Abstract
A summary is given of the known compositions and properties for MTA-type products, both commercial and experimental. Comparisons are made of the phases, particle sizes, and other attributes such as setting time or radiopacity. MTA-type materials used for root canal sealers are included.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
8.1 Introduction
This chapter describes the dental products that contain or are based on tri- or dicalcium silicates. Resin-based products that contain these powders are included. For simplicity, these products are denoted at MTA-type materials because they rely on the hydration reactions in Eqs. 8.1 and 8.2.
Tricalcium silicate:
Dicalcium silicate:
Secondary or lesser hydration reactions occur involving the minor phases, but the strength and the release of calcium hydroxide for bioactivity arise from these two reactions. The key to the bioactivity of MTA-type products is the precipitation of hydroxyapatite when the calcium hydroxide reacts with phosphate ions in body fluids, as shown in Eq. 8.3.
Calcium silicate, CaSiO3 (wollastonite), is not part of this discussion because this compound does not react with water and hydrate. However, this distinction is not always clear in the literature. Calcium silicate was used in another experimental magnesium phosphate dental product [32, 79, 93]. The calcium silicate was not a hydraulic phase but a phase that reacted in situ contributing to bioactivity.
8.2 Commercial Products
From 1993 to 1998, Dr. Torabinejad of Loma Linda University (Loma Linda, CA, USA) distributed experimental samples of MTA from his laboratory to endodontists. Commercial introduction of MTA products began in 1998 by the Tulsa Dental Specialties division of Dentsply International with ProRoot® MTA. This product was introduced after two applications to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clearance of these indications: repair of pulpal exposures, apexification, root perforation, root-end filling, and management of internal resorption. A picture of this gray MTA product is shown in Fig. 8.1a. In 2008, the US FDA cleared additional indications of cavity liner, pulpotomies, obturation, and root canal sealer, for MTA-type products from Dentsply. In Korea, MTA-type products are used for replantation [36, 72], transplantation, file separation, and vertical cracks. MTA-type products are generally suitable for dental procedures that contact with pulpal or periapical tissues, as described in this chapter and others. The performance and the convenience of products for a procedure have varied, as can be gleaned in the following discussion.
Since the introduction of ProRoot MTA, a shorter setting time has been desired, so that the clinician can feel confident that the product has set before the procedure is finished, as is conventional for dental materials. Several products and many researchers have sought to achieve this goal, often by the addition of calcium chloride, a known accelerant for Portland cement setting even though calcium chloride is not necessarily the most effective salt for accelerating the set. The elimination of calcium sulfate is known to reduce setting time for Portland cement [68], and this approach has also been used by several manufacturers. Calcium sulfate is necessary in construction concrete pouring to avoid flash or “false” setting, as described in Chap. 1. In dentistry, flash setting is unimportant and may be beneficial as noted below.
Researchers and clinicians have reported that the ProRoot MTA product had poor handling characteristics and “looses consistency in the presence of excess liquid, even at the proportion recommended by the manufacturer,” creating a low viscosity, “soupy mix” [62]. Since 1998, many investigators and companies have developed alternatives that were less “sandy”, faster setting and less expensive.
The key characteristics for comparisons of MTA products are crystalline phases, particle-size distribution, setting time, handling adjuvants, radiopacifier, and resistance to washout. All of these characteristics contribute to the clinician’s ability to satisfactorily prepare and mix the material. Washout resistance is important for stable placement of the material, particularly for the products that have a long setting time. The evolution of the available products and supporting research is described here.
The first patented MTA was a blend of a particular Portland cement composition, which included about 5 % iron oxide, and was believed to be unique in its ability to “work” (private communication about US Patents 5,415,547 and 5,769,638). Dentsply fabricated the patented cement formula under controlled environmental conditions and created a finer powder than the original samples, with better bismuth oxide distribution. This product became ProRoot MTA. The color of the powder was dark gray, as shown in Fig. 8.1a. The powder was packaged in foil pouches and supplied with ampoules of water in the kit (Fig. 8.1a). In 2002, a “tooth-colored” (white) ProRoot MTA (US Patent 7,892,342) product superseded the gray ProRoot MTA. This product was very similar but contained less than 0.5 % iron, so that the cement was yellowish white in color. The bismuth oxide contributed the yellow cast. In many articles, the tooth-colored ProRoot MTA product is denoted as white ProRoot MTA (Fig. 8.1b). Market demand required the original gray-colored ProRoot MTA to be reintroduced, and it has been sporadically available since then. Some papers have proposed greater biocompatibility for the gray version [37, 78].
The Angelus company in Londrina, Brazil, founded by Dr. Roberto Q. M. Alcântara, commercialized a more affordable MTA product in 2001. This product was available in Brazil and now is available through Henry Schein distributors. The format of their gray and white Angelus products is bottles of powder and water in a vial, different from ProRoot MTA powder in 1 g pouches with water ampoules. Originally, commercial Portland cement was used to create MTA Angelus, a gray-colored powder with bismuth oxide, which was followed by MTA Bianco, a white Portland cement with bismuth oxide.
When evaluating products, researchers have often repeated the term “sandy” feel of MTA [64]. Coarse particles give this sensation and scratchy sound when a powder is mixed with water on a glass slab. Therefore, the particle-size distributions have been compared for several powders. The particle-size distribution of the experimental samples of MTA from Loma Linda University is shown in Fig. 8.2a, and this powder has a significant portion of particles coarser than 40 μm, hence the “sandy feel.” The material was coarser than ProRoot MTA [65] and had incompletely dispersed bismuth oxide which appeared as bright spots in radiographs. The particle-size distributions in Fig. 8.2b, c are for the Angelus company’s white and gray MTA powders. The median particle sizes are below 10 μm, but each powder contains many particles which are coarser than 40 μm, up to 100 μm. The line at 20 μm allows a comparison of the number of particles that are coarse. Figure 8.2d–f show the distributions of particle sizes in ProRoot (gray and white) and DiaRoot powders (DiaDent Group International, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada), which have significantly fewer coarse particles than the original MTA or the Angelus materials. Figure 8.3 has particle-size distributions for three newer materials, which are remarkably finer: Biodentine, EndoSequence sealer, and RetroMTA powders. None of these powders is “nano-sized.” Nano-sized particles are 1/1,000 of a micron and none of these materials is even submicron (1/10 of a micron).
Nano-sized particles are of interest because of the high surface-to-volume ratio versus micron-sized particles. The surface-to-volume ratio changes from less than 10 % for micron-sized particles to more than 50 % for nanoparticles, which is important because a higher surface-to-volume ratio can dramatically increase reactivity, such as hydration. Fumed or colloidal silica are nano-sized particles that are commonly added to many dental products. Such silica products may be a minor addition to some MTA products; however, no MTA product has been identified that is primarily composed of nanoparticles.
Calcium sulfate is used in construction uses of Portland cement to delay setting. Without calcium sulfate, the calcium aluminate phase of Portland cement quickly hydrates and causes initial setting by stiffening the cement, which is undesirable for bulk pouring of concrete. For MTA indications, faster setting is desired. The Angelus company has integrated the manufacture of the tricalcium silicate powders into their operations so that their MTA products are now made with fewer trace metal oxides and without calcium sulfate (private communication, 2013). The initial setting time of their products is reported to be only 10 min, by allowing the tricalcium aluminate phase to quickly hydrate [54]. Later, the Angelus Corporation developed a sealer containing MTA powder (MTA Fillapex®), which is described in the ensuing sealer section.
DiaRoot® from DiaDent® was introduced by 2007, and this material was manufactured without tricalcium aluminate; therefore, no calcium sulfate phase is needed to control the rapid hydration of the tricalcium silicate. Tantalite (Ta2O5) is used as the radiopaque powder, making this material very white, by comparisons to gray ProRoot MTA or tooth-colored (white) ProRoot MTA that contain bismuth oxide. DiaRoot was advertised as containing calcium phosphate monobasic, but no phosphate phase was detected with XRD (Table 8.1), indicating that the phosphate was either amorphous or was present at less than 1 %. The format of this product is very similar to ProRoot MTA with one gm sachets of powder and water ampoules shown in Fig. 8.4. Currently, this product is sold through Verio Dental Co. (Vancouver, Canada) from Innovative BioCeramix Inc. (IBC) (Vancouver, Canada).
The Brasseler Co. (Savannah, GA, USA) offers MTA-type products, under the trade name EndoSequence BC or Bioceramic. These products appear to be related to the DiaRoot and iRoot products, and IBC is believed to be the supplier/manufacturer. The Brasseler products are based on fine tricalcium silicate powders that do not contain alumina. The products are offered in four formats: powder for mixing with water, a paste, a putty, and a sealer (Fig. 8.5). The EndoSequence BC putty, paste, and sealer have the powder mixed with various carrier liquids that do not cause setting; hence, the liquid must be anhydrous. These paste/putty forms of the EndoSequence BC material do not require mixing before placement and they allow a clinician to choose a viscosity suitable for the indication or case. When placed, water must diffuse from the tissues into the paste, putty, or sealer to displace the carrier liquid and cause hydration/setting of the tricalcium silicate powder. The percentage of the ceramic powder in any of the products is not known, but is estimated as 60–80 % MTA-type powder. The fine powders and convenience as putty or paste are solutions to the criticisms of MTA being coarse and hard to place. The time for diffusion of water to cause setting will vary with the indication and location. Brasseler EndoSequence putty sets more slowly than ProRoot MTA [28], but the setting times for these materials are more than 24 h, therefore irrelevant for the procedure. In vitro testing shows that setting of the sealer takes more than 1 week [71]. However, the ability to place the putty and complete the procedure may outweigh other concerns.
Brasseler and IBC companies use the terms bioaggregate and bioceramic for their products. Bioaggregate has no technical meaning, but does imply the bioactivity that occurs when tri- and dicalcium silicates are placed in contact with tissue fluid. Bioceramic is a term used to refer any ceramic (nonmetallic and inorganic) material, including glass, in the body of suitable biocompatibility. Bioceramics are not limited to the Brasseler products, but include resorbable ceramics and inert ceramics such as alumina or zirconia used in dentistry and other medical devices.
Brasseler also manufactures EndoSequence BC gutta-percha points that contain the same tricalcium silicate powder used in their other tricalcium silicate products. This product is their approach to bonding the sealer to the gutta-percha and the dentin as a “monoblock” [94]. The use of MTA powder in gutta-percha has been patented (US 7,838,573).
Biodentine® (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) is a fast-setting tricalcium silicate product, which has the same indications as ProRoot MTA. The company has emphasized using the material to replace dentine lost to caries. Its use as a dentine replacement may not prevent leakage [22]. A composite resin should be placed over the Biodentine as the material will not be sufficiently stable when exposed to the oral cavity. Biodentine powder is packaged in unit doses of 0.75 g, more than is usually used for endodontic or vital pulp therapy indications (Fig. 8.6). The user manually adds the liquid to the powder’s capsule and the mixture is triturated. The water-based liquid, supplied in ampoules, contains a “plasticizer” (polycarboxylate) and calcium chloride to enhance the properties and speed the setting. Although advertised as “dentin in a capsule,” the Biodentine powder contains mostly tricalcium silicate (83 %) with 14 % calcium carbonate and 4 % zirconia (Table 8.1) and does not contain hydroxyapatite and collagen. Biodentine does not contain dentine and should not be confused with bone grafting material, which is hydroxyapatite. However, its fine powder and faster setting are improvements over the original MTA. The low amount of zirconia in Biodentine makes the material only as radiopaque as dentin. High radiopaque contrast is desired for dental materials, such as composite resins, which are also dentin replacements, for X-ray visibility. However, this product was stable to discoloration [95], unlike ProRoot MTA [9, 12, 59, 67, 70].
TheraCal™ LC (Bisco Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA) is the only commercial light-curing version of MTA to date and is indicated for pulpal tissue contact. This material contains less than 20 % MTA powder, a radiopacifier of barium zirconate (BaZrO3), and dimethacrylate resins. The product literature describes the MTA component as Type III Portland cement, which denotes a finer powder than Type I Portland cement. The particle size is less important for a premixed material that needs no spatulation prior to light curing. TheraCal has been tested and shown to release more calcium ions than Dycal® (Dentsply International, York, Pennsylvania, USA), a calcium hydroxide-based pulp-capping material [44]. Also the TheraCal product has higher radiopacity, lower solubility, and better bonding than Dycal, the current “gold standard” for pulp capping. TheraCal is not indicated for the endodontic indications for which MTA has become known and may not be suitable for such indications based on cytotoxicity studies [55].
New endodontic cement (NEC, AKA calcium-enriched mixture or CEM) has been introduced (BioniqueDent, Tehran, Iran) and contains calcium compounds not found in ProRoot MTA. The NEC material contains more calcia than MTA does by the addition of [8] calcium oxide, calcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, calcium silicate, calcium sulfate, calcium hydroxide, and calcium chloride. Over time, calcium oxide powder will form hydroxide and then carbonate in the container, to create more calcium carbonate. Asgary has not disclosed the presence of tri- or dicalcium silicates, nor a radiopaque agent in the literature; however, the material’s similar performance to MTA makes this material likely to be based on the familiar MTA phases of tri- and dicalcium silicate phases. NEC has been reported to be bioactive and have good handling and sealing [6] as a root-end filling material. Its film thickness was lower than ProRoot MTA’s and its flow was higher, indicative of a finer particle size than the ProRoot MTA, which has the same indications. A study with pulp capping in canines has shown equivalent results of MTA and NEC, and NEC’s superiority to calcium hydroxide-based IRM® [91]. A root-end filling study in canines was successful (after 60 days) versus MTA when apical lesions were induced [5]. Pulpotomies in humans showed similar success (about 75 %) for NEC and MTA [76] for apical development for as long as a 1-year follow-up. A second study in humans compared conventional root canal therapy to pulpotomies (with NEC) for postoperative pain and 6-month radiographic outcome. Significantly less pain occured in the first 7 days for pain and radiographic superiority [4].
