Q10 value). It is the rate of change in a chemical or biological system with a temperature change of 10 °C (Berglund et al. 2010) and with soil depth this tends to increase (Tang et al. 2003). Dalal and Allen (2008) estimated a Q10 value of approximately 4 for CH4 emission. Wu et al. (2010) reported increase in CO2 emission from 5 to 15 °C temperature but emission got reduced significantly when it is changed to −10 °C, suggesting that the CH4 oxidation rate is greatly influenced by warmer temperature. N2O emission increased exponentially with increasing temperature from 0 to 50 °C (Liu et al. 2011). These reports show that temperature has a significant effect on the fluxes of GHGs and mostly they are positively correlated. Due to an increase in temperature, soil respiration and denitrification processes increase leading to the enhanced flux of GHGs.
14.6.2.2 Soil Moisture
Moisture content of the soil is an important controlling factor of the microbial activity and thus influencing emission of GHGs. Moisture content is usually associated with the soil type. CH4 emission increases with increasing soil humidity as strict anaerobic condition is required for the production of CH4 (Gao et al. 2014). Emission is stimulated after wetting of a dry land and drying and wetting cycles of the soil leading to rapid emission of GHGs due to the mineralization of soil organic matter (Birch Effect) (Birch 1958) leading to increase in microbial metabolism due to availability of easily decomposing material (Ludwig et al. 2001). Sponseller (2007) reported that emission increases suddenly after rainfall and then declines after a few days to the background level.
Emission of N2O is also significantly affected by the moisture content of the soil. As the moisture content increases, N2O emission also increases (Baggs et al. 2000) and emission greatly enhances after rainfall and irrigation (Liu et al. 2006). Water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) play an important role in emission as they affect denitrification and respiration processes. Gao et al. (2014) observed that soil with 60% water-filled pore spaces showed optimum emission, while the least emission was reported at less than 30% WFPS. This may be due to the reason that high water-filled pore spaces provide less space for air inside the soil thus maintaining the anaerobic conditions favorable for denitrification.
14.6.2.3 Soil Type
Fine-textured soil like clayey shows more N2O emission than coarse-textured like sandy soil (Stevens and Laughlin 1998). Similar findings were reported by Tan et al. (2009) that soil management practices in clay loam soil and rain-enhanced N2O emission by four times than in sandy loam. This is because fine-textured soil provides more anaerobic sites in micropores for denitrifiers than in sandy soil. CO2 emission is also higher in fine-textured soil (Dilustro et al. 2005).
14.6.2.4 pH
Soil pH affects microbial activity by affecting their enzymatic activities. Denitrification process is slowed down under low pH as the enzyme nitrous oxide reductase is inhibited by low pH and in presence of O2 (Chapuis-Lardy et al. 2007). Similarly, CO2 emission is decreased under low pH. Čuhel et al. (2010) reported that N2O emission is highest at neutral and alkaline soil pH. CH4 production by methanogens is very sensitive to pH and their activities are optimum under near neutral or slightly alkaline pH (Wang et al. 1993; Garcia et al. 2000). A slight change in pH changes the rate of CH4 emission (Wang et al. 1993). Some of the methanogenic species can grow even at a lower pH of 5.8 (Garcia et al. 2000). Ye et al. (2012) have reported that an increase in pH enhances the emission of CO2 and CH4. This may be due to an increase in the fermentation process and availability of methanogenic substrates. The solubility of organic matter also increases with an increase in pH in wetland soil and as a result, the microbes produce more CO2 (Grybos et al. 2009).
14.6.2.5 Nutrients
When the soil is carbon-rich, relatively higher N2O emission occurs (Brentrup et al. 2000). Higher carbon in the soil induces the microbial activity and the available oxygen in the soil is also consumed due to active growth of the microbes, thus providing an anaerobic condition to the microbes and organic carbon for the process of denitrification. The relation of organic matter availability and N2O emission depends upon the anaerobic conditions led by the microbes (Stevens and Laughlin 1998). C/N ratio is also an important factor in determining the process of nitrification and denitrification as it decides the balance between immobilization and mineralization. Baggs et al. (2000) reported that N2O emission is significantly less when the soil was provided with straw having a high C/N ratio due to the immobilization process and higher N2O emission occurred when no straw or straw with low C/N ratio was applied.
14.6.2.6 Salinity
Salinity is emerging as a major problem for agriculture. Mainly the arid and semi-arid regions are affected by salinity due to low rainfall. According to the report of FAO (http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/management-of-some-problem-soils/salt-affected-soils/more-information-on-salt-affected-soils/en/), about 397 and 434 M ha of the land area in the world are affected by salinity and sodicity, respectively. Salinity is an important factor that limits plant growth and yield due to the limitation of organic matter present, high salt concentration in the soil and low osmotic potential of the salt solution. High salt concentrations in the soil also alter the physico-chemical and biological properties of the soil. Saline soils are characterized by >4 dSm−1 electrical conductivity, >15 exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) or more than 13 sodium absorption ratio (SAR). Areas affected by salinity are expected to increase due to natural and anthropogenic activities such as irregular irrigation practices, weathering of salt containing rocks and precipitation.
Emissions of GHG are also influenced by salinity. There are contradictory opinions about the salinity and microbial activity. Pathak and Rao (1998) observed reduced microbial activity when the electrical conductance of the soil was high enough to cause osmotic stress. In contrast, Nelson et al. (1996) reported high microbial activity at high SAR. Salinity negatively affects GHG emissions in paddy field (Tang et al. 2016). Emission of methane is higher from fresh water habitats than from saline wetlands (Poffenbarger et al. 2011). The salt marsh present near the sea receives a great amount of sulfate and sulfate-reducing microbes, which decompose organic matter anaerobically grow abundantly. Methanogenesis is reduced due to sulfate reduction (Wang et al. 1996). Salt marshes act as sinks for atmospheric CO2 and CH4 (Weston et al. 2014).
14.7 Impacts of Enhanced Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Agriculture
Agriculture is affected by an increase in temperature, changes in precipitation pattern, flooding of coastal areas, soil salinization (IPCC 2014), and many indirect effects on crops such as loss of pollinators, pest infestations, etc. (Bale et al. 2002). Agricultural crops are affected by heat stress by various ways like the rate of photosynthesis is reduced, pollen production and viability are decreased, the rate of seed abortion is increased and reductions in grain weight and number occurred (Prasad et al. 2006). Bale et al. (2002) have reported that higher temperature during winters increases the rate of herbivory and winter survival of pests. Different crops responded differently to varying temperature and have different optimum temperatures (Sánchez et al. 2014). Schlenker and Roberts (2009) reported a reduction in yield of rainfed crops at 30 °C air temperature in the United States. High temperature also causes evaporation from soil and water leading to loss of crop water. Due to evaporation of water from the soil, salinity also increases in the soil. Lobell et al. (2011) estimated the reduction in maize yield by 1% for each 1 °C increase above a base temperature of 30 °C in the sub-Saharan African region. Likewise, in India annual loss of wheat crop is estimated to be about six million tons for each 1 °C rise in mean temperature (Kang and Banga 2013). The high temperature is reported to damage the reproductive stages in cereals, millets, oilseeds, and pulses (Prasad et al. 2017).
Increasing temperature is reported to increase the biological invasion that competes for nutrients and space and thus negatively affects the diversity of native species and crop plants (Fuhrer 2003). An increase in the CO2 concentration increases the growth of C4 weeds that affect the growth of C3 crops (Fuhrer 2003). Ziska (2000) reported that the presence of weeds neutralizes the positive effect of enhanced CO2 on soybeans. Weed biomass is reported to increase under elevated CO2 level by Ziska (2000).
The tropospheric ozone (O3) concentration increases with an increase in the temperature especially when the temperature reaches above 32 °C. Tropospheric O3 is known to adversely affect the rate of photosynthesis, plant growth, reproduction and yield throughout the world (Tiwari and Agrawal 2018).
Increases in CO2 have significant effects on plant growth, leaf area, and yield (Mishra and Agrawal 2014). CO2 enrichment also affects the nutritional quality of the crop plants. Myers et al. (2014) observed reductions of 7–15% in protein content in rice, wheat, barley, and potato tubers, but very little change in C3 legumes and C4 crops. Jena et al. (2018) found that CO2 concentration at 490 ± 30 ppm reduced the grain yield by 10–13% in high yielding rice cultivar although the biomass increased by 27–29%. Grain quality and nutrient allocation were also negatively affected under elevated CO2, whereas the low yielding cultivar of rice showed positive effects (Jena et al. 2018). Nutrient requirements of plants are increased under the elevated CO2 level (Jena et al. 2018), so excess use of fertilizers will occur. Also, the higher CO2 level increased the K uptake from soil but translocation of K toward storage was found to be reduced by Jena et al. (2018). Increasing the CO2 concentration will increase the growth of both wanted and unwanted species. Meta-analysis study of Liu et al. (2018) observed that elevated CO2 increases the flux of CO2, CH4, and N2O by increasing the C and N pools in soil. High atmospheric CO2 increased the flux of CO2 by 24%, CH4 by 34% in rice fields, and 12% from wetlands, while N2O flux did not change significantly.
14.8 GHG Mitigation Strategies for Agriculture
As the temperature increases during summer, the equatorial regions get hotter resulting in damaging effects on the ecosystems. This necessitates the need to reduce the emission or trap the gases from the atmosphere to lessen the effects of GHGs. Mitigation strategies involve two processes i.e. to reduce the emission and to increase the carbon sink in form of soil organic matter (SOM). Mitigation from agricultural soil involves the processes that enhance the soil carbon content, make use of applied nitrogen fertilizers efficiently by the plants, cause less soil disturbance, enhance photosynthesis, etc. The most effective mitigation measure is the amendment of organic matter to the soil. Following are the mitigation measures that are effective in reducing GHG emissions.
14.8.1 Reducing Tillage Frequency
It has been reported that no-till condition or reduced tilling leads to low flux of GHGs from soil as compared to conventional tillage (Gregorich et al. 2005; Nath et al. 2017; Pandey et al. 2012). Tilling of soil results in loosening and shattering of aggregates and thus soil organic matter decomposition and soil respiration are enhanced. The loss of soil water and disturbance in the microbial community lead to higher fluxes of GHGs under tilling, but no tilling also reduce the productivity of the soil (Soane et al. 2012). Under no tillage conditions, methanotrophic activity is more favored than conventional tillage leading to a reduction in CH4 emission (Pandey et al. 2012).
14.8.2 Biochar Amendment
Application of biochar obtained from pyrolysis of straw and other crop residues is found to be an effective measure to enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) to improve the soil quality and to increase the plant productivity (Sohi et al. 2010). Zhang et al. (2010) reported 40–51% and 21–28% reductions in N2O emission with and without N fertilizer application, respectively, whereas the CH4 flux was increased after wheat straw biochar amendment. Karhu et al. (2011) reported reduced fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O from an agricultural field after biochar application. Although biochar cannot be always used for the mitigation of GHGs, enhanced emission has also been reported on biochar amendment (Junna et al. 2014). The effects of biochar depend on many factors like biochar properties, application rates, soil texture, constituents of the soil, and their interactions (Cayuela et al. 2014).
14.8.3 Agronomic Practices
Improved crop varieties, deeply rooted plants, and better management of residues reduce GHG emissions (Smith et al. 2008). Different agronomic practices that enhance the plant productivity, high growth rate and higher biomass lead to increase in soil organic carbon (Abbas et al. 2017). The cover crops, catch crops, and crop rotation with leguminous crops are reported to provide carbon to the soil (Freibauer et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2008). Application of straw is reported to reduce N2O emission (Ma et al. 2007). Bare fallow land also causes more GHG fluxes (Freibauer et al. 2004). SOC in the soil is enhanced by high plant biodiversity, which also improves the soil structure. Organic polymers produced by soil biota help in formation and stabilization of aggregates (Lal 2004). Soil erosion decreases SOC. Nutrient cycling, biological nitrogen fixation, and other agro-ecological processes can be used to reduce GHG emissions (Thomson et al. 2012). Agroforestry results in a higher quantity of SOC in the deeper layer of soil as compared to crop cultivation. Soil microbial diversity enhanced due to tree plantation, which caused a positive effect on soil carbon sequestration (Abbas et al. 2017). In rice-wheat cropping system, application of neem oil coated urea, intermittent irrigation of rice crop, and no-tillage before wheat crop reduce the global warming potential (GWP) of the system (Gupta et al. 2016). Direct seeded rice reduced the GHG emissions effectively compared to transplanted rice (Gupta et al. 2016; Peyron et al. 2016). The ground cover rice production system is an effective measure to reduce GHG emissions as compared to the conventional rice production system (Yao et al. 2017).
14.8.4 Efficient Fertilizer Uses and Nutrient Management
Nutrient management is important to sequester carbon in the soil especially in the form of manure and compost than as an inorganic fertilizer. Fertilizers applied are not used by the plants effectively. Neem oil-coated urea has been reported to effectively reduce N2O and CH4 emissions as neem oil inhibits the nitrification process and enhances the population of methanotrophs (Gupta et al. 2016). Real-time N management techniques like leaf color chart (Bhatia et al. 2012) and greenseeker (Nath et al. 2017) based N application are found to be effective in reducing the emission as well as to enhance the nitrogen use efficiency. Leaf color chart-based urea application not only reduced GWP of rice-wheat cropping system but also increased the yield (Bhatia et al. 2012). Leguminous crops and organic manure can be used to enhance the productivity in place of inorganic N fertilizers, which enhance the GHG flux (Mosier et al. 2002). Manure application for a longer time strengthened the SOC pool and improved aggregates for a longer period (Thomson et al. 2012). Fertilizer, when applied in depth of the soil profile, leads to low emission (Liu et al. 2006; Yao et al. 2017). By using nitrification inhibitor technology, avoiding unnecessary external inputs to the soil, increasing soil pH by using lime to reduce denitrification, the fluxes of N2O can be reduced (Thomson et al. 2012).
14.8.5 Irrigation Management
Irrigation management also influences GHG emission mainly in rice field. In drought-prone areas, proper water management practices enhance SOC by increasing the biomass (Lal 2004). Islam et al. (2018) observed about 90% reduction in CH4 emission when practising early season drainage as compared to conventional flooding, while N2O emission was higher. Emission from soil is significantly reduced when there is drought-like condition and the soil acts as a sink for N2O (Goldberg and Gebauer 2009). Irrigation enhanced soil organic matter in the dry areas (Denef et al. 2008). The practices that increase SOC can decrease GHG emissions.
14.9 Conclusion
The agricultural sector directly or indirectly emits a significant proportion of GHGs and thus contributes to climate changes. Emissions of GHGs from soil mainly CO2, CH4, and N2O are influenced by many biological and abiological factors acting simultaneously in nature. Excessive use of chemicals, tilling of fields, improper irrigation, etc., enhance GHG emissions. Rice fields are a major contributor to CH4 emission. Wetting and drying cycles of soil emit a significant proportion of N2O. High temperature provides favorable conditions for GHG emissions likewise high moisture content in soil and fine-textured soil maintain anaerobic conditions and thus emit comparatively higher GHGs. GHG emissions are low at high pH as well as low salinity. Nutrient availability enhances N2O emission depending upon anaerobicity, C/N ratio, and active growth of microbes. Several factors influence the soil to act as a source or a sink for GHGs. Increased GHGs in the atmosphere affect the plant growth positively as well as negatively. A high CO2 concentration increases the productivity of plant by increasing the photosynthetic rate and reducing transpiration, whereas the nutritional value is deteriorated. Different mitigation strategies can be adapted to reduce the GHG emissions from agricultural lands like reduced tilling, periodic irrigation, proper use of fertilizers, better crop varieties, and other agronomic practices depending upon the crop type and local environmental conditions.
References
Abbas F, Hammad HM, Fahad S, Cerdà A, Rizwan M, Farhad W, Ehsan S, Bakhat HF (2017) Agroforestry: a sustainable environmental practice for carbon sequestration under the climate change scenarios—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(12):11177–11191
Abbasi MK, Adams WA (2000) Gaseous N emission during simultaneous nitrification–denitrification associated with mineral N fertilization to a grassland soil under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 32(8–9):1251–1259
Almaraz JJ, Zhou X, Mabood F, Madramootoo C, Rochette P, Ma BL, Smith DL (2009) Greenhouse gas fluxes associated with soybean production under two tillage systems in Southwestern Quebec. Soil Till Res 104(1):134–139
Babu YJ, Nayak DR, Adhya TK (2006) Potassium application reduces methane emission from a flooded field planted to rice. Biol Fertil Soils 42(6):532–541
Baggs EM, Rees RM, Smith KA, Vinten AJA (2000) Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use Manage 16(2):82–87
Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JEG, Harrington R, Hartley S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittaker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Chang Biol 8(1):1–16
Behnke GD, Zuber SM, Pittelkow CM, Nafziger ED, Villamil MB (2018) Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 261:62–70
Berglund Ö, Berglund K, Klemedtsson L (2010) A lysimeter study on the effect of temperature on CO2 emission from cultivated peat soils. Geoderma 154(3–4):211–218
Bhatia A, Pathak H, Jain N, Singh PK, Tomer R (2012) Greenhouse gas mitigation in rice–wheat system with leaf color chart-based urea application. Environ Monit Assess 184(5):3095–3107
Birch HF (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 10(1):9–31
Bodelier PL, Roslev P, Henckel T, Frenzel P (2000) Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature 403(6768):421
Bouwman AF (1990) Soils and the greenhouse effect. Wiley, New York
Bouwman AF (1996) Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46(1):53–70
Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H (2000) Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(6):349
Cayuela ML, Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Jeffery S, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA (2014) Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: a review and meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:5–16
CDIAC (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center) (2016). http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/pns/current ghg.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2018
Chapuis-Lardy L, Wrage-Monnig N, Metay A, Chotte JL, Bernoux M (2007) Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Glob Chang Biol 13(1):1–17
Cha-un N, Chidthaisong A, Yagi K, Sudo S, Towprayoon S (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 237:109–120
Čuhel J, Šimek M, Laughlin RJ, Bru D, Chèneby D, Watson CJ, Philippot L (2010) Insights into the effect of soil pH on N2O and N2 emissions and denitrifier community size and activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(6):1870–1878
Da Cunha-Santino MB, Bitar AL, Junior IB (2016) Gas emission from anaerobic decomposition of plant resources. Acta Limnol Brasiliensia 28:e30
Dahlman L (2017) Climate change: global temperature. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature. Accessed 24 Feb 2018
Dalal RC, Allen DE (2008) Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems. Aust J Bot 56(5):369–407
Das S, Ghosh A, Adhya TK (2011) Nitrous oxide and methane emission from a flooded rice field as influenced by separate and combined application of herbicides bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor. Chemosphere 84(1):54–62
Denef K, Stewart CE, Brenner J, Paustian K (2008) Does long-term center-pivot irrigation increase soil carbon stocks in semi-arid agro-ecosystems? Geoderma 145(1–2):121–129
Dilustro JJ, Collins B, Duncan L, Crawford C (2005) Moisture and soil texture effects on soil CO2 efflux components in southeastern mixed pine forests. For Ecol Manage 204(1):87–97
ESRL GMD (Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division) (2014) CDIAC (Carbon Dioxide information analysis center). https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ff.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
ESRL GMD (Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division) (2016). https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/iadv/graph.php?code=MLO&program=ozwv&type=ts. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2003) World Agriculture: towards 2015/2030 - an FAO perspective. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4252e/y4252e06.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2018
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/management-of-some-problem-soils/salt-affected-soils/more-information-on-salt-affected-soils/en/. Accessed 3 Mar 2018
Freibauer A, Rounsevell MD, Smith P, Verhagen J (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122(1):1–23
Fuhrer J (2003) Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO2, ozone, and global climate change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 97(1–3):1–20
Gao B, Ju X, Su F, Meng Q, Oenema O, Christie P, Chen X, Zhang F (2014) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from optimized and alternative cereal cropping systems on the North China plain: a two-year field study. Sci Tot Environ 472:112–124
Garcia JL, Patel BK, Ollivier B (2000) Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of methanogenic Archaea. Anaerobe 6(4):205–226
Goldberg SD, Gebauer G (2009) N2O and NO fluxes between a Norway spruce forest soil and atmosphere as affected by prolonged summer drought. Soil Biol Biochem 41(9):1986–1995
Gomes J, Bayer C, de Souza Costa F, de Cassia Piccolo M, Zanatta JA, Vieira FCB, Six J (2009) Soil nitrous oxide emissions in long-term cover crops-based rotations under subtropical climate. Soil Till Res 106(1):36–44
Gregorich EG, Rochette P, Vanden Bygaart AJ, Angers DA (2005) Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in Eastern Canada. Soil Till Res 83(1):53–72
Grybos M, Davranche M, Gruau G, Petitjean P, Pédrot M (2009) Increasing pH drives organic matter solubilization from wetland soils under reducing conditions. Geoderma 154(1–2):13–19
Gupta DK, Bhatia A, Kumar A, Das TK, Jain N, Tomer R, Malyan SK, Fagodiya RK, Dubey R, Pathak H (2016) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emission from rice–wheat system of the Indo-Gangetic plains: through tillage, irrigation and fertilizer management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:1–9
INCCA (Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment) (2010, May) India: greenhouse gas emissions 2007. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi
IPCC (2007) Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
IPCC (2014) Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Islam SFU, Van Groenigen JW, Jensen LS, Sander BO, de Neergaard A (2018) The effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies without compromising yield by early-season drainage. Sci Tot Environ 612:1329–1339
Jain N, Arora P, Tomer R, Mishra SV, Bhatia A, Pathak H, Chakraborty D, Kumar V, Dubey DS, Harit RC, Singh JP (2016) Greenhouse gases emission from soils under major crops in Northwest India. Sci Tot Environ 542:551–561
Jena UR, Swain DK, Hazra KK, Maity MK (2018) Effect of elevated [CO2] on yield, intra–plant nutrient dynamics, and grain quality of rice cultivars in Eastern India. J Sci Food Agric 98:5841. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9135
Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Boddey RM, Gresshoff PM, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves BJ, Morrison MJ (2012) Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32(2):329–364
Jia Z, Cai Z, Xu H, Li X (2001) Effect of rice plants on CH4 production, transport, oxidation and emission in rice paddy soil. Plant Soil 230(2):211–221
Junna S, Bingchen W, Gang X, Hongbo S (2014) Effects of wheat straw biochar on carbon mineralization and guidance for large-scale soil quality improvement in the coastal wetland. Ecol Eng 62:43–47
Kallenbach CM, Rolston DE, Horwath WR (2010) Cover cropping affects soil N2O and CO2 emissions differently depending on type of irrigation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137(3–4):251–260
Kang MS, Banga SS (2013) Global agriculture and climate change. J Crop Improve 27(6):667–692
Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity–results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140(1–2):309–313
Kyaw KM, Toyota K (2007) Suppression of nitrous oxide production by the herbicides glyphosate and propanil in soils supplied with organic matter. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53(4):441–447
Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123(1–2):1–22
Le Mer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol 37(1):25–50
Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento-Borbe MA, Pittelkow C, van Kessel C (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Chang Biol 18(1):194–209
Liu XJ, Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Zhang FS (2006) The impact of nitrogen placement and tillage on NO, N2O, CH4 and CO2 fluxes from a clay loam soil. Plant Soil 280(1–2):177–188
Liu C, Wang K, Meng S, Zheng X, Zhou Z, Han S, Chen D, Yang Z (2011) Effects of irrigation, fertilization and crop straw management on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from a wheat–maize rotation field in northern China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140(1–2):226–233
Liu S, Ji C, Wang C, Chen J, Jin Y, Zou Z, Li S, Niu S, Zou J (2018) Climatic role of terrestrial ecosystem under elevated CO2: a bottom-up greenhouse gases budget. Ecol Lett 21(7):1108–1118
Lobell DB, Bänziger M, Magorokosho C, Vivek B (2011) Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nat Clim Chang 1(1):42
Ludwig J, Meixner FX, Vogel B, Förstner J (2001) Soil-air exchange of nitric oxide: an overview of processes, environmental factors, and modeling studies. Biogeochemistry 52(3):225–257
Ma J, Li XL, Xu H, Han Y, Cai ZC, Yagi K (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat straw application on CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field. Soil Res 45(5):359–367
Marcotullio PJ, Sarzynski A, Albrecht J, Schulz N (2012) The geography of urban greenhouse gas emissions in Asia: a regional analysis. Glob Environ Chang 22(4):944–958
Mishra AK, Agrawal SB (2014) Cultivar specific response of CO2 fertilization on two tropical mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) cultivars: ROS generation, antioxidant status, physiology, growth, yield and seed quality. J Agron Crop Sci 200(4):273–289
Mohanty SR, Bharati K, Moorthy BTS, Ramakrishnan B, Rao VR, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK (2001) Effect of the herbicide butachlor on methane emission and ebullition flux from a direct-seeded flooded rice field. Biol Fertil Soils 33(3):175–180
Mosier AR, Bleken MA, Chaiwanakupt P, Ellis EC, Freney JR, Howarth RB, Matson PA, Minami K, Naylor R, Weeks K, Zhu Z (2002) Policy implications of human-accelerated nitrogen cycling. In: Boyer EW, Howarth RW (eds) The nitrogen cycle at regional to global scales. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 477–516
Muhammad W, Vaughan SM, Dalal RC, Menzies NW (2011) Crop residues and fertilizer nitrogen influence residue decomposition and nitrous oxide emission from a Vertisol. Biol Fertil Soils 47(1):15–23
Muñoz C, Paulino L, Monreal C, Zagal E (2010) Greenhouse gas (CO2 and N2O) emissions from soils: a review. Chilean J Agric Res 70(3):485–497
Myers SS, Zanobetti A, Kloog I, Huybers P, Leakey AD, Bloom AJ, Carlisle E, Dietterich LH, Fitzgerald G, Hasegawa T, Holbrook NM, Nelson RL, Ottman MJ, Raboy V, Sakai H, Sartor KA, Schwartz J, Seneweera S, Tausz M, Usui Y (2014) Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 510(7503):139
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (2010) Earth observatory. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page2.php. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Nath CP, Das TK, Rana KS, Bhattacharyya R, Pathak H, Paul S, Meena MC, Singh SB (2017) Greenhouse gases emission, soil organic carbon and wheat yield as affected by tillage systems and nitrogen management practices. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63(12):1644–1660
Nelson PN, Ladd JN, Oades JM (1996) Decomposition of 14C-labelled plant material in a salt-affected soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28(4–5):433–441
Nishiwaki J, Mizoguchi M, Noborio K (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields with different organic matter application rates and water management practices. J Dev Sustain Agric 10(1):1–6
Pandey D, Agrawal M (2015) Greenhouse gas fluxes from sugarcane and pigeon pea cultivated soils. Agric Res 4(3):245–253
Pandey D, Agrawal M, Bohra JS (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from rice crop with different tillage permutations in rice–wheat system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 159:133–144
Pathak H, Rao DLN (1998) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from added organic matter in saline and alkali soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30(6):695–702
Pathak H, Bhatia A, Jain N, Aggarwal PK (2010) Greenhouse gas emission and mitigation in Indian agriculture–a review. ING Bulletins Regional Assess Reactive Nitrogen 19:1–34
Peyron M, Bertora C, Pelissetti S, Said-Pullicino D, Celi L, Miniotti E, Romani M, Sacco D (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions as affected by different water management practices in temperate rice paddies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:17–28
Poffenbarger HJ, Needelman BA, Megonigal JP (2011) Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31(5):831–842
Prasad PV, Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr (2006) Adverse high temperature effects on pollen viability, seed-set, seed yield and harvest index of grain-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are more severe at elevated carbon dioxide due to higher tissue temperatures. Agric For Meteorol 139(3–4):237–251
Prasad PV, Bheemanahalli R, Jagadish SK (2017) Field crops and the fear of heat stress—opportunities, challenges and future directions. Field Crops Res 200:114–121
Reay D, Grace J (2007) Carbon dioxide: importance sources and sinks. In: Reay D, Hewitt CN, Smith K, Grace J (eds) Greenhouse gas sinks. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–10
Sánchez B, Rasmussen A, Porter JR (2014) Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: a review. Glob Chang Biol 20(2):408–417
Schaufler G, Kitzler B, Schindlbacher A, Skiba U, Sutton MA, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions from European soils under different land use: effects of soil moisture and temperature. Eur J Soil Sci 61(5):683–696
Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(37):15594–15598
Scialabba NEH, Müller-Lindenlauf M (2010) Organic agriculture and climate change. Renew Agric Food Syst 25(2):158–169
Shang Q, Yang X, Gao C, Wu P, Liu J, Xu Y, Shen Q, Zou J, Guo S (2011) Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice cropping systems: a 3 year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Glob Chang Biol 17(6):2196–2210
Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenke O, Howden M, McAllister T, Pan G, Romanenkov V, Schneider U, Towprayoon S, Wattenbach M, Smith J (2008) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363(1492):789–813
Soane BD, Ball BC, Arvidsson J, Basch G, Moreno F, Roger-Estrade J (2012) No-till in Northern, Western and South-Western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil Till Res 118:66–87
Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82
Sponseller RA (2007) Precipitation pulses and soil CO2 flux in a Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 13(2):426–436
Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ (1998) Measurement of nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen emissions from agricultural soils. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 52(2–3):131–139
Tan IYS, van Es HM, Duxbury JM, Melkonian JJ, Schindelbeck RR, Geohring LD, Hively WD, Moebius BN (2009) Single-event nitrous oxide losses under maize production as affected by soil type, tillage, rotation, and fertilization. Soil Till Res 102(1):19–26
Tang J, Baldocchi DD, Qi Y, Xu L (2003) Assessing soil CO2 efflux using continuous measurements of CO2 profiles in soils with small solid-state sensors. Agric For Meteor 118(3–4):207–220
Tang J, Liang S, Li Z, Zhang H, Wang S, Zhang N (2016) Emission laws and influence factors of greenhouse gases in saline-alkali paddy fields. Sustainability 8(2):163
Thangarajan R, Bolan NS, Tian G, Naidu R, Kunhikrishnan A (2013) Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil. Sci Tot Environ 465:72–96
Thomson AJ, Giannopoulos G, Pretty J, Baggs EM, Richardson DJ (2012) Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 367:1157–1168
Tiwari S, Agrawal M (2018) Tropospheric ozone and its impacts on crop plants: a threat to future global food security. Springer, Cham
Toma Y, Hatano R (2007) Effect of crop residue C: N ratio on N2O emissions from Gray Lowland soil in Mikasa, Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53(2):198–205
Tongwane M, Mdlambuzi T, Moeletsi M, Tsubo M, Mliswa V, Grootboom L (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from different crop production and management practices in South Africa. Environ Dev 19:23–35
Tubiello FN, Salvatore M, Rossi S, Ferrara A, Fitton N, Smith P (2013) The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ Res Lett 8(1):015009
U.S. EIA, U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016, August) The annual energy outlook 2016 with projection to 2040. U.S. EIA, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2016). https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2017). https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/greenhouse-gases. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
Wang ZP, Delaune RD, Patrick WH, Masscheleyn PH (1993) Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57(2):382–385
Wang Z, Zeng D, Patrick WH (1996) Methane emissions from natural wetlands. Environ Monitor Assess 42(1–2):143–161
WDCGG, World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (2016). http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/wdcgg/pub/global/2017/. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
Weston NB, Neubauer SC, Velinsky DJ, Vile MA (2014) Net ecosystem carbon exchange and the greenhouse gas balance of tidal marshes along an estuarine salinity gradient. Biogeochemistry 120(1–3):163–189
Wu X, Yao Z, Brüggemann N, Shen ZY, Wolf B, Dannenmann M, Zheng X, Butterbach-bahl K (2010) Effects of soil moisture and temperature on CO2 and CH4 soil–atmosphere exchange of various land use/cover types in a semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. Soil Biol Biochem 42(5):773–787
Yao Z, Zheng X, Dong H, Wang R, Mei B, Zhu J (2012) A 3-year record of N2O and CH4 emissions from a sandy loam paddy during rice seasons as affected by different nitrogen application rates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:1–9
Yao Z, Zheng X, Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang R, Lin S, Zhao Q, Butterbach-Bahl K (2017) Urea deep placement reduces yield-scaled greenhouse gas (CH4 and N2O) and NO emissions from a ground cover rice production system. SC Rep 7(1):11415
Ye R, Jin Q, Bohannan B, Keller JK, McAllister SA, Bridgham SD (2012) pH controls over anaerobic carbon mineralization, the efficiency of methane production, and methanogenic pathways in peatlands across an ombrotrophic–minerotrophic gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 54:36–47
Zhang J, Han X (2008) N2O emission from the semi-arid ecosystem under mineral fertilizer (urea and superphosphate) and increased precipitation in Northern China. Atmos Environ 42(2):291–302
Zhang A, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Hussain Q, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D (2010) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139(4):469–475
Ziska LH (2000) The impact of elevated CO2 on yield loss from a C3 and C4 weed in field grown soybean. Glob Chang Biol 6(8):899–905
Zou J, Huang Y, Jiang J, Zheng X, Sass RL (2005) A 3 year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Global Biogeochem Cycles 19(2):GB2021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002401
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Botany, Coordinators DST FIST, CAS, ISLS for laboratory and library facilities. Financial support from APN (Asia Pacific Network) project (CRRP2016-09MY-Lokupitaiya) and UGC JRF & SRF to Bhavna Jaiswal are also acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaiswal, B., Mukherjee, A., Pandey, B., Agrawal, M. (2020). Emission of Greenhouse Gases from Soil: An Assessment of Agricultural Management Practices. In: Singh, P., Singh, S.K., Prasad, S.M. (eds) Plant Responses to Soil Pollution. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4964-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4964-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4963-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4964-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)