Abstract
Science teachers are increasingly called on to support students in understanding the key scientific ideas needed for making sense of phenomena in the world around us. They are expected to implement inquiry-based science teaching [IBST] in order to enhance students’ learning and motivation regarding scientific activities.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Teacher Education
- Science Teacher
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Professional Knowledge
- Pedagogical Knowledge
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Alonzo, A. C., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacherstudent interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211–1239.
Boreham, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). A socio-cultural analysis of organisational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 307–325.
Colucci-Gray, L., & Fraser, C. (2008). Contested aspects of becoming a teacher: Teacher learning and the role of subject knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 475–486.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Fisher, M., & Boreham, N. (2004). Work process knowledge: Origins of the concept and current development. In M. Fisher, N. Boreham, & B. Nyham (Eds.), European perspectives on learning at work: The acquisition of work process knowledge (pp. 121–53). Luxembourg, Europe: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP).
Gess-Newsome, J. (2014). Reports from the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit. Presented at ESERA conference, Cyprus, Europe.
Grangeat, M. (2013a). An inquiry based continuing professional development programme: How to make the first Steps? Presented at ECER conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
Grangeat, M. (2013b). A model for understanding science teachers’ approaches to inquiry based science teaching and learning. In M. Honerød Hoveid & P. Gray (Éds.), Inquiry in science education and science teacher education (pp. 55–82). Trondheim, Norway: Akademika Publishing.
Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2007). Factors influencing teachers’ professional competence development. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(4), 485–501.
Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2008). Teaching as a collective work: Analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 34(3), 177–189.
Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment & inquiry-based science education: Issues in policy and practice. Trieste, Italy: IAP Global Network of Science Academies.
Hudson, B. (2007). Comparing different traditions of teaching and learning: What can we learn about teaching and learning? European Education Research Journal, 6(2), 135–146.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F. J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201.
Leroy, N., & Grangeat, M. (2010). Designing TPD for new teachers: The role of socio-cognitive conflict. In A. Tiberghien & S. Coppé (Eds.), Elements for collaborative teacher development and teacher resources: France, Report for European commission S-TEAM project (FP7) (pp. 82–89). Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together-Primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1309–1318.
Pieters, J. M. (2004). Designing artefacts for inquiry and collaboration when the learner takes the lead. European Education Research Journal, 3(1), 77–100.
Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120.
Rogalski, J., Plat, M., & Antolin-Glenn, P. (2002). Training for collective competence in rare and unpredictable situations. In N. Boreham, R. Samurçay, & M. Fisher (Eds.), Work process knowledge (pp. 134–147). London, England: Routledge.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grangeat, M. (2015). Exploring the Set of Pedagogical Knowledge, from Pedagogy to Content. In: Grangeat, M. (eds) Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-313-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-313-1_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-313-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)