Two manufacturers from Korea have introduced MTA products to the USA and elsewhere: OrthoMTA and RetroMTA (BioMTA, Daejeon, Korea), and Endocem MTA (Maruchi, Gangwon-do, Korea) shown in Fig. 8.7. OrthoMTA and RetroMTA products are fine powders, advertised as having an average particle size of 2.6 μm, although independent testing has shown that the powders have a median particle size of about 10 μm (Fig. 8.3c). The indications for OrthoMTA and RetroMTA overlap, although RetroMTA has more vital pulp indications. OrthoMTA is sold in (centrifuge vials) containing 0.2 g of powder. The user adds his/her own water to the powder in the vial and places the vial in a battery-powered centrifuge to spin for 20 s. Then the excess water is decanted and the retained powder is considered hydrated for dispensing. Special instruments are used for dispensing. Initial setting time is 3 min. and the final setting is about 6 h. The phases present are said to include tri- and dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, tetracalcium aluminoferrite, less than 1 % free calcia, and 3 % of amorphous phase. Its radiopaque component is bismuth oxide. The material is indicated for orthograde use.
RetroMTA has a different format from OrthoMTA. Sachets of 0.3 g of powder are packaged in a flat plastic container disk with separate ampoules of water, which are manually mixed by the user. This light gray tri- and dicalcium silicate powder has about 25 % zirconia, some tricalcium aluminate phase, calcium chloride, and silica (Table 8.1). It is advertised as containing calcium aluminozirconate for radiopacity, but this was not detected by X-ray diffraction. The RetroMTA brochure lists “lack of discoloration” as an attribute; discoloration has been attributed to bismuth oxide [23]. RetroMTA does not contain bismuth oxide, so the discoloration claim seems valid. The initial setting time of RetroMTA is said to be 1.5 min, which is likely caused by the calcium chloride.
Endocem MTA shown in Fig. 8.7c is advertised as setting in 3:15 min. Like the OrthoMTA, the powder is sold in a flip-top vial of the kind that is often used in centrifuging biological samples. The Endocem product literature states that zirconia is present, but bismuth oxide was identified in X-ray diffraction (Table 8.1). Endocem was the only product tested that contained only dicalcium silicate, with no tricalcium silicate for the hydraulic reaction. The setting was not tested independently; however, dicalcium silicate is slower setting than tricalcium silicate. About 40 % calcium carbonate was also identified, with minor amounts of calcium phosphate, crystalline silica, and magnesia. This excess calcium carbonate indicates that the material is pozzolanic.
Cerkamed PPH (Wojciech Pawlowski, Nisko, Poland) has introduced an MTA + product (Fig. 8.8), which is distinct from the product MTA Plus® described below. The MTA + product is distributed in small polymer bottles containing 0.3 g of powder with a separate vial of water. This white powder contained primarily tricalcium silicate (63 %) with silica, and about 9 % each of bismuth oxide and zirconia, and a small amount of an aluminate phase (Table 8.1) in X-ray diffraction.
Medcem GmbH (Weinfelden, CH) offers a Portland cement powder for use instead of formocresol [83]. However, this powder has no radiopaque material; therefore, its radiopacity is similar to dentin.
Two MTA Plus® products are available and both are tri/dicalcium silicate powders with bismuth oxide. The white version is sold outside the USA, and is manufactured by Prevest Denpro (Jammu, India); its phase composition is substantially identical to that of tooth-colored ProRoot MTA (Table 8.1). Grey MTA Plus is manufactured in the USA by Avalon Biomed Inc. (Bradenton, FL, USA). Both products include a powder and gel for mixing.
Both MTA Plus products are indicated for pulp and periapical tissue contact. This is the only MTA product that is indicated for the additional indication of a root canal sealer. The variety of indications from pulp-capping to root-end filling can be satisfied by varying the ratio of powder to gel to the desired consistency for the procedure. The benefit of the gel is the washout resistance, versus other MTA products mixed with water. The MTA Plus powders are finer than ProRoot MTA powder, as can be seen in the scanning electron micrographs of Fig. 8.9. The coarse particles of ProRoot MTA create the “sandy” feeling when mixing with water. The MTA Plus powder is packaged in a desiccant-lined bottle, which is more protective and convenient than sachets of other manufacturers against water absorption by the cement, and permits the clinician to use any amount of powder without waste. Several articles have been written about the properties of MTA Plus including remineralization, anti-washout, and use as a root canal sealer [25, 40, 69, 75, 84]. A product similar in appearance to the white-version of MTA Plus is marketed by Dentonics (Charlotte, NC, USA) as Masterdent® MTA.
In 2013, several European companies introduced MTA products that have 0.3 g “unit doses” in triturator capsules containing powder. When the capsules are squeezed to activate (like an amalgam capsule), a separate compartment with water is opened and the powder and water are triturated. Harvard Dental International’s (Hoppegarten, Germany) MTA, Micro-Mega (Besancon, France) MM-MTA™, S&C Polymer Silicon’s (Elmshorn, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany) MTA cement, and MTA Caps by Acteon (Merignac, France) all have unit-dose triturator capsules (Fig. 8.10). These capsules are sold in foil pouches, to protect the powder in the capsule from humidity. Ironically, the capsules also contain water for mixing. The water must be sufficiently segregated to avoid harming the powder during storage, or the shelf life will be impaired.
The MTA Caps powder was analyzed (Table 8.1) and found to contain tricalcium and dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, about 18 % calcium carbonate, and 31 % calcium tungstate (for radiopacity). A small amount of silica and calcium chloride hydrate is included, which presumably enhance handling and accelerate initial setting. MM-MTA is also said to have a “faster set time” (20 min), achieved by the addition of calcium carbonate.
Other products are close to marketing such as Trioxident (VladMiVa, Belgorod, Russia)’s NEX MTA (Tokyo, Japan) cement or Endo–Eze MTA by Ultradent (South Jordan, UT, USA). The Trioxident product is a powder–water system, with the powder sold in sachets. The powder has some coarse particle but appears to be a conventional MTA formula with bismuth oxide. The NEX MTA is a powder–liquid system and the powder is provided in sachets. The format of the Endo–Eze MTA is unknown.
The spectrum of formulas, packaging, properties, and colors is widening. Undoubtedly, more calcium silicate products will enter the marketplace in the coming years.
8.3 Experimental Products
In 2005–2010, experimental products from Dentsply were described in the literature: ProRoot MTA Advanced [79, 97] and ProRoot MTA sealer (AKA Generex A and B, respectively). The former had the usual periapical and pulpal contact indications; the latter was indicated only for root canal sealing. Although the results were favorable for sealing [57, 99] and bioactivity [99], these powder/gel products have not been commercially introduced. The experimental Dentsply products were disclosed as being more radiopaque and having improved handling compared to ProRoot MTA. Each product had a unique liquid for use for its indications.
Another experimental product was Viscosity Enhanced Root Repair Material (VERRM) [30] which contained Portland cement, bismuth oxide, and “other compounds” such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, natural gums, cellulose, or clay dispersions to improve the handling versus MTA. Cellulose and calcium chloride have also been tested by others [10] for mixing with MTA products.
Camilleri has been a forerunner in experimental materials by testing gray and white Portland cements, with the addition of an industrial plasticizer. The plasticizer improved the handling (workability) and did not reduce biocompatibility [26]. The absence of calcium sulfate in a tricalcium silicate accelerated setting [18]. She did pioneering work [19] in investigating the suitability of MTA products for use as a sealer, when MTA-type materials were mixed with Glenium® (Degussa, Manchester, UK), a polycarboxylic ether polymer, to attempt to meet the requirements of ISO 6876 for root canal sealers.
Ding has researched sol–gel–processed dicalcium silicate cement for endodontics and possibly bone cement. He used mixtures of the cement with sodium phosphate dibasic (Na2HPO4) as an accelerant [34]. Recently he reported on ß-Ca2SiO4 powder, combined with gelatin and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) solution in a liquid phase [29]. Research has also been performed by his group regarding incorporating zinc oxide, magnesia, and iron oxide additions to tricalcium silicate powders [63] for improved properties.
Gandolfi and Prati have tested Portland cement-based materials (denoted as TC materials) using variations that include montmorillonite (a type of inorganic clay that is a layered phyllosilicate), calcium chloride, and fluoride, sometimes mixed with Articaine®. Their MTA formulas were as biocompatible as the ProRoot MTA product and more biocompatible than AH Plus® (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) root canal sealer [42]. Other experimental formulas, also denoted as TC, used another white Portland cement and showed the bioactivity of the experimental materials [48], although the pushout strengths of their experimental formulas were not as high as for ProRoot MTA [61]. A promising light-curable formula has also been reported [47].
An experimental material containing barium sulfate, Portland cement, and undisclosed emulsifiers has been investigated. Like other Portland cement products, implantation was equal to MTA (Angelus) [51].
Asgary, the inventor of NEC, mentioned other materials that were being developed for MTA-type applications, but information on these experimental materials was not available: Root MTA (Salamifar in Iran) ([41]), Abyek cement (Abyek company in Iran), Melcann cement or Melcann white cement (Melcann cement in Australia), and Saveh white cement (Saveh company in Iran) [7]. However, the latter three cements seem to reference cement brands, not dental companies or brands.
An experimental root canal sealer has been reported in the literature, MTAS [96], having a composition of 80 % white Portland cement with zirconia for radiopacity. Its liquid contains water, calcium chloride, and a “resinous vehicle” [81].
Many studies have used commercial Portland cements as a substitute for MTA products on the market and as the basis for experimental products [3, 7, 13, 14, 24, 31, 33, 35, 43, 45, 50, 58, 60–62, 65, 66, 74, 82, 86–88, 90, 92, 100]. Often, the focus has been on biocompatibility of the Portland cements, usually cell culture studies, versus ProRoot MTA. Other studies have measured the arsenic or other trace metal oxides in Portland cements versus commercial products. The total arsenic oxide content of the noncommercial preproduction MTA powder was 5 ppm (unpublished data, 2007), determined by inductively coupled plasma technique (ICP), although the leachable content would be less. Researchers disagree on methods for arsenic determinations and the reports of the amounts in commercial cements or MTA products have varied, ranging from <1 ppm to over 50 ppm. The potential arsenic content has been discussed [80], as a possible contaminant in commercial Portland cements designed for construction, versus medical devices. The International Standards Organization (ISO) 9917 document limits the leachable arsenic content to 2 ppm for water-based dental cements. No researcher has reported a commercial construction grade Portland cement that meets all the important attributes of sealing, fine particle size, freedom from lead and arsenic, and conformance to ISO 6876 standards such as insolubility and radiopacity.
8.4 Alternative Formulas
Portland (calcium silicate) cement has been combined with calcium aluminate cement for some tests as a dental material. Monocalcium aluminate cements should not be confused with the tricalcium aluminate phase of Portland cements. The monocalcium aluminates, hereafter referred to as calcium aluminate cement, are commercially used for high-temperature linings of furnaces and as a coating in some sewer systems. The calcium aluminate cements have the advantages of higher early strength and greater resistance to acid than calcium silicate (Portland-type) cements; however, the calcium aluminate cements undergo “conversion,” a reversible hydration reaction at environmental temperatures, making them unsound for massive construction. The main setting reaction calcium aluminate cements at body temperature is given in Eq. 8.4, which is a dissolution–precipitation reaction.
Calcium aluminate cements have higher strength than the minor phase of tricalcium aluminate, present in most Portland cements as described earlier. Furthermore, some reactivity of the monocalcium aluminate occurs with silica, which seems to contribute to the Quick-Set material described below.
Capasio, now known as Quick-Set, is an experimental material that has been investigated as an MTA improvement. The Quick-Set system includes a fine calcium aluminosilicate powder and a water-based gel. This material is quick-setting, washout resistant, and acid resistant [97]. Quick-Set is chemically distinct from MTA because it does not contain tri- or dicalcium silicate. This fine aluminosilicate powder has been shown to penetrate dentinal tubules [11] and to biocompatible [38, 98]. EndoBinder material (Binderware, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) is a calcium aluminate product, which does not contain silica but is a water-setting hydraulic material. EndoBinder has less MMP-2 activity than other hydraulic dental materials [89]. Other properties of Endobinder have been shown to be favorable [1, 2, 49]. The monocalcium aluminate in EndoBinder and in Quick-Set powders is known to be more acid resistant, which is beneficial for placing the cement in infected conditions or for the placement of a composite, which requires acid etching, over the cement.
Camilleri also tested combinations of calcium aluminate, calcium silicate cements, and fluoride-containing silicate cements with calcium sulfate additions reporting adequate in vitro properties [15, 17], acceptable biocompatibility [16], and successful reduction of the initial and final setting times. While some companies have removed calcium sulfate, Camilleri added about 8 % CaSO4 and a plasticizer to achieve desirable test results. Dye leakage was noted with these experimental materials [20], but bacteria may be killed by the high pH of the interstitial liquid in the cement, preventing harm from leakage. Attack by acid on these predominantly tricalcium silicate materials did occur [21].
8.5 Root Canal Sealers
MTA-based root canal sealers are intriguing because of the biocompatibility of MTA and its osteogenic potential for accidental extrusion beyond the apex. The American Dental Association (ADA) 57 and ISO 6876 requirements for root canal sealers are useful for evaluating such root canal sealer products. These two documents’ requirements and methods are identical with two exceptions. The ISO 6876 standard uses a flow and working time sample of 0.05 ml versus 0.5 ml for the ADA 57 standard. The second difference is the ISO 6876 version has no requirement regarding dimensional stability, whereas the ADA 57 standard requires the linear dimensional stability over 30 days to be less than 1 % shrinkage and less than 0.1 % expansion (1 % <∆L <+ 0.1 %.). Data from the literature have been gathered in Table 8.2
for several materials discussed above. The requirements provide a basis for comparisons; however, the standards are not designed to compare clinical handling, sealing of the canal, or clinical efficacy. The following discussion of MTA-containing sealers refers to the methods of these standards.
The EndoSequence BC sealer of Brasseler is a single paste sealer that contains a very fine tricalcium silicate powder and an unidentified liquid medium. The fill percentage of powder is also undisclosed. Within the tooth, water must interact with the powder, displace the medium, and cause hydration and setting of the tricalcium silicate around the gutta-percha. The sealer has been reported to meet the ISO 6876 requirements [27, 101], as shown in Table 8.2. When used with EndoSequence BC gutta-percha, some hydration and bonding of the tricalcium silicate in the gutta-percha can be expected with the sealer. However, the benefits of this interaction have not been published, such as, evidence that hydration does bond the sealer to the gutta-percha. The EndoSequence BC sealer’s setting time is quite long (>24 h), depending on the testing methodology, but zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) sealers also have a long setting time.
MTA Plus products are indicated for use as a root canal sealer. The MTA Plus powders are very similar in composition to the original MTA, but the powder is finer and a gel is included, not water. The finer powder and gel allows the small film thickness to be achieved (<50 μm is required) for a root canal sealer, which was not possible with ProRoot MTA (Table 8.2), or in general, for construction grade Portland cements. Setting time is less than 10 h in vivo, using the ISO 6876 test method, when mixed to the consistency needed for a sealer.
MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) is a two-paste root canal sealer that contains MTA powder in a salicylate resin (Fig. 8.11). The 1,2 butylene glycol disalicylate resin creates a 35 min working time and a 2:10 h setting time; however, the sealer contains only 13.2 % MTA powder. Studies are needed to find out if the MTA will hydrate within the resin and if bioactivity occurs in this format. If not, then the sealer’s resin carrier is more similar to the pulp-capping material called Dycal, without the calcium hydroxide. Studies have shown Fillapex to be antibacterial but also to be more soluble than AH Plus sealer [39].
Retreatability has been an issue regarding MTA-based sealers, because of the challenge of removing the old sealer before retreatment. Two studies have shown that complete removal of the EndoSequence sealer, Fillapex, and MTA Plus sealers is not possible [56, 75]. No study has shown that retreatment will be more or less important for these sealers.
Endoseal by Maruchi is an MTA powder that is mixed with water for use with gutta-percha cones. This material is provided in a plastic vial within a foil pouch for unit doses of 0.3 g. The material is said to contain zirconia and no heavy metals.
Endo CPM material (EGEO SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina), shown in Fig. 8.12, is a powder–liquid system for use as a root canal sealer. The composition is reported to be 50 % MTA (SiO2, K2O, Al2O3, SO3, CaO), 7 % SiO2, 10 % CaCO3, 10 % Bi2O3, and 10 % BaSO4, with a liquid containing 1 % propylene glycol alginate, 1 % propylene glycol, 1 % sodium citrate, and 10 % calcium chloride in water [52]. Small differences from the stated formula were found by X-ray diffraction as presented in Table 8.2. Bacterial leakage for this sealer was reported to be worse [77] and antibacterial action was less than AH 26 sealer (Dentsply International, Konstanz, Germany) [73]. However, implantation studies show equivalence to MTA and superiority to AH Plus [85] and bioactivity [52].
Tech Biosealer products from Isasan SRL (Rovello Porro (CO; Italy)) seem to be based on the compositions of Gandolfi et al. [46, 53], where a phyllosilicate is added to improve handling of the tricalcium silicate powder. The powder is a mixture of white CEM (presumably Portland cement), CaSO4, CaCl2, Bi2O3, “water-swelling silicate” (montmorillonite), and NaF. The liquid contains Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). The cement is milled and heat-treated before packaging into kits with capsules containing 0.27 g of powder, with one vial of liquid containing 5 cm3 of DPBS. The product is offered in three formats: root-end, pulp capping, endodontic, and apexification. The four product differentiations could not be discerned as to which was best for root canal sealing.
8.6 Summary
A wide variety of commercial MTA-type materials are now available for pulp-capping, endodontic treatment, and root canal sealing, many having improved characteristics and wider indications that the original MTA products. Several products have finer particles, less “sandy” handling, and faster initial or final setting. Adjuvants are incorporated in some products for faster setting achieved by the addition of fluoride, the elimination of calcium sulfate, or an increase in tricalcium aluminate phase. Additions to the mixing liquid to speed setting include calcium chloride, polycarboxylate, or various organic resins. Several new products have enhanced calcium content compared to the original MTA, although the biological benefits of excess calcium oxide or carbonate have not been substantiated. A gel system has been developed (MTA Plus) to reduce washout resistance and speed setting. Even a light-cured MTA-containing material is marketed. Depending on the product, the radiopacity and the radiopacity agent may vary. The product formats include bulk powder/liquid containers (1–8 g), unit doses as small as 0.27 g in triturator capsules, or unit doses in centrifuge tubes. All-purpose materials, for use for all endodontic and pulpal indications, including root canal sealer, are also available.
No studies have shown superior biocompatibility over the original MTA formula. Portland cements normally used for construction have not been shown to be biologically inferior, despite their slow setting, impurities, low radiopacity, and coarseness. The bioactivity of tri- and dicalcium silicate powders, by the release of calcium hydroxide during setting, dominate the biological response. The resulting layer of HA masks the underlying cement, reducing the opportunity for leaching of any impurity into the tissues.
Major advances have been made to create more convenient MTA products that have good handling, faster setting, good radiopacity, washout resistance, and resistance to discoloration. However, no product has definitively improved on the biocompatibility or bioactivity of the original formula.
- Alumina :
-
Aluminum oxide Al2O3.
- Amorphous :
-
Lacking a crystalline structure identifiable by x-ray diffraction.
- Ceramic :
-
Inorganic, nonmetallic material, usually an oxide, but includes other compounds such as sulfates, carbonates, sulfides, or carbides.
- Bioceramic :
-
Any ceramic material that is used in the body; includes all MTA products.
- Calcia :
-
Calcium oxide, usually created by calcining (heating) calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to release carbon dioxide.
- Calcium aluminate cement :
-
A high-temperature (refractory) cement based on hydration of CaO·Al2O3
- Calcium hydroxide :
-
Portlandite, a reaction phase of hydrating tri- or dicalcium silicates; Ca(OH)2 or CH in cement notation.
- Calcium silicate :
-
CaSiO3, AKA wollastonite, a non-hydraulic compound of calcium oxide and silica.
- Calcium sulfate :
-
CaSO4, which may be present as anhydrous, hemihydrate, and dihydrate.
- Cement notation :
-
Abbreviations used for the phases of Portland cement for brevity and convenience.
- Clinker :
-
The cement product, usually a particle larger than 1 cm, that exits from a rotary kiln.
- Component :
-
(1) The materials that are used before firing a ceramic. For example, calcium carbonate is used to make Portland cement; or (2) the compound in a phase diagram to show the interrelations of several components usually over a range of temperatures.
- Dicalcium silicate :
-
Belite, the second most common phase in Portland cement. Ca2SiO4, also written as 2CaO·SiO2 or C2S in cement chemist notation.
- Ettringite :
-
A hydrated calcium aluminum sulfate mineral with formula (CaO)6(Al2O3)(SO3)3·32H2O or (CaO)3(Al2O3)(CaSO4)3·32H2O, formed by reaction of tricalcium aluminate with calcium sulfate.
- Ferrite :
-
Tetracalcium aluminoferrite; 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3, also shown in cement notation as C4AF.
- Glass :
-
An amorphous (noncrystalline) ceramic, usually based on silica but can also be based on boron oxide or phosphorous oxide as the main components.
- Hydraulic material :
-
A powdered ceramic material that hardens (sets) when mixed with water.
- Hydroxyapatite :
-
The mineral component of the bone having the formula Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. Carbonated calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite is the main mineral of dental enamel and dentin.
- Kiln/rotary kiln :
-
A furnace capable for high temperature (higher than 1,200 °C) for firing materials such as Portland cement. A rotary kiln rotates the feedstock (usually balls of 1–3 in. in diameter) to economically, uniformly, and continuously fire (react and sinter) Portland cement.
- Minerals :
-
Compounds that are mined which may vary in purity depending on the source. Some deposits of minerals are one nearly pure phase, or they may be a combination of phases or purities. For instance, calcium carbonate sources can be very pure, white calcium carbonate, with less than 1 % or any other carbonate, such as strontium carbonate or magnesium carbonate. Other mines may have calcium carbonate mineral interspersed with iron oxide; such raw material sources will create a gray-colored Portland cement by the presence of iron.
- Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) :
-
An inorganic powder composed primarily of tricalcium and dicalcium silicates, usually with a radiopacifier and other minor ceramic phases.
- Nano-sized :
-
Particles that are close to a nanometer (nm) in size, which is 1/1,000 of a micron (μm).
- Phase :
-
A chemical compound that is present in a material, uniquely identifiable by X-ray diffraction.
- Pozzolan, pozzolanic :
-
(1) A Portland cement that has free silica added which reacts with calcium hydroxide released from the Portland cement during the hydration of its calcium silicate phases, or (2) Roman-era cement that relied on the reaction of calcium oxide, made by heating calcium carbonate, with silica to form calcium silicate hydrates, via the reaction below, which differs from the Portland cement hydration (Eq. 8.5):
$$ \begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Ca}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_2+{\mathrm{H}}_4{\mathrm{SiO}}_4\to {\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{H}}_2{{\mathrm{SiO}}_4}^{2-}+2{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\\ {}\to {\mathrm{Ca}\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{SiO}}_4\cdot 2{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\end{array} $$(8.5) - Portland cement :
-
A range of compositions based on reacting calcia, silica, and alumina to form powders containing tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate, usually with some minor phases. Calcium sulfate is commonly added to the silicate powders to control and slow the setting time for use in large scale constructions. Type I and Type III are the common categories for construction uses of Portland cement. The properties are similar, but the Type III product is a finer powder.
- Silica :
-
Silicon dioxide, SiO2, usually amorphous, but the quartz form is crystalline.
- Sintering :
-
A heating process for powders that reduces the overall surface area by various atomic movements, to cause a powder to form a solid mass, and usually reduces porosity. For Portland cement, the sintering process is concomitant with the reaction process to create the calcium silicate phases from the raw materials in the kiln.
- Tricalcium aluminate :
-
Ca3Al2O6, also written as 3CaO·Al2O3, or C3A in cement notation. A minor phase in most Portland cements.
- Tricalcium silicate :
-
Ca3SiO5, also written as 3CaO·SiO2 or as C3S in cement chemist notation. The main component of Portland cement.
- Zirconia :
-
Zirconium oxide, ZrO2.
- Ziron :
-
Zirconium silicate, ZrSiO3
- Zirconates :
-
Compounds that combine another oxide with zirconia into a unique compound such as CaZrO3.
- Tungstate :
-
Compounds that combine another oxide with tungsten into a unique compound such as CaWO4, which is commonly used for radiopacity in dental materials.
References
Aguilar FG, Garcia Lda F, Rossetto HL, Pardini LC, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Radiopacity evaluation of calcium aluminate cement containing different radiopacifying agents. J Endod. 2011;37(1):67–71.
Aguilar FG, Roberti Garcia LF, Panzeri Pires-de-Souza FC. Biocompatibility of new calcium aluminate cement (EndoBinder). J Endod. 2012;38(3):367–71.
Appelbaum KS, Stewart JT, Hartwell GR. Effect of sodium fluorosilicate on the properties of portland cement. J Endod. 2012;38(7):1001–3.
Asgary S, Eghbal MJ. A clinical trial of pulpotomy vs. root canal therapy of mature molars. J Dent Res. 2010;89(10):1080–5.
Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Ehsani S. Periradicular regeneration after endodontic surgery with calcium-enriched mixture cement in dogs. J Endod. 2010;36(5):837–41.
Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M. Sealing ability of a novel endodontic cement as a root-end filling material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;87(3):706–9.
Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J, Kheirieh S, Brink F. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate's composition with Portland cements and a new endodontic cement. J Endod. 2009;35(2):243–50.
Asgary S, Shahabi S, Jafarzadeh T, Amini S, Kheirieh S. The properties of a new endodontic material. J Endod. 2008;34(8):990–3.
Belobrov I, Parashos P. Treatment of tooth discoloration after the use of white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2011;37(7):1017–20.
Ber B, Hatton J, Stewart G. Chemical modification of ProRoot MTA to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod. 2007;33(10):1231–4.
Bird DC, Komabayashi T, Guo L, Opperman LA, Spears R. In vitro evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and biomineralization ability of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1093–6.
Bortoluzzi EA, Araujo GS, Guerreiro Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Marginal gingiva discoloration by gray MTA: a case report. J Endod. 2007;33(3):325–7.
Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod. 2009;35(4):550–4.
Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end filling. J Endod. 2006;32(9):897–900.
Camilleri J. Characterization and chemical activity of Portland cement and two experimental cements with potential for use in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2008;41(9):791–9.
Camilleri J. The biocompatibility of modified experimental Portland cement with potential for use in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2008;41:1107–14.
Camilleri J. Modification of MTA. Physical and mechanical properties. Int Endod J. 2008;41:843–9.
Camilleri J. The physical properties of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2008;41(2):151–7.
Camilleri J. Evaluation of selected properties of mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1412–7.
Camilleri J. The sealing ability of modified experimental Portland cements with potential use in dentistry. Adv Cement Res. 2010;22:115–21.
