Skip to main content

Kooperativer Einkauf von logistischen Dienstleistungen im Liefernetzwerk der Automobilindustrie: Analyse der gemeinsamen Nutzung von Kapazitäten eines Logistikdienstleisters mittels der Prinzipal‐Agenten‐Theorie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Management Research

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Supply Management ((ASSM))

  • 4995 Accesses

Abstract

Der Einkauf bietet Unternehmen großes Potenzial, um relevante Wettbewerbsvorteile zu erzielen und Kosteneinsparungen erreichen zu können. Dieses Potenzial kann durch Kooperationen gesteigert werden. Vor allem bei kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen können durch Kooperationen im Einkauf nicht nur Kostenvorteile erzielt, sondern auch Nachteile durch die geringe Größe ausgeglichen werden. Im Lichte der Prinzipal‐Agenten‐Theorie delegiert ein Zulieferer (Prinzipal) im Bereich des Einkaufs Leistungen an einen Logistikdienstleister (Agent). Im Falle des kooperativen Einkaufs von logistischen Dienstleistungen besteht die Besonderheit darin, dass mehrere Einkäufer (Prinzipale) die Leistung eines Logistikdienstleisters (Agenten) in Anspruch nehmen. Für diesen Fall untersuchen wir mit Hilfe einer Fallstudie in der deutschen Automobilzuliefererindustrie, inwiefern sich die Prinzipale gegenseitig beeinflussen und wie sich der Umgang mit der Informationsasymmetrie zwischen den Prinzipalen sowie zwischen Prinzipal und Agent verhält.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970): The market for ‘Lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market for mechanism, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3), S. 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, E.; Walker, H.; Schotanus, F.; Harland, C. (2008): Choosing an organizational form: the case of collaborative procurement initiatives, in: International Journal of Procurement Management 1 (3), S. 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D.; Whinston, M. D. (1986): Common Agency, in: Econometrica 54 (4, S. 923–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, M.; Dutta, S.; Walker, O. C. (1992): Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories, in: Journal of Marketing 56 (3), S. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, J. V.; Scheibe, K. P.; Johnson, D. J. (2008): Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38 (2), S. 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M.; Meffert, H. (2013): Dienstleistungsmarketing: Grundlagen – Konzepte – Methoden. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. K.; Kam, B. H. (2008): A conceptual framework for analysing risk in supply networks, in: Journal of Enterprise Information Management 22 (4), S. 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y.; Kim, Y. (2008): Structural Embeddedness and Supplier Management: A Network Perspective, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (4), S. 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y.; Wu, Z. (2009): Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 15 (4), S. 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J. G.; Ketchen, D. J. (1999): Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Performances: Toward a Reconciliation of Predictions from the Resourced‐based View and Organizational Economics, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 9, S. 867‐888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruijssen, F., Borm, P., Fleuren, H., Hamers, H. (2010): Supplier‐initiated outsourcing: A methodology to exploit synergy in transportation, in: European Journal of Operational Research 207 (2), S. 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorger, M. (1999): Cooperation for Cost‐Effectiveness in Purchasing, in: New Directions for Higher Education 1999 (106), S. 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette, W. R. (1997): Influences on Member Commitment to Group Purchasing Organizations, in: Journal of Business Research 40 (3), S. 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Agency theory: An assessment and review, in: Academy of Management Review 14 (1), S. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eßig, M. (1999): Cooperative Sourcing: Erklärung und Gestaltung horizontaler Beschaffungskooperationen in der Industrie. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eßig, M. (2000): Purchasing Consortia as symbolic relationships: Developing the Concept of “Consortium Sourcing”, in: European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6 (1), S. 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayezi, S.; OʹLoughlin, A.; Zutshi, A. (2012): Agency theory and supply chain management: a structured literature review, in: Supply Chain Management: An international Journal 17 (5), S. 556–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C.; Hochrein, S. (2011): Purchasing Organization and Design: a literature review, in: BuR Business Research Journal 4 (2), S. 149–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez‐Mejia, L. R.; Wiseman, R. M. (2007): Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (1), S. 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1985): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, in: American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), S. 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornibrook, S. (2007): Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management: Goals and Incentives in Supply Chain Organisations, in: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/11411/1/Web_Version.pdf

  • Hüttinger, L.; Schiele, H.; Veldman, J. (2012): The drivers of customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: A literature review, in: Industrial Marketing Management 41 (8), S. 1194–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C.; Meckling, W. H. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, in: Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), S. 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. F. (1999): The Pattern of Evolution in Public Sector Purchasing Consortia, in: International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 2 (1), S. 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. F.; Leenders, M. R.; McCue, C. (2003): A Comparison of Purchasing’s Organizational Roles and Responsibilities in the Public and Private Sector, in: Journal of Public Procurement 3 (1), S. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, A.; Cotton, S. (1997): Patterns of inter‐organizational purchasing: Evolution of consortia‐based purchasing amongst GP fundholders, in: European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 3 (2), S. 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M.; Benton, W. C. (2000): Power Influences in the Supply Chain, in: Journal of Business Logistics 21 (1), S. 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCue, C.; Prier, E. (2008): Using agency theory to model cooperative public purchasing, in: Journal of Public Procurement 8 (1), S. 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. H. (2012): Understanding attractiveness in business relationships—A complete literature review, in: Industrial Marketing Management 41 (8), S. 1206–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R.; Schründer, C. P.; Mongar, A. (2004): How Co‐operative is Co‐operative Purchasing in Smaller Firms? Evidence from UK Engineering SMEs, in: Long Range Planning 37 (1), S. 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollet, J.; Beaulieu, M. (2003): The development of group purchasing: an empirical study in the healthcare sector, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9 (1), S. 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollet, J.; Beaulieu, M. (2005): Should an organisation join a purchasing group?, in: Supply Chain Management: An international Journal 10 (1), S. 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, M.; Hellingrath, B.; Wagenitz, A.; Szekely, L. (2010): Logistische Lieferantenentwicklung in der Automobilindustrie, in: Bogaschewsky, R.;Eßig, M.;Lasch, R.;Stölzle, W. (Hrsg.): Supply Management Research – Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2010, Advanced Studies in Supply Management, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.‐C.; Gareis, K. (2005): Supplier parks in the German automotive industry: A critical comparison with similar concepts, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 35 (5), S. 302–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998): Clusters and the new economics of competition, in: Harvard Business Review 76 (6), S. 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, J.; Ball, D. (1999): Purchasing consortia: trends and activity in the UK, in: The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances 12 (1), S. 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeker, C.; Hellingrath, B.; Wagenitz, A. (2011): Bewertungsansatz zur ökologischen Gestaltung automobiler Logistiksysteme im Werksumfeld von Produktionsstandorten, in: Bogaschewsky, R.;Eßig, M.;Lasch, R.;Stölzle, W. (Hrsg.): Supply Management Research – Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2011, Advanced Studies in Supply Management, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, C. L.; Choi, T. Y. (2008): Supply Management under High Goal Incongruence: An Empirical Examination of Disintermediation in the Aerospace Supply Chain, in: Decision Sciences 39 (3), S. 507–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus, F. (2005): Cooperative purchasing within the United Nations, in: IPSERA Conference Proceedings, Archamps, France, S. 961–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J. (2007): Developing a typology of organisational forms of cooperative purchasing, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 13 (1), S. 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J.; de Boer, L. (2008): Unfair allocation of gains under the Equal Price allocation method in purchasing groups, in: European Journal of Operational Research 187 (1), S. 162–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus, F.; Telgen, J.; de Boer, L. (2010): Critical success factors for managing purchasing groups, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 16 (1), S. 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus, F.; Bakker, E.; Walker, H.; Essig, M. (2011): Development of purchasing groups during their life cycle: from infancy to maturity, in: Public Administration Review 71 (2), S. 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella, E.; Virolainen, V.‐M. (2005): Motives behind purchasing consortia, in: International Journal of Production Economics 93–94, S. 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, W.; Wynstra, F.; Axelsson, B. (2009): Effective buyer‐supplier interaction patterns in ongoing service exchange, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29 (8), S. 807–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, W.; van Iwaarden, J. (2011): Monitoring in service triads consisting of buyers, subcontractors and end customers, in: Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 17 (3), S. 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C.‐M.; Chen, C.‐Y. (2008): An empirical study of purchasing strategy in automotive industry, in: Industrial Management & Data Systems 108 (7), S. 973–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009): Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4. Auflage, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A.; Ellram, L. M. (2003): An Agency Theory Investigation of Supply Risk Management, in: The Journal of Supply Chain Management 39 (3), S. 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Elbert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elbert, R., Franzke, T. (2014). Kooperativer Einkauf von logistischen Dienstleistungen im Liefernetzwerk der Automobilindustrie: Analyse der gemeinsamen Nutzung von Kapazitäten eines Logistikdienstleisters mittels der Prinzipal‐Agenten‐Theorie. In: Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06200-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06200-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06199-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06200-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics