Keywords

1 Introduction

In order to understand the cooling load required by the building, major emphasis needs to be given to the building envelope. During the headload calculations, there are different variables like U-factor for wall, glass, roof and some constant factors like outdoor temperature its relative humidity, solar gains, heat dissipation through lights, equipment and humans. There is no control over the constants, except the variables by using glass having innovative film technology, using wall and roof with insulation and air cavity. Therefore, by controlling the U-factor, i.e., by changing the different configuration, the total aggregate heat entering indoors can be restricted [1]. This leads to a reduction in headload tonnage, thereby resulting in savings. By using this methodology in the future, there is a great scope of saving energy and manufacturing various façade wall panels and glass having excellent U-values which will bring about a significant difference in load reduction. After researching and analyzing in the field of HVAC, its ever-increasing demand due to attaining thermal comfort within the premises has led to increased energy demand and higher electricity bills. Also, the conventional methods of generating electricity further lead to environmental impacts. Therefore, a reduction in HVAC load will not only result in lower energy consumption but also reduce the energy bills and have less impact on the environment. In this research paper, there are improved ways of reducing the cooling load by means of improving the building envelope. This research paper shows reduction in the cooling load by comparing three different sets of options by changing the conditions and the U-values.

2 Overview of the Research Paper

The building envelope acts as the door between indoor and external climatic conditions. It potentially controls the building climatic response [2]. The building envelope should be designed to preserve energy significantly. Well-designed building envelope maximizes daylight, natural ventilation (access to fresh air) and views to the exterior and enables to modulate solar heat gain and control/reduce noise. Building envelope components and their configuration largely determine the amount of heat gain or loss and wind that enters inside the building and extent of natural ventilation in the building [3].

The primary components of building envelope which affect the performance of a building are,

  1. (a)

    walls,

  2. (b)

    roof,

  3. (c)

    fenestration (openings with or without glazing),

  4. (d)

    floor, etc. (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1
    figure 1

    Basic building envelope incorporating various primary components

Heat can be generated in various ways, and they are either directly or indirectly.

Some of the sources are as follows:

2.1 Solar Heat Gain [4]

The radiation from the sun enters the interior design spaces in three modes—conduction, convection and radiation.

2.2 Heat from Human Beings

Occupants are another major source of heat gain in the interiors of the structure. Humans consume hundreds of calories every day as food, and part of this energy is released as heat to the surroundings during the metabolic processes.

2.3 Outdoor Air Heat

The warm outside air is called outdoor air or ambient air. Since it is warmer than the air inside the building spaces, when it enters the spaces it tends to increase the indoor average room temperature.

2.4 Heat from Electrical and Electronic Appliances

Indoor spaces are loaded with electrical and electronic appliances such as lightning fixtures, television sets, coffee machines, water heaters, etc. These appliances consume electricity and release a part of it in the form of heat in the air-conditioned spaces.

3 Research Methodology

For research purpose, the building selected to do this analysis is a Ground + 10 Floors Multi-Purpose Center situated in Pune as a base plan for calculations.

3.1 A Conventional Approach to Heat Load Calculations

In this approach, heat load calculation was done based on U-values of standard materials used as building envelope. Architects/civil consultants/engineers use the conventional approach in designing facades. The materials used are as follows:

Summer conditions: [5]

Indoor temperature: 75.2 °F [6]

Outdoor temperature: 101 °F

Glass: double pane regular glass

Properties:

Solar heat gain co-efficient (SHGC)—0.80

U-value—0.55 BTU/HR-FT2—°F

Wall: (inside) 25 mm plaster + 100 mm brick + 25 mm plaster

Properties:

U-value—0.35 BTU/HR-FT2— °F

Roof: 100 mm RCC

Properties:

U-value—0.63 BTU/HR-FT2— °F

Light load: 0.75 W/ft2.

3.2 B Option 1

In this approach, heat load calculation was done based on improved set of U-values of materials used as building envelope.

The glass and wall configuration used in this approach are as follows:

Summer conditions:

Indoor temperature: 75.2 °F

Outdoor temperature: 101 °F

Glass: double pane regular glass with film

Properties:

Solar heat gain co-efficient (SHGC)—0.28

U-value—0.26 BTU/HR-FT2— °F

Wall: 25 mm plaster + 200 mm AAC Block + 50 mm insulation + 25 mm plaster

Properties:

U-value—0.06 BTU/HR-FT2— °F

Roof: 100 mm RCC + 40 mm insulation

Properties:

U-value—0.09 BTU/HR-FT2— °F.

3.3 C Option 2

In this approach, heat load calculation was done based on the same set of U-values used in Option 1 as well as increasing the indoor conditions. We have also added ceiling fans in the conditioned space [7]. A perfect combination of saving electricity is making use of the fans as well as the air conditioner. Ceiling fans can create a breeze that makes people in the room feel cooler and more comfortable. With a ceiling fan running, you can raise the thermostat of the air conditioner by 3–4 degrees with no reduction in comfort. Increasing the temperature on the air conditioner can reduce your electricity bills significantly (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Using a fan with an air conditioner leads to savings

3.4 Headload Comparison

As we can see from Table 1, when the building headload is calculated using conventional approach to walls and glass, the tonnage of refrigeration required to cool the building comes to 240 TR. On the other hand, when these walls and glass configurations are improved the tonnage reduces to 190 TR and when the same U-values are used along with ceiling mounted fans, the tonnage further drops to 170 TR. This show that the tonnage difference between the conventional approach and Option 2 comes to nearly 90 TR (Table 2).

Table 1 The table shows a summary of tonnage required for the entire building premises
Table 2 Sample heat load of the building premises

4 Comparison of Capital and Operational Expenditures

The comparison gives us a summary of the initial capital investment required and the operational expenditures for conventional approach as well as Option 1 and 2. Section A shows the capital investment of all 3 options, this included cost for variable refrigerant flow system, wall insulation, roof insulation, glass film, ACC blocks, brick blocks and ceiling fans. Section B shows the operational expenditures for 1 year based on the electrical consumption of all the 3 options. Section C shows the comparison with the annual maintenance charges subjected to every option and 10 years of CAPEX AND OPEX cost difference between the 3 options (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of capital and operational expenditure

5 Results

From Table 4, we understand that,

Table 4 Comparison of capital and operational expenditures

When we compare conventional system and Option 1, we achieve savings right from the second year. The column named difference shows yearly saving when compared to conventional system, i.e., if the building is designed as per Option 1, we achieve savings shown as in column number 4. Similarly, when we compare conventional system and Option 2, we achieve savings right from the very first year. The column named difference shows yearly saving when compared to conventional system, i.e., if the building is designed as per Option 2, we achieve savings shown as in column number 7.

6 Conclusion

The building envelope is a door to the outside environment and its performance is directly proportional to the HVAC load within the premises. Also, with the rise in urbanization, cities are growing vertically, due to lack of availability of land. This results in tall buildings/towers/skyscrapers. HVAC system deployed in such towers will impact hugely on energy consumption. Smart manufacturing of wall panels with sandwiched air cavity, insulation, even glass panels with low-E coats improved the U-values used for headload calculation leading to reduced tonnage for HVAC system.

From the above results for the envelope of the building, the following parameters were improved;

  1. 1.

    Occupancy comfort

  2. 2.

    Energy efficiency

  3. 3.

    Reduction in cooling tonnage and energy use

  4. 4.

    Energy cost savings.

This reduction in tonnage due to an optimized envelope reduced the size of the HVAC system, which lead to high energy conservation and lower energy bills.