Skip to main content

Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination

  • Chapter
Automation of Reasoning

Part of the book series: Symbolic Computation ((1064))

Abstract

A proof procedure based on a theorem of Herbrand and utilizing the matching technique of Prawitz is presented. In general, Herbrand-type proof procedures proceed by generating ever increasing numbers of candidates for the truth-functionally contradictory statement the procedures seek. A trial is successful when some candidate is in fact a contradictory statement. In procedures to date the number of candidates developed before a contradictory statement is found (if one is found) varies roughly exponentially with the size of the contradictory statement. (“Size” might be measured by the number of clauses in the conjunctive normal form of the contradictory statement.) Although basically subject to the same rate of growth, the procedure introduced here attempts to drastically trim the number of candidates at an intermediate level of development. This is done by retaining beyond a certain level only candidates already “partially contradictory.” The major task usually is finding the partially contradictory sets. However, the number of candidate sets required to find these subsets of the contradictory set is generally much smaller than the number required to find the full contradictory set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chinlund, T., Davis, M., Hinman, P., AND McIlroy, M. D. Theorem-proving by matching. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, M. Eliminating the irrelevant from mechanical proofs. Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. XV (1963), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, J. A semi-decision procedure for the functional calculus. J. ACM 10 (1963), 1–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Prawitz, D. An improved proof procedure. Theoria 26 (1960), 102–139.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Quine, W. V. A proof procedure for quantification theory. J. Symbolic Logic 20 (1955), 141–149.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, J. A. A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. J. ACM 12 (1965), 23–41.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wos, L., Carson, D., AND Robinson, G. The unit preference strategy in theorem proving. Proc. AFIPS 1964 Fall Joint Comput. Conf., Vol. 26, Pt. II, pp. 615–621 ( Spartan Books, Washington, D. C. ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wos, L., D.Robinson, G., AND Carson, D. Efficiency and completeness of the set of support strategy in theorem proving. J. ACM 12 (1965), 536–541.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loveland, D.W. (1968). Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination. In: Siekmann, J.H., Wrightson, G. (eds) Automation of Reasoning. Symbolic Computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81955-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81955-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81957-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81955-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics