Abstract
In order to start a discussion concerning the possibility of applying AI models to judicial decisions, a necessary preliminary step is to refer to some theoretical frameworks concerning the practice of judicial decision-making and the reasonings made by judges. Of course this is not a matter of free choice or of individual preferences: what is needed is to determine which theoretical approach may produce the relatively best approximation to the empirical phenomenon of decisions made in the context of the administration of justice. This is an extremely complex and difficult problem. On the one hand, the experience of the various judicial systems (and even within a given single system) shows that judicial decision-making includes an almost infinite range of variations. The factors influencing the ways in which judicial decisions are made are numerous and include for instance the format and size of the court (single judge or panels, and so on), the composition of the court (professional and/or lay judges), several procedural rules, the factual circumstances of cases, the form and content of the substantive rules governing the case, the evidence available and the methods and standards used to decide on facts according to the proofs and to solve legal issues according to the relevant rules and principles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Branting, L.K., Lester, J.C., and Callaway, Ch.B. (1997) Automatic Judicial Document Drafting: A Unification-Based Approach. In this issue, pp 111–149.
Christie, G.C. (1986) ‘An essay on discretion’, Duke L.J. 747.
Freeman, K., and Farley A.M. (1996) ‘A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning’, Al & Law 4, 163.
Hage, J. (1996) ‘A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match’, AI & Law 4, 199.
Kowalski, R.A. and Toni, F: (1996) ‘Abstract Argumentation’, AI & Law 4, 275.
Larenz, K. and Canaris, W. (1995) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. 3.Aufl New York: Springer.
Leith, Ph. (1997) The Judge and the Computer: How Best “Decision Support”? In this issue, pp. 289–309.
Pecezenik, A. (1996) ‘Jumps and logic in the law’, AI & Law 4, 297.
Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (1996) ‘A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning’, AI & Law 4, 331.
Prakken, H. and Sartor, and 1997. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. In this issue, pp. 231–287.
Roedig, J. (1969) Die Denkform der Alternative in Jurisprudenz. Berlin: Springer.
Sartor, G. (1994) ‘A formal model of legal argumentation’, Ratio Juris 7, 177.
Sartor, G. (1997) ‘Logic and argumentation in legal reasoning’, Current Legal Theory 25.
Schild, U.J. (1997) Criminal Sentencing and Intelligence Decision Support. In this issue, pp. 151–202.
Summers, R.S. and Taruffo, M. (1991) In MacCormick, N., and Taruffo, M. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, p. 461. Hants: Dartmouth.
Taruffo, M. (1975) La motivazione della sentenza civile. Padova: Cedam.
Taruffo, M. (1992) Laprova deifatti giuridici. Nozioni generali. Milano: Giuffre.
Taruffo, M. (1994) ‘Involvement and detachment in the presentation of evidence’, in Krawietz, W., MacCormick, N., and von Wright, G.H. (eds.), Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems. Festschrift for Robert S. Summers, p. 385.
Taruffo, M. (1995) ‘Elementi per un’analisi del giudizio di fatto’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile 785.
Tata, C. (1977) The Application of Judicial Intelligence and “Rules” to Systems Supporting Discretionary Judicial Decision-Making. In this issue, pp. 203–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taruffo, M. (1998). Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence. In: Sartor, G., Branting, K. (eds) Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9010-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9010-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5136-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9010-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive