Skip to main content

Response of Mature Triticale Embryos to Aluminium-Toxic Callus Induction Media

  • Chapter
Triticale: Today and Tomorrow

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant Breeding ((DIPB,volume 5))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

Callus induction of threefold cut mature embryos of one winter triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) variety (“Lasko”) and three spring triticale genotypes (PFT 8512, Ocepar 1 and PFT 8710) was determined in a recently developed aluminium (Al)-toxic medium. Callus weight and pH alteration of spent medium were assessed at the end of the callus induction phase of 7 weeks in media containing different levels of AlCl3 (0.1 – 10mM) and being sterilised either by filter or by autoclaving.

In filter-sterilised media with concentrations higher than 2mM none of the four examined triticale genotypes developed calli and the pH-level of the spent medium remained nearly constant. Lower concentrations of 0.5mM and 1mM Al yielded callus weights significantly higher than the pH 3.6-control without AI, but less than the pH 4.6-control, and pH increased on the same level as in either control. In all concentrations below 2mM Al, somatic embryos could be observed. In contrast, the toxic effect of autoclaved Al-toxic media was expressed by inferior callus quality - even the controls were poor - and did not result in any somatic embryo.

Consequently, filter-sterilised Al-toxic media should be preferred and could serve to select Al-tolerant cell lines, e.g. in suspension cell cultures, or may be useful to investigate Al-tolerance mechanisms at the celluar level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinraide TB. Identity of the rhizotoxic aluminium species. In: Wright RJ, Baligar VC, Murrmann RP, editors. Plant-soil interactions at low pH. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991: 717–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagatsuma T, Ezoe Y. Effect of pH on ionic species of aluminum in medium and on aluminum toxicity under solution culture. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 1985; 31: 547–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conner AJ, Meredith CP. Stimulating the mineral environment of aluminium toxic soils in plant cell culture. J Exp Bot 1985; 36: 870–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamp-Glass M, Powell D, Reddy GB, Baligar VC, Wright RJ. Biotechniques for improving acid aluminum tolerance in alfalfa. Plant Cell Reports 1993; 12: 590–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wersuhn G, Kalettka T, Gienapp R, Reinke G, Schulz D. Problems posed by in-vitro selection for aluminium-tolerance when using cultivated plant cells. J Plant Physiol 1994; 143: 92–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Potrykus I, Harms CT, Lörz H. Callus formation from cell culture protoplasts of corn (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 1979; 54: 209–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962; 15: 473–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ojima K, Koyama H, Suzuki R, Yamaya T. Characterization of two tobacco cell lines selected to grow in the presence of either ionic Al or insoluble Al-phosphate. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 1985; 35: 545–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wersuhn G, Nhi HH, Tellhelm E, Börner T. Response of potato cell cultures to aluminium and selection of tolerant cell lines. Potato Research 1986; 29: 399–02.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marziah M. Changes of pH of legume cell suspension culture media containing aluminium. In: Wright RI, Baligar VC, Murrmann RP, editors. Plant-soil interactions at low pH. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991: 879–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Marziah M. Growth of peanut cells in suspension cultures treated with aluminium. In: Wright RI, Baligar VC, Murrmann RP, editors. Plant-soil interactions at low pH. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991: 875–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ojima K, Abe H, Ohira K. Release of citric acid into the medium by aluminum-tolerant carrot cells. Plant & Cell Physiol 1984; 25: 855–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaus, C.S., Oettler, G., Hesemann, CU. (1996). Response of Mature Triticale Embryos to Aluminium-Toxic Callus Induction Media. In: Guedes-Pinto, H., Darvey, N., Carnide, V.P. (eds) Triticale: Today and Tomorrow. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0329-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0329-6_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0329-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics