Skip to main content

Innovation mit Hilfe der Vielen

Crowdsourcing im Innovationsprozess

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovationsgesellschaft heute

Zusammenfassung

Als neuartige Form der Arbeitsteilung können externe Akteure durch Crowdsourcing in den Innovationsprozess eingebunden werden. Die Ausgestaltungsmöglichkeiten unterliegen dabei einer Dynamik, die vielfältige Fragestellungen und neuen Forschungsbedarf aufwirft. Ausgehend vom Open-Innovation-Prinzip kommt es damit zunehmend zu einem Paradigmenwechsel weg von der herstellerzentrierten hin zu kundenbezogener und kollaborativer Innovation, die in Anbetracht fallender Kommunikations- und Designkosten immer einfacher und flexibler anwendbar wird. Durch den Einsatz von Crowdsourcing eröffnen sich aber nicht nur Einsparungs-, sondern auch erhebliche Innovationspotenziale. Das wirft freilich verschiedene Fragen auf, die näherer Erforschung bedürfen. Diese betreffen unter anderem den Organisationsprozess der Innovation, die Eignung verschiedener Arten von Innovationsproblemstellungen sowie die Wertgenerierung und den Schutz des intellektuellen Eigentums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review 37 (3), 355-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2013). Value capture and crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Review 38 (3), 457-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science 22 (6), 1399-1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science 59 (1), 226-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, Ivo (2013). Open Innovation Communities – Absorptive Capacity und kollektive Ideenbewertung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J. (2013). Crowdsourcing: Useful for problem solving, but what about value capture? Academy of Management Review 38 (3), 455-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science 57 (5), 843-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. L. (2013). Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner. Havard Business Review 4, 60-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brügge, B., Harhoff, D., Picot, A., Creighton, O., Fiedler, M., & Henkel, J. (2004). Open-Source-Software: eine ökonomische und technische Analyse. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review 44 (4), 35-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1991). New product processes at leading industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management 20 (2), 137-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2012). Don’t bet on it. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21567382-intrade-retreats-american-regulators-dont-bet-it. Zugegriffen: 06.10.2014.

  • Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of product innovation management 21 (6), 401-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadiraju, U., Kawase, R., & Dietze, S. (2014). A taxonomy of microtasks on the web. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, Santiago, Chile, 1.-4.09.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature 75, 450-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R. C., & Schader, M. (2011). Managing the crowd: towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. In Proceedings of the 17 th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Detroit, Michigan, 4.-7.8.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35, 519-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32 (7), 791-805.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (1), 63-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 6, 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. W. (2014). How to measure anything: Finding the value of intangibles in business. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., & Horton, J. (2013). The future of crowd work. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, San Antonio, Texas, 23.02.2013. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupsch, P. U., Marr, R., & Picot, A. (1991). Innovationswirtschaft. In E. Heinen (Hrsg.), Industriebetriebslehre (S. 1069-1156). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. R., Garvin, D. A., & Lonstein, E. (2010). TopCoder (A): Developing software through crowdsourcing. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Case, Nr. 610-032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. R., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The Principles of Distributed Innovation. Innovations 2 (3), 97-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. R., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32 (6), 923-943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanxon, N. (2011). How the Oxford English Dictionary started out like Wikipedia. Wired 13.1.2011. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-01/13/the-oxford-english-wiktionary. Zugegriffen: 06.10.2014.

  • Malone T. W., Laubacher, R. J., & Dellarocas, C. (2009). Harnessing crowds: mapping the genome of collective intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R. J., & Johns, T. (2011). The age of hyperspecialization. Harvard Business Review 89 (7-8), 56-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, J. (2013). Scientists See Promise in Deep-Learning Process. New York Times 24.11.2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/24/science/scientists-see-advancesin-deep-learning-a-part-of-artificial-intelligence.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Zugegriffen: 06.10.2014.

  • Narula, P., Gutheim, P., Rolnitzky, D., Kulkarni, A., & Hartmann, B. (2011). MobileWorks: A Mobile Crowdsourcing Platform for Workers at the Bottom of the Pyramid. In Proceedings of the 3rd Human Computation Workshop, San Francisco, California, 8.08.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2009). What is web 2.0. Köln: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner G. (1998). Forecasting Markets: An Industrial Application: Part II. (Working Paper.) Wien: Technische Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A. (1990). Division of Labour and Responsibilities. In E. Grochla, E. Gaugler, & H. E. Büschgen (Hrsg.), Handbook of German Business Management (S. 745-752). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., & Fiedler, M. (2008). Open Source Software und proprietäre Software. Funktions- und Nachahmungsschutz oder Offenheit?. In O. Depenheuer & K. N. Pfeifer (Hrsg.), Geistiges Eigentum: Schutzrecht oder Ausbeutungstitel (S. 165-185). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., & Hopf, S. (2013). Grundformen des Crowdsourcing und ihre Bedeutung im Innovationsprozess. IM+io – Fachzeitschrift für Innovation, Organisation und Management 3, 24-32. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. (2008). Information, Organization and Management. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Interaktive Wertschöpfung und Open Innovation. In A. Picot & S. Döblin (Hrsg.), Innovationsführerschaft durch Open Innovation (S. 187-201). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R., & Chen, K. Y. (2002). Information aggregation mechanisms: Concept, design and implementation for a sales forecasting problem. (Social Science Working Paper 1131). Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, M., & Skiera, B. (2009). Sports forecasting: a comparison of the forecast accuracy of prediction markets, betting odds and tipsters. Journal of Forecasting 28 (1), 55-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. W. (2012). Open innovation in the eighteenth century: The longitude problem. Research-Technology Management 55 (4), 39-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2009). Die Weisheit der Vielen: Warum Gruppen klüger sind als Einzelne. Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villarroel, J. A. (2013). Strategic Crowdsourcing. In A. S. Huff, K. M. Möslein, & R. Reichwald (Hrsg.), Leading Open Innovation (S. 171-200). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2004). Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2), 107-126.

    Google Scholar 

Internetquellen

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Picot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Picot, A., Hopf, S. (2016). Innovation mit Hilfe der Vielen. In: Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H., Hutter, M. (eds) Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10873-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10874-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics