Abstract
Duplicated thumb is a common, often sporadic, congenital anomaly that must be addressed surgically early in life. Classification, operation timing, and methods of anesthesia of the initial surgery are determined by not only simple radiograph but also by ultrasonography and MRI. Ideally, the surgeon seeks to accomplish three goals: construction of a thumb that is adequate in size, preservation of pinch function, and reconstruction of all components in one procedure. The author discusses the various classification systems, procedures, and outcomes after primary surgery for duplicated thumbs as well as secondary correction of the previously reconstructed duplicated thumbs.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Radial polydactyly of the hand is the second most common congenital hand disorder, and it ranges from a vestigial radial skin tag to varying degrees of splitting to complete duplication. It is believed to arise from excessive cell proliferation and disturbed cell necrosis of preaxial ectodermal and mesodermal tissues before the eighth week of embryonic life. It occurs sporadically and unilaterally. Hereditary influence has not been documented in isolated thumb polydactyly, although autosomal dominance has been reported in triphalangism and polysyndactyly. It is difficult to establish the true incidence of polydactyly because many minor cases are treated in the nursery by pedicle ligation shortly after birth. Region, race, and combined numbers of all polydactylies, or only radial- or ulnar-sided polydactyly, provide very different incidences in published series. The incidence of preaxial polydactyly is reported as 0.08 to 1.4 per 1000 live births [1, 2]. The IFSSH (International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand) classifies these malformations in group III [3].
Classification
Since late 1960, Wassel’s classification [4] is the most widely accepted and is very simple to understand and remember. It was based on the duplication level of the bone checked only by simple radiograph. Recently, nomenclature of this classification has been changed to “Flatt classification” [5] although 40% of duplicated thumbs could not be classified using this system [6]. This classification does not account for the anatomic complexity of congenital hand differences, including soft tissue deficiencies and redundancies, axial plane deformities, joint instability, and functionality. Simple X-ray shows only bone and soft tissue shadow with limitations in describing the concrete morphology of the duplication. Surgeons can imagine only the presence and shape of the cartilage and joint between bones. In 2013, Chung et al. suggested a new classification system of the radial polydactyly [7] based on the anatomic morphology of osseous or chondral connection of the joint and epiphysis. However, they did not show the true nature of the joint. Modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques can show exquisite anatomic detail. Imaging with 3.0 tesla (T) MR units can show very small field-of-view imaging at high resolution, especially a baby’s diminutive cartilage and joints (Fig. 3.1). It also can show tendons and vessels in three dimensions. In a certain type V or VI polydactyly by Flatt classification on the X-ray, the extra digit is connected to the main digit by soft tissue alone without any chondral connection. Because this type needs only soft tissue surgery, both operation timing and surgical planning should be changed (Fig. 3.2).
Of the 1138 radial polydactyly cases of the senior author (SH Woo) during the last 20 years, the three most common Flatt types are, respectively, 495 cases of type IV (44.2%), 223 cases of type II (20%), and 188 cases of floating type (16.8%) (Table 3.1). In the author’s cases, there were many cases of thumb duplications that defied classification, and there was no radial polydactyly involving carpal bone.
Among many proposed classifications, there is a new “Rotterdam classification” based on the triphalangeal components, triplication, hypoplasia or floating components, deviation, and symphalangism [8]. This classification includes designations for complex osseous, and soft tissue elements may prove more useful in conveying the full extent of the radial-sided hand deformity and for informing surgical technique (Fig. 3.3).
Preoperative Considerations: Operation Timing and Anesthesia
The initial operation for radial polydactyly should be determined based on the child’s age and overall health including tolerance for anesthesiology and the surgeon’s experience or preference. Informed consent should be dealt on advantages and disadvantages of the surgery as well as the possibility of secondary surgery. Preoperative discussion with the parents allows for physical examination and clarification of the expected surgical steps necessary for reconstruction of the new thumb. The potential need for secondary revision, which can include scar revision, joint capsule plication, tendon transfer, and osteotomy with or without joint fusion, is also informed at the time of initial operation.
The timing and methods of anesthesia of the initial surgery are very different between cases. According to the anatomical variation checked by MRI, complexity of the surgical procedure, method of anesthesia, and operation timing will be determined. In addition to MRI, ultrasonography can show the dynamic images of joint and tendons as well as location of the flexor or extensor tendons.
Generally, parents want the period of hiding the baby’s hand with polydactyly to be shortened. The thumb and index finger function develops at 10–12 months, and coordinated function of the thumb does not appear until a child is 2–3 years of age. Developmentally, waiting until the patient is 3 years of age will not alter the function of the reconstructed thumb when the extra digit is connected to the main digit by soft tissue alone without any chondral connection, the operation can be performed under local anesthesia with or without oral sedatives around 100 days after birth. Floating thumb can be ligated or resected before 1 month at the outpatient clinic. In Flatt type IV cases, timing of the operation is recommended at around 8–10 months under general anesthesia. Frequent surgical procedures include extra digit resection, resection of the radial head of metacarpal bone, and ligament and muscle repair with or without extensor tendon transfer. Because all these procedures take less than 1 hour under a tourniquet, intravenous sedation with fentanyl and combined injection of local anesthesia during the procedure are preferred. This also provides a comfortable situation for the surgeon as this anesthesia works especially well where the parents refuse or are averse to endotracheal intubation.
In cases of required osteotomy and bone fixation and more proximal radial polydactyly than type V, surgical procedures may be more complicated. For this reason, initial surgery is usually delayed until the child is at least 1 year of age and should be done under general anesthesia. This minimizes anesthetic risks and allows time for the thumb growth.
Operative Principles
Except with very simple polydactyly, the surgeon always reflects upon or regrets the previously adapted operation method or surgical technique when the patients having residual deformities in shape or limited range on the long-term follow-up irrespective of the initial type. Therefore, the strategy for the initial operation should be ingenious and creative, not conservative. The surgeon should apply the “best part” doctrine, in which the most complete anatomic parts from all duplicated parts are used to construct a new thumb as normal as possible [9]. Operation for the radial polydactyly does not involve the removal of extra digit but reconstruction of the new thumb with proper function of the joint and tendons as well as achieving acceptable aesthetic outcome in length, axis of the phalangeal bone, and bulkiness of the soft tissue.
Flatt Types I and II
In this type, the deformity is divided into two types according to appearance. One involves equal components for both the radial and ulnar side which share a common epiphysis or where there are two epiphyses. The other involves a larger ulnar and smaller radial component of the distal phalanx. Selection of the operation method between resection of smaller or radial component and combination of the two components is always debated.
The “rule of 70 or 80%” will be the guide to choose operation technique. If the nail width at nail fold of the larger component is over 70–80% of the contralateral thumb, resection of the smaller component is reasonable [10]. To excise the smaller thumb, the incision can be made laterally in an elliptical shape to result in a straight scar. More lateral incision leaves less conspicuous scars. Surgical procedure includes ablation of the smaller component and shaving of the articular cartilage of the proximal phalanx. If possible, centralization of the extrinsic tendons on the distal phalanx and reattachment and reeling of the capsule of the distal IP joint should be done. At the lateral side distal to the IP joint, the collateral ligament with periosteal flap is preserved proximally. If the articular cartilage was trimmed to produce a flat joint surface, the joint capsule should be strongly repaired (Fig. 3.4). Where the longitudinal axis through IP joint is not straight with an oblique joint surface, primary corrective osteotomy is very useful to correct angulation. This procedure involves closing wedge ostectomy at the neck of proximal phalanx and one 0.7 mm Kirschner wire fixation under C-arm (Fig. 3.5). In many cases, the proximal nail fold is not horizontal but slanted, and so simultaneous eponychial fold plasty helps improve the aesthetic outcome. The longitudinal incision is made on the short side of the proximal nail fold in the same length as the opposite side. The incised eponychium is proximally folded and fixed with half-buried horizontal mattress sutures (Fig. 3.6).
In cases where the nail width at nail fold of the larger component is the same size or less than 70% of the contralateral thumb, treatment is more complex. The Bilhaut-Cloquet operation of central wedge resection is reserved for only Flatt type I or II thumbs so that not more than one growth plate is violated (Fig. 3.7). Commonly this procedure makes an uneven nail bed, a central split ridge, and an uneven eponychial nail fold.
Flatt Type III
In this type of radial polydactyly, there are many factors that should be considered preoperatively, such as divergence angles of the MP joint, convergence angle of the IP joint, and shape and longitudinal axis of proximal phalanx and metacarpal bone based on simple radiology. The status of epiphyseal sharing at the base of the proximal phalanx as well as eccentric insertion of extrinsic tendons can be identified with MR scanning. The shape and width of nail and bulkiness of the pulp should also be examined.
Postoperative thumb length, girth, and nail width may influence the aesthetic outcome. The most common reason for lower satisfaction is angulation; thus, the goal of surgical reconstruction of radial polydactyly is to create a thumb that is well-aligned, stable, and of normal size with appropriate range of motion [11].
In type III polydactyly with equal or almost equal size, even though modified Bilhaut-Cloquet procedures have been introduced [11, 12], complicated surgical technique and unpromising outcomes are frequently the results (Fig. 3.8). With the modified technique of Manske [13] for type II, instead of narrowing the distal articular surface, distal and radial portion of proximal phalangeal bone should be preserved to prevent radial angulation of the distal phalanx [14] (Figs. 3.9 and 3.10). The radial collateral ligament along with the cartilage is sutured to the ulnar distal phalanx. The EPL tendon of the retained thumb is augmented by the EPL tendon of the excised thumb. Fillet flap from the radial thumb can provide additional coverage of the radial pulp. The radial paronychium is also reconstructed with soft tissue from the excised thumb. The IP joint is temporarily fixed by K-wire.
Flatt Type IV
From personal data of cases operated by the senior author (SH Woo) for the radial polydactyly, type IV duplication is the most common. There are many variations of type IV duplications. When the ulnar component is straight in axis and relatively similar in nail size, the radial component should be excised without undue concern. In Rotterdam type IV D with severe divergence at MP joint and convergence of IP joint, there may be a high incidence of Z-deformity postoperatively. That’s the reason why modification of Bilhaut techniques with longitudinal combination procedures is still useful to achieve a straight and large thumb (Fig. 3.11). Even revision surgery in Z-deformity requires more technical consideration for reconstruction, but the postoperative result is not always promising. According to the divergence and convergence of the joints, shape of the P1 and metacarpal bone, and volume of soft tissue and nail shape, different operation options should be adopted.
The ulnar thumb should always be preserved because it maintains the critical ulnar collateral ligament at the MP joint, which is important for stability during pinch. In easy cases of type IV, the ulnar thumb is usually bigger than the radial side in size, and the longitudinal axis of the ulnar thumb is almost straight (Fig. 3.12). An elliptical incision is made on the radial thumb extended proximally in a curvilinear fashion along the junction between dorsal and volar aspect. The radial thumb is amputated through the MP joint preserving EPL and FPL tendon as well as elevated periosteal flap from the base of the radial side of the proximal phalanx and proximally in continuity with the collateral ligament. The widened metacarpal head has two facets, of which the radial facet is removed in an oblique fashion by scalpel, preserving the periosteal flap. The abductor pollicis brevis that is inserted on the bone remnant is transferred to the proximal phalanx of the preserved portion of the digit, and the capsule of the MP joint is reconstructed. Even in wide divergence of the proximal phalanx in type IV, this procedure alone is sufficient to prevent secondary angulation deformity (Fig. 3.13).
Regarding correction of convergence of the IP joint, there are three options. In a mild case, V-Y advanced plication of ulnar collateral ligament and release of radial collateral ligament are enough. Additional longitudinal K-wire fixation is necessary for 3 weeks. In moderate to severe cases or where the parents are resistant to bone surgery, tendon transfer of the radial half of EPL tendon only (Fig. 3.14) or combined with FPL tendon (Fig. 3.15) is a good option. Harvested tendons from radial component are passed under the dorsal or volar skin around IP joint and then fixed at the ulnar collateral ligament. In severe convergence, closing wedge ostectomy and internal fixation at the P1 shaft (Fig. 3.16) or sometimes at the distal shaft of metacarpal bone (Fig. 3.17) are mandatory. Fixation with one or two Kirschner wires is enough to maintain the straightened position of the joints. There is no risk of scar contracture even with a straight closure of the incision on the radial aspect of the thenar area.
Flatt Types V and VI
The radial polydactyly has three bones including the metacarpal remnant. If there is no connection of cartilage or joint capsules between the metacarpal bones, this is not metacarpal polydactyly but floating type. In type V, the radial thumb is crooked and small on the distal end with a near-normal ulnar component. Compared with normal extrinsic tendons of the ulnar thumb, a part of thenar muscle is shared with the radial thumb. When the ostectomy of the radial prominence of the metacarpal bone is performed, thenar muscle should be preserved and repaired to metacarpal bone again. The first web space is sometimes narrow, which should be released with flap or Z-plasty (Fig. 3.18).
In type VI, the development of the metacarpal bone is very different. One component has a better proximal portion of nearly normal metacarpal bone with good and stable carpometacarpal joint, and the distal portion is usually hypoplastic and angulated interphalangeal joint. The other component has poor or absent carpometacarpal joint but better morphology of distal portion with a near-normal nail. Hypoplastic metacarpal bone shows a tendency of under- or no development of extrinsic tendons. Transposition of the relatively well-aligned ulnar digit to the radial ray is named as “on-top-plasty” technique [15, 16]. Preoperatively, the surgeon should check the shape and size of the nail, bulkiness of the pulp, length and axis of phalangeal and metacarpal bone, and presence of instability of the joints. According to this, abnormality and malposition of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles should be identified before surgery. Three-dimensional ultrasound technique [17] or 3.0 T MR image can be a great help to plan strategies in radial polydactyly if intrinsic muscular anomalies are suspected to be involved. If so, the operation should be delayed until the active motion of the baby’s ulnar thumb is observed. The appropriate age for complex operative procedures is from around 2 years old. In most cases, parents prefer to preserve the apparently dominant thumb even with reduced functionality. The strategy of this complex procedure is very important to achieve not only an aesthetically pleasing appearance but adequate function of the reconstructed thumb by using osteotomy and tendon transfer.
After confirmation of the presence of extrinsic FPL/EPL tendon, resection of hypoplastic soft tissues and bones as well as level of osteotomy should be predetermined preoperatively. Under tourniquet application, a Y-shaped incision is placed at the midline of the dorsum between both thumbs. The skin flaps are elevated with intact neurovascular pedicle and venous channel. After marking the osteotomy site, the flexor and extensor tendons are elevated with periosteal flap, which will be sutured to the proximal parts of FPL/EPL. According to the better distal portion, the level of osteotomy varies at distal phalangeal bone (Fig. 3.19), proximal phalangeal bone (Fig. 3.20), or metacarpal bone (Fig. 3.21). Depending on the location of the osteotomy, detachment and reattachment of the thenar muscle insertion may be necessary. Length as well as proper rotation and angulation are carefully evaluated prior to final fixation with Kirschner wire under C-arm. Long-arm splint is applied for 2 weeks, and then a custom-made thumb brace is kept for 6 weeks (Fig. 3.22). K-wire is removed about 3–4 weeks after the operation, and a gentle range of motion exercises are begun.
Secondary Deformity and Its Reconstruction
As children grow, the need for reoperation increases. Concern for cosmetic issues supersedes the lack of function of the joints or pain issues. Residual deformities occurring after correction of radial polydactyly involves the soft tissue, joint, and bone separately or combined [18, 19]. Instability is mainly caused by hyperlaxity or hypoplasia of supportive tissues of the joint and by abnormal insertion of a tendon. Angulation is the result of an incorrect axis of a bone, an excessively large cartilaginous head, imbalance and abnormal insertion of a tendon, an interposed delta phalanx, and scarring. The joint problem is stiffness, deviation and instability, bone abnormality including angled bone growth, and presence of a delta bone. The soft tissue abnormality shows nail deformity, narrowing of the first web space, hypoplasia of thenar muscles, and anomalous insertion of the flexor and extensor tendons. These outcomes can be avoidable or not, and surgical results are largely dependent on the severity of the initial deformity. These are usually associated with incomplete correction at the time of initial operation or with failure of the patient to return for subsequent steps of reconstruction.
Evaluation of long-term outcomes following radial polydactyly reconstruction was made by Tada et al. in 1983 [20] and by Stutz et al. in 2014 [21]. In spite of a 30-year time interval, the results are very similar, 76 vs. 79% good, 20 vs. 21% fair, and 4% vs. no poor outcomes using the same evaluation scales based on range of motion, instability, and malalignment. Reoperation rate varies by 12% [22], 19%, [21] and 26% [23] of cases. However, reoperation rate is not significantly meaningful because it does not always mean poor function of the reconstructed thumb. Often the reason for reoperation arises from cosmetic desire and sometimes pain. The greatest deformity occurs with significant angular deformity of the IPJ in Rotterdam type IV D [19, 24].
Before the reoperation, the secondary deformities should be analyzed in detail involving the structures. Regarding joints, it may involve IP joint or MP joint only or together. In the case of IP joint angulation deformity only, closing wedge ostectomy and internal fixation at the proximal phalangeal bone guarantee much better functional and cosmetic results rather than other soft tissue surgeries (Fig. 3.23). Centralization, ulnarization, or radialization of the tendons and/or plication or release of the joint capsule cannot support straight axis of the thumb. To prevent recurrence of the angulation deformity of the joint, overcorrection is indispensable.
The most severe deformity is a zigzag deformity, either angulated radially at the IP joint and ulnarly at the MP joint or the reverse [25]. With growth, secondary problems may include bony overgrowth, tendon imbalance, and joint stiffness. Surgeons must be aware of these potential complications when the performance of initial surgery and long-term follow-up of the child are necessary.
Regarding the age of the patients and operation options, performing an osteotomy at the joint should be suspended after closure of the epiphyseal growth plate. During the period of growth, reoperation should be confined to the osteotomy at metaphysis only not epiphysis, joint capsule, or soft tissue surgery including tendon and scar. When the reconstruction is performed, the excess elements of the thumb such as neuroma, the cartilage or bone remnant of the distal and proximal phalanges, or the metacarpal must be removed completely. In order to stabilize the joint, the distal insertion of the collateral ligament is elevated while preserving a slip of the subperiosteal tissue for reattachment together with the distal insertion of the collateral ligament, or if this is not possible, a new ligament should be created with part of the ablated tendon (Fig. 3.24).
Regarding correction of alignment of the joint, joint space should be transverse by the osteotomy or shaving of articular cartilage first. Tendon rebalancing is then very important to prevent dynamic instability. If a previous operative scar or a skin contracture is suspected to cause angulation, employ soft tissue release with local flap or Z-plasty (Fig. 3.25). Bulky soft tissue should certainly be excised, and fat or dermo-fat graft is sometimes necessary to replace the depressed area.
In cases of a MP joint deformity, the remaining base of the proximal phalanx is removed preserving the subperiosteal insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis and the radial collateral ligament. However, excision of soft tissue is also important to prevent prominence at the joint. The abductor pollicis brevis is reinserted into the radial base of the proximal phalanx.
In angulated deformity of the joint, almost all extrinsic tendons are hypoplastic and have eccentric abnormal insertion. Successful reconstruction can be achieved with combined closing wedge osteotomy at the metacarpal neck with reduction of its widened head, reconstruction of the radial collateral ligament of the MP joint with a periosteal capsular sleeve, and centralization of the FPL with relocation of its insertion in a more ulnar position. Even weak FPL and EPL tendon should be centralized or reinserted to the opposite direction. If it is insufficient, extension lag or radial angulation at IP joint can be corrected with EIP tendon transfer which provides force to correct dynamic instability [26]. In a severe zigzag deformity, double osteotomy at the phalangeal bone or double arthrodesis of the IP joint and the MP joint is the final salvage procedure in adults (Fig. 3.26).
Correction of any angulation deformity and any instability should result in as little sacrifice of the arc of motion as possible. Alignment and size of the thumb, the shape of the nail, and even the circumference of the thumb are more important than the function of the thumb. Alignment can be corrected in the secondary operation, but deformities of the nail, such as hypoplasia, splitting, and distortion, are too difficult to treat properly.
To prevent secondary deformity of the radial polydactyly, the radial nail should be removed, preserving part of the radial distal phalanx to provide breadth for distal duplication in types I and II. Though this exposes the proximal and distal deforming structures, conjoint EPL/FPL tendons can be identified. In the first operation, secure stabilization of joints with collateral ligament advancement is mandatory. Primary corrective osteotomy and internal fixation may guarantee prevention of severe secondary deformity, where corrected tendon and joint stabilization cannot be achieved. In excision of the radial component, the surgeon should carefully consider how to use the resected bone, tendon, and even soft tissue or nail.
References
Jobe MT. Congenital anomalies of the hand. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008. p. 4367–449.
Goldfarb CA, Wall LB, Bohn DC, Moen BA, Van Heest AE. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a Midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:127–32.
Swanson AB, Swanson GD, Tada K. A classification for congenital limb malformation. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8:693–702.
Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–93.
Manske MC, Kennedy CD, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: the Wassel classification for radial polydactyly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:1740–6.
Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, et al. A multicenter comparative study of two classification system for radial polydactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:991–1001.
Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:190–6.
Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:373–7.
Upton J, Hergrueter C. Congenital anomalies of the hand. In: Cohen M, editor. Mastery of plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 3. Boston/New York: Little, Brown; 1994. p. 1424–53.
Dobyns JH, Lipscomb PR, Cooney WP. Management of thumb duplication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:26–44.
Tonkin MA, Bulstrode NW. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel types III, IV and VII thumb duplication. J Hand Surg. 2007;32B:684–93.
Baek GH, Gong HS, Chung MS, Oh JH, Lee YH, Lee SK. Modified Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel type-II and III polydactyly of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89A:534–41.
Manske PR. Treatment of duplicated thumb using a ligamentous/periosteal flap. J Hand Surg. 1989;14A:728–33.
Horii E, Hattori T, Koh S, Majima M. Reconstruction for Wassel type III radial polydactyly with two digits equal in size. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1802–7.
Shen K, Wang Z, Xu Y. Reconstruction of Wassel type VI radial polydactyly with Triphalangeal thumb using an on-top osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1216–22.
Bell B, Butler L, Mills J, Stutz C, Ezaki M, Oishi S. “On-Top Plasty” for radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42:753.e1–753.
Saito S, Ueda M, Takahashi N, Kawakatsu M, Suzuki S. Three-dimensional ultrasonography for visualization of muscular anomalies in type VI and VII radial polydactyly. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:541–7.
Cohen MS. Thumb duplication. Hand Clin. 1998;14:17–27.
Mih AD. Complications of duplicate thumb reconstruction. Hand Clin. 1998;14:143–9.
Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, et al. Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:584–98.
Stutz C, Mills J, Wheeler L, et al. Long-term outcomes following radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg. 2014;39:1549–52.
Ogino T, Ishii S, Takahata S, Kato H. Long-term results of surgical treatment of thumb polydactyly. J Hand Surg. 1996;21A:478–86.
Larsen M, Nicolai JP. Long-term follow-up of surgical treatment for thumb duplication. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:276–81.
Goldfarb CA, Patterson JM, Maender A, et al. Thumb size and appearance following reconstruction of radial polydactyly. J Hand Surg. 2008;33:1348–53.
Kawabata H, Tada K, Masada K, Kawai H, Ono K. Revision of residual deformities after operations for duplication of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:988–98.
Kawabata H, Masatomi T, Shimada K, Kawai H, Tada K. Treatment of residual instability and extensor lag in polydactyly of the thumb. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18:5–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woo, S.H., Lee, Y.S. (2019). Duplicated Thumb and Secondary Deformity. In: Woo, S. (eds) The Thumb. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4400-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4400-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4399-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4400-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)