Zusammenfassung
Der soziologische Neo-Institutionalismus gehört in der Organisationsforschung zu den derzeit dominierenden Theorien. Diese Theorie hat mit ihren Begriffen und Konzepten viele empirische und theoretische Projekte der Organisationsforschung angetrieben. Trotzdem werden erhebliche Baustellen sichtbar, die es zu bearbeiten gilt. Dieser Beitrag stellt die grundlegenden Theoriebausteine kurz vor, greift aktuelle Weiterentwicklungen auf und identifiziert die Kernprobleme der Theorie auf drei analytischen Ebenen, der Mikro-, der Meso- und der Makroebene. Dabei wird deutlich, dass es diese Probleme konstruktiv anzugehen gilt, um die bislang ungenutzten Potentiale des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus freizulegen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: the signifi cance of partial organization. Organization Science, 18(1), 83–104.
Aldrich, H. E. (2011). Heroes, Villains, and Fools: Institutional Entrepreneurship, NOT Institutional Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(2), 1–6.
Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.
Beckert, J. (2010). How do fi elds change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–629.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of Ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Hrsg.), Translating Organizational Change (S. 13–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag.
Dacin, T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 43–56.
Davis, G. F. (2010). Do theories of organizations progress? Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 690–709.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Hrsg.), Institutional patterns and organizations. Culture and environment (S. 3–21). Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fi elds. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (S. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edelman, L. B., Uggen, C., & Erlanger, H. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance precedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 406–454.
Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–44.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fi elds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (S. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Hrsg.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional Entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Hrsg.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (S. 198–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hasse, R., & Krücken, G. (1999). Neo-Institutionalismus. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.
Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Problematizing Actors and Institutions in Institutional Work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62–66.
King, B. G., Felin, T., & Whetten, D. A. (2010). Finding the Organization in Organizational Theory: A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290–305.
Kirchner, S. (2012). Wer sind wir als Organisation? Organisationsidentität zwischen Neo- Institutionalismus und Pfadabhängigkeit (Campus Forschung). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag.
Kirchner, S. (2014). Organisationsidentität und Unsicherheit. In M. Apelt & K. Senge (Hrsg.), Organisation und Unsicherheit (S. 69–86). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Krücken, G., & Drori, G. S. (Hrsg.). (2009). World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of organization studies. Second Edition (S. 215–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organization. Cambridge; NY: Cambridge University Press.
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields – an Organizational History of the United- States Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333–363.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities. Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307.
Meier, F. (2011). Die Akteure des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus. In N. Lüdtke & H. Matsuzaki (Hrsg.), Akteur – Individuum – Subjekt. Fragen zu ‚Personalität‘ und ‚Sozialität‘ (S. 199–218). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Meier, F. (2012). Hybridization and the order of institutional orders. Conference Paper: 28th EGOS Colloquium: Design!? Helsinki, July 5–7, 2012.
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Meyer, J. W. (2005). Weltkultur: wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1994). Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account. In J. W. M. W. Richard Scott (Hrsg.), Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Indiviudalism (S. 9–27). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2005). Die Weltgesellschaft und der Nationalstaat. In J. W. Meyer (Hrsg.), Weltkultur. Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen (S. 85–132). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2006). Higher Education as an Institution. CDDRL Working Papers. Stanford: Stanford University. 57.
Meyer, R. E. (2008). New Sociology of Knowledge. Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current debates in Institutional Research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (S. 519–536). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (S. 183–203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Hrsg.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (S. 276–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). Expansion and Impact of the World Human Rights Regime. Longitudinal and Cross-National Analyses Over the Twentieth Century. Stanford University. Stanford: Stanford University. Abgerufen von www.stanford.edu/group/csw/hr_proposal2002.doc
Reay, T., & Hining, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351–384.
Reay, T., & Hining, C. R. (2009). Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication s.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Senge, K., & Hellmann, K.-U. (2006). Einführung in den Neo-Institutionalismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 801–843.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (S. 99–129). Los Angeles; London: Sage Publications.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walgenbach, P., & Meyer, R. E. (2008). Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag.
Weik, E. (2011). Institutional Entrepreneurship and Agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 466–481.
Wooten, M. E., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future of a Core Construct. In C. O. & R. S. Royston Greenwood (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (S. 130–147). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirchner, S., Krüger, A., Meier, F., Meyer, U. (2015). Wie geht es weiter mit dem soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus?. In: Apelt, M., Wilkesmann, U. (eds) Zur Zukunft der Organisationssoziologie. Organisationssoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07330-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07330-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07329-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07330-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)