Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reaktion auf Online-Bildung während der Pandemie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht

  • 681 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Herausforderungen und Hindernisse, die durch den Übergang zu einer Online-Lernumgebung entstanden sind, haben zu einer Reihe von Reaktionen geführt, die ein neues Unterstützungssystem erforderten. Von den Kindern über die Lehrer bis hin zu den Eltern – alle haben einen emotionalen, sozialen oder physischen Umbruch erlebt, der sich auf ihre Akzeptanz auswirkte. Die Benutzerfreundlichkeit, die Zugänglichkeit und die Akzeptanz der Technologie haben die Endnutzer in hohem Maße beeinflusst, und diese Tatsache wird im folgenden Kapitel untersucht. Eine Analyse der individuellen Bewältigungsstile, der Motivation usw. im kleinen wie im großen Maßstab ergab Auswirkungen, die nicht nur unüberschaubar und kontraproduktiv, sondern auch unvermeidbar waren.

Die Manuskripte beschränken sich nicht nur auf die Kinder, sondern befassen sich auch mit den Erfahrungen, Analysen und Reaktionen von Eltern und Lehrern auf die Veränderungen, die das System mit sich bringt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Alberta Education (2020). Retrieved from https://www.alberta.ca/k-to-12-school-re-entry-2020-21-school-year.aspx.

  2. Alberta Education (2020). French Language Education in Alberta. Retrieved from https://www.alberta.ca/french-language-education-in-alberta.aspx#toc-0.

  3. Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D. (2020). Mental health and the COVID-19 crisis: The hopes and concerns for children as schools re-open. Interchange. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-020-09413-1.

  5. Ralston-Berg, P., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C., & Hixon, E. (2015). Students’ perceptions of online course quality: How do they measure up to the research? Internet Learning Journal, 4(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.18278/il.4.1.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lay, C. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 474–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, N. (2021). Establishing social presence for an engaging online teaching and learning experience. Internal Journal of TESOL Studies, 3(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.03.04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Czerkawski, B., & Lyman, E., III. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z.

  12. Remón, J., Sebastian, V., Romero, E., & Arauzo, J. (2017). Effect of using smartphones as clickers and tablets as digital whiteboards on students’ engagement and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1469787417707618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

  15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. (7th ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yilmaz, A. B. (2019). Distance and face-to-face students’ perceptions towards distance education: A comparative metaphorical study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 20(1), 1302–6488.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yelland, N. (2006). Shift to the future: Rethinking learning with new technologies in education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Doherty, D., Dromey, M., Lougheed, J., Hannigan, A., Last, J., & McGrath, D. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: An integrative review (report). BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Youn, M. H., Leon, J., & Lee, K. J. (2012). The infuence of maternal employment on children’s learning growth and the role of parental involvement. Early Childhood Development and Care, 182(9), 1227–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2017). E-learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China, (2020, February 12). 教育部办公厅、工业和信息化部办公厅印发通知部署中小学延期开学期间“停课不停学”有关工作. Retrieved July 13, 2020, from http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-02/12/content_5477795.htm.

  23. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. XinHua News, (2020, February 17). 教育部: 国家中小学网络云平台开通免费使用. Retrieved July 13, 2020, from http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-02/17/c_1125586475.htm.

  25. Kirzinger, A., Hamel, L., Munana, C., Kearney, A., & Brodie, M. (2020). KFF health tracking poll – late April 2020: Coronavirus, social distancing, and contact tracing – economic and mental health impacts. KFF. https://www.kff.org/report-section/kff-health-tracking-poll-late-april-2020-economic-and-mental-health-impacts-of-coronavirus/?utm_campaign=KFF-2020-polling-surveys&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=86917437&_hsenc=p2ANqtz%2D%2D89fbrxjVE6vIGvlQ_77kiaSBhSaYb_RinGOnY41WkARf-1FgKfiDDxHD1TvUK3EZ-PsGcFKOqPZOZumvA1tV1GJVkCA&_hsmi=86917437.

  26. Linnan, L., Arandia, G., Bateman, L. A., Vaughn, A., Smith, N., & Ward, D. (2017). The health and working conditions of women employed in child care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Institute of Medicine [IOM] & National Research Council [NRC]. (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth to age 8: A unifying foundation. The National Academies Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/19401.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoon, J. S. (2002). Teacher characteristics as predictors of teacher-student relationships: Stress, negative affect, and self-efficacy. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 30(5), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.5.485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zinsser, K. M., Christensen, C. G., & Torres, L. (2016). She’s supporting them; who’s supporting her? Preschool center-level social-emotional supports and teacher well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 59, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stec, M., Bauer, M., Hopgood, D., & Beery, T. (2018). Adaptation to a curriculum delivered via iPad: The challenge of being early adopters. Technology, Knowledge and Learning,23(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2018). Reprint of readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in Human Behavior,78, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Callaghan, R. (2018). Developing mobile teaching practice: A collaborative exploration process. Technology, Knowledge, & Learning, 23, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9319-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwok, P. W. (2014). The role of context in teachers’ concerns about the implementation of an innovative curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education,38, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2013). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. http://www.sedl.org/cbam/socq_manual_201410.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2016.

  35. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Partnership for 21st century learning. Retrieved from: http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, Indien

    Anamica Sinha

Authors
  1. Anamica Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, India

    Anamica Sinha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, A. (2023). Reaktion auf Online-Bildung während der Pandemie. In: Sinha, A. (eds) Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39608-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39609-1

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation