Abstract
Measuring local cerebral blood flow and metabolism by various mapping methods, such as PET (positron emission tomography), SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography), perfusion computed tomography, MRI, and so on, helps us to evaluate detailed functions of brain areas containing a focal ischemic lesion, but does not necessarily represent neural activities of the areas. Scalp electroencephalography (EEG), reflecting volume-conducted neural activities, demonstrates that slow wave activity is dominant in an acute ischemic cerebral region, but this technique presents major problems with the lack of objective indices for brain functions and low spatial resolution. Magnetoencephalography (MEG), an important new method in neuroscience to directly detect neural activities with high spatial resolution, has been applied in stroke patients. This chapter mainly describes the relation between magnetic responses and cerebral ischemic changes from several stroke-related manuscripts.
Some papers stressed the clinical usefulness of MEG, for example, that slow wave activities occur on the affected cerebral hemisphere and somatosensory evoked potential becomes indicator of brain plasticity. However, other neurophysiological signal changes after stroke are various and not consistent. The usage of MEG for assessing neural activities in an ischemic brain area has not been fully established as yet. Therefore, more objective analysis of MEG findings in ischemic conditions is needed for future development.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
There are various correlations between electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses in stroke, epilepsy, brain tumor, dementia, rehabilitation process, etc.
There are two main clinical approaches for cerebral vascular disease, especially stroke. The first is measurement of cerebrovascular reserve capacity, evaluation of which is very important to treat cerebral infarction. The other approach involves determination of brain plasticity, which is an indicator of rehabilitation after stroke [1].
Cerebral blood flow and metabolism can be measured by nuclear medicine studies, such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), as well as by perfusion CT, MRI, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). These methods have been established for diagnosing and assessing cerebrovascular disease. Some reports have indicated that brain plasticity can be evaluated by diffusion-weighted MRI or fMRI [2].
However, hemodynamics in cerebrovascular disease as assessed by these imaging studies only indirectly reflects brain function.
On the other hand, electrophysiological studies like electroencephalography (EEG) more directly reflect neural activity. It is well known that the slow wave activity in EEG occurs in ischemic areas of the brain. On the other hand, scalp-recorded EEGs are greatly affected by the skull itself. Electrophysiological signal in small infarct lesions may be buried within normal signal findings in surrounding areas and go undetected. Thus, routine EEGs are problematic because of low spatial resolution and a lack of objective indices for quantitative measurement of brain function. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) quantitatively measures magnetic activity in the brain and may overcome some of these limitations of EEG. This chapter mainly describes the relations between magnetic responses and cerebral ischemic changes.
MEG is now performed with devices that can cover the entire head, thus providing improved spatial resolution. MEG was first used in clinical research to assess brain function and search for epileptic foci preoperatively in patients undergoing neurosurgery. The usefulness of MEG for brain function evaluation in other diseases has also been frequently reported, but its clinical use in diseases other than epilepsy has been sparse, so it is still unclear what level of scientific evidence exists for its utility outside of epilepsy.
Therefore, trends in clinical research of MEG in ischemic cerebral disease were examined in a literature search to evaluate the level of scientific evidence for using MEG in clinical evaluation.
2 Methods
A PubMed database literature search (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) was conducted with the keywords (stroke or cerebral ischemia) and (MEG or magnetoencephalography) for publications dated between January 1990 and July 2014. A total of 62 papers were retrieved from this search regarding MEG based on the titles, 28 of these papers were reviewed based on their abstract contents, and then, focusing on the level of evidence, 14 papers that measured cerebral blood flow (CBF) or used controlled comparisons were selected and reviewed.
Although it was difficult to directly compare these reports due to the nonuniformity of presentation and varied ischemic conditions, some common results are described.
3 Results 1
A total of 62 papers about MEG and cerebral ischemia were retrieved from the literature search. These were then limited to original manuscripts, and 28 papers were selected based on their abstract contents. These included reports about diagnostic criteria for cerebral ischemia and functional recovery/neuroplasticity after stroke. They were further divided into reports about spontaneous cerebral magnetic fields and evoked cerebral magnetic fields.
Evaluation of the use of MEG in functional recovery after stroke is reported separately, and some reports about the evaluation of ischemia are described.
3.1 Diagnostic Criteria for Cerebral Ischemia in MEG
-
1.
Spontaneous magnetic fields: slow waves occur after stroke
-
Affected side
-
In areas surrounding lesions after stroke, MEG shows a decrease of high-frequency components (gamma band) and an increase of low-frequency delta (theta band) [3, 4].
-
Increased theta waves are seen in the temporoparietal area of the affected side [5] and correlate with misery perfusion [6].
-
Slow waves are seen on the affected side in transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients [7].
-
The power of delta waves is correlated with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [8].
-
Slow wave components are correlated with decreased N-acetylaspartate (NAA) on MR spectroscopy [9].
-
Slow wave activity during re-buildup in areas of impaired circulation in moyamoya disease is seen in deep cortical sulci [10, 11].
-
-
Unaffected side
-
-
2.
Evoked magnetic fields
-
SEF (somatosensory evoked fields)
-
In stroke cases, asymmetry of localization of equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) in N20m of the affected side [13], prolonged latency [14, 15], abnormal waveforms [16], and decreased [12, 17] or increased ECD strength [11, 15] are seen. This asymmetry is correlated with improvement of clinical symptoms [12, 18].
-
The SEF ECD component at N20m is correlated with the NIHSS [8].
-
In parallel with decreased CBF, N20m dipole moment decreases and P30m increases [19].
-
-
MEF (motor evoked fields)
-
AEF (auditory evoked fields)
-
The temporal lobe response on the affected side is decreased [22].
-
-
3.2 Functional Recovery, Plasticity, and Indices of Reorganization
-
1.
Spontaneous magnetic fields (slow waves)
-
Slow waves on the affected side decrease with improved circulation after surgical treatment [6, 23].
-
Normalization of slow waves leads to a clinical improvement in symptoms [12].
-
Revascularization improves CBF and decreases theta bands, but there are no changes in delta bands [23]. In another report, delta waves near the lesion did not change during follow-up, and there was no correlation with clinical symptoms [3].
-
In TIAs, normalization of slow waves from the somatosensory cortex may be an index of short-term functional recovery after stroke [24].
-
In cases of aphasia due to stroke, delta waves (1–4 Hz) were seen near the lesion, and a decrease of delta waves after speech therapy was associated with good outcomes [25].
-
Delta waves on the unaffected side and gamma waves on the affected side may be indices of functional recovery.
-
-
2.
Evoked magnetic fields
4 Results 2
Of the abovementioned 28 papers, 14 with high evidence levels, including measurement of CBF or comparisons with normal controls, were further reviewed. Table 11.1 describes their content in detail.
4.1 Target Diseases and Comparisons
Most papers discussed internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusion or stenosis. One paper dealt with TIAs, and one paper was about moyamoya disease. There were normal controls in 11 papers.
4.2 Analysis Methods
Spontaneous magnetic fields were measured in six studies, evoked cerebral magnetic fields were measured in six studies, and both spontaneous and evoked cerebral magnetic fields were measured in one study. Among papers dealing with evoked cerebral magnetic fields, four used median nerve stimulation, one used tactile finger stimulation [15], one used auditory stimulation [4], and two used motor-related magnetic fields [27, 28].
Most papers on evoked magnetic fields used a single equivalent current dipole (ECD) method, but one used a spatial filtering technique (synthetic aperture magnetometry, SAM) [28]. Measurement of spontaneous magnetic fields included analysis of the waveforms themselves, analysis of magnetic field distribution using ECDs, analysis using a spatial filtering technique (standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography, sLORETA) [23], and analysis using power spectral density (PSD) [4].
One paper showed the relation between direct current (DC)-MEG signal and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for a finger movement task [27].
4.3 Cerebrovascular Measurements
Six papers described measurement of CBF, including five that measured cerebrovascular reserve capacity. Three papers discussed areas of decreased cerebrovascular reserve (penumbra). They mainly described the correlation with areas of slow wave appearance and discussed postoperative improvement. Ohtomo and coworkers [6] demonstrated typical temporoparietal theta activity (TPTA) in ischemic lesion in Fig. 11.1 and the relation between cerebral circulation and TPHA in Fig. 11.2. Sakamoto and coworkers [23] showed the changes in slow wave activity between pre- and postsurgical anastomosis after stroke in Fig. 11.3.
5 General Remarks
Low-frequency activity often appears near ischemic foci and in an ischemic hemisphere, and these waves also tend to occur in the temporoparietal area [5]. In addition, with improved cerebral blood flow (CBF), slow waves, particularly theta band activity, usually disappear [6, 23]. However, this phenomenon is not necessarily seen in all cases, so using changes in slow waves as an objective index of a penumbra can be unreliable.
Many investigators have reported a decreased SEF N20m response to median nerve stimulation in an ischemic hemisphere, but it is difficult to determine whether this signifies complete ischemia or a penumbra.
MEG reflects activity in the sulcal cortex, whereas EEG also reflects activity in the sulcal and gyral cortex activity. On the other hand, MEG uses large number of channels (> 100 sensors on the whole head), so MEG can detect brain function over a wider area. Furthermore, its spatial resolution is much better than that of EEG. MEG directly detects magnetic fields because it is unaffected by the skin and bones and is, therefore, quantitatively superior to EEG. Moreover, MEG and MRI images can be fused, making it convenient for clinical application, such as neurosurgical navigation techniques.
MEG is a noninvasive technique to quantify neural activity, but it is not yet an established method for evaluating cerebral ischemia. The use of new analytical methods, including spatial filtering, not only measuring spontaneous magnetic fields but also objectively assessing neural activity when patients perform simple tasks [28], is a novel approach using cerebral magnetic fields to evaluate ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
6 Summary
-
1.
Slow waves appear on the affected side in patients with stroke.
-
2.
Slow waves are seen in areas of decreased blood perfusion (often the temporoparietal area) in patients with cerebrovascular occlusion.
-
3.
The first peak of the somatosensory evoked field (SEF) in the ischemic hemisphere may decrease, may disappear, or be abnormal.
7 Conclusion
This section examined trends in clinical research and reviewed the scientific evidence, based on a literature search, for the use of MEG in evaluating ischemic cerebrovascular disease. MEG could not absolutely evaluate brain plasticity and circulation. Although it is complete as an alternative device to other modalities, a few papers reported a relatively high level of evidence for using MEG in diagnosis and treatment planning. MEG may be superior to scalp EEG in assessing ischemic changes in neural function.
MEG may also be useful to objectively evaluate neurological function, other than from the perspective of cerebral blood flow and metabolism, in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
References
Jang SH. Recovery mechanisms of somatosensory function in stroke patients: implications of brain imaging studies. Neurosci Bull. 2013;29:366–72.
Zappasodi F, Tombini M, Milazzo D, et al. Delta dipole density and strength in acute monohemispheric stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2007;416:310–4.
Butz M, Gross J, Timmermann L, et al. Perilesional pathological oscillatory activity in the magnetoencephalogram of patients with cortical brain lesions. Neurosci Lett. 2004;355:93–6.
Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Pasqualetti P, et al. Rhythmic brain activity at rest from rolandic areas in acute mono-hemispheric stroke: a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage. 2005;28:72–83.
Seki S, Nakasato N, Ohtomo S, et al. Neuromagnetic measurement of unilateral temporo-parietal theta rhythm in patients with internal carotid artery occlusive disease. Neuroimage. 2005;25:502–10.
Ohtomo S, Nakasato N, Shimizu H, et al. Temporo-parietal theta activity correlates with misery perfusion in arterial occlusive disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1227–34.
Vieth J, Kober H, Weise E, et al. Functional 3D localization of cerebrovascular accidents by magnetoencephalography (MEG). Neurol Res. 1992;14:132–4.
Assenza G, Zappasodi F, Squitti R, et al. Neuronal functionality assessed by magnetoencephalography is related to oxidative stress system in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroimage. 2009;44:1267–73.
Kamada K, Saguer M, Moller M, et al. Functional and metabolic analysis of cerebral ischemia using magnetoencephalography and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:554–63.
Nakasato N, Kanno A, Tominaga T. Magnetoencephalography (MEG): its application to moyamoya disease. In: Buying-Kyu Cho, Tominaga T, editors. Moyamoya disease update. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2010. p. 220–4.
Qiao F, Kuroda S, Kamada K, et al. Source localization of the re-build up phenomenon in pediatric moyamoya disease-a dipole distribution analysis using MEG and SPECT. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:760–4.
Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Tombini M, et al. Brain plasticity in recovery from stroke: an MEG assessment. Neuroimage. 2006;32:1326–34.
Altamura C, Torquati K, Zappasodi F, et al. fMRI-vs-MEG evaluation of post-stroke interhemispheric asymmetries in primary sensorimotor hand areas. Exp Neurol. 2007;204:631–9.
Gallien P, Aghulon C, Durufle A, et al. Magnetoencephalography in stroke: a 1-year follow-up study. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10:373–82.
Rossini PM, Tecchio F, Pizzella V, et al. Interhemispheric differences of sensory hand areas after monohemispheric stroke: MEG/MRI integrative study. Neuroimage. 2001;14:474–85.
Forss N, Hietanen M, Salonen O, et al. Modified activation of somatosensory cortical network in patients with right-hemisphere stroke. Brain. 1999;122:1889–99.
Tsutada T, Ikeda H, Tsuyuguchi N, et al. Detecting functional asymmetries through the dipole moment of magnetoencephalography. J Neurol Sci. 2002;198:51–6.
Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Tombini M, et al. Interhemispheric asymmetry of primary hand representation and recovery after stroke: a MEG study. Neuroimage. 2007;36:1057–64.
Bundo M, Inao S, Nakamura A, et al. Changes of neural activity correlate with the severity of cortical ischemia in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002;33:61–6.
Kotani K, Kinomoto Y, Yamada M, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of movement-related fields in stroke patients. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;2004:63.
Forss N, Mustanoja S, Roiha K, Kirveskari E, Mäkelä JP, Salonen O, Tatlisumak T, Kaste M. Activation in parietal operculum parallels motor recovery in stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:534–41.
Toyoda K, Ibayashi S, Yamamoto T, et al. Auditory evoked neuromagnetic response in cerebrovascular diseases: a preliminary study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:777–84.
Sakamoto S, Tanaka H, Tsuyuguchi N, et al. Quantitative imaging of spontaneous neuromagnetic activity for assessing cerebral ischemia using sLORETA-qm. Neuroimage. 2010;49:488–97.
Stippich C, Kassubek J, Kober H, et al. Time course of focal slow wave activity in transient ischemic attacks and transient global amnesia as measured by magnetoencephalography. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3309–13.
Meinzer M, Elbert T, Wienbruch C, et al. Intensive language training enhances brain plasticity in chronic aphasia. BMC Biol. 2004;2:20.
Huang M, Davis LE, Aine C, et al. MEG response to median nerve stimulation correlates with recovery of sensory and motor function after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:820–33.
Leistner S, Sander-Thoemmes T, Wabnitz H, Moeller M, Wachs M, Curio G, Macdonald R, Trahms L, Mackert BM. Non-invasive simultaneous recording of neuronal and vascular signals in subacute ischemic stroke. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2011;56(2):85–90.
Oshino S, Kato A, Hirata M, et al. Ipsilateral motor-related hyperactivity in patients with cerebral occlusive vascular disease. Stroke. 2008;39:2769–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsuyuguchi, N. (2016). Cerebrovascular Diseases. In: Tobimatsu, S., Kakigi, R. (eds) Clinical Applications of Magnetoencephalography. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55729-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55729-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55728-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55729-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)