Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 35))

Abstract

Some time in the High Middle Ages, the Romance languages created a determiner system from chunks of the demonstrative paradigm of Latin. This language did not have definite articles, nor did it have third person pronouns—it used demonstratives to refer to third persons. In fact, in many (though not in all)2 Romance dialects, the Latin demonstratives used for the determiner paradigm are the same ones used for the pronominal paradigm; see Wanner (1988) for these matters. An empirical issue is then raised with respect to whether in some structural sense pronouns and determiners are of the same type. The intuition behind this idea goes back to Postal (1966), who specifically argued for “so-called pronouns” being nothing but a “determiner + one” (that is, he = the one).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, S. (1987), MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R., X. L. Regueria, and H. Monteagudo (1986), Gramatica Galega, Galaxia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez Caccamo, C. (1989), “Variacom Linguistica e o factor social na Galiza,” Hispanic Linguistics, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson (1992), A-morphous Morphology, ms. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badia Margarit, A. (1980), Gramatica Catalana, Gredos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1988), Incorporation, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and K. Hale (1990) “Relativized Minimality and Pronoun Incorporation,” Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, A. (1988), “The Case of Unaccusatives,” Linguistic Inquiry, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and L. Rizzi, (1988), “Psych Verbs and Theta Theory,” NLLT 6, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerman, D. (1990), MA Thesis, UTexas, El Paso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame, M. (1981), “The General Theory of Binding and Fusion,” Linguistic Analysis, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. and S. Mchombo (1987), “Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chichewa,” Language 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, L. (1986), Italian Syntax, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986), Barriers, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986), Knowledge of Language, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and H. Lasnik (1977), “On Filters and Control,” Linguistic Inquiry 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, H. (1976), A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J. (1978), “The Verbal Complex V′-V in French,” Linguistic Inquiry, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1988), UConn Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidin, R. and H. Lasnik (1981), “Core Grammar, Case Theory, and Markedness,” in Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. (1990), Argument Structure, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. and S. Keyser (1992), “On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations,” ms. MIT. Inkelas, S. and D. Zec (eds.) (1990), The Phonology-Syntax Connection, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. (1994), “Licensing Heads,” in Hornstein and Lightfoot (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (1985), “Bare NP Adverbs,” Linguistic Inquiry 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988), “On The Double-Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D. (1988), Ph.D. dissertation, UMass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, R. (1984), Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1989), “Clitics and Phrase Structure,” in Baltin and Kroch (eds.) (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, A. (forthcoming), Ph.D dissertation, University of Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, A. (1991), Reply to Williams, forthcoming in The Linguistic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, J. (1992), “The Position of Clitics in Brazilian Portuguese,” paper presented at UNICAMP Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1990), Events in The Semantics of English, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter 1978, “Impersonal Passives and The Unaccusatives Hypothesis,” in Proceedings of the Berkeey Linguistics Society, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky (in progress), Psych Predicates, Universal Alignment, and Lexical Decomposition, MIT monograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y (1989), “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and The Structure of IP,” Linguistic Inquiry 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P. (1966), “On So-Called “Pronouns” in English,” in D. Reibel and S. Schane, eds., Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quicoli, C. (1976), “Conditions on Clitic Movement in Portuguese,” Linguistics Analysis 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, E. (1987), “Case Theory and Infl to Comp: The Inflected Infinitive in European Portuguese,” Linguistic Inquiry 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J. Uriagereka (1990), “Long Distance Case Assignment,” Linguistic Inquiry 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. (1982), Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989), “On Chain Formation,” in H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1991) “Excorporation and Minimality,” Linguistic Inquiry 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994) “Long Head Movement, Comp, and Agreement in Romance,” in Hornstein and Lightfoot (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1989) “Two Types of Noun Incorporation: A Lexical Analysis,” Language 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1990) Brandeis Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. and J. Uriagereka (in progress), “Psychological Predicates in Galician,” ms. University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1967), MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwet, N. (1972), Theorie Syntaxique et Syntaxe du Français, Editions du Soleil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (1980), Early Romance Texts, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, U. (1987), MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrego, E. (1985, in progress), “Pronouns and Determiners: A DP Analysis of Spanish Nominals,” ms. UMass at Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (forthcoming), Internal Arguments in Spanish, ms. UMass at Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka, J. (1988), UConn Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992), “A Focus Position in Western Romance,” presented at GLOW, in K. Kiss (ed.) Discourse ConfigurationalLanguages, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (in progress), Extraction Parameters, ms. UMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995), “Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance,” Linguistic Inquiry 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, J.R. and M.L. Zubizarreta (1992), “The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English,” Linguistic Inquiry 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, D. (1987), The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, G. (1985), “On the Expansion of S in Spanish,” ESCOL 85, Ohio State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora Vicente, A. (1974) Dialectologia Espanola, Gredos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, J. (1989), Ma. Thesis, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. (1977), On Clitics, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uriagereka, J. (1996). Determiner Clitic Placement. In: Freidin, R. (eds) Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0135-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics