Abstract
Der Einkauf bietet Unternehmen großes Potenzial, um relevante Wettbewerbsvorteile zu erzielen und Kosteneinsparungen erreichen zu können. Dieses Potenzial kann durch Kooperationen gesteigert werden. Vor allem bei kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen können durch Kooperationen im Einkauf nicht nur Kostenvorteile erzielt, sondern auch Nachteile durch die geringe Größe ausgeglichen werden. Im Lichte der Prinzipal‐Agenten‐Theorie delegiert ein Zulieferer (Prinzipal) im Bereich des Einkaufs Leistungen an einen Logistikdienstleister (Agent). Im Falle des kooperativen Einkaufs von logistischen Dienstleistungen besteht die Besonderheit darin, dass mehrere Einkäufer (Prinzipale) die Leistung eines Logistikdienstleisters (Agenten) in Anspruch nehmen. Für diesen Fall untersuchen wir mit Hilfe einer Fallstudie in der deutschen Automobilzuliefererindustrie, inwiefern sich die Prinzipale gegenseitig beeinflussen und wie sich der Umgang mit der Informationsasymmetrie zwischen den Prinzipalen sowie zwischen Prinzipal und Agent verhält.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Akerlof, G. A. (1970): The market for ‘Lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market for mechanism, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3), S. 488–500.
Bakker, E.; Walker, H.; Schotanus, F.; Harland, C. (2008): Choosing an organizational form: the case of collaborative procurement initiatives, in: International Journal of Procurement Management 1 (3), S. 297–317.
Bernheim, B. D.; Whinston, M. D. (1986): Common Agency, in: Econometrica 54 (4, S. 923–942.
Bergen, M.; Dutta, S.; Walker, O. C. (1992): Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories, in: Journal of Marketing 56 (3), S. 1–24.
Blackhurst, J. V.; Scheibe, K. P.; Johnson, D. J. (2008): Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38 (2), S. 143–165.
Bruhn, M.; Meffert, H. (2013): Dienstleistungsmarketing: Grundlagen – Konzepte – Methoden. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Cheng, S. K.; Kam, B. H. (2008): A conceptual framework for analysing risk in supply networks, in: Journal of Enterprise Information Management 22 (4), S. 345–360.
Choi, T. Y.; Kim, Y. (2008): Structural Embeddedness and Supplier Management: A Network Perspective, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (4), S. 5–13.
Choi, T. Y.; Wu, Z. (2009): Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 15 (4), S. 263–266.
Combs, J. G.; Ketchen, D. J. (1999): Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Performances: Toward a Reconciliation of Predictions from the Resourced‐based View and Organizational Economics, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 9, S. 867‐888.
Cruijssen, F., Borm, P., Fleuren, H., Hamers, H. (2010): Supplier‐initiated outsourcing: A methodology to exploit synergy in transportation, in: European Journal of Operational Research 207 (2), S. 763–774.
Dorger, M. (1999): Cooperation for Cost‐Effectiveness in Purchasing, in: New Directions for Higher Education 1999 (106), S. 67–78.
Doucette, W. R. (1997): Influences on Member Commitment to Group Purchasing Organizations, in: Journal of Business Research 40 (3), S. 183–189.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Agency theory: An assessment and review, in: Academy of Management Review 14 (1), S. 57–74.
Eßig, M. (1999): Cooperative Sourcing: Erklärung und Gestaltung horizontaler Beschaffungskooperationen in der Industrie. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Eßig, M. (2000): Purchasing Consortia as symbolic relationships: Developing the Concept of “Consortium Sourcing”, in: European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6 (1), S. 13–22.
Fayezi, S.; OʹLoughlin, A.; Zutshi, A. (2012): Agency theory and supply chain management: a structured literature review, in: Supply Chain Management: An international Journal 17 (5), S. 556–570.
Glock, C.; Hochrein, S. (2011): Purchasing Organization and Design: a literature review, in: BuR Business Research Journal 4 (2), S. 149–191.
Gomez‐Mejia, L. R.; Wiseman, R. M. (2007): Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (1), S. 81–88.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, in: American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), S. 481–510.
Hornibrook, S. (2007): Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management: Goals and Incentives in Supply Chain Organisations, in: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/11411/1/Web_Version.pdf
Hüttinger, L.; Schiele, H.; Veldman, J. (2012): The drivers of customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: A literature review, in: Industrial Marketing Management 41 (8), S. 1194–1205.
Jensen, M. C.; Meckling, W. H. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, in: Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), S. 305–360.
Johnson, P. F. (1999): The Pattern of Evolution in Public Sector Purchasing Consortia, in: International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 2 (1), S. 57–73.
Johnson, P. F.; Leenders, M. R.; McCue, C. (2003): A Comparison of Purchasing’s Organizational Roles and Responsibilities in the Public and Private Sector, in: Journal of Public Procurement 3 (1), S. 57–74.
Laing, A.; Cotton, S. (1997): Patterns of inter‐organizational purchasing: Evolution of consortia‐based purchasing amongst GP fundholders, in: European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 3 (2), S. 83–91.
Maloni, M.; Benton, W. C. (2000): Power Influences in the Supply Chain, in: Journal of Business Logistics 21 (1), S. 49–73.
McCue, C.; Prier, E. (2008): Using agency theory to model cooperative public purchasing, in: Journal of Public Procurement 8 (1), S. 45–70.
Mortensen, M. H. (2012): Understanding attractiveness in business relationships—A complete literature review, in: Industrial Marketing Management 41 (8), S. 1206–1218.
Mudambi, R.; Schründer, C. P.; Mongar, A. (2004): How Co‐operative is Co‐operative Purchasing in Smaller Firms? Evidence from UK Engineering SMEs, in: Long Range Planning 37 (1), S. 85–102.
Nollet, J.; Beaulieu, M. (2003): The development of group purchasing: an empirical study in the healthcare sector, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9 (1), S. 3–10.
Nollet, J.; Beaulieu, M. (2005): Should an organisation join a purchasing group?, in: Supply Chain Management: An international Journal 10 (1), S. 11–17.
Pauli, M.; Hellingrath, B.; Wagenitz, A.; Szekely, L. (2010): Logistische Lieferantenentwicklung in der Automobilindustrie, in: Bogaschewsky, R.;Eßig, M.;Lasch, R.;Stölzle, W. (Hrsg.): Supply Management Research – Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2010, Advanced Studies in Supply Management, Wiesbaden.
Pfohl, H.‐C.; Gareis, K. (2005): Supplier parks in the German automotive industry: A critical comparison with similar concepts, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 35 (5), S. 302–317.
Porter, M. E. (1998): Clusters and the new economics of competition, in: Harvard Business Review 76 (6), S. 77–90.
Pye, J.; Ball, D. (1999): Purchasing consortia: trends and activity in the UK, in: The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances 12 (1), S. 12–18.
Reeker, C.; Hellingrath, B.; Wagenitz, A. (2011): Bewertungsansatz zur ökologischen Gestaltung automobiler Logistiksysteme im Werksumfeld von Produktionsstandorten, in: Bogaschewsky, R.;Eßig, M.;Lasch, R.;Stölzle, W. (Hrsg.): Supply Management Research – Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2011, Advanced Studies in Supply Management, Wiesbaden.
Rossetti, C. L.; Choi, T. Y. (2008): Supply Management under High Goal Incongruence: An Empirical Examination of Disintermediation in the Aerospace Supply Chain, in: Decision Sciences 39 (3), S. 507–540.
Schotanus, F. (2005): Cooperative purchasing within the United Nations, in: IPSERA Conference Proceedings, Archamps, France, S. 961–973.
Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J. (2007): Developing a typology of organisational forms of cooperative purchasing, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 13 (1), S. 53–68.
Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J.; de Boer, L. (2008): Unfair allocation of gains under the Equal Price allocation method in purchasing groups, in: European Journal of Operational Research 187 (1), S. 162–176.
Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J.; de Boer, L. (2010): Critical success factors for managing purchasing groups, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 16 (1), S. 51–60.
Schotanus, F.; Bakker, E.; Walker, H.; Essig, M. (2011): Development of purchasing groups during their life cycle: from infancy to maturity, in: Public Administration Review 71 (2), S. 265–275.
Tella, E.; Virolainen, V.‐M. (2005): Motives behind purchasing consortia, in: International Journal of Production Economics 93–94, S. 161–168.
van der Valk, W.; Wynstra, F.; Axelsson, B. (2009): Effective buyer‐supplier interaction patterns in ongoing service exchange, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29 (8), S. 807–833.
van der Valk, W.; van Iwaarden, J. (2011): Monitoring in service triads consisting of buyers, subcontractors and end customers, in: Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 17 (3), S. 198–206.
Wei, C.‐M.; Chen, C.‐Y. (2008): An empirical study of purchasing strategy in automotive industry, in: Industrial Management & Data Systems 108 (7), S. 973–987.
Yin, R. K. (2009): Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4. Auflage, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
Zsidisin, G. A.; Ellram, L. M. (2003): An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk Management, in: The Journal of Supply Chain Management 39 (3), S. 15–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elbert, R., Franzke, T. (2014). Kooperativer Einkauf von logistischen Dienstleistungen im Liefernetzwerk der Automobilindustrie: Analyse der gemeinsamen Nutzung von Kapazitäten eines Logistikdienstleisters mittels der Prinzipal‐Agenten‐Theorie. In: Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06200-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06200-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06199-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06200-2
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)