Camilleri J. Characterization of modified calcium-silicate cements exposed to acidic environment. Mater Charact. 2011;62(1):70–5.
Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J Dent. 2013;41(7):600–10.
Camilleri J. Color stability of white mineral trioxide aggregate in contact with hypochlorite solution. J Endod. 2014;40(3):436–40.
Camilleri J, Cutajar A, Mallia B. Hydration characteristics of zirconium oxide replaced Portland cement for use as a root-end filling material. Dent Mater. 2011;27(8):845–54.
Camilleri J, Formosa L, Damidot D. The setting characteristics of MTA Plus in different environmental conditions. Int Endod J. 2013;46(9):831–40.
Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Di Silvio L, Pitt Ford TR. The constitution and biocompatibility of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2005;38:834–42.
Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MA, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012;38(6):842–5.
Charland T, Hartwell GR, Hirschberg C, Patel R. An evaluation of setting time of mineral trioxide aggregate and EndoSequence root repair material in the presence of human blood and minimal essential media. J Endod. 2013;39(8):1071–2.
Chen CC, Wang WC, Ding SJ. In vitro physiochemical properties of a biomimetic gelatin/chitosan oligosaccharide/calcium silicate cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;95(2):456–65.
Chng H, Islam I, Yap A, Tong Y, Koh E. Properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 2005;31(9):665–8.
Coomaraswamy K, Lumley P, Hofmann M. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifier content on the material properties of an endodontic Portland cement–based (MTA-like) system. J Endod. 2007;33(3):295–8.
De Souza ET, Nunes Tameirao MD, Roter JM, De Assis JT, De Almeida Neves A, De-Deus GA. Tridimensional quantitative porosity characterization of three set calcium silicate-based repair cements for endodontic use. Microsc Res Tech. 2013;76(10):1093–8.
De-Deus G, de Souza MCB, Sergio Fidel RA, Fidel SR, de Campos RC, Luna AS. Negligible expression of arsenic in some commercially available brands of Portland cement and mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2009;35(6):887–90.
Ding SJ, Kao CT, Shie MY, Hung Jr C, Huang TH. The physical and cytological properties of white MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 as an accelerant. J Endod. 2008;34(6):748–51.
Dreger LA, Felippe WT, Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe GS, Bortoluzzi EA, Felippe MC. Mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement promote biomineralization in vivo. J Endod. 2012;38(3):324–9.
Dyanne de Souza Gomes W. MTA and calcium hydroxide as root canal filling materials in delayed replantation of monkey’s teeth. Proceedings from the 17th World Congress on Dental Traumatology: 19–22 Sept 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Braz J Dent Traumatol. 2012;(Special issue), p 110.
Eid AA, Gosier JL, Primus CM, Hammond BD, Susin LF, Pashley DH, et al. In vitro biocompatibility and oxidative stress profiles of different hydraulic calcium silicate cements. J Endod. 2014;40(2):255–60. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
Eid AA, Niu LN, Primus CM, Opperman LA, Pashley DH, Watanabe I, et al. In vitro osteogenic/dentinogenic potential of an experimental calcium aluminosilicate cement. J Endod. 2013;39(9):1161–6.
Faria-Junior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Berbert FL, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2013;46(8):755–62.
Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J. The chemical properties of light- and chemical-curing composites with mineral trioxide aggregate filler. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):e11–9.
Froughreyhani M, Milani AS, Barakatein B, Shiezadeh V. Treatment of strip perforation using Root MTA: a case report. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(2):80–3.
Gandolfi MG, Pagani S, Perut F, Ciapetti G, Baldini N, Mongiorgi R, et al. Innovative silicate-based cements for endodontics: a study of osteoblast-like cell response. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;87(2):477–86.
Gandolfi M, Perut F, Ciapetti G, Mongiorgi R, Prati C. New Portland cement–based materials for endodontics mixed with Articaine solution: a study of cellular response. J Endod. 2008;34(1):39–44.
Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C. Chemical-physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light-curable MTA-like material for pulp capping. Int Endod J. 2012;45(6):571–9.
Gandolfi M, Silvia F, Pashley David H, Gasparotto G, Carlo P. Calcium silicate coating derived from Portland cement as treatment for hypersensitive dentine. J Dent. 2008;36(8):565–78.
Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Modena E, Siboni F, Prati C. Biointeractivity-related versus chemi/physisorption-related apatite precursor-forming ability of current root end filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101(7):1107–23.
Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Siboni F, Modena E, Ciapetti G, Prati C. Development of the foremost light-curable calcium-silicate MTA cement as root-end in oral surgery. Chemical-physical properties, bioactivity and biological behavior. Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):e134–57.
Gandolfi MG, Van Landuyt K, Taddei P, Modena E, Van Meerbeek B, Prati C. Environmental scanning electron microscopy connected with energy dispersive x-ray analysis and Raman techniques to study ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium silicate cements in wet conditions and in real time. J Endod. 2010;36(5):851–7.
Garcia LD, Aguilar FG, Rossetto HL, Sabino MG, Pires-de-Souza FD. Staining susceptibility of new calcium aluminate cement (EndoBinder) in teeth: a 1-year in vitro study. Dent Traumatol. 2013;29(5):383–8. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
Gomes Cornelio AL, Salles LP, Campos da Paz M, Cirelli JA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru Filho M. Cytotoxicity of Portland cement with different radiopacifying agents: a cell death study. J Endod. 2011;37(2):203–10.
Gomes-Filho JE, Rodrigues G, Watanabe S, Estrada Bernabe PF, Lodi CS, Gomes AC, et al. Evaluation of the tissue reaction to fast endodontic cement (CER) and Angelus MTA. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1377–80.
Gomes-Filho JE, Watanabe S, Bernabe PF, de Moraes Costa MT. A mineral trioxide aggregate sealer stimulated mineralization. J Endod. 2009;35(2):256–60.
Hakki SS, Bozkurt BS, Ozcopur B, Gandolfi MG, Prati C, Belli S. The response of cementoblasts to calcium phosphate resin-based and calcium silicate-based commercial sealers. Int Endod J. 2013;46(3):242–52.
Hashem AA, Hassanien EE. ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and IRM used to repair large furcation perforations: sealability study. J Endod. 2008;34(1):59–61.
Hebling J, Lessa FC, Nogueira I, Carvalho RM, Costa CA. Cytotoxicity of resin-based light-cured liners. Am J Dent. 2009;22(3):137–42.
Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1547–9.
Huffman BP, Mai S, Pinna L, Weller RN, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, et al. Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine. Int Endod J. 2009;42(1):34–46.
Hungaro Duarte MA, Minotti PG, Rodrigues CT, Zapata RO, Bramante CM, Tanomaru Filho M, et al. Effect of different radiopacifying agents on the physicochemical properties of white Portland cement and white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2012;38(3):394–7.
Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(7):460–7.
Hwang Y-C, Kim D-H, Hwang I-N, Song S-J, Park Y-J, Koh J-T, et al. Chemical constitution, physical properties, and biocompatibility of experimentally manufactured Portland cement. J Endod. 2011;37(1):58–62.
Iacono F, Gandolfi MG, Huffman B, Sword J, Agee K, Siboni F, et al. Push-out strength of modified Portland cements and resins. Am J Dent. 2010;23(1):43–6.
Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and Portland cement. J Endod. 2006;32(3):193–7.
Kao C, Shie M, Huang T, Ding S. Properties of an accelerated mineral trioxide aggregate–like root-end filling material. J Endod. 2009;35(2):239–42.
Kogan P, He J, Glickman G, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod. 2006;32(6):569–72.
Komabayashi T, Spangberg L. Comparative analysis of the particle size and shape of commercially available mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cement: a study with a flow particle image analyzer. J Endod. 2008;34(1):94–8.
Komabayashi T, Spangberg L. Particle size and shape analysis of MTA finer fractions using Portland cement. J Endod. 2008;34(6):709–11.
Krastl G, Allgayer N, Lenherr P, Filippi A, Taneja P, Weiger R. Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: a literature review. Dent Traumatol. 2013;29(1):2–7.
Lea FM, Hewlett PC. Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete. 4th ed. London/New York: Arnold; 1998; Copublished in North, Central, and South America by J. Wiley.
Leiendecker AP, Qi YP, Sawyer AN, Niu LN, Agee KA, Loushine RJ, et al. Effects of calcium silicate-based materials on collagen matrix integrity of mineralized dentin. J Endod. 2012;38(6):829–33.
Lenherr P, Allgayer N, Weiger R, Filippi A, Attin T, Krastl G. Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2012;45(10):942–9.
Loushine BA, Bryan TE, Looney SW, Gillen BM, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, et al. Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2011;37(5):673–7.
Luvizuto ER. Periapical tissue reactions to MTA after external root resorption in delayed tooth replantation. Proceedings from the 17th World Congress on Dental Traumatology: 19–22 Sept 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Braz J Dent Traumatol. 2012;(Special issue). p. 63.
Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Shalavi S. Antibacterial activity of a new mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealer. Int Dent J. 2012;62(2):70–3.
Monteiro Bramante C, Demarchi AC, de Moraes IG, Bernadineli N, Garcia RB, Spangberg LS, et al. Presence of arsenic in different types of MTA and white and gray Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(6):909–13.
Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Sharma S. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod. 2013;39(7):893–6.
Nosrat A, Seifi A, Asgary S. Pulpotomy in caries-exposed immature permanent molars using calcium-enriched mixture cement or mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(1):56–63.
Oliveira AC, Tanomaru JM, Faria-Junior N, Tanomaru-Filho M. Bacterial leakage in root canals filled with conventional and MTA-based sealers. Int Endod J. 2011;44(4):370–5.
Perez AL, Spears R, Gutmann JL, Opperman LA. Osteoblasts and MG-63 osteosarcoma cells behave differently when in contact with ProRoot MTA and White MTA. Int Endod J. 2003;36(8):564–70.
Porter ML, Berto A, Primus CM, Watanabe I. Physical and chemical properties of new-generation endodontic materials. J Endod. 2010;36(3):524–8.
Primus CM. Comments on “arsenic release provided by MTA and Portland cement” by Duarte MA, et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(4):416–7; author reply 417–418.
Rawtiya M, Verma K, Singh S, Munuga S, Khan S. MTA-based root canal sealers. J Orofac Res. 2013;3(1):16–21. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10026-1057.
Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010;36(2):286–91.
Richard Steffen D, Hubertus van Waes CM. Regenerative endodontie. Endod J. 2011;10(2):6–12.
Sawyer AN, Nikonov SY, Pancio AK, L-n N, Agee KA, Loushine RJ, et al. Effects of calcium silicate–based materials on the flexural properties of dentin. J Endod. 2012;38(5):680–3.
Scarparo RK, Haddad D, Acasigua GA, Fossati AC, Fachin EV, Grecca FS. Mineral trioxide aggregate-based sealer: analysis of tissue reactions to a new endodontic material. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1174–8.
Schembri M, Peplow G, Camilleri J. Analyses of heavy metals in mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1210–5.
Seong K-P, Jeon S-Y, Singh B, Hwang J-H, Song S-J. Comparative study of an experimental Portland cement and ProRoot MTA by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Ceram Int. 2014;40(1 Part B):1741–6.
Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Mokhtari H, Roshangar L, Abasi MM, et al. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cements on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2010;36(5):899–903.
Silva EJ, Herrera DR, Almeida JF, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and up-regulation of gelatinases in fibroblast cells by three root repair materials. Int Endod J. 2012;45(9):815–20.
Storm B, Eichmiller F, Tordik P, Goodell G. Setting expansion of gray and white mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod. 2008;34(1):80–2.
Tabarsi B, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Haghdoost AA, Torabzadeh H, Asgary S. A comparative study of dental pulp response to several pulpotomy agents. Int Endod J. 2010;43(7):565–71.
Tanomaru-Filho M, Tanomaru JM, Barros DB, Watanabe E, Ito IY. In vitro antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers, MTA-based cements and Portland cement. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(1):41–5.
Tay KC, Loushine BA, Oxford C, Kapur R, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, et al. In vitro evaluation of a Ceramicrete-based root-end filling material. J Endod. 2007;33(12):1438–43.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007;33(4):391–8.
Valles M, Mercade M, Duran-Sindreu F, Bourdelande JL, Roig M. Influence of light and oxygen on the color stability of five calcium silicate-based materials. J Endod. 2013;39(4):525–8.
Viola NV, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, da Silva GF, Sasso-Cerri E, Tanomaru-Filho M, Cerri PS. Biocompatibility of an experimental MTA sealer implanted in the rat subcutaneous: quantitative and immunohistochemical evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100(7):1773–81.
Washington JT, Schneiderman E, Spears R, Fernandez CR, He J, Opperman LA. Biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of New generation endodontic materials by using primary osteoblasts. J Endod. 2011;37(8):1166–70.
Wei W, Qi YP, Nikonov SY, Niu LN, Messer RL, Mao J, et al. Effects of an experimental calcium aluminosilicate cement on the viability of murine odontoblast-like cells. J Endod. 2012;38(7):936–42.
Weller RN, Tay KC, Garrett LV, Mai S, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, et al. Microscopic appearance and apical seal of root canals filled with gutta-percha and ProRoot Endo Sealer after immersion in a phosphate-containing fluid. Int Endod J. 2008;41(11):977–86.
Wongkornchaowalit N, Lertchirakarn V. Setting time and flowability of accelerated Portland cement mixed with polycarboxylate superplasticizer. J Endod. 2011;37(3):387–9.
Zhou H-M, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng Y-F, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of five root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1281–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Primus, C.M. (2014). Products and Distinctions. In: Camilleri, J. (eds) Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Dentistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55157-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55157-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55156-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55157-